Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

The beating of humanity's heart cannot be felt by placing the finger on the church's pulse.

[Lemuel K. Washburn, Is The Bible Worth Reading And Other Essays]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Sunday Sacrilege: Metaphorical Acid | Main | I have been objectified! »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

The warped, weird world of Christianity

Category: Godlessness
Posted on: July 18, 2010 2:26 PM, by PZ Myers

The most disturbing thing about this video is that, even though it's made by The Thinking Atheist, I can imagine it being shown in a church to the approval of the congregation.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/143943

Comments

#1

Posted by: alysonmiers Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 2:35 PM

What a creepy video to make with such a pretty baby.

#2

Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 2:49 PM

OMG I usually don't go baby crazy but that is a cute cute baby.

Oh, and that movie actually explained a bit about Christianity to me. It sounds totally like normal mainstream Christianity though.

#3

Posted by: Glen Davidson Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 2:57 PM

It's, it's just beautiful.

Imagine how much worse it would be to think that you evolved from a monkey, and that the problems we have are the result of co-evolving parasites, predators, and a world simply not designed for us.

Pain and misery are instead come from heaven. I see the light, hallejuah.

Glen Davidson

#4

Posted by: Jason Dick Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:08 PM

I have to say, this is a really good representation of the beliefs my parents instilled in me growing up. So glad I shed all that nonsense. It's amazing how absurd it seems to me today, but honestly, if I were seeing this video when I was a Christian, I might well have found it inspirational instead. And that, to me, is truly sad.

#5

Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:08 PM

First of all, I must also *squeal* about the yummy--I mean adorable--baby. I could just eat it up with a spoon.

The bit about the tithe hit me hard. My father was a die-hard tither--tithed off his gross, not his net pay. Twenty years he gave to the same church, where we (all four of us kids) also went to the school. Which he also paid for. He worked there the last year or so of his life, and they came through for him in one big way: his life insurance policy from his former job had lapsed just months before he got diagnosed, and the church bought a blanket policy, insuring every employee there, so that he could be covered. It was a genuinely noble thing to do.

My mother recently informed me that she tithed off the life insurance check.

#6

Posted by: SaintStephen Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:12 PM

GODD IS REEL.
GODD IS GOODD.
GODD IS REALY REEL.
GODD IS REELY GOOOD.
GODD IS REEELLLY REALY REEL.

Welcome to America.

#7

Posted by: Galactus35 Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:12 PM


Christians accuse us of being cynical but we're not the ones basting our kids brains in guilt and persecution fantasies before they can even walk.

#8

Posted by: SteveM Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:18 PM

Yes, I can just see priests saying to everything in the film, "That's not a bug, it's a feature"

The only thing I don't think is true is asking forgiveness for the death of Christ. We are supposed to thank him for his sacrifice, not apologize for his murder.

#9

Posted by: Big Boss Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:24 PM

Glen,

Your comment underscores a fundamental flaw in your understanding of evolution.

Evolution does not state that humans "evolved from monkeys." Rather, it posits that humans and monkeys share a common ancestor.

I challenge you to come to a complete comprehension of evolution before you criticize it.

#10

Posted by: Kawa Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:30 PM

Babies are weird. And I haven't even seen the video yet.

#11

Posted by: Gregory Greenwood Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:30 PM

That is pretty much religion all over. Corrupt the minds of children with an unjustifiable burdern of guilt for events that mostly never occurred or alternatively that they cannot be rationally held accountable for. When they are desperate for forgiveness, offer them the illusion of same, all for the low, low price of lifelong servitude and prostration before a theistic mafia.

Of course, difference or, even worse, dissent are anathema to this cosy little grift. As a result, any who do not believe, or who question your authority in any way, must be destroyed. If such destruction is impractical, then marginalisation and disenfranchisement will have to suffice...

The true brilliance of the video for me was the juxtaposition of the cute baby and the maternal intonation of the woman's voice with the grotesquery of the message. This elegantly captures another important element of christianity; preach the most abominable, dominionist evil, and call it virtue.

#12

Posted by: Zetetic Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:34 PM

@ Big Boss post #9:
With all due respect, I'm certain that Glen was being sarcastic.

#13

Posted by: Titus Flavius Vespasianus Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:36 PM

I'm the baby. I am very scared of that god, please take him away from me; please, tell me it's not real!!!

#14

Posted by: Gregory Greenwood Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:37 PM

SteveM @ 8;

The only thing I don't think is true is asking forgiveness for the death of Christ. We are supposed to thank him for his sacrifice, not apologize for his murder.

Unless, of course, you are crass enough to have the bad taste to be Jewish, and thus a 'Christ-killer' in the eyes of the fundies.

A logical person who believed in the christian god (is there such a beast?) might say that all the Jewish authorities and their Roman masters were doing was unwittingly enacting god's own plan, and thus should not be blamed. Unfortunately, logic has never been a xian strong suit...

Big Boss @ 9;

Glen is a regular here. He is parodying the mindset of fundies, not endorsing it.

#15

Posted by: jcmartz.myopenid.com Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:37 PM

But with a few phrase and word changes it would equally apply to any religion.

#16

Posted by: JacobCH Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:38 PM

I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm, Boss.

#17

Posted by: Kawa Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:38 PM

Glen usually does strikes me as sarcastic.

#18

Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:44 PM

Boss:

Glen,

Your comment underscores a fundamental flaw in your understanding of evolution.

Glen is a long time regular here, and understands evolution perfectly well. I suspect you haven't lurked and read enough, Boss. Also, your sarcasm meter is broken.

#19

Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:55 PM

Poe's law, illustrated beautifully by Glen. You really can't tell if you don't already know.

#20

Posted by: Shplane, some shit in french Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:58 PM

Things like this are a large part of why I will never understand the religious. The ideas expressed here are REVOLTING. Completely and utterly disgusting in myriad ways. And it barely scratched the surface of all the horrible things about Christianity.

How is it that people respond to this kind of information positively? How is it that people look at this, and instead of being disgusted, instead of feeling nauseated and enraged, think "Oh yes, that is exactly right, wonderful, and perfect. I love this kind of thing, and will instill these ideas into my child"?

I guess that's probably why I'm such a hateful person. How can a species that created and embraced something as horrible as religion be anything but, at its core, evil?

#21

Posted by: Ternon Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 3:59 PM

If any video deserves to go viral this is the one.

#22

Posted by: Fred The Hun Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:07 PM

But what kind of barbecue sauce would you put on that baby and how long would you grill it, so it still stays moist and juicy? I know, I know, I'm asking for the secret recipe... Yum!

#23

Posted by: Lynna, OM Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:07 PM

Awww, cutest baby! Little tiny sweet thing, lick-em-up skin and drool-wet lips! Ohhh, just the tenderest thing...

