This may be the last update of the non-terminal thread for a while — I'm going to get beat up by some doctors today, and there are too many steps involved in thread closure and new thread creation and template updating to hand this job off to Mary. So the ol' portcullis may stay up for a while.
A hard day of knives and needles demands a more inspiring video than usual to get it going…so here's Stephen Fry with some advice I'll be taking to heart.
(Current totals: 10,888 entries with 1,101,198 comments.)









Comments
Posted by: TrineBM
|
August 24, 2010 7:13 AM
Have a nice day ... no wait, that wasn't appropriate.
Say ARGHHH like a pirate, swear and curse, kick a nurse in hte belly (I did that once ... hey, she woke me up by sticking a needle in my bum!!!)
and once again: GET WELL!
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 7:18 AM
I think Sven was secretly hoping...
All the best today, to you, Mary and the kids and make sure you all indulge in much swearing, it really does work wonders! I damn well swear by it!
Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/oipiHyMX057IBfghb1IGAQT1D9hAVlO_VSA-#e3b8e
|
August 24, 2010 7:22 AM
G'luck to you PZ. But, listen..........can you just FORGET that we are here for awhile? We'll be fine. It's okay. They must be getting ready to load you on to a gurney. (I know the feeling, having been through a few OR "challenges" of my own.)I'm feeling your nervousness (or maybe just remembering my own). If good wishes and positive thinking could heal you, you'd be home already.
Posted by: irenedelse
|
August 24, 2010 7:23 AM
No end of best wishes, then. And thanks for thinking of your readers' endless need of all things Pharyngula, even in the face of surgical knives. That's a mighty good heart you have in your chest, sir. And may it keep beating there long!
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 24, 2010 7:25 AM
All the best PZ. Get well.
Now, let's see if we can run this sucker up to 5K before The Tentacled One wakes up.
Posted by: Antiochus Epiphanes
|
August 24, 2010 7:27 AM
OK...so we shouldn't use up comments unneccessarily. I mean, every comment has to count.
Fuck. I'm out.
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 24, 2010 7:28 AM
Oh no, swearing, Phil Plait will have a heart attack ! Oh, wait.....
Get through the day well mate, be thinking of you !
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 7:30 AM
Well, since PZ will be MIA for a while, we'll just have to fill this up quickly. Sven can get his longest subthread yet.
Since this thread was posted, Pharyngula has been very slow to load at home. I hate to see what it is like at work.
Posted by: vanharris
|
August 24, 2010 7:31 AM
Best wishes, PZ. We're thinking of you, & hope you get fully recovered & back on your feet soon. And when you've got the all clear, get a bike. (And ride it.)
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 24, 2010 7:32 AM
Damn you and your otherworldly strength, PZ! *shakes fist*
Now best of wishes to you and the Trophy Wife, and enjoy the thought of others dealing with your students for awhile.
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 24, 2010 7:33 AM
Except in places where everyone is rh-. In such places (Pyrenean and Caucasian valleys), which may have arisen by founder effects, being Rh+ is the disadvantage.
Some claim it makes you better able to cope with a lot of meat in your diet. Don't ask me if there's any evidence for this; but if it's right, it would fit the hypothetical Neandertal connection.
If Burushaski is related, then the (North) Caucasian languages are related, too. And these three are supposed (I hope the paper has come out yet; I'll have to ask) to share agricultural vocabulary, and that would mean their last common ancestor was spoken not long before the world was created and spread rather shortly before the Indo-European language family did.
The other way around, as Carlie said: you have no antibodies, because you have all antigens (and would have died long ago if you had the antibodies against them).
Yes, but so much woo in the comments... <facepalm>
Posted by: Fred The Hun
|
August 24, 2010 7:34 AM
Prayer, by the way, is worth considerably less, than a steaming pile of the most rancid and fetid yak dung that has ever spewed forth from the arse of any a long-haired bovine.
This of course, being merely my most humble opinion.
Posted by: VRAlbany
|
August 24, 2010 7:37 AM
Good doctors to you!
Posted by: backwardsbuddhist
|
August 24, 2010 7:39 AM
Looking forward to your speedy return. Your days may be considerably more painful in the interim, but the rest of us will be enduring the excruciating agony of boredom without the physical aspects to keep us occupied. Encouragement to you and your family on this somewhat necessary but unlooked for adventure.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 7:40 AM
Nerd:
Perhaps we should all indulge in some communal swearing too. Why the fuck not, couldn't hurt, eh? ;)
Posted by: Greg Laden
|
August 24, 2010 7:40 AM
It is going to be interesting to watch you blog under the influence for a few weeks.
Posted by: drtomaso
|
August 24, 2010 7:44 AM
Here's hoping you don't get any of those creationist MDs that seem to pop up now and again to give the profession a bad name.
Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula
|
August 24, 2010 7:46 AM
On an unrelated note, I'm home from seeing Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, which I really enjoyed - though it did get a bit same-same after a while. Still, it was very impressive stylistically, and the cuts from scene to scene were just brilliant.
Posted by: TrineBM
|
August 24, 2010 7:51 AM
Rorschach wrote:
... and I giggled (loud enough for my colleagues to notice) and that wasn't very nice of me!!!! Damn! Or as I would have sworn in my mother tongue: PIS!
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 7:56 AM
Child rape is not the only priestly crime that the Catholic hierarchy covers up:
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 24, 2010 7:57 AM
If you run out of original swear words, try to learn Finnish or possibly Jiddish !
---- ---- ----
'Free tuition for students who stay in Sweden' http://www.thelocal.se/28540/20100824/
You are probably already through with your university studies, but if your Spawn (or your younger siblings) want to study, -and like to be in a country that is virtually free of fundamentalists and creationists- this might be something for them (NB you pay for your own rent and food, the education is free). PS no human sacrifice to Elder Gods permitted!
Posted by: bbgunn071679
|
August 24, 2010 8:00 AM
To Dr. Myers and Mary, the Trophy Wife:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHeP9Sve48
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 8:06 AM
May the fermenting excrement of a thousand camels descend on theCreationStoopidity Museum exhibits. Just what Poopiehead Hamikins deserves.Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 8:08 AM
Having lived (or at least, existed) for a time in Milton Keynes, I'm not sure it's much less of a hostile environment than outer space!
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 24, 2010 8:08 AM
I honestly don't know where the fucking idea of "swear" words impoverishing the vocabulary comes from. In Spanish, pretty much all serious writers use them indiscriminately and without fanfare. CD's don't come with "explicit lyrics" labels. University professors don't have a problem with it, especially if they're linguists, and some even swear left and right without consequence. Linguists will even defend their use, just like Fry is doing here.
Is this an American thing, where media corps fine hundreds of thousands of dollars for an on-air "fuck"? I've seen Australian and British shows where they swear plenty.
Posted by: Cannabinaceae
|
August 24, 2010 8:08 AM
One word:
"Shitfuckdamn!"
Recover or attain health, PZ. That's my recommendation.
I revel in swearing, as has been attested by W.U.'s sister, who recently called me vis-a-vis organizing Family Pizza Night (which, for me, usually involves ravioli instead). The phone devices chose to partially break mid conversation, such that I could not hear her, but she could hear me. Therefore I indulged, fiddling with the phone, the base station, etc. trying to correct the situation. To the tune of "Shit fuck! God fuck! Mother fuck! What the fuck! God fuck it!" etc.
This became a topic of conversation later that evening, once the kidlings were up in the child ghetto.
Posted by: podblack
|
August 24, 2010 8:13 AM
Big hugs and best wishes... don't forget that the Digital Cuttlefish sends his best too:
http://digitalcuttlefish.blogspot.com/2010/08/pharyngulate-blood-bank.html
Take care of you!! :)
Posted by: Zeno
|
August 24, 2010 8:18 AM
I'm joining in on the good wishes, but I'll pass on the swearing. (It's just the way that I am, with my Plaitian adversion.)
Don't imagine that we didn't notice, PZ, that you said you're taking Fry's advice "to heart." Humor in the face of adversity. Ha! (And we'll see you on the other side of this necessary medical unpleasantness.)
Posted by: melissa.b.elliott
|
August 24, 2010 8:19 AM
Andyo @25: I think the American perception is that *heavy* swearing (as opposed to the occasional well-placed remark) is an activity best enjoyed by the uneducated. And we really don't like it when little kids do it at all. It's a cultural thing.
Also, I am getting banner ads to join the Mormon Church. What kind of conversion testimony would that be? "I saw a banner on a website showing a man riding a motorcycle from the Mormon Church, and I felt a burning in my bosom to click through and join the latter-day saints!"
Posted by: BillMetrey
|
August 24, 2010 8:20 AM
Hey PZ, don't believe the guy who says, "I am going to give you something to help you relax."
He is the guy who is going to knock you out until you wake up in recovery. He lies like a rug!
Here's for a speedy recovery!
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 24, 2010 8:21 AM
can't see the vid in work - is it about profanity?
I remember seeing Ken Tynan saying 'fuck' on a BBC TV prog.
Shit, now I feel old - it was 196fucking5 and I was 19!
How can it be so long ago when I KNOW I'm barely 30?
Shit, wank, bollocks.
(pouts) I'm NOT that old, I'm just fucking NOT (/pouts)
(sulk)
Posted by: ophelia.benson
|
August 24, 2010 8:24 AM
An intelligent designer would have made the whole thing out of durable plastic so yaboosucks!
Best of luck; float like a butterfly, sting like a bee; fuck pain; get well soonest.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 8:27 AM
Andyo:
To a large extent. The whole puritan thing bubbles up when it comes to TV/Radio, 'cause of chiiildren, ya know. Can't have all those tender ears tainted. Never mind that most 'Mericans cuss a blue streak on occasion.
Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/IFR2b_p5o8kZ3YV1mrRajqve6Rsg#061e6
|
August 24, 2010 8:29 AM
A lurker here, de-lurking to say "You better fucking get better fast!"
Afterall, I need something to do at work in the mornings.
Seriously, though. Get well soon!
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 24, 2010 8:30 AM
SIWOTI spree completed. =8-)
To some degree, yes. Where curses are blasphemous, cursing is regarded as a grave sin – soon extended to any cursing, not just that with religious topics. Plus, English curse words are mostly sexual, and the US is the prudest place in the Western world (apart from the Vatican I suppose), again (in part) for religious reasons.