Fucking goddamned auto-mother responses anyway.

And then we get to channel the evil and lay that on the naked baby instead of a soft blankie. Sheesh. The horror, the horror.

#24

Posted by: aveworld Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:10 PM

Fear is a method of teaching religion, it not a method atheists should use. Using exaggeration or even irony to ridicule religion simply does not work maybe that is the secret message of this clip.

#25

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:12 PM

Several thousand years ago two people "sinned" and, as a result, two thousand years ago someone else had to die. How does either event have anything to do with me? I had no control over either of them so why should I be affected in any way?

If you look at Christianity it doesn't even make sense as a metaphor.

#26

Posted by: lilith Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:16 PM

To Gregory @14:
To quote Andy Zaltzman: He was guilty under the law of the time!

BTW, they've open the bible on a page that has nothing to do with heaven, hell or sin, but had an old testament boring bit about what to do with a misbehaving ox. Just thought that was kinda funny.

#27

Posted by: Shplane, some shit in french Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:17 PM

#24

Fear? I don't see any inordinate amount of fear there. All I see is honesty.

#28

Posted by: browne.as Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:17 PM

The baby looked like he (she?) was feeling a few doubts. A couple of times he had this completely WTF? look on his face...or it could have been gas.

#29

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm4CYGXi1n4Armyc3H5WH0I3OSlKZ1Zvc4 Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:18 PM

Isn't "Thinking Atheist" redundant?

#30

Posted by: SteveM Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:20 PM

re 14:

Unless, of course, you are crass enough to have the bad taste to be Jewish, and thus a 'Christ-killer' in the eyes of the fundies.

True, but I didn't want to bring that up since the video was the voice of a christian parent talking to their christian child and was not talking about those nasty "christ killers".

#31

Posted by: snurp Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:37 PM

Big Boss @9

Why wouldn't the members of that common ancestral catarrhine group be called monkeys? I have never gotten this.

#32

Posted by: Dr. I. Needtob Athe Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:55 PM

Great video! It's actually a clever trap. If shown to an unsuspecting Christian, he'll hopefully find himself in agreement up until the very end when the credits appear, and then suddenly realize that it's a satire.

The link needs to be spread to Christian websites, and, in fact, it probably is.

#33

Posted by: Forbidden Snowflake Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 4:57 PM

Using exaggeration or even irony to ridicule religion simply does not work
Citation needed.
Isn't "Thinking Atheist" redundant?
No, it isn't. Some were fortunate enough not to be brainwashed with religion from childhood, and, consequentially, didn't need to think their ways out of it.
#34

Posted by: Frank b Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 5:08 PM

I think Big Boss #9 was joking. His demand for Glen seemed excessive. He needs to reply to we can know.

#35

Posted by: Frank b Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 5:10 PM

so we can know, sorry

#36

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawk8Er0xHwr5oQ2bWARUzonh6Ov_ijL0Dbw Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 5:15 PM

SteveM @ 8;

"The only thing I don't think is true is asking forgiveness for the death of Christ. We are supposed to thank him for his sacrifice, not apologize for his murder."

I think there's a fine line, though, between being somehow the guilty cause of the death of Christ and needing his sacrifice. This creepy hijacking of normal human empathy and sorrow in light of this bizarre story of what he did "for us" makes it sort of our fault that the sacrifice was supposedly necessary. The idea that he suffered for our sake is a real guilt hook.

#37

Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/Iv5nEZhh1NqPPmx3lYrN0OKSZoNeotqV0eBwHWE-#ceecc Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 5:32 PM

Well done. This fits neatly with Dawkins' claim that much religious 'education' is child abuse.

#38

Posted by: --PatF in Madison Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 5:38 PM

This video sums up many of the reasons I left the Catholic church so many years ago. That was before the days of financial shenanigans with the Vatican bank or child abuse.

Even before those days, the church would make you feel worthless and guilty for things with which you had nothing to do. For these things, you would be punished and, of course, the nuns and priests would happily watch you burn in hell while they enjoyed the pleasures of Heaven. (I never really did understand why Heaven was so pleasurable. It seemed pretty boring to me with everyone sitting around singing Gregorian chant.)

But that's the way they exerted psychological control: "DO WHAT WE SAY OR BURN FOREVER."

We once had to read a story concerning Our Lady of Fatima. The one thing I remember is a drawing of the three children who had seen the Virgin. They were turning away in horror from a vision of Hell in which the damned were being punished horribly. The faces of the children said it all. (The actual drawing of Hell was not depicted but for a truly gruesome description read chapter III of "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man" by James Joyce.)

That was pretty much the way each day began in catholic school: you are worthless and you will burn for the slightest transgression.

Glad I left.

#39

Posted by: JSW Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 5:48 PM

To Shplane @20:

I see it another way: I look at all the things we've managed to accomplish despite having such a huge, disgusting parasite as religion infecting our thinking and imagine the things we will be able to do once we're finally free of it.

#40

Posted by: danielm Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 6:12 PM

I'm going to go away and cry now, because even as a Poe, it is exactly what is happening. A cruel and unusual punishment, you deserve, mister thinking atheist. And a greater one deserve the theists who actually do this.

#41

Posted by: raven Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 6:12 PM

Sidebar random quote:

If God's aim is to maximize acceptance of Him and intense suffering brings about acceptance, then why is there so relatively little suffering in some countries and times? Surely God could have indirectly brought about more suffering and increased acceptance. For example, in the US suffering is relatively low in comparison to many Third World countries. Surely God could have arranged things to increase suffering and increase acceptance of God in the US. For example, hurricanes, earthquakes, draughts, epidemics, and severe economic depression would cause much suffering and, if Craig is right, increase acceptance. An all powerful God surely could have brought these things about.

Michael Martin, "Human Suffering and the Acceptance of God"

For another pernicious xian doctrine, the random quote had the above. It must be a miracle, LOL.

Not sure what sects actually believe that, "intense suffering brings about acceptance [of god]. Might be a Catholic thing, what Mother Theresa said once.

Doesn't look like too many actually believe it though. If they did, the holiest people would be those who go around making other people miserable by cutting brake lines and mining bridges and parks. Hmmmm, what do they teach ministers an priests in seminary, how to make people miserable to "maximize acceptance of god"?

#42

Posted by: PenguinFactory Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 6:15 PM

While it's a slickly produced video, it strays too far in my opinion into strawman territory. Essentially it's doing the same thing as all of those Christians who tell atheists what they believe and then critcise those beliefs regardless of whether or not anyone actually holds them.

#43

Posted by: Matrim Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 6:21 PM

"Evolution does not state that humans "evolved from monkeys." Rather, it posits that humans and monkeys share a common ancestor"

Technically we both statements are true: we evolved from basal monkeys and stare a common ancestor with extant monkeys. That's one of the things that really annoys me about creationist bullshit...they're taking a fundamentally true statement (that we evolved from a form of monkey, among other forms both older and younger) and using it is a way that it's not intended (using the term monkey to refer to extant monkeys that we share an extinct monkey ancestor with).

#44

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 6:24 PM

Penguin Factory,

Please give examples of strawmen in that video. It certainly agreed with the Christianity I was taught as a child.

#45

Posted by: Nicol Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 6:49 PM

I think the only way to make sense of religion is to consider it in light of Pavlov's dogs -- you learn to associate relief and happiness with certain phrases or ideas, whether the actual concepts make sense or not. So, for example, finding friends in a congregation makes you feel good, but then you're told that that sense of deep community is only brought on through this "true" religion, because it is you getting closer to god. And of course, the only reason you get to be close to god is because he had his only son killed. If you actually THINK about that progression, it doesn't make sense, but if you are trained to associate the two things, then it's not such a logical leap.

I am, however, glad that there are so many atheists out there who have reasoned themselves out of these beliefs, especially the really fundamentalist ones, and are doing better for it. It says a lot about the power of the human mind when used properly.

#46

Posted by: Nineveh Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 7:03 PM

That was kind of terrifying.

#47

Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 7:14 PM

Glen,

Your comment underscores a fundamental flaw in your understanding of evolution.

Evolution does not state that humans "evolved from monkeys." Rather, it posits that humans and monkeys share a common ancestor.

I challenge you to come to a complete comprehension of evolution before you criticize it.

and........... fail

#48

Posted by: Kirk Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 7:38 PM

There are some days when I can't bring myself to click on the link. This was one of those days and one of those links.

Maybe another day.

#49

Posted by: tonysidaway Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 7:50 PM

This is a film that should be seen widely. It raises problems that speak to the credibility of Christianity, in a way that is accessible to any loving parent.

Those problems aren't new and they should all be familiar to any intelligent Christian. The presentation is powerful, though, and presents the absurdity and the horror very well.

#50

Posted by: jafafahots Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 8:01 PM

Maybe it's the mood I've been in lately, just woke up in, but that has me near crying.

#51

Posted by: RamblinDude Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 8:06 PM

I don't know what's more depressing, the poignancy with which this video highlights the sheer madness of Christian fundamentalism, or the fact that I already know the arguments that Christian fundamentalists will use to rebut it. Oh, and the way they will shake their heads in sadness like Roma Downey at those who don’t understand God’s love

#52

Posted by: MetzO'Magic Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 8:13 PM

To me, that really drives home the reality that 2000 years ago, there were these people who imagined themselves to be clued in about the origins of the universe, and ultimately of mankind. Then (time passes...), several thousand years later, there has been not one single revelation that validates that way of thinking. But there are still billions of adherents to it. WTF?!

#53

Posted by: Christy Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 9:07 PM

@SteveM:
I pretty much agree with you - IME seeking forgiveness for "killing Christ" is not emphasized for most Christians. However, I do recall feeling resentful every spring when we (Catholic) parishioners were made to read out the part of the crowd calling for Jesus to be crucified on Good Friday. Even as a kid, I was like, "WTF, I never did anything to him!"

Anyway, hearing the opening lines, juxtaposed with that beautiful baby, just hurt my heart. The doctrine of original sin is so disgusting I can't come up with an adequate adjective for it. It literally nauseates me.

I wish I could share this via Facebook without destroying many relationships.

#54

Posted by: jafafahots Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 9:50 PM

I wish I could share it via facebook and wouldnt worry about the response. But I got kicked off facebook.

#55

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm4CYGXi1n4Armyc3H5WH0I3OSlKZ1Zvc4 Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 10:05 PM

@33

Regarding my original post:

Isn't "Thinking Atheist" redundant?

You replied:
No, it isn't. Some were fortunate enough not to be brainwashed with religion from childhood, and, consequentially, didn't need to think their ways out of it.

I disagree. Growing up in northern Ontario I was 'blessed' to have hockey practice every Sunday morning, and so got out of church (not sure I would have been forced to go anyways, but that is beside the point). However, despite growing up in an essentially unreligious home, Christian thought is so pervasive in our culture that one cannot hope to miss it completely. Certainly it is easier for people in our situation to intellectually dismiss religion, however there is some contemplation involved.

#56

Posted by: Aaron Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 10:59 PM

There is more to Christianity than what was summed up in the video. Not that the Christian church, especially the evangelicals, don't deserve to be intellectually ridiculed. They absolutely do. The Christian church in general has let the world down in much the same way Islam, at least certain sects, advocate murder to conquer the infidel.
The beauty of Christianity is this; no matter what burden a believer bears it will be lifted. Its not about the sin as much as it the forgiveness. When we are honest with ourselves, even the best of us need to be forgiven from time to time. Christianity is about Love. An expression of love so great that if it touches you, you will never escape it. I know this because it is my testimony. I have hated the church for its sins and run as far as possible from its blood stained hands.
Now I find myself doing outreach projects with a Christian church. Projects like handing out groceries in poor neighborhoods. Holding car washes where we pay the people for the privilage of washing their car. Handing out bottled water and ice cream at parks on a hot day. When people ask why we do this we say "to show Gods love".
I grew up in the lords army. I have heard the sermons that change normal, good hearted people into zealous bigots. This, as I have come to understand is the hijacking of the church, not the church herself. Also, I will never argue the
"prove God" argument again because the truth is, I can't prove God. I see him..everywhere. Even when I don't want to.
As I close this probably long winded essay I want to say I'm sorry. I'm sorry that for hundreds of years groups of people terrorized others under the name of Christian. During this spiritual journey I have learned the power of forgiveness. Both giving and receiving. So, as a Christian, I would humbly ask your forgiveness. To anyone who may read this comment and feel they have been wronged by a name I have come to Love, I am truly sorry for your pain. Lastly, I see a new era coming. An era of peace where scientist and philosopher can work together. Where the atheist and the christian might sit down and have a beer together and find out they really are not that different after all.

#57

Posted by: Doktor Zoom Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 11:19 PM

Nauseating. I much prefer this one:

"Hello, babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It's round and wet and crowded. At the outside, babies, you've got about a hundred years here. There's only one rule that I know of, babies--God damn it, you've got to be kind."

#58

Posted by: a.human.ape Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 11:32 PM

An era of peace where scientist and philosopher can work together.

I can't imagine why a scientist would want to work with a full-of-shit philosopher.

I see him..everywhere.

You see your magic god fairy everywhere? Really?

Did you know this is an atheist blog? Did you know at least some people here are going to think you're full of shit?

I have heard this "I see god everywhere" bullshit before and I sure would like to know what this supernatural creature looks like. Since you've seen this god, you want to describe it for us?