But still, it is not well regarded in most of the Western world. The USA is merely the extreme.
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
August 24, 2010 8:31 AM
Well, that was a lovely way to start the day before heading off to work. I hope everything goes well - despite Rorschach's assurance that heart surgery is a routine medical procedure, it still sounds pretty hairy to me. That's why I'm glad that there are doctors - they view heart surgery as routine so that I don't have to...
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 24, 2010 8:32 AM
Well yeah, I don't think they should be overused, but just as any other word or phrase. I used to have a co-worker who was always saying "you know?" at the end of every damn comment he had to make. I just stopped trying to converse with him unless absolutely necessary. It was pretty annoying.
Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline.
|
August 24, 2010 8:36 AM
Speak for yourself!!I can assure that there's nothing more important in life (/The Thread) than MEEEEEE, and I demand PeeZed devote all his attention to MEEEE!
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 24, 2010 8:36 AM
Hey, what's going on with Cuttlefish and Podblack, btw ???
;)
Oh, and I thought I could comment on Greg Laden's blog, like, anyone else, but I was wrong.My bad, I guess.I got thread-copped.
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 24, 2010 8:36 AM
Oh and I didn't mean to imply that in Spanish there isn't any of this puritanical bullshit, it's just it's not as pronounced. And as Fry pointed out too, it seems the people with the least linguistic skills are the ones that complain the most. It's amazing how spot-on he is. I have friends tell me not to swear so much on the bus or at the supermarket, not because of them (of course, they're as potty-mouthed as me) but because of others. Fuck others. If anyone gets offended by some generic word someone says out loud, it's their problem, methinks.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 8:41 AM
Laden:
Looking for more material?
Posted by: Multicellular
|
August 24, 2010 8:44 AM
A speedy recovery to you PZ.
As we wait for the news of your recuperation we'll wait in the shadows, counting the beads of scientific discovery and innovation that will, unlike a god, preserve and protect your mortal frame.
Posted by: opposablethumbstoo
|
August 24, 2010 8:44 AM
Putain d'bordel d'merde, me cago en dios y la putissima hostia. That's about the best I can manage :D. And get well soon.
Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline.
|
August 24, 2010 8:48 AM
I have it on good authority that the Vat has a collection of marble penes in a cupboard somewhere.I'm O-neg, but being hopped up on antidepressants, noöne wants it.
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnDeIPvGdG5Ko4xndZFTM9TfaGkoKe-h1E
|
August 24, 2010 8:49 AM
Best of luck I hope that all goes smooth. It's going to be a pain after, but when they tell you to get up and sit in a chair awhile, do it. Just have a care with fast movements and the tubes. When they tell you to get up and walk, do it. The faster you comply and become assimilated to convincing your cells to express the right way to heal the faster you get rid of each attachment, tube, appliance, etc. The faster you do that the better you feel.
Be very careful with your thorax drain, you don't want to create a pneumothorax. There's also a balance on the pain meds -- too much and you just want to sleep, and don't get up to exercise as needed. Too little and it hurts too much to get up... find your zone.
Posted by: No One
|
August 24, 2010 8:49 AM
fuck
Posted by: SQB (fuck death)
|
August 24, 2010 8:52 AM
Let's pharyngulate the recovery room and wake PZ post op by chanting ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 24, 2010 8:52 AM
It's funny that "hostia" ("host", as in that Goddamn Cracker) is a swear word in Spain.
Posted by: Cuttlefish, OM, CR
|
August 24, 2010 8:52 AM
Rorschach @#39--
Podblack is my pal IRL, and the one who got me started blogging. Sorry, nothing more intriguing than that.
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 24, 2010 8:54 AM
I hope everything goes well - despite Rorschach's assurance that heart surgery is a routine medical procedure, it still sounds pretty hairy to me.
I'm not certain what procedure exactly PZ is having, but if it's a CABG then, yes, it's got definite risks and has a (low but higher than we'd like) mortality. Cardiac surgery, when one's heart is in bad shape is kind of like democracy: it ain't pretty but it probably beats the alternatives.
Posted by: joshurtree
|
August 24, 2010 8:54 AM
Sounds like Natural Selection's imminent destruction has been sounded....Again
As the Yale prof says the results seem accurate. It's the interpretation that's been fucked up.
Posted by: Julie Stahlhut
|
August 24, 2010 8:54 AM
Best wishes for a successful set of repairs and a stress-free recovery, PZ!
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnDeIPvGdG5Ko4xndZFTM9TfaGkoKe-h1E
|
August 24, 2010 8:56 AM
PZ: Also note that I am seven weeks out and have more stamina, and feel lots better than before I went in. Life has improved greatly for me. I didn't realize that it was heart disease creating the pains in my back, right lung, and shoulders. I thought that stitch in my side was reflux.. boy was I wrong. You will have flat and down periods during your recovery, but overall you are going to feel better.
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 24, 2010 9:01 AM
Pictures or it didn't happen!Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 24, 2010 9:02 AM
Good luck in there, PZ!
Posted by: podblack
|
August 24, 2010 9:14 AM
@ Rorschach #39:
:p :p :p :)
Posted by: ericwilliamlin
|
August 24, 2010 9:16 AM
Best of luck PZ! Hang in there and hope the recovery process goes well and can't wait till you're back in action.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 24, 2010 9:19 AM
A blood transfusion with antidepressants built in? Sounds like a feature rather than a bug to me.
Posted by: irenedelse
|
August 24, 2010 9:23 AM
Andyo (#48):
Funny, French Canadians do the same with "Ostie!" (French for host, communion wafer, or of course goddam cracker.)
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 24, 2010 9:29 AM
David M:
Gah, you're exactly right. I said "antigens" and meant "antibodies".
Posted by: Cosmic Teapot
|
August 24, 2010 9:33 AM
Please tell us which one as my play web site is on freehostia.
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 24, 2010 9:33 AM
@Sili:
I don't know what my blood type is, but I'm blacklisted because I lived in Germany from 1988 to 1992 (see Creutzfeldt-Jakob blood donor restrictions)
Posted by: mongreltiger
|
August 24, 2010 9:35 AM
Best wishes Mr. Myers. I look forward to your return.
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 24, 2010 9:36 AM
I don't know what my blood type is, but I'm blacklisted because I lived in Germany from 1988 to 1992
Really? Germany? I thought there were like 5 cases of nvCJD is cows and none in humans in Germany. The UK on the other hand...nvCJD is definitely passed through blood so it's probably a reasonable precaution.
OTOH, it might be time to dump the restriction on gay men now that we've got reasonable tests for HIV.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 24, 2010 9:36 AM
KG,
You wouldn't, by any chance, have spawned a future Oxford law grad that would have many political debates online with you while there, would you?
Posted by: gawdmail
|
August 24, 2010 9:39 AM
Best of lock, PZ... er, even though luck is just a constructed concept.
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 24, 2010 9:41 AM
@Dianne:
*shrug* The Red Cross is paranoid.
Posted by: irenedelse
|
August 24, 2010 9:42 AM
While we wait for good news from the hospital, I'll add my voice to send good thought to the Myers family, and especially the Trophy Wife a.k.a. Mystress of Mercy (TM). Take good care of yourself, too! PZ is fortunate to have you. And so are we all.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 9:42 AM
curses
foiled again
Posted by: Stephen Wells
|
August 24, 2010 9:49 AM
I just got a call from the NHS blood transfusion service this morning, telling me there's a session next month. I was off donating for a few months because of travel restrictions.
But the vampires know where I live and they're coming for my precious fluids!
O+, if you were wondering.
Posted by: Bryson
|
August 24, 2010 9:51 AM
There's more than 'ostie' in the French Canadian list of religious swear words-- 'chalice', 'ciboire' (host container) and 'tabernacle', of course (one of my favourites), along with wimpy sound-alikes ('colline' for 'chalice', 'tabernoosh' and more). The 17th century was a different time...
We'll be thinking of you today, PZ-- I'll donate some blood to the local supply in your name.
Best wishes from Bryson, Tessa & Linde.
Posted by: TGAP Dad
|
August 24, 2010 9:56 AM
BTW: It's Stephen Fry's 53rd birthday today!
Posted by: ckerstann
|
August 24, 2010 10:01 AM
Good luck P.Z., we'll just talk among ourselves until you get back.
Posted by: Ring Tailed Lemurian
|
August 24, 2010 10:04 AM
KG #20
I loved how the Catholic Church responded in the only way it knows of how to deal with "problem" priests (same story, from the Guardian) -
Re Milton *spit* Keynes - It's no surprise that the only good thing to ever come out of M*s*K (the Open University) was a distance learning project. Ideal, because it's the last place anyone would want to actually go, and the further one stays away from it the better.
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 10:07 AM
I can be quite certain I didn't! First, the time is wrong (I lived there in 1977). Second, throughout that time, I remained in that condition of... inexperience which said law grad assures us he still maintains!
Unless, I suppose, someone surreptitiously took and froze a semen sample while I slept - but then, the MK connection would be irrelevant :-p
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 24, 2010 10:08 AM
Not keyne on MK then?
Posted by: Stephen Wells
|
August 24, 2010 10:08 AM
@20: I'm watchin BBC news 24 at the moment and there's a tone of stunned bafflement that a priest who was killing people with bombs was "transferred out of the parish".
Seriously.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 10:12 AM
PZ or Mary, if anyone prays over PZ, take names. Patricia and the Pullet Patrol™ are on the case, and rude surprise may be waiting when they leave the hospital...
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 10:14 AM
Well I think my blood is mostly used by people who happen to have the same blood type as me.
For the longest time though I couldn't donate because I was too anemic, or because my weight was too low. Always one or the other, or both. I *think* that should be better but I dunno. Well the weight is higher...
Reading the symptoms of anemia a lightbulb went off. Yeah, I may still be too anemic. And that explains a lot about me actually maybe. Why is it worse some times than other times? I thought it went away.
What do you even do about that? I mean it's such bullshit. All my life anytime blood is taken they ask me about it like I'm supposed to be doing something.
Eh... I took iron for a while.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 10:19 AM
Ah! Perhaps he's listening. I suggest that chronic virginity correlates to proximity to MK. Maybe should try living in Manchester. :P
Oh I'll have to tell my mom. She's obsessed with his TV show.