Where the atheist and the christian might sit down and have a beer together and find out they really are not that different after all.

Normal people and Christians are the same species. The difference is normal people know how our species developed, while Christians think our species was magically created out of nothing.

#59

Posted by: Eris Author Profile Page | July 18, 2010 11:47 PM

I wish I could show that video to every Christian in the world and say "this is how we atheists see you". Maybe it would make them wake up to how sick their teachings are. On the other hand, my wife sitting across the room saw the video and thought that it was made _by_ Christians. Perhaps actual Christians would simply see no problem with anything in that video. Sad.

#60

Posted by: jafafahots Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 12:00 AM

Aaron, we like to complain about the horrors of religion and rightly so. But we don't think all religious people are horrible.

When I was near homeless, before my disability came in, I used to go occasionally to the "soup kitchen" type lunches at a nearby church. In part it was the kind hearts and wanting to help of the people of this Lutheran church (and more rarely, a nearby Catholic Church) and in part it was government, which coordinated efforts and provided funding and funneled it through churches for distribution.

As we sat there waiting for food, scruffy people or all sorts - simply poor with lots of kids, to alcoholics, to homeless, to mental patients... people would bring us food with a smile.

There was never any preaching - with the exception of an extremely brief generic blessing given by the pastor on two occasions a year - the Christmas and Easter meals (which were amazing.)

Other than being in a church, the only display of religion was the occasional cross around some individual's neck, and I think ONCE a "god bless you" form a woman I was talking to.

If you needed MORE help, social work of a sort, you could get in line to go into the tiny office of a wonderful, sweet caring warm woman who could direct you to services, give you vouchers for the local food bank, mental health services.

As I sat talking to her one day, I noticed a photo on her desk of an obviously homeless man, seriously disheveled, and clearly in the throes of extreme alcoholism (the teeth show this.)

She started talking about him, called him her dearest friend, went on about how much he meant to her, how wonderful he was, how much she loved him. He had died. As she spoke of him she had tears running down her face.

This is a man that many would have harassed, shunned, criticized, judged. Athiest and religious alike, he would have suffered scorn. But she accepted him and loved him without question, and missed him terribly.

She NEVER spoke of religion, but did have a small cross she wore around her neck.

I am sure if you discussed things with her, she would say that her faith inspired her to do the tireless volunteer work she did to help others, inspired in her the love of others.

But I am confident that while her religious beliefs may have helped her focus her feelings, may have in her mind been her reason, that she would have been the same kind, warm, caring person without religion.

She simply was a sweet, wonderful empathetic person who wanted to help others, clearly NOT for reward, but because she hated to see pain and wanted to help. She would have been that person without any dogma.

So I don't hate the religious, I don't demonize individuals. I realize that SOME of the people taking the time to volunteer may have ONLY been doing so out of selfish hope for eternal reward, though probably not.

But no matter what their motivation, that does NOT mean that there is a god. That does NOT mean that there is an eternal reward. It simply means that some people believe there is, and some may be motivated by that thought.

The only evidence in this experience is that some people can be wonderful and compassionate, and that they can be motivated by things both logical and illogical, that the emotion of love and caring expresses itself in many ways.

It doesn't mean that there is a God or that religion is true. (and for that matter, it doesn't mean its NOT true either. It simply isn't evidence either way, nor is the vast list of horrors committed by people because of religious belief.)

#61

Posted by: jafafahots Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 1:07 AM

Cripes, someone say something.

It makes me paranoid when my comment kills a thread.

#62

Posted by: Brian, Defender of Tone Trolls Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 1:57 AM

@Aaron.

Sounds like you're on the road out of Christianity, which is probably for the best. You've widened the circle of salvation to include just about all christians right? Maybe wondering if God embraces people from other faiths? That He is bigger than dry, formulaic dogma? Rejected Hell as incompatible with a loving God? Shredded the bulk of the Old Testament? Realised that Muslims, Hindus and Mormons were - for the most part - born into their faith just like you were born into yours?

Good for you.

Now read a few books by Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris. That should complete your transition.

You can be good without God. You already are.

#63

Posted by: Claudia Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 3:35 AM

I agree that children do as children see, but there is always a point in ones life (a moratorium) where one must find ones self. This is proven by athiest's with christian parents. They may have been taught to do certain things and think certain ways, but they went against that. Some never enter moratorium and some never leave, but I'm sure we all know this.
The strict rules depicted in this seemingly hypnotic video are an exaggeration of a widely taught truth. I don't think the video would be shown in a church because of this exaggeration. The video is inconspicuously sarcastic throughout as well. "(paraphrased) God loves you, but will never show you his face. You can pray, but you will never audibly hear answers. If you live your entire life according to these rules, you are allowed to worship him forever..."
The truth I have come to know is this. There is a God. He loves me unconditionally. He is always there to protect, love, and listen. He guides me in the right path and teaches me his love along the way.
I think it's harder to believe that there is Satan. A thing that is so evil, he wants to separate a father from all his children...so evil that he would rather the world be filled with hate for the one who loves us. So evil, that he would dare to manipulate a human when they are most vulnerable into thinking that he loves more...that...that is much much harder to believe.
But believing that there is a God who loves me?...that's pretty simple. pretty nice. pretty true.
If we evolved from monkeys...there wouldn't be any monkeys...
Things evolve...but only slightly and in order to adapt to a new surrounding...only what's needed.

#64

Posted by: Claudia Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 3:37 AM

I think we are all interested in learning other points of view...that's the only way to strengthen our own.

#65

Posted by: raven Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 3:45 AM

Claudia the creationist:

If we evolved from monkeys...there wouldn't be any monkeys...
Things evolve...but only slightly and in order to adapt to a new surrounding...only what's needed.

If Protestants evolved from Catholics, why are there still Catholics?

Creationism is a lie. The earth is 4.7 billion years old and Noah never had a boatload full of dinosaurs.

If satan is the fathr of lies, you are worshipping him. But it is a lot simpler. You are merely repeating some other human's lies. If you had been raised Hindu, you would be a Hindu.

I agree that children do as children see, but there is always a point in ones life (a moratorium) where one must find ones self.

So what? It happens sometimes but not always. Most of of us are ex-Xians. It obviously hasn't happened to you yet.

#66

Posted by: jafafahots Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 3:51 AM

But believing that there is a God who loves me?...that's pretty simple. pretty nice. pretty true.

You clearly don't understand the meaning of the word true.

"True" doesn't mean "makes me feel good." Doesn't mean nice. Doesn't mean "what I would like to be." Doesn't mean "is the only thing I can emotionally accept."

What is is. What isn't isn't. Whether you or I recognize it or not, whether you or I like it or not.

#67

Posted by: 朴競花/박경화 (Gyeong Hwa) Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 3:57 AM

If we evolved from monkeys...there wouldn't be any monkeys... Things evolve...but only slightly and in order to adapt to a new surrounding...only what's needed.

Stupid. We evolved with modern monkeys from a recent common monkey ancestor. And small evolutionary changes leads to bigger evolutionary changes. You're assuming we that we go from monkey to *BAM* humans like were pokemons. It's a common misconception that can be remedied through actually studying evolution.

#68

Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 4:01 AM

Claudia wrote:

The truth I have come to know is this. There is a God. He loves me unconditionally. He is always there to protect, love, and listen. He guides me in the right path and teaches me his love along the way.

How do you know? How would you know if you were wrong?

I think it's harder to believe that there is Satan.

It's actually much easier to believe in Satan - provided you actually think about it. If God is good and all powerful then bad and evil simply cannot exist - but bad and evil and unhappiness and suffering does exist, so if there is a superpowerful being out there it must either be evil or incompetent.

If we evolved from monkeys...there wouldn't be any monkeys...

If modern Americans came from Europe (to begin with), how come there are still people in Europe?

#69

Posted by: Brian, Defender of Tone Trolls Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 4:29 AM

@Claudia.

You focus on the love aspect of God and that is positive; but what about hell? How do you explain that?

It's scriptural; widely believed in both catholic and protestant circles; and according to some theologians the logical outcome of a God that is infinite. An infinite God requires infinite justice. Are you absolutely sure your version of Christianity is the right one?

#70

Posted by: Matt "Nora" Penfold Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 4:49 AM

Claudia,

You clearly know nothing about evolution. Why should we accept you know anymore about this god thing ?

#71

Posted by: Walton, Marquis of Carabas Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 4:57 AM

If we evolved from monkeys...there wouldn't be any monkeys...

Aaaaaaarrrrrrggghhhh.

Please tell me you're a Poe... I don't think I've ever seen the above argument deployed except as a joke.

#72

Posted by: Moveable Type Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 5:24 AM

Kawa@10

you used to be a baby, so what's your excuse?? ;O)

#73

Posted by: Rorschach Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 5:25 AM

If we evolved from monkeys...there wouldn't be any monkeys

Wait, someone actually said that ??

Mwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

#74

Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline. Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 5:52 AM

Isn't "Thinking Atheist" redundant?
Two words: Bill Maher.
#75

Posted by: Moveable Type Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 6:09 AM

Aaron @ 56

Please read Bart Ehrman, 'Misquoting Jesus', or indeed any of his book, but that is probably the best one to begin with. Then see the light shine!! The light of day that is.

#76

Posted by: ConcernedJoe Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 6:45 AM

Religion's raison d'etre is not to promote superior values, nor to spread the glory of god, nor to comfort you in your time of need, nor to guide you to paradise. Religion sells or does these things to greater or lesser degrees but only as a way to its own end.

Religion really is about conformance to doctrine and dogma and ritual for the purpose of the control and fleecing of people. Religion is simultaneously a profit-making business (self-aggrandizing in money and/or power) and an effective and efficient construct for RWA or basically self-serving or just plain insane leaders to accumulate power and control.

It is and always has been nothing more than an integral part of mechanisms of obtaining and holding on to power and wealth - of having sway over some mass of people.

It is nothing much different than the Auto Industry or the Petroleum Industry basically. Many competing companies - each trying to gain share and maximize profits - yet these competitors can rally together when fundamentally threatened. And the "powers that be" and these have symbiotic relationships - usually at the expense of progress and justice for the People.

Atheists are threatening not because they are mean (they can be most cordial and kind) but because they erode a mechanism useful to the powerful and precious to RWAs. Atheists are demons in the same way Edward R. Murrow was to the McCarthy-ites.

#77

Posted by: james.schumann Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 7:23 AM

I am sad that this is how many Christians portray and believe of Christianity. These people should be ridiculed. But I hope that's not where it ends. I hope you also realize that there are better Christians than this, and there's really something here that needs to be understood before it's all thrown out the window. There are Christians who hear what you say, and many times they agree, and they do understand your position. What many Christians don't see is the same kind of understanding shown to them. At they very least, they don't deserve to be ridiculed. They're not responsible for the sins of those who misrepresent them.

#78

Posted by: m0r_ri0ghain#75dc1 Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 7:30 AM

I disagree. Growing up in northern Ontario I was 'blessed' to have hockey practice every Sunday morning, and so got out of church (not sure I would have been forced to go anyways, but that is beside the point). However, despite growing up in an essentially unreligious home, Christian thought is so pervasive in our culture that one cannot hope to miss it completely. Certainly it is easier for people in our situation to intellectually dismiss religion, however there is some contemplation involved.
Having knowledge of something hardly necessitates accepting it as, ah, gospel truth, does it?

I grew up in a household very much free of religious practices; I can only recall a detached sort of bemusement where it came to praying and mass and such rituals. However, my mum had an interest in all sorts of myths, folk tales and fairy tales - and the christian mythology was discussed in that framework. An exercise in literary criticism, if you will.
Moreover, she held that having knowledge of christian myths and symbolism was key to understanding much of Europe's history, literature, art and architecture.

So I grew up atheist from the start (seriously, no thinking was involved), but with a working knowledge of the bible and church. *Shrug* Maybe it's easier in N-W Europe's highly secular societies?

#79

Posted by: John Morales Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 7:30 AM

James Schumann

There are Christians who hear what you say, and many times they agree, and they do understand your position.

Where does one find Christians who agree with atheists that Christianity is a ridiculous and pernicious conceit?

#80

Posted by: m0r_ri0ghain#75dc1 Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 7:33 AM

Tag closing fail. Only "knowledge" should have been in italics. D'oh.

#81

Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/084SzO4Lo.EHQlTMacnJmTsZxw--#36bf3 Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 7:35 AM

To me, that really drives home the reality that 2000 years ago, there were these people who imagined themselves to be clued in about the origins of the universe, and ultimately of mankind. Then (time passes...), several thousand years later, there has been not one single revelation that validates that way of thinking. But there are still billions of adherents to it. WTF?!

Religion is a virus of the mind. It's transmitted from host to host via tactics like those this video illustrates.

Whether the message is that you're worthless and will burn in hell unless you accept the invisible sky fairy, or that you'll burn in hell if you flip on a light switch on Saturday, or that you'll burn in hell if you don't kill infidels, it's fucked up.

Religion is fucked up. It's just plain fucked up. Even if a particular set of god botherers does genuinely good work (charity, etc.), what's driving them at their core is still fucked up.

It's sad that there are so many people on this planet who won't be good just for the sake of being good. Nope, they need the threat of eternal suffering to keep them in line.