Posted by: Ewan R
|
August 24, 2010 10:21 AM
If I remember right I'm O pos, for all the good it does - my blood is unwanted on grounds of autoimmune awesomeness - shame as donation would be insanely easy now - the donation wagon stops directly below my office - I could just open a vein, open the window, and spray it into a bucket.
In unrelated news - discovered yesterday that my son to be is already an overachiever - weighing in at 8lbs despite only being 35 weeks along (his head measures at 41 weeks, his abdomen at 39, and his legs were out of the normal range by so much that they didn't give a number on the ultrasound)
I'm glad to live in the modern age where this is relatively easily dealt with by highly trained doctors.
I'm assuming he takes after his mother in terms of overachieving - a high school teacher once said of me "if he were any more laid back he'd be horizontal" - a maxim by which I attempt to live to this day.
Posted by: Lynna, OM
|
August 24, 2010 10:23 AM
Ah, yes, cursing. One of the mormon members of Great Rift Writers told me that if I "dropped the F bomb" in her house, I had to put $5 in the Swearing Jar. I don't have that much fucking money.
My brother's once-upon-a-time mormon girlfriend told me that saying "that word" [meaning, "goddamn"] was an insult to her Heavenly Father. [cue tears springing to eyes, and cue chin rising to indicate a goddamn intolerable shitload of self righteousness]
This will be a a repeat for some who have heard the tale before, but I was told while still in college that "there's nothing worse than a foul-mouthed woman." And so began my lifelong career as a foul-mouthed woman, as the pinnacle of evil.
From fellow judges of a writing competition: "Cursing coarsens the language and creates an atmosphere unsuitable for younger writers." "It shows a lack of creativity." [Oh, would that I had the Stephen Fry video then!] Swag-bellied, mewling, clay-brained, lace-trimmed, complacent fuckless harpies.
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 24, 2010 10:25 AM
Ol Greg: Do you know the reason for your anemia? That could be a more serious threat to your health than the anemia per se...iron deficiency, for example, can mean a GI or GU cancer. Please get it checked out if you haven't already.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 10:25 AM
Those first two sentences are the most egregiously stupid straw-manning of Darwin I have ever seen. And the final sentence, a quote from Stearns, is just exactly spot on what I was thinking throughout. Now I'll have to track down the original to find out if it's just the usual dumbass press release/reporter problem or if the actual study is really that stupid.
So about the Rh blood factor.
What always gets lost in these immunological discussions is that the Rh+ protein has a physiological function-it's not just an 'antigen'. According to 'kipedia, its sequence suggests it is an ion channel or pump (possibly for NH3- or (they must mean) HCO3-).
So the Rh-negative phenotype does involve a loss of (largely unknown) function (of some kind). Apparently its loss is largely compensatable physiologically.
Importantly, that protein may serve as part of the mechanism for certain parasite infections. That 'kipedia article goes on to discuss a possible advantage for Rh- and heterozygotes vs. toxoplasmosis infection; and here is another hypothesis (rather quaintly translated from the Italian) involving another malaria-like blood parasite.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 10:28 AM
Here's the only possibly stupid thing in the original study's abstract:
which is a pretty obvious false dichotomy to me.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 10:34 AM
oo, I think that one actually is frowned on around here.
That'll be $5 in the beer-&-bacon-fund Casual Misogyny
VatJar, please.Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 10:37 AM
Smug atheism goes against the spirit of science
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 24, 2010 10:37 AM
I've tried donating blood twice in my life. The first time I got rejected because I'd been to Costa Rica over spring break and was thus at risk for having gotten malaria. The second time my iron levels were too low. That time I swore silently as I left, although every time I've told the story since, I've always added, "Well bloody fucking hell, what next, they'll tell me I can't donate because my iron levels are too high? I can't fucking get a break!"
Also, I don't know my blood type, so I'm doing my best to not get into a situation where that knowledge will be very necessary.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 10:41 AM
Menyambel, #660, previous incarnation. Re: Beer
Correct. Beer is a small seaside town in East Devon:
http://www.devonretreat.com/communities/0/004/006/700/180/images/4529583059.gif
It is on the Heritage/"Jurassic" Coast and within the range of Professor Ian West:
http://www.soton.ac.uk/~imw/jpg-Beer/6BR-Beer-Seaton-general.jpg
Close to Beer the coastline is Triassic clastic rock (mudstone, sandstone etc.). Beer itself stands on Cretaceous rock faulted into the Triassic sequence. At beach level (or a little below) the rock is Lower Greensand, overlain with a sequence of chalk strata, up to the Upper Chalk. Nowhere in the UK is the K/T or K/Pg boundary exposed.
Posted by: Lynna, OM
|
August 24, 2010 10:42 AM
From Rorschach's link @39:
Only half of us?I put the [sic] in so I could be counted among the dicks.
Now, to imagining PZ reining us in...
As for "harpies" being frowned upon, yes you are quite right. But the ladies of such dimity convictions were the real thing, not a general category of women, but real life religious harpies. I take refuge in limiting the description to two harpies.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 10:44 AM
FUCK!
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 10:45 AM
Hey RTL, this clueless American Idiot wants to know what you hate about that place so much? Bad memories, evil corruption, did they burn down a better city to build it? I googled it but didn't see anything interesting. Looks, frankly, like a boring suburban city or maybe a Jersey City to NYC kind of thing?
Not really. But I've had a problem with anemia for most of my life, including childhood.
Posted by: rozmit0
|
August 24, 2010 10:45 AM
PZ - We love you. Wishing you morphine as needed.
Posted by: sj3364
|
August 24, 2010 10:50 AM
Best wishes for a full and fast recovery.
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 24, 2010 10:50 AM
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 24, 2010 10:51 AM
"Hah!" I say, and "Pish-tosh!"
I can reflect on the nature of Klingon nose ridges with the best-educated Klingon-study-person in the world. I can contemplate the universes held within a single atom. I can ponder the wispiest of wisps, the largest and most perfect being that can be, the Tolkienest of elves or hobbits or other such nonsuch.
And in the end, I have meditated upon nothing of consequence outside my own brain.
And so I ask in my smuggiest of atheist voices (I have several, including Donald Duck, which is a party favorite among 5-year-olds), "Why do we have to take metaphysics seriously, if all it's going to do is ruminate on fantasy?"
"Gah," I say, and "Fuck you, you self-satisfied navel-gazing twit."
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkqQXrl7yEsdEmCGIJY6e4vK85szmL2lf8
|
August 24, 2010 10:52 AM
Off topic but maybe it's funny. Hope Prof.Myers gets to see it.
http://i166.photobucket.com/albums/u100/sbl1952/bba526b8.jpg
Posted by: Peter Henderson
|
August 24, 2010 10:55 AM
Hope all goes well P.Z.
If it's any comfort my dad had a tripple by-pass 4 years ago and he's never looked back. He's now 80.
I know what heavy surgery is like too. I've ulerative colitis with a permanent ileostomy and I've more to come as well.
All the best for today.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 10:55 AM
Ol'Greg:
I not only don't want to know, I don't care. All RTL ever does is complain. About everything. As for MK, one of the most talented photographers I've ever had the privilege to know is from MK and the surreal concrete cows are...well, surreal.
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 24, 2010 10:55 AM
Not really. But I've had a problem with anemia for most of my life, including childhood.
My through the intertubes guess would be some sort of thalassemia, but you should probably get it checked out sometime to be sure. (Bearing in mind that this is free advice: worth every penny you pay for it.)
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 10:56 AM
Well I kind of hate it when predatory types gather round like hungry vultures looking to lap up another one in a moment of weakness. And when I'm in a moment of crisis a debate is not what I'm interested in. Hell, I'm not often interested in one when I feel great.
When I'm feeling stressed the last thing I want to do is waste time with non-productive things.
I won't be in a mood to talk about sports either.
Posted by: Lynna, OM
|
August 24, 2010 10:57 AM
Jesus, Caine, did you have to do that? The whole damned thing was painful, but the "renouncing the will to know" paragraph made me bite my tongue. I think there should be a tax on "metaphysical speculation."Posted by: CaptTu
|
August 24, 2010 10:58 AM
That Mitchell and Webb Look: Homeopathic A&E
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 10:59 AM
Lynna:
Yeah, I saw that. It seems Laden has found his niche, being the gossiphole of sciblogs.
Nigel:
You and me both, my smuggy brother.
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 24, 2010 11:01 AM
Oh my heavens! Milton Keynes? Summer of 1989 or the winter of 1988? Walton, please tell me your Mother's name is not Stella, or Anne, or Barbara.
Communal cursing? Gracious, I will have to buy some new pearls. Tabernac!
I have O- blood. Love to give, but having had hepatitis and malaria, they do not want it.
On the up side, optometrist was yesterday and eyes are in great shape. Only a minor change in the Rx and no need to even get new glasses until the current ones break or I get tired of them. Dr. today for a pre-operation physical and she thinks I am doing well. Heart and lungs good (going to ecig helped that), chemistry all nominal, cleared for surgery. Dematalogist coming up next week to check for more skin cancer, but she thinks that sucker is whipped for now. Looks like I got PZ's good luck by accident.
Posted by: Ewan R
|
August 24, 2010 11:01 AM
Thankfully they work it out pretty damn fast should the situation arise - and in the meantime you get to be thankful for all the O neg CMV negs out there (At least in the UK I believe that's what goes to unknowns - was always on standing order for ambulances and whatnot)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 11:06 AM
Lynna:
Me too. Actually, it caused some thoughts about being able to reach through the interether with a clue by four.
That's a damn good idea.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 11:06 AM
you gotta watch for the sidekick over there
Posted by: Lynna, OM
|
August 24, 2010 11:07 AM
JeffreyD, glad to hear your good news re health and skin.
Here's the Moment of Mormon Madness for the day: "Breaking news, BYU — you're delusional" -- this is the header for a story in the Denver Post.
Excerpt:
Posted by: recovering catholic
|
August 24, 2010 11:09 AM
The little puppy with the heart brought me to tears and made me think of the stories you've told about how you and Mary met, PZ, and how happy you've been together since then.
You will have many more decades to enjoy together! Thinking about you both with fondness.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 11:10 AM
Jeffrey:
You've been overdue in the luck department, good to see the Lady finally delivered for you.
Posted by: Dude... Real Men Watch Ponies!
|
August 24, 2010 11:14 AM
Thou on a practical side of things, how would you apply that tax? Furthermore, without violating the constitution.Posted by: The Countess
|
August 24, 2010 11:17 AM
Great video PZ. We'll drive up comments so you'll never catch up byt the time you wake up.
It sounds less like cursing and more like the art of name-calling. I learned this art at a young age when I was 12 and called a girl in class who bullied me relentlessly a "horsey petunia". It was such a ridiculous insult (I read in a book) that the teacher immediately picked up on it and called the bully by that name. It caught on. The class started doing it. For a short period of time, I was considered cool because I outsmarted a the number 1 class bully.
I've since loved name calling, cursing, and insults. When I did family law work I called father's rights activists "flukeworms" because they are slimy bloodsuckers who have no spines. Still applies. ;)
Get better PZ!
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 11:20 AM
UberFubar:
A good start would be taking tax exemption away from all religions and their organizations. You want to navel gaze, fine. You don't get a reward for it.
Posted by: Dave A
|
August 24, 2010 11:20 AM
Don't worry about the small shit. This will pass,and you will be even better. Know this P.Z, you are loved by thousands. What a privilage it is to know you even if it is only by way of Pharyngula.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 24, 2010 11:22 AM
"The will to know." Yeah. As if his metaphysical playtime had anything to do with knowledge. As if there is an epistemology that can glean anything useful from the supposedly-enlightened questions he was asking.
I have not renounced the will to know. I have renounced muddling knowledge with idle flights of fantasy.
Posted by: Susan
|
August 24, 2010 11:23 AM
The use of Randy Newman's "Shame" as the framing music for that video was particularly inspired. Kudos to the editor(s)! There's not a good YouTube video of Randy performing it, or I'd post a link.
I'm banned for catching mononucleosis in the 70's. Man. Who didn't?!
Best wishes, PZ. I hope you're up and grumpy in no time.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 24, 2010 11:27 AM
I've only donated blood once. I lied about my weight so I could do it. I was 108 lbs, which I figured was close enough. I figured wrong (either that, or my blood sugar issues kicked my ass). I fainted just as the phone rang, so there was no one around to catch me. I split my eyebrow open on the tile and bled even more. I almost got to get free stitches, but I come from a mutant family with Wolverine-like healing properties, and though they were certain at the blood donation center I'd need the stitches, by the time I got to the (very handsome) doctor's office, it was neatly closed up. I thought about slipping in the shower so I could see the doc again, but decided worsening the scar wasn't worth flirting (especially when I was a little loopy from the blood donation).
My blood type is A+. I found that out in college. I asked Mom what her blood type was. She said O+. I asked her what Dad's was. She said B+. I informed her that that wasn't really possible. He didn't know for sure, but he said B+ as well. My sibs are all O+ (or didn't know). Now, I could've just written this off as neither of them remembering, which is what I mostly did, but the thing is that my entire life people have made the stupid milkman joke because I look nothing like anyone else in my family. I'm half the size of my sibs, and both parents and all sibs have really dark hair and dark brown eyes. I'm the redheaded, blue-eyed, tiny one (I'm not actually tiny--just compared to them). So, it sort of stuck in my mind as a little bit of a mystery that I wasn't really sure I wanted to solve.
Fast forward 5 years, and Dad goes into the hospital for the last time. His blood pressure had been dangerously low, and he needed a transfusion. They tested his blood type and solved the mystery. Turns out Mom was half-right, which made her all the way wrong. He was AB+. It doesn't prove that there was no hanky-panky surrounding my conception, but it squashed any doubts I had. It's a little thing, because as I said, I didn't really think there was funny business going on, but it was really nice to put it to rest.
Posted by: ouranosaurus
|
August 24, 2010 11:29 AM
Good luck and get well.
(Has nothing witty to add. Slinks away in shame.)
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 24, 2010 11:36 AM
You know it's true.Posted by: Randomfactor
|
August 24, 2010 11:36 AM
A+ here, although I'm given to understand that's not worth much in the heirarchy. No, I am *NOT* doing pheresis. One needle good, two needle bad.
Heck, half the time they don't want my blood due to hypertension issues. You'd think it would be an *ADVANTAGE* that I can fill the bag from across the room...
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 11:39 AM
Susan:
No kidding. I had a bout in the '70s m'self.
Posted by: Ribozyme
|
August 24, 2010 11:41 AM
Wishing you from Mexico the best of recoveries and as little pain as possible. If prayers were good for something, I would be praying for you right now. You better get well, you hear me! My life just wouldn't be the same without your daily musings and, besides, the world needs more people like you, not less.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 11:42 AM
Nigel:
Excellently stated. Wouldn't get anywhere with meta-idjit though. We'd all be consigned to smug status unless we're willing to sit around pondering the fit of puddles in potholes.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 24, 2010 11:46 AM
That's perfectly OK with me. Call me Captain Smug of the Smugetty-Smug Division. I specialize in smug! Only the finest grade-A smug from me.
Would you like your order of smug with a side of crisp-fried smug? I mean, who wouldn't?!
Posted by: Dude... Real Men Watch Ponies!
|
August 24, 2010 11:50 AM
Meh, being smug is too tiring.
Best is being completely apathetic.
Good for the blood pressure.
My brother calls it "meh."
Posted by: Ring Tailed Lemurian
|
August 24, 2010 11:50 AM
Read the (lengthy, sorry) article I linked to, or read this repost of the link :)
Oi! I'd like to complain about that.A - Untrue. I'll happily admit I'm a cynical old curmudgeon, and a bit bi-polar and either totally detest something, or love it to death, but there's lots I (over)enthuse about.
B - So what if I did/do anyway? 95% of everything is shit :)
C) - Don't read me, or killfile me.
D) - Aww, I quite like you, and always read your posts, time permitting.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 11:50 AM
Coincidentally, I've just been working on my pilot for a retro muscle-car cop show featuring Jim "Mullet" Magnet, Tulsa PD.
Ad copy: "MAGNET! How does he work?!"
He refers to his '85 IROC as "Roxie" and it's treated as a character.
That's pretty much as far as I've gotten. I guess he'll need a sidekick...
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 11:51 AM
I'm another whose (A+) blood is unwanted - in my case because of medication for hypertension. A few years ago, the NHS decided to allow the hypertension drugs I'd just been switched from, but still don't allow those I've switched to. Mind you, if I'd been honest even before I was put on medication, they would have refused my blood, because an ex-partner lived in Africa - the fact that it was years ago, and I was still in touch with her and knew she was well, notwithstanding. Mrs. KG gets refused half the time for having too low an iron level, or just having been to the dentist, or having recently taken an aspirin... but they are always complaining about a shortage of blood!
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 11:53 AM
got to keep those Precious Bodily Fluids pure
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 11:53 AM
This is an introduction to the Jurassic Coast to provide background to a number of posts to follow.
The so-called Jurassic Coast is the first natural World Heritage Site in England. This places it on a par with the Grand Canyon and the Great Barrier Reef. It stretches for 85 miles along the coast from East Devon to Old Harry rocks in East Dorset.
It is "so-called" because the site includes Triassic rocks in the West and Cretaceous rocks along most of the coast, if not at beach level then in the cliffs. A brief summary (1.63 Mb pdf) is available at:
http://www.jurassiccoast.com/downloads/jurassic_coast_miniguide.pdf
As ever, it is Profeoor* Ian West's great site that gives the most information about the geology of the whole of the coast, along with excellent annotated photographs:
http://www.soton.ac.uk/~imw/
Despite being retired from Southampton University, Prof West continues to improve and expand the site on a daily basis with the help of his wife and family.
As a side issue, Professor West is probably everyone's idea of the mad scientist/geologist:
http://www.soton.ac.uk/~imw/jpg-Ian-West/Ian-West-2005.jpg
In his favour he is well respected (loved might not be too strong although not to the level of Ray Bradbury, it would appear). He has specialised on the Heritage Coast and on evaporite rock formation in geological times and the present.
Because of hid depth of knowledge and understanding (driven by his love for the area), I will refer frequently to Ian West's site for explanations and photographs.
^ Professor. The term, 'Professor' in the UK is used in 2 ways: He could be a Head of Department; not just a tenured staff member. Alternatively, certain Professorships are awarded to individuals in recognition of their major contribution in a field but without the need for managerial involvement and usually a minimal amount of teaching.
Posted by: Randomfactor
|
August 24, 2010 11:53 AM
I'm *HOPING* to have a bout with mono in my 70's.
Oh, in *THE* 70's?
Never mind.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 11:53 AM
Really? It doesn't seem that way to me? But maybe I don't notice things.
Hehe... well if we're basing opinions on people we know from there then MK must be almost as cool as Dallas :P
lol
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 11:56 AM
Nigel:
Oh yes. Personally, my gloat is full of smug. Or my smug is full of gloat.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 11:56 AM
This is an introduction to the Jurassic Coast to provide background to a number of posts to follow.
The so-called Jurassic Coast is the first natural World Heritage Site in England. This places it on a par with the Grand Canyon and the Great Barrier Reef. It stretches for 85 miles along the coast from East Devon to Old Harry rocks in East Dorset.
It is "so-called" because the site includes Triassic rocks in the West and Cretaceous rocks along most of the coast, if not at beach level then in the cliffs. A brief summary (1.63 Mb pdf) is available at:
http://www.jurassiccoast.com/downloads/jurassic_coast_miniguide.pdf
As ever, it is Profeoor* Ian West's great site that gives the most information about the geology of the whole of the coast, along with excellent annotated photographs:
http://www.soton.ac.uk/~imw/
Despite being retired from Southampton University, Prof West continues to improve and expand the site on a daily basis with the help of his wife and family.
As a side issue, Professor West is probably everyone's idea of the mad scientist/geologist:
http://www.soton.ac.uk/~imw/jpg-Ian-West/Ian-West-2005.jpg
In his favour he is well respected (loved might not be too strong although not to the level of Ray Bradbury, it would appear). He has specialised on the Heritage Coast and on evaporite rock formation in geological times and the present.
Because of hid depth of knowledge and understanding (driven by his love for the area), I will refer frequently to Ian West's site for explanations and photographs.
^ Professor. The term, 'Professor' in the UK is used in 2 ways: He could be a Head of Department; not just a tenured staff member. Alternatively, certain Professorships are awarded to individuals in recognition of their major contribution in a field but without the need for managerial involvement and usually a minimal amount of teaching.