#82

Posted by: ConcernedJoe Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 8:04 AM

#81 etc. -- It is not that I disagree with you but religion is much more than fantasy - and personal.

See my #76.

I am not saying I am eloquent nor rigorous in presentation nor the author of a unique thought. But what I am trying to convey is seems vitally important to me: religion is first and foremost an extremely important part of the power structure - a power structure that is really secular in its greedy goals - and second it is in itself a for profit business.

To think of religion as god belief is to think of the Hell's Angels as avid motorcyclists that only want the freedom of the open road with wind whipping through their hair.

When we combat "religion" we are taking on a lot of THE Establishment of a general nature. We are rocking not just Auntie May's boat boats but the yachts of some powerful entities and Centuries cultivated (for political purpose) RWA fevor.

#83

Posted by: Forbidden Snowflake Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 8:11 AM

Googlemess #55:

However, despite growing up in an essentially unreligious home, Christian thought is so pervasive in our culture that one cannot hope to miss it completely.

Your culture inflicts Christianity even on those who come from non-religious homes within it. But there are other cultures, in which the concentration of religion in the environment is low, and the cultural osmotic pressure generated by it is negligible.
I have friends who are "unthinking atheists". That is not to say that they're shallow, but that they simply aren't interested. They weren't exposed to religion as children, thought it strange and silly as teenagers and never felt the need to ponder it much (beyond the occasional "how can people believe that crap?") as adults.
As far as what you say about your own culture goes... I'll just have to take your word for it.

#84

Posted by: Cosmic Snark Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 8:21 AM

Some years ago, I would have agreed with every word of this video. Now, after my deconversion, it looks alien and creepy (and a bit scary in a cultish mid-control way.)

It's good to be free!

#85

Posted by: Cosmic Snark Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 8:23 AM

^ should say "mind control", not "mid control" in my previous comment.

#86

Posted by: MarioneTTe Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 9:03 AM

Those opening words, calling the baby "Worthless" makes me squirm. I've been atheist for 4 years, agnostic for about 2 years before that, but I remember all too well thinking such similar things.

To have been raised in a home where open thought were fostered... That would have been truly grand.

#87

Posted by: jafafahots Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 9:06 AM

"What many Christians don't see is the same kind of understanding shown to them. "

Oh fucking come off it. Christians don't feel they get understanding?

Our entire political system - every damned last politician... and 99.99% of the media, and virtually all of American culture spends a large deal of its time giving Christians a non-stop handjob.

Christians are catered to, pandered to, sucked up to, stroked, given special consideration and privileges virtually every second of their lives in this country.

If Christians fuck up they're more quickly forgiven. If they lie, cheat or steal, they're more quickly forgiven.

Despite the Constitution forbidding it, the law regularly favors them and supports them over others.

If they victimize others and commit crimes, they're given shorter sentences or paroled sooner.

The reason Christians feel they aren't understood is because like spoiled children who are given every fucking thing they want, it's never enough.

It's pretty fucking obvious even the fucking POPE doesn't feel coddled enough, catered to enough. The fucker acts like he feels pretty damned aggrieved.

Christians do not get to blame non-Christians for symptoms of the disease of Christianity.

#88

Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 9:11 AM

John Morales wrote:

Where does one find Christians who agree with atheists that Christianity is a ridiculous and pernicious conceit?

A cognitive dissonance support group?

#89

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm4CYGXi1n4Armyc3H5WH0I3OSlKZ1Zvc4 Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 9:21 AM

@74

Isn't "Thinking Atheist" redundant?
Two words: Bill Maher.

Agreed. Not all atheists are brilliant. My original post regarded thinking about religion only.

However, working in a research university setting I am happy to say that the atheists I am surrounded by are all a bunch of smartypants.

#90

Posted by: ConcernedJoe Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 9:51 AM

#87 well said

#91

Posted by: raven Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 10:17 AM

There are Christians who hear what you say, and many times they agree, and they do understand your position.

I'm sure there are a few. So where have they been hiding for the last half century? They are almost mythological by now.

playing the xian persecution card:

What many Christians don't see is the same kind of understanding shown to them.

We understand too well. Most of us are ex-Xians. Where do you think atheists come from and why? Falwell, Hagee, Robertson, Ham, etc.. produce more atheists in a day than Richard Dawkins does in a year.

That is a problem for US Xianity. We see cults based on hate who constantly attack gays, scientists, science, other xian sects, other religions, atheists, democrats, Kenyan born, Moslem terrorists who happen to be president, and on and on. We see xian terrorists assassinating MDs. We see creationists trying illegally to sneak their mythology into our kid's science classes. There are a lot of xian Dominionists who hate the USA, would destroy it, and set up a new Dark Age.

US xianity has been largely taken over by the fundie death cults. We understand them too well. Nihilistic extremists with hate and lies are easy to understand.

#92

Posted by: raven Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 10:29 AM

Someone will have to remind that baby that nothing really matters and he is going to be killed and the earth destroyed by a powerful sky fairy any day now.

A recent poll stated that 40% of the US population thinks jesus will show up by 2050. To kill 6.7 billion people and destroy the earth.

2050 is the latest date, not the target date. The current target date is 2012 because jesus uses the Mayan calendar.

I guess that means there is no point in doing anything but sitting around and waiting. Why bother pursuing a career? Why bother even getting up in the morning or having children who will just be murdered by a capricious supernatural being for obscure reasons. One that the vast majority of the world's population doesn't even believe in?

#93

Posted by: Griff Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 10:49 AM

*sigh* The other day my mom told me on the phone that she and my dad tried very hard to raise their kids without guilt. The only problem is, they raised us in the Catholic church of the 1970s and 1980s. I don't know if she will ever understand that the only way to raise children without guilt is to raise them free of religion.

The video is downright creepy, and I agree with PZ that it could easily be shown in a number of fundamentalist churches and taken completely seriously. When it comes to people and groups with broken sarcasm meters, fundies top the list.

#94

Posted by: aynsavoy Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 1:55 PM

Re: being a "thinking atheist," I was (lucky enough to be) raised by atheist parents, who cared enough to give us (my twin bro and me) a few books talking about world religions and talk to us Christianity oppresses women--otherwise, my parents were pretty passive in their atheism.

I lost friends in first grade after announcing one day that my brother and I didn't believe in God. After that, I remember wanting to know what all the fuss was about. I experimented with religion at different times in my childhood. Not Christianity or anything "standard," because I couldn't reconcile the the idea that one religion was true with the fact that there were so many different ones.

But I dabbled in Wicca in middle school (I liked the trappings but never bought the idea of casting spells), and I attended a youth group at a Unitarian Universalist church for some time during high school (which concerned my mother before she realized that God really never came up, but the siloing and liberal bigotry drove me away before too long. I called myself an agnostic until an atheist mentor helped me see that I really wasn't.