Posted by: Hurin, Nattering Nabob of Negativism.
|
August 24, 2010 11:56 AM
Good luck and stay strong. Remember: Lord Cthulhu eats the strong ones first.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 11:58 AM
There is. It is called delusional thinking, or mental masturbation. It's also why when idjits get worked up about metaphysical ways on knowing, I get a death grip on my wallet with one hand, and make sure my brains don't fall out with the other. Too late for the metaphysical woomeisters, as their rationality flew the coop when metaphysics became more important than reality.Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 12:00 PM
Ol'Greg:
:D :D Nah, I don't know much about MK, just that it's not worth going on and on and on and on and on about.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 24, 2010 12:01 PM
Tulsa PD. Grrrrr. I hate those guys. They gave me a ticket for a barely expired tag less than a mile from my home after asking me if I'd recently moved and receiving confirmation on the spot (via mail in my passenger seat) that I had. He couldn't get me on anything else because I'm the world's
most boringsafest fucking driver. Fuck. Tulsa. PD.Your pilot sounds like Nightrider, but in a Wal-Mart parking lot.
Posted by: lose_the_woo
|
August 24, 2010 12:01 PM
A fucking swearing thread PZ?! You leave us with a goddamn swearing thread? Well piss. That's just fucking rich. How 'bout this - get your ass back to slaggging on this blog with something better than a frggin' thread about foul-mouthed fulminations. Jebus fucking christ.
Feel better PZ. Best wishes to you, your wife, and family. We wait patiently. May the great skill of the doctors and good luck be with you.
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 24, 2010 12:03 PM
The whole assumption that you're somehow 'smug' if you merely point out the deeply loopy actually are, well, deeply loopy, has always struck me as a bit self-inflating on the part of those so assuming, really...
As in: what, you figure it must necessarily make me so full of myself to imagine myself less deluded than you? Like I'd figure this for some kind of crowning achievement?
As if. Crowing over such standing would be roughly equal to saying: 'Yes, I am somewhat less physically repulsive to the average person than Jabba the Hut. Yeah, baby! I win!' Similarly: recognizing an incredibly silly superstition for what it is just doesn't make you Mensa, material, y'know?
So again: I get to thinking there's a certain self-regard about it. The zealot declaring: man, you think you're smarter than me? How full of yerself can you get?
So, kid, let's put this in perspective: there's rocks that are smarter than you. Ain't no thang.
(/Me, playin' smug jiu jitsu.)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 12:04 PM
RTL:
Oh, I like you too, I just prefer you when you aren't in 'bitch about everything' mode. ;)
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 12:06 PM
oh but see Roxie is treated as a character, but is not one. No bullshit quantum magical AI electronics. Stock all the way, and fucked-up paint. In fact, I think I'll give her a bum electrical system just to press the point.
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 12:08 PM
- Ol'GregYou've got part of it: it is a boring suburban city - they are not so common in the UK as in the US. It was built on the assumption of 95% car ownership, and I didn't have one. It was criss-crossed by long, straight, flat roads that all look the same, so it was easy to get lost. It had something called an "infrastructure park". It was run by the MKDC - the Milton Keynes Development Corporation - not an elected council. The MKDC had caused to be erected drab estates with daft things like flat roofs, and heating elements embedded in the ceilings (apparently, the architect didn't know about rain, or that heat rises). It may have improved since I last visited, around 30 years ago, I suppose.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 24, 2010 12:09 PM
AJ Milne, OM:
Agnostic Mountain Gospel Choir's Ten Thousand arrived on Friday. I've been listening to it since.
Thanks for the most excellent suggestion.
Posted by: Ewan R
|
August 24, 2010 12:09 PM
KG:-
Meh, don't believe 'em! (well, do, as the odd time there isn't enough is way worse than having to chuck blood on occasion) I worked for the NBS for 6 months, the only time blood was in a short supply was directly following the London bombings - we had to shift a lot of blood around the country quickly (I think in preparation for more attacks - perhaps it's just the NE of England that has an abundance of blood), most the time we had two massive walk in fridges full of blood (one fridge for CMV+ one for CMV-) A massive walk in freezer full of fresh frozen plasma and a couple of 36 degree shakers of platelets - if anything people should donate regularly just to keep the platelet supply good - iirc red blood cells have a shelf life of about a month, ffp is good for something like a year, but platelets are only good for a week or so. Oh and whole blood is fuggin disgusting - at 4C all the fat coagulates out and is totally vomit inducing.
Posted by: dnebdal.myopenid.com
|
August 24, 2010 12:13 PM
I seem to remember that Good Omens has some stings against Milton Keynes,too - it seems to be a popular target. Being a 60s planned city is probably not a good start, but having never been there I can't say too much about it.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 12:15 PM
oo oo oo I know:
The car's bum electrical system causes the radio to cut in unpredictably with not-really-random-seeming but often-extremely-oblique commentary via song lyrics and talk-radio fragments.
An ostensibly stochastic synchronicity sidekick.
And of course the occasional failure of the car to start can offer many a fraught moment while we cut to commercial.
ok. Now about the quirkily adorable and whipsmart girlfriend-or-is-she?
single mom, obv (a funny kid or 2 is always good for ratings)
Trailer park (sorry, this is TV)
Good-for-nothing comic-relief ex-husband
cocktail waitress or is that OTT?
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 24, 2010 12:15 PM
Awesome! Glad it pleased.
(/Speaking of... Really should put that on now... Been a bit.)
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 12:16 PM
"Share and Enjoy" - Chalk Edition, Part 1.
The paper I want to talk about, or use to lead into further thoughts, goes by the catchy title:
Chalk and “Upper Cretaceous” Deposits are Part of the Noachian Flood
(The scare quotes are because of the unwillingness of the author (and many, but not all, YEC geologists) to accept the scientific nomenclature because they are concerned about the implications it carries with it.)
The paper is available on the Internet (a definite plus in my mind - at least we can get hold of the technical basis of their approach):
http://www.answersingenesis.org/contents/379/arj/v2/Chalk_Part_of_Flood.pdf
This is the pdf version (2.58 Mb) of an article in Answers Research Journal 2 (2009): 29–51. This, in turn, is described as:
This would appear to be the apex of YEC scientific reporting. The Call for Papers starts with:
The author is John D. Matthews. We know nothing about him except that he lives local to the Jurassic Coast in Dorset. Is he a professional geologist? Does he belong to a professional or senior amateur society? Is this paper a revised version of a project required to earn a qualification?
The author makes no statement that he has discussed the contents with anyone and no acknowledgements to others. All that we know is that it is "Cutting-edge creation research" and has been "peer-reviewed"
I'll leave those who are interested to flick through the paper if you wish. My suggestion is that you don't waste too much time on a detailed study unless the thought of studying "cutting-edge", "peer-reviewed" YEC research appeals to you. And, oh yes, I'd almost forgotten, it is published and presumably endorsed by that influential scientific organisation, Answers in Genesis.
More to follow ...
Footnote:
Since chalk is rare in the US it might help if I explain what it is. Chalk is a pure and comparatively soft form of limestone laid down in the Cretaceous in England and across mush of NW Europe. In England it is divided into the Lower, Middle and Upper Chalk and these are the youngest rocks exposed in the Cretaceous. As noted before, the K/T (or K/Pg) boundary ("Death of Dinosaurs") is not present in England.
Chalk is formed from the accumulation of microscopic fragments of calcareous algae called coccoliths. These form a significant proportion of modern deep-water carbonate oozes.
"The Chalk" is a term used in England for the formations made out of this soft white limestone.
Blackboard chalk is made from calcium sulfate rather than calcium carbonate.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 24, 2010 12:18 PM
Emergency room PA. That'd give it an element of hospital drama.
And Roxie has to pop her brake at least once, rolling downhill and slamming into the villian, who has Mullet at gunpoint.
Posted by: Ing: PhD Trollologist
|
August 24, 2010 12:19 PM
Get better....damn it
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 12:21 PM
Captain Smug! Love it.
Sven:
Please, for once, go against type. No sprogs, give her a weapon she's terribly fond of and has named or something.
Posted by: Ring Tailed Lemurian
|
August 24, 2010 12:21 PM
So Ayatollah Caine's declaring a fatwah on running themes/jokes* in the Undying Thread?
* in this case, a self-deprecating "joke" that is partly directed at myself, and a football fan's ludicrously obsessive loyalty to his/her club.
"Never forget. Never forgive".
;)
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 12:24 PM
What was there before they built MK? Anything interesting?
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 12:24 PM
RTL:
I'm an ayatollah now? Oh, why not, I seem to be every other type of evil. As for your running jokes, run on, my man. I'm done, just had to do a bit of bitchin' myself, it's out of the system now. ;)
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 12:26 PM
Indeed. I tried to read but my eyes glazed over. Apparently the only things more incomprehensible than sports from my country are sports from other countries.
Posted by: Pareidolius
|
August 24, 2010 12:30 PM
That's some thrilling invective. There's a reason for that OM Lynna.
Countess, children are such dicks. I grew up with Kernan for a first name. You can imagine the ration of non-creative shit I got called for not being named John or Bruce.
I'm totally stealing Horsey Petunia, it's quite Shakespearean for grade school . . . "away, thou clodweasel, thou Horsey Petunia! Thy presence doth offend the very air in which we dwell."
Now Willie-the-Shake, he could write a get well card . . .
Gentle P-Zed, if good-will doth in thy bosom the bloom of health most manifest, then surely is thy speedy return, and thus, thy myriad minion's dearest desire assured.
Too much Darjeeling this morning . . .
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 24, 2010 12:30 PM
I'm trying to analyse just what it is about "Fistfull of Glitter" that makes it so puke-worthy to my ears, from the first portentious-sounding piano chords, through the "you call me sugar" garbage, and right up to the end. *gag. retch*
I'm curious about Milton Keynes, as well. I first became aware of its existence via mention in Good Omens, where it says that neither Aziraphale or Crowley were responsible for it, but each reported it as a success, which suggests that it contains both awfulness and awesomeness; then, the concrete cows wafted past my awareness courtesy of Charles Stross' The Concrete Jungle. So...what, exactly, is the deal?
JeffreyD, glad to hear that your hide is cancer-free. :)
My blood is A+ and packed with additives and preservatives. Yummy!
This. D&D isn't Real Life, and neither are fuzzy religions and religion-substitutes.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 12:33 PM
Lynna
I haven't forgotten your message in the last incarnation about your owh trip but I would like to get my current sub-thread sorted and then I'll enjoy your beautiful photos!
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 12:35 PM
cicely:
Those have to be seen. They are...something. Really something. They don't resemble cows at all, except for the black & white paint job. I never did figure out what they do resemble.
Posted by: AlisonS
|
August 24, 2010 12:35 PM
Bring on the fucking drugs!! Just make sure not to swear directly at the nurses.
How can one drive without a few, or maybe a lot, of very blue words? Or, for that matter, deal with fucking idiots?
I'm A+ too and can't give blood. Not because I have any dread condition but because my veins collapse around the needle and nothing but drips come out. And it hurts like hell.
Rest, relax and get well bloody soon.
Posted by: robert.hak
|
August 24, 2010 12:36 PM
Good luck PZ!
My father went in for a quad by-pass a bit over a year ago. If you're in for anything similar, the recovery time is stunningly quick.
Keep the chin up and don't let the kooks in clothes get to you!
Posted by: dnebdal.myopenid.com
|
August 24, 2010 12:36 PM
cicely:
I thought both sides reported is as done by the other side, which would be far fainter praise?
Hm, I'd forgotten that Stross story for a moment - odd, since it's a good one.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 12:37 PM
*googles the cows*
Wow. That was not what I was expecting.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 12:37 PM
#131 & 135
Sorry about the double post. Once was more than enough!
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 24, 2010 12:42 PM
And their heirs and assigns. Sideways with a bazooka.
Twice.
I just google-imaged the cows, and I gotta say, I'm underwhelmed.
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 12:42 PM
Small towns, villages, and fields. To be fair, the towns and villages were not bulldozed. It was planned as a "New city" mainly for people previously in London slums, but was actually occupied mostly by middle-class families, including many commuters to London and Birmingham.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 24, 2010 12:47 PM
There are machines that do it with only one needle; my Red Cross location has both and you can choose which you want. Two is a pain for not being able to use your arms, but the one isn't a piece of cake either; what it does is switch back and forth every two minutes or so, and there's a bit of a, well, lurching feeling in one's arm every time it switches to pumping it back in that is a bit to get used to.
That said, they treat you like gold, and it's kind of nice to feel important for a little while. And if you go to try it, take 4 or 6 Tums right as you walk in the door. Really. Do it. Not for the queasy feeling, but to ward off the calcium depletion that will make you feel freezing cold and then you pass out. But the nurses, they're good at catching that. I used to do platelet donations regularly, but then my schedule got such that the three hours or so the whole enterprise takes got to be too much, and I've never gotten back into it. I should.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 24, 2010 12:51 PM
Oh great. I had "lurching" all italicized like the word itself was physically lurching, and was all proud of myself for being clever, and then I botched the tags.
*mutter*
Posted by: Stephen Wells
|
August 24, 2010 12:54 PM
@Alan: please, please can we namecheck Huxley's "On a piece of chalk"? Fantastic takedown of creationism from the mid-19th century.
Posted by: GordonOKC
|
August 24, 2010 12:57 PM
In the same tone used by Daniel Dennett may I say "Thank Goodness" you are receiving proper evidenced based care by a qualified team of health care professionals. I also hope you and your family find comfort in knowing there are thousands of people anxiously waiting and hoping for your complete recovery not to mention the countless numbers of cephalopods. May this procedure ensure many more years of PZ Myers.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 1:00 PM
#74 Ring Tailed Lemurian
Hadn't thought of that!
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 1:01 PM
PZ Status Update.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 1:13 PM
Short PZ update. New stent and doing well. Scheduled to go home tomorrow. And will be able to start torturing his students in due course. *Applause*
Posted by: onkundig
|
August 24, 2010 1:17 PM
Caine @ 153
A Callahan full-bore auto-lock. Customized trigger, double cartridge thorough gauge
Let's call her Vera.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 1:23 PM
Onkundig, Vera works for me.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 24, 2010 1:26 PM
Sven
I like how Roxie has that everycar fallibility that makes her more approachable to the average viewer.
On the gf:
Can't do the cocktail waitress thing--definitely OTT.
Can't do PA thing--there's already a cop show with a pseudo-girlfriend who's a PA (it may be RN or CNP, but I think she's a PA).
Can't do the gf with a love of weapons, as I think Burn Notice covers that pretty effectively.
The only solution is to make Magnet a woman, and give her a pseudo-boyfriend who's a farmer or meth cooker (depending on what kind of conflict you want Magnet to face).
What? Women can have mullets, too.
cicely
Was that just a show of support, or have you had personal experience with TPD?
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 24, 2010 1:26 PM
I see what you did there.
You still can't trade it for my wife.
Posted by: Steve LaBonne
|
August 24, 2010 1:29 PM
Good news re PZ! Stents seem to be popular again lately- a friend of my ex's just got 5. And clearly the short recovery time is a big plus. But I thought the data showed they didn't increase survival as much as a bypass, nor any better then purely medical treatment? Am I out of date on that?
Posted by: Truckle
|
August 24, 2010 1:31 PM
Is this possibly worse than the cases of Paedophile priests?
link
I mean seriously, this is horrendous, and involved direct collusion from the UK government to allow a priest who was involved in the killing 9 people including children to be shuffled out of view across the border...
I have never been more disgusted with my own government. This is all over the news right now and so it should be.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 1:31 PM
On second thought, Onkundig, maybe that should be Vera Jayne. ;)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 1:35 PM
Jules:
Woman with a love of a particular weapon works fine, it's nowhere near as done as woman with sprogs. Think Aeryn Sun...
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 24, 2010 1:37 PM
Fair enough. Can we still have Magnet be a woman (which is my primary goal)? White trash lesbian love rarely gets much play either.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 24, 2010 1:41 PM
Jules:
Personal experience, though years back; reinforced by more recent anecdata from friends and relatives, though.
Posted by: ophelia.benson
|
August 24, 2010 1:43 PM
Yay! Just a stent. Less boredom, less wasted time, less all around tsuris.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 1:44 PM
Jules:
Yes and yes. And another yes.
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkqQXrl7yEsdEmCGIJY6e4vK85szmL2lf8
|
August 24, 2010 1:45 PM
"Father Jack" speaks...
http://my.telegraph.co.uk/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/user/neanderthaler/20080617163547.jpg
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 1:48 PM
Ophelia:
Nice word, that.
Posted by: mikefoxtrothow
|
August 24, 2010 1:48 PM
Sort of wandering from topic, but if the experiences of various family members is typical, even if everything goes perfectly for PZ in hospital.
The bastards will have stolen his beard before he gets out, in fact before surgery.
PZ will be beardless, for possibly the first time since puberty. (OK, i am guessing on that last part, based on my own experiences with facial hair.)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 1:52 PM
mikefoxtrothow:
PZ had a stent installed this morning. Even if he did lose the facial hair, it's a small price for a none exploding heart.
Posted by: Joffan
|
August 24, 2010 1:52 PM
yahoo_rndm @34
"You better fucking get better fast!"
NOnononono. Fuck no. Fucking get it right:
"You fucking better get better fucking fast!" (Adding "you feeble fucker" is optional.)
I'm bloody sure though that the bastard sentiment was fucking appreciated.
Posted by: eetacs
|
August 24, 2010 2:04 PM
I'd also like to de-lurk in order to say that this sucks and wish PZ all the best - may you dreams be filled with Cephalopoda.
Until next time, fuck a Jesus.
Posted by: blf
|
August 24, 2010 2:10 PM
Spherical cows by someone who didn't get the joke.
Posted by: irenedelse
|
August 24, 2010 2:14 PM
Nerd of Redhead:
Thanks for the update. And hooray for science! A good medical team beats prayer every time!
Unless, of course, it was the pictures of puppies >^.^
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 2:16 PM
Yay! Good news about both PZ and JeffreyD!
Posted by: Marie the Bookwyrm
|
August 24, 2010 2:16 PM
Glad to hear you get to go home tomorrow PZ. (In case somebody's reading The Thread to you.)
Just a word of warning. During your recovery, you may get the feeling that Somebody Up Above is keeping an eye on you. The fact is, I burned a catnip square on my alter to Ceiling Cat. So...He's going to be watching. :)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 2:25 PM
I don't know, blf. They're closer to deflated cows. Well, semi-deflated cows, with distortions which look like they were done by a child attempting to imitate Dali. Or somethin'.
Posted by: Dania
|
August 24, 2010 2:27 PM
Seconded!
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 24, 2010 2:28 PM
They lopped them off the classical statuary, lest anyone be exposed to pron.
Blood donation - I rate too low on iron to give to anyone else, and the only time I gave an autologous donation for my own surgery, the surgery had to be cancelled because I failed the pre-op; apparently, I barely produce enough red blood cells to live. When the hospital later tried to give me a transfusion, I promptly developped a high fever. After much lab work it was determined that my blood "contained undeterminable antigens making it hostile to transfusions". I fucking told you I was from another planet.
Posted by: mikefoxtrothow
|
August 24, 2010 2:29 PM
Caine @191 An acceptable price, possibly not a small one. (Though this is from someone who has trouble recognizing myself in the mirror on the few occasions I have been forced beardless.)
With a S\stent IIRC he may well keep the beard, but lose the pubes, which is even itchier growing back.
Yaaay for relatively non-invasive procedures.
I am tempted to offer up a prayer for PZ just to be a smart ass, but i can't think of any deities I would trust enough to pray to even if i did believe in them.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 2:36 PM
mikefoxtrothow:
I'm sure a quietly whispered thank you to the Great Cephalopod of the Deep would be okay.
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 24, 2010 2:40 PM
The Concrete Cows of Milton Keynes.
Posted by: Fred The Hun
|
August 24, 2010 2:41 PM
This some how seems rather appropriate and it even contains a poll...
http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2010/08/24/lunchtime-poll-achin-bacon/?hpt=C2
There was a disturbance in the Force this morning. We felt it deep within our souls, but could not identify the cause until our boss, a woman comprised of 67% bacon and 23% really good beer, sent us this link in an e-mail with the subject line, "BACON PRICES INCREASE!"
Before you trot on over to get the FULL STORY from our colleagues at CNN Money, we wanna know:
Will increased bacon prices affect your consumption?