Since then, I've come to my own still-developing conclusions about WHY being an atheist makes sense to me, where my morals are grounded, and how I want to live my life in light of my beliefs.

I consider myself lucky that I did not have to escape religion to become who I am today, but I also know the value of the time I've spent thinking about my atheism.

#95

Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/JuNwRu0vvtvEJ_UEOQJNLH4MISqJZw--#beed8 Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 3:16 PM

I know many or most of us are ex-believers, but the comments here are making me wonder whether you all attended nutty fundamentalist churches. I grew up in a fairly mainstream church, pretty conservative, but not militant, and I could never imagine this being accepted in my church or any of the others I visited over the years. A video that says you were born "worthless" and must "apologize for murdering His son Jesus" is pretty much the exact opposite of the message we were given. We were told we had worth, that God loved and cared for us, etc., and that we repented of our own sins, not for "murdering" Jesus; Jesus had sacrificed himself willingly. If you have any sense of perspective, you'd know that that's what millions of Christians hear every week, not the stuff in this video.

Of course I no longer believe these things, but the reason that I became an atheist was more because belief seemed too touch-feely, pie-in-the-sky, head-in-the-sand, out-of-touch baloney. I began to try to take it more seriously, and only then did I realize what it would really mean to believe this stuff. I think that is the real point that this video is trying to make -- what it really means to believe what's in the Bible. But it would never in a million years get shown in a real church, in my opinion.

#96

Posted by: crowepps Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 6:17 PM

I am sad that this is how many Christians portray and believe of Christianity. These people should be ridiculed. But I hope that's not where it ends. I hope you also realize that there are better Christians than this, and there's really something here that needs to be understood before it's all thrown out the window. There are Christians who hear what you say, and many times they agree, and they do understand your position. What many Christians don't see is the same kind of understanding shown to them. At they very least, they don't deserve to be ridiculed. They're not responsible for the sins of those who misrepresent them.
I'm sorry, but, yes, the 'better Christians' are indeed responsible, because those "who misrepresent them" hold the 'better Christians' up as THEIR example of "the church does a lot of good in the world" and use the 'better Christians' as THEIR authority as the misrepresenters try to turn America into a "Christian Nation", pass onerous laws discriminating against people they don't like, justify letting pregnant women die, etc. It is not the responsibility of the on-lookers to determine who is the True Scotsman but rather the responsibility of the 'good Christians' to actively and loudly disavow the misrepresenters. If your 'call' includes missionary work, there is definitely an unplowed field among those misrepresenters where it would be productive to direct your first efforts.
#97

Posted by: aschimke Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 10:03 PM

One of the main problems I have with Christianity in developed nations is that it is tragically self-centered.

I understand that it feels good to "know" that God loves and protects you. And to some degree, it does seem like you are protected. I'm guessing that if you're posting on this site, you have enough food and water to survive, and you also probably have some type of shelter to live in.

However, there are some tragic, TRAGIC things that happen to Christians all the time, especially in third world countries. Is it part of God's plan that children in undeveloped countries (some of which are Christian) sometimes drink water of such poor quality that they have uncontrollable diarrhea and eventually die of dehydration?

It's very, very hard to believe that God planned for that child such a horrible, undignified death.

#98

Posted by: aschimke Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 10:08 PM

The other major problem I have with Christianity is prayer. Many of the Christians I know say things like, "Thank God I wasn't laid off from my job during this economy." Or "Thank God our mortgage loan went through!"

Even if they don't say things like that, they ask their friends to pray for them for things like getting that job they just interviewed for.

That is just disgustingly self-centered. If prayer did work, which it doesn't and studies have shown this, I would hope that these Christians could find something a little more worthwhile to pray about.

#99

Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 10:25 PM

I think it's harder to believe that there is Satan. A thing that is so evil, he wants to separate a father from all his children.

If you're thinking of the person who said, "For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household," (Matthew 10:35), I should let you know his name is not Satan, but Jesus.

#100

Posted by: echidna Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 10:35 PM

Raven@91:

We understand too well. Most of us are ex-Xians. Where do you think atheists come from and why? Falwell, Hagee, Robertson, Ham, etc.. produce more atheists in a day than Richard Dawkins does in a year.

Just this. I am a Ham atheist, myself.

#101

Posted by: Claudia Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 11:14 PM

Brian, no...I'm not absolutely sure my "version" of Christianity is the right one, but I do know that it has brought more peace and happiness into my life than any philosophical or physical proof of creation could.
I have had my share of doubts, and no, I'm not at all out of moratorium, but I am quite sure that I'm on my journey through it.
I do apologize for the incredible weak attempt at a comment on evolution. I should have thought that one through.
As for Mathew 10:35, that portion is correct. Those are God's words. They are taken out of context though. This is referencing those who come to believe and those who don't. It is saying that God should be first in one's heart.

#102

Posted by: 朴競花/박경화 (Gyeong Hwa) Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 11:28 PM

As for Mathew 10:35, that portion is correct. Those are God's words

And you know this, how?

#103

Posted by: Aratina Cage Author Profile Page | July 19, 2010 11:29 PM

Claudia #101,

Those are God's words.

The words of a character in a fictional story. Nothing more. God is as fictional as Harry Potter.

#104

Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 12:06 AM

Claudia wrote:

Brian, no...I'm not absolutely sure my "version" of Christianity is the right one, but I do know that it has brought more peace and happiness into my life than any philosophical or physical proof of creation could.

So, whether something is true or not is irrelevant; it's how it makes you feel that's the most important?

#105

Posted by: echidna Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 12:23 AM

Claudia:

I do apologize for the incredible weak attempt at a comment on evolution. I should have thought that one through.

Now think through the implications of the fact that you accepted such a ridiculous proposition as true.

Religion encourages people to listen, and accept without question the things they are told from the pulpit. No matter how ridiculous, damaging, or patently false it is. This brings "peace" and "happiness" because you are lulled into not thinking for yourself - and this type of control over people has had nasty consequences in the past. No one expects the Spanish inquisition, the witch-hunts, the purges, the killing of doctors, the harrassing of soldiers' funerals.

#106

Posted by: Claudia Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 12:31 AM

When I said "correct", I meant the passage was quoted correctly from the Bible (and that it is written as coming from God).

Many do think God fictional...it's hard not to. One cannot see him as one can see another human. One cannot hear him as one can hear another human. We seem to rely on these senses. Again, I'm not looking to argue, only to give some of my thoughts and to learn others.

I'm not saying that truth of untruth is irrelevant...I just said that the happiness means more to me personally than a proof of creation.

#107

Posted by: Aratina Cage Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 12:58 AM

I can't believe Claudia actually said this in all seriousness in #63:

If we evolved from monkeys...there wouldn't be any monkeys...