There is no price I will not pay for bacon.
I may consume it less, but will enjoy it all the more for it.
It will be an occasional treat -- much less frequent than before.
It will be off the menu, but I long for a comeback.
I don't eat bacon for religious reasons.
I don't eat meat.
I don't care for bacon.
I seriously do not get the whole bacon fascination. It's fine, but I'll live without.
Other (share the sizzling details below)
Posted by: opposablethumbstoo
|
August 24, 2010 2:42 PM
A stent, and early release on your own recognisance! Great news!
Sorry, I believe current protocol demands that this should read as follows: bloody brilliant, mate, about time you stopped swinging the lead and got your sodding finger out.
Happy recovery time to PZ and family.
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 24, 2010 2:43 PM
But I thought the data showed they didn't increase survival as much as a bypass, nor any better then purely medical treatment? Am I out of date on that?
It's not my area, but IIRC, that depends on how many vessels need to be bypassed: one or two you may be better off with a stent, 3 or more, it's still bypass time. But that may also be out of date.
A quick wander through medline suggests that for left main disease (which I suspect PZ of having), CABG and stent are pretty equivalent. Want refs?
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 2:43 PM
Spherical cows? Vera Jayne? "Mullet" Magnet? Roxie? We have some unfinished business. Time to find the solutions today and tonight with a couple thousand posts. Let's get some chatter going...
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 24, 2010 2:43 PM
I apologise for the above assault on your aesthetics, but, damn it, Jim, someone had to do it.
Posted by: mikee
|
August 24, 2010 2:44 PM
Don't know if it's been seen before but here's something people can practice swearing about.
http://objectiveministries.org/kidz/
Try moving your mouse over the lamb. These fundies are a whole different category of stupid and insanity all mixed up into one bundle
Posted by: 朴競花/박경화 (Gyeong Hwa)
|
August 24, 2010 2:44 PM
While PZ is in the hospital, I think it's time for another pie:
Guava Pie
3 tablespoons flour
2/3 cup sugar
1/8 teaspoon salt
Pastry for a 9-inch 2-crust pie
4 cups Florida guava, peeled, seeded and sliced
1 tablespoon plus 1 teaspoon lemon juice
3 tablespoons cold butter, cut in small pieces
Mix together the flour, sugar, and salt; set aside. Line a 9-inch pie plate with pastry; fill with sliced guava, slightly mounding in the center. Sprinkle the flour and sugar mixture evenly over the guavas. Sprinkle with the lemon juice and dot with butter. Cover with the top pastry and flute edge. Cut several vents into top crust to let steam escape. Bake in a preheated 450° oven for 10 minutes, then reduce to 350° and bake 30 to 40 minutes longer.
I'd give you some PZ, but you need to ask the doc if it's okay.
Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline.
|
August 24, 2010 2:44 PM
Congrats, JeffreyD!
Sounds like the sum of all misery is indeed constant.
Posted by: truthspeaker
|
August 24, 2010 2:45 PM
Heading home?!?! But the state fair starts the day after tomorrow! Of course, almost all the food there is deep fried...
Posted by: 朴競花/박경화 (Gyeong Hwa)
|
August 24, 2010 2:47 PM
Good news JefferyD!
Posted by: mikefoxtrothow
|
August 24, 2010 2:47 PM
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! Don't want to get that ones attention, best case, I will have a very expensive underwater camera stolen, worst case, it will turn out that Lovecraft was right.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 2:47 PM
wait, you guys are now positing a childless lesbian with a mullet...in the Tulsa PD?
It wasn't going to be fantasy.
mikee, you been Poed by the best.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 24, 2010 2:48 PM
What was that poem about Ravens quothing and such?
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 24, 2010 2:48 PM
You could try This One for all the good it will do.Posted by: otrame
|
August 24, 2010 2:49 PM
Don't have time to check if anyone else linked this.
This, my friends, the the definition of PWNED.
Posted by: Steve LaBonne
|
August 24, 2010 2:49 PM
I'm happy with your summary, thanks. (I'll soon turn 55, so one of these years this may not of entirely academic interest...)
Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline.
|
August 24, 2010 2:49 PM
Well, does anyone eat Bacon for religious reasons?Oh ... this is The Thread. Nevermind then.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 2:54 PM
Nerd:
Hey, I'm standing by Vera Jayne. That's a weapon with street cred and certified teevee history. Hell, if I wasn't so attached to my nym, I'd use Vera Jayne. Except I keep trying to type it as Very Jayne, which is scary.
Posted by: blf
|
August 24, 2010 2:55 PM
Inflate them and they're spherical. Or shrapnel.
Posted by: Xenithrys
|
August 24, 2010 2:55 PM
I think PZ would have blogged about this had he been up & about:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/aug/24/claudy-bombings-cover-up-report
Seems the UK government colluded with the Catholic Church to cover up a priest's involvement in an IRA bombing that killed 9 people in 1972.
He might have said it's what you can expect when religion is given a free pass from criticism.
Posted by: Peter Ashby
|
August 24, 2010 2:55 PM
If it is swearing you want then the British TV Show The Thick of It is the one for you if you can find it. The British political references might go past you but the character of Malcolm Tucker is just absofuckinglutely stupendous.
Note that it went out on free to air public broadcast TV at prime time in the evening. It was after 9pm (the designated watershed) though.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 24, 2010 2:56 PM
Me either - I eat it because it tastes good. :)
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 2:58 PM
Those MK cows are ugly. I much prefer the Chicago style concrete cows.
Posted by: Don Quijote
|
August 24, 2010 3:00 PM
for Cosmic Teapot
Relax, "hostia" isn´t really a swear word. Apart from meaning "host, holy cracker" the word has different conotations depending on how it´s used.
It can mean "punch" (not the drink), "the best" as in "es la hostia" she´s incredible or as an exclamation ¡hostia! meaning damn, christ almighty! ect.
To PZ "echar hostias, ¡suerte!
Posted by: Julie Stahlhut
|
August 24, 2010 3:02 PM
Yay! Glad PZ's okay. (My 84-year-old aunt recently got a stent and did just fine. So a young whippersnapper like PZ should be back on his feet in no time.)
Hugs to Mary too. It's scary when your squid-nificant other gets sick.
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 3:08 PM
Sili (@220):
What, you haven't heard of the Church of the Holy Swine?
Oh, I see you have! Nevermind.
All:
I guess I'm late to be joining the Milton Keynes pile-on. I've never been there myself (never been anywhere in the UK other than London, Canterbury, Dover, and the rail lines between them), but based on KG's description, it sounds like the place I recall Bill Bryson ripping up in Notes from a Small Island, both for its pedestrian-unfriendliness and for the utter aesthetic and functional bankruptcy of its architecture.
I have'ta' say, though, I kinda' like the concrete cows.
Also, I need a little advice: I apparently let some of my gym clothes sit a bit too long before laundering them, and now they (and all the other clothes I washed them with) have a peculiar problem. They smell fresh and clean when they come out of the wash, but when I wear them, my body warmth (or even the slightest bit of moisture, whether from sweat or rain) brings out a (thankfully faint) background odor of musty gym bag. As I say, these clothes smell fine when they're sitting folded in the clean laundry pile, so... [a] what special industrial-strenght cleaning protocol can I undertake to fix this and [b] how in the <Obligatory_Swearing>fucking hell</Obligatory_Swearing> can I tell it's fixed? Or must I just have a bonfire and buy a new wardrobe
Posted by: Jadehawk, cascadeuse féministe
|
August 24, 2010 3:09 PM
*whinge* now that would be extremely soap-opera-ish, hehe seconded.Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 3:10 PM
Don't expect anything else. Just trying to see the story. Joan "Mullet" Magnet, with Vera Jayne in the holster. Driving around Tulsa in Roxie. Now what? Lets get the story going. I see the first take-down. An ORU board member for fraud and theft...Posted by: Josh, "Raquel Dommage," Porte-parole Gay Official
|
August 24, 2010 3:11 PM
Le Dauphin:
Try a shit ton of baking soda in the wash with the clothes, using hot water. If that doesn't work, try Borax.
Posted by: Xenithrys
|
August 24, 2010 3:13 PM
Bill @ 229:
I'd start with a peroxide-based bleach (usually a powder that you dissolve in hot water), then wash normally and, if you're allowed locally, dry in sunshine.
If that fails, carefully try regular bleach. Good luck.
Posted by: boxmaker
|
August 24, 2010 3:13 PM
Unfortunately, as I understand it, the pain does not end with the PTCA and stent:
http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/mba/lowres/mban187l.jpg
Get well, soon. You're missed already!
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 3:18 PM
Nerd:
No, Vera Jayne belongs to Magnet's white trash, trailer dwellin' girlfriend. Girlfriend is very attached to Very Jayne.
Posted by: blf
|
August 24, 2010 3:18 PM
Options:
[a] Incinerator.
[b] Look for ashes.
or:
[a] Mail them to Ken “piglet rapist” Ham.
[b] Creation “Museum” meltsdown and heads towards China.†
† They only recently grasped the idea the Earth maybe isn't flat. Antipodes are a bit beyond them. Well, rather a lot beyond them, actually.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 3:20 PM
#171 Stephen Wells
Seems like you've done that!
Huxley's Autobiography and selected essays (of which 'On a piece of chalk' was one) is available in pdf at:
http://pdfbooks.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3851&Itemid=72
Whole book 348 kb.
Posted by: danow
|
August 24, 2010 3:29 PM
PZ, hope you make a rapid recovery. I had heart surgery at 42 and it took me a good 6weeks to recover, hope you do better.
Posted by: Stephen Wells
|
August 24, 2010 3:29 PM
I have an Everyman edition :)
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 24, 2010 3:29 PM
[vent mode=on]
Some days I hate my job. I've been all over other people's tasks today because apparently my priority project is less important than everybody else's. Fine. May they are. Then I get a call from one of the bosses who is over at a school where I went and tried to fix something a couple weeks ago. Of course, if I'm going on site that means nobody else is available, so it's a crazy day. I've been here about 7 months and am always left out of the loop on everything, so when I have to fix something, I'm usually trying to learn it for the first time as I go. So, as I said, I tried to fix something a couple weeks ago. It went like this:
Client won't reach the server? Let's see the settings. There's no server with that address in your server room. What's it supposed to be set to? Well, this sheet here has a different address, let's try that. Oh hey, it's working now.