Still laughing! I hope it goes into FSTDT.

#108

Posted by: Aratina Cage Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 1:04 AM

Many do think God fictional...it's hard not to.

Tell me about it! Many people think Santa Claus is fictional, too.


One cannot see him as one can see another human. One cannot hear him as one can hear another human. We seem to rely on these senses.

It's simple really. You cannot see him because he doesn't exist. You cannot hear him because he doesn't exist. You cannot taste him or feel him or smell him either. You cannot detect him with your senses or with instruments because he doesn't exist.

#109

Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 2:27 AM

They are taken out of context though. This is referencing those who come to believe and those who don't. It is saying that God should be first in one's heart.

Not at all. Splitting up families based on who believes and who doesn't. Like God with heaven and hell.

Doesn't seem like you have a problem believing in somebody who separates a father from his children at all.

Let me guess: you're not a biblical literalist. Don't worry; few Christians are.

So, how do you know which things Jesus says are meant to be taken literally and which are to be taken 'metaphorically'? What others say? How you 'feel'? If it's the former, then it's only an accident of history and geography that you didn't write "Many do think Vishnu fictional...it's hard not to". If it's the latter, and you're using some internal compass to guide you, then why bother with the bible at all?

#110

Posted by: Claudia Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 2:42 AM

You're right. It's definitely a challenge trying to figure out what to take literally. The bible is here...it's been here for ages. I think that it is important to study whether one lives by it's word or not.

Is love considered something one feels?
It's the love that's so permanent.
You cannot see him or hear him like you do other humans...but his love can be felt by anyone.

#111

Posted by: John Phillips, FCD Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 3:55 AM

Claudia said

..but his love can be felt by anyone.


As it is based on no evidence whatsoever beyond hearsay it can only be felt by the deluded. If you were talking about feeling such things based on anything but a religion you might be considered a suitable candidate for psychiatric help.

#112

Posted by: Cody Miller Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 12:38 PM

This is not Christianity.

1. We (Christians) do not tell our babies that they are worthless, NOR SHOULD WE. The Bible teaches that life is precious in God's eyes. We are worth very much to God and ought to respect other humans as being worth something to Him also.

2. We do teach that man is fallen and is sinful by nature (and that all people have sinned). This sin brings death. Mankind does not die because of the sin of Adam & Eve, or for the disobedience of those who killed Christ, but for sins which a person has individually committed.

3. We do not live our lives in guilt and shame, nor with a sword of Damocles raised high above our heads. We are free in Christ, from all guilt and all shame.

#113

Posted by: kilternkafuffle Author Profile Page | July 20, 2010 11:16 PM

Unanswered Christians at a godless blog!!

@Claudia:

It's definitely a challenge trying to figure out what to take literally.

It's an impossible challenge - there is no way of knowing the right answer, every person will come out with their own interpretation. Exactly the same situation with the Koran. Shouldn't "the word of God" have some clarity?? If there are actual rules the creator of the universe wants us to live by, why make it so difficult to figure them out??
The bible is here...it's been here for ages. I think that it is important to study whether one lives by it's word or not.
The Bible is demonstrably written by fallible dessert people. It justifies genocide, racism, sexism, and homophobia. Some word to live by!
Is love considered something one feels? It's the love that's so permanent. You cannot see him or hear him like you do other humans...but his love can be felt by anyone.

Children feel the love of imaginary friends, schizophrenics feel the love of inexistent persons - it doesn't prove anything. Also, do you mean just feeling one with the world, feeling transcendent when you accomplish something, or enjoying others smile? That's just happiness accessible to anyone. Doesn't require a God, certainly doesn't require THE Christian God.

@Cody Miller:
1. Christians vary, and may be you are sensible enough not to abuse your children, but (from personal and others' experiences) the vocal majority focuses on everyone being born into original sin and being guilty and worthless and dirty... and therefore needing salvation or whatnot.
2. Whoa. Where is the connection to #1?? Being fallen and sinful from birth is a pretty nasty thing to claim! That's the point!
If you're going to say that you don't subscribe to the concept of "original sin", you're a poor Christian. Christians have been peddling it for 2 thousand years. Don't lie by saying that that "sin" doesn't matter, by your own theology.

disobedience of those who killed Christ
Um, who did they disobey?? Wasn't getting killed Christ's mission? Get your story straight. This is the sort of logical inconsistency that makes Christianity look like the ridiculous sham it is at every turn.
3.
We are free in Christ, from all guilt and all shame.
I take it you aren't a Catholic?
If you really mean what you just said, you've just sworn off all morality. Among "us" are some murderers, abusers, and liars. They should feel guilt and shame. Otherwise they can kill, assault, and lie and then immediately feel okay with themselves.
Also, do you mean we shouldn't be ashamed about masturbation, homosexuality, casual intercourse? Great news!
When you throw away the nonsense of religion, you feel guilt and shame for your own moral transgressions, but not for simply existing or doing what comes natural without hurting anybody else.

#114

Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula Author Profile Page | July 21, 2010 12:06 AM

The Bible is demonstrably written by fallible dessert people.

I wish I'd been brought up by dessert people. I might have been able to master the soufflé had that been the case.

Is love considered something one feels? It's the love that's so permanent. You cannot see him or hear him like you do other humans...but his love can be felt by anyone.

Except that there are people - like most of us here - who don't feel this love. Which means that either God doesn't want us to feel it, and atheism is the only choice we have available to us (since he wants us to be atheists); or, alternatively, God doesn't exist.

In my opinion, if God did exist, I don't see how it'd be possible for us to disbelieve in him. Not obey him, perhaps - free will and all - but not disbelieve.

#115

Posted by: Fathawan Author Profile Page | July 21, 2010 12:35 AM

I've spent years working around avarage people. Spent years working with young and adult mentaly ill. The Bible was writen by men who claim it to be the words of another man who claims to be the son of GOD. This man who lives a noble "GOOD" life in the words of other men, does things that he knows will break of lead to the breaking or rules/laws of a ruling nation and thus end in his death. Is this the way of a noble forgiving unbelivable person. Or the way or a person completly lacking a solid mental state. Im not sure im guessing thats where Christians "FAITH" some into play. But is faith not just beleving in something u cannot see or touch , Fine line if any between faith and mental instability. Once again not sure i hope someday i will figure it all out probley not though

#116

Posted by: Malcolm Author Profile Page | July 21, 2010 2:10 AM

WowbaggerOM
To make soufflé properly, one needs to have been brought up by infallible dessert people.

#117

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnG39uMFt69kwCKZ8DoxtmMCvmzr5chx94 Author Profile Page | July 26, 2010 10:00 AM

More loving?

"You were too worthless to be born. So I killed you when you were still a fetus. But thank you for your stem cells!"

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.