Well, apparently that sheet was out of date and somewhere in the building there is now a server with that IP address, and it took the boss a while to get it straightened out. Still have no idea where the hell that server is. Apparently it was just turned off that day a couple weeks ago, but it's on now.
So the boss asks me, "What could possibly make you think somebody had changed the IP address the client was looking for?"
"My insane distrust for users."
"Nobody there is smart enough to know how to do that!"
"It's really easy to do. And besides, I've seen users do some really amazing fuckups."
"Well none of them could do that."
Then he went into details about how all the other machines that connect to that server are set the same way. Oh, there are other machines that connect to that server? Gee, that might have been useful information to give me two weeks ago. Might have influenced my judgement a bit, doncha think?
I'm so sick of being left out of everything and then being judged harshly for making the wrong decision based on that lack of knowledge.
[vent mode=off]
Posted by: heddle
|
August 24, 2010 3:34 PM
Get well, PZ.
Posted by: Adamvs Maximvs
|
August 24, 2010 3:35 PM
Toooooo many posts to read the whole thread and catch up on it... so here's my contribution to what I did read.
A+ for this regular Canadian donor. My first couple times giving blood were pretty bad though. First time was in a high school blood drive. I was 18 and in reasonable shape. The nurse first tried to take blood from the left arm, the vein collapsed and she couldn't get blood.
No biggie, I say I don't mind if she tries the right arm. She puts the needle in the vein, nothing again. She moves the needle further in and back a few times because she thought she must not have hit the vein or something. Not a particularly pleasant experience, not helped by the fact I was staring at the whole process and should have probably looked away.
She finally says, I'm going to pull it out and try again. She starts to pull it out but the needle is sticking (still in my arm). Not sure why or how, but it was. She decides to give it a quick tug and.... instant unconscious. It felt like I was asleep for days (but was really just a half minute or so) and I'm not sure if I fainted from being a moron and watching or she poked a nerve or what. I decided to shoot up and was about to throw myself out of the chair (in a boyish 'See! I'm fine!' action and quickly fell back into the chair feeling rather woozy. Either way was a big fuss and they said that I wasn't going to be able to give that day.
Second time was in University, first vein collapsed again. Second one starts to draw blood, but the needle is in a very uncomfortable angle. About half-way through, I start sweating a lot and the nurses noticed a very pale palor to my skin. A cool cloth to the forehead and after a while I manage to finish (strongly resisting the urge to go to the bathroom the whole time strangely enough). I had to sit in the chair for 15 mins to be observed and then in the refreshment area for a while.
Now, I try to go regularly, though work makes it tough. I'm somewhere in the high-teens low twentys (which isn't too bad considering I'm still in my 20s). It goes very smoothly now, and it seems the more I'm working out at the time I go, the better the process is. (plus I like to see what my resting heart rate is everytime I go and hope it keeps getting lower lol).
So if you know someone who has one bad experience and quits tell them to suck it up and try again :D
That's all for my, most probably, boring little tale of sanguinary experience
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 24, 2010 3:36 PM
I had heart surgery at 42 and it took me a good 6weeks to recover
I initially read this as "...had heart surgery IN 42 [as in in the year 1942]..." and was mildly alarmed at your probable current age.
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 24, 2010 3:39 PM
Replace the beard with nanotube whisker antennae tuned into the spacetime manifold. It should also be able to be used as a transmitter; that way P Z can use a collimated beam to explode the head of anyone he does not like.
Kw*k alert: I logged into Amazon.com and ordered a graphic novel for PZM.
"Lobo: Holiday Hell" by Keith Giffin, an extended version of "Lobo Paramilitary Christmas Special", where the Easter Bunny hires Lobo to take out Santa. The level of gratitous violence -lovingly depicted by Simon Bisley- is just ridicilous. (This is the kind of stuff I would want to read if I was confined to bed at home when everyone else is away having a good time)
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 3:39 PM
Nerd (@226):
Not for nothin', but Cows on Parade™ aren't concrete; they're fiberglas. They're not unique to Chicago, either. CoP is a charity project (I forget which charity it benefits¹) in which local artists are given identical lifesize white fiberglas cows (IIRC there are 3 or 4 different poses) to decorate in their own inimitable styles (and the artists get paid!). Sometimes they're sponsored by local business, and the resultant cows are auctioned off to raise funds after they've been publicly displayed. There's also a line of collectible figurines representing some of the more notable efforts
¹ Apparently mostly children's hospitals (including the one that saved my daughter's life!) and other children's charities. Google, as always, is my friend! here's the CowParade story, and here are some cows I've had the pleasure of seeing in person.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 3:48 PM
Not to be left out of the Ugly Cow sweepstakes, Norf Dakota has Salem Sue, the World's largest Holstein Cow. Sue is fiberglass, not concrete.
I see Salem Sue about once a week, she resides in New Salem, which is about 22 miles from us.
Posted by: John Pieret
|
August 24, 2010 3:51 PM
PZ had a stent installed this morning. Even if he did lose the facial hair, it's a small price for a none exploding heart.
As a proud possesser of two of the damn things, I can say with certainty that his face ain't the part they would have shaved. Within a week of the procedure I was traveling by train to NYC to see Hal Holbroook do Mark Twain. PZ should be his feisty ... err ... cephlopodian self in short order.
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 3:52 PM
Birger (@244):
Did you by any chance check to see if PZ has a public wishlist on amazon?
Posted by: Lynna, OM
|
August 24, 2010 3:56 PM
Many thanks to Alan B for the lessons in chalk.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 24, 2010 4:00 PM
Great news for PZ!!
Pity about the face fungus!! Is it time for a change? How about:
PZZ Myers
http://www.aeroforceone.com/af1/cms/Phoenix2.jpg
PZ 'Bulldog' Myers
http://www.evolutionvfact.com/Im02346.jpg
(Forget the beard - look at those sideburns ...)
Da Vinci Jones Myers
http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/11/2/128701550123696842.jpg
Choose either - or are they the same man? I've never seen them together ...
PZ Mc Myers
http://www.partywigs.com/acatalog/21359.jpg
Is there a hairy Scotsman waiting to come out?
All the best.
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 24, 2010 4:00 PM
Sven DiMilo
Can we throw in Cassidy, the hard-drinking Irish vampire character from "Preacher" in an episode or two? He is great in urban mayhem settings.
--- --- --- --- ---
I just learned that the extinct cave bear was as omnovorous as the current bears instead of a vegetarian giant. So if we clone it from the remaining DNA we will have a big fucking predator that can eat grizzly bears when it gets hungry. It would make the woodlands...interesting
Posted by: blf
|
August 24, 2010 4:01 PM
Poopyhead is having a sooper secreet gadget installed and everyone developed a cow fetish?!
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 4:01 PM
Thanks, all, for the laundry advice. The irksome thing is that the problem with my clothes is really not bad enough to seriously consider trashing them, despite my "bonfire" comment: The odor is very faint, and my Lovely Bride® assures me that nobody but me will notice it... but I do notice it. It's one of those threshold-level annoyances that can easily become maddening.
I'll try each of the suggestions, starting from the least drastic (which I take to be baking soda), until something works.
Posted by: Chgo_Liz
|
August 24, 2010 4:02 PM
Bill Dauphin @ #245:
I feel obliged to comment, both to back up Nerd's post and to represent for my town: Cows On Parade STARTED in Chicago and then became an international phenomenon.
Cause/effect? I think so.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 4:03 PM
Where I live cow statues are basically unavoidable. Everywhere you look... bronze, concrete, mosaic, fiberglass, it's cows!
My favorites though are the ones in the little park by the Amy's Ice Cream in Austin, because kids love those cows. I loved those cows when I was a kid.
As for the Cows on Parade thing Dallas did something like that only with Pegasus.
http://pegasusflyers.fuzidave.com/pegasuses.html
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 24, 2010 4:04 PM
Since we're talking about blood...
I'm O+. About 70% of the US population could accept a donation from me. But I've been disqualified as a donor because I managed to get two separate false positives on their HepB antibody test. First time, they throw out your blood and send you a letter. Second time, they throw it out and disqualify you. I've never been exposed to it (to my knowledge), never been vaccinated for it (which is beside the point, as it was a hit for core antibodies, and the vaccine gives you surface antibodies), and a more thorough blood screening showed that I do not have the antibodies. However, until that more thorough test is approved (by whatever governing body that was), I still can't donate. I had finally gotten over my needle issue sufficiently in order to go through with the donation process, and they go and throw away half my donations and tell me I can't do it anymore. Go figure.
Posted by: glownz
|
August 24, 2010 4:05 PM
Get Well soon PZ! May you have the most skilled surgeons!
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 4:09 PM
blf, the sooper secreet gadget has already been installed. PZ should just be blissing out on good drugs now.
Posted by: Walton, Marquis of Carabas
|
August 24, 2010 4:11 PM
Having had an eleven-hour day today, I don't have time to catch up with the whole subThread, but I spotted a few references to my hometown. (I'm surprised to learn that KG used to live here.)
Contrary to popular belief, Milton Keynes is not all bad. Some areas of town are much nicer than others. I won't claim that it's exactly scenic, but it wasn't a bad place to grow up. (And I feel compelled to point out that it has far more parkland and trees than most urban areas. Not to mention that, as it's a planned city with a grid system, the traffic is far less bad than in many British towns.)
For non-Britons: Milton Keynes is mainly renowned for having more roundabouts per square mile than anywhere else in Britain. Many non-locals complain about this when driving through. It's also known for the iconic concrete cows (don't ask). And for Bletchley Park, home of the WWII Enigma codebreakers, which is located in modern-day Milton Keynes (though obviously it predates the city itself).
Posted by: Xenithrys
|
August 24, 2010 4:11 PM
In New Zealand our cows, like everything else, are made of corrugated iron:
http://tpo.tepapa.govt.nz/ViewTopicExhibitDetail.asp?TopicFileID=0x000a3cfc
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 4:12 PM
Blech, my toes taste awful. The problem with hoofinmouth disease. I had a feeling I goofed before I saw BD's post. Time for a few Hail Ramens.
Alan B, good lesson about chalk.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 4:12 PM
I'm sure the Trophy Wife™ won't mind, although she might giggle a lot.
Posted by: dnebdal.myopenid.com
|
August 24, 2010 4:12 PM
@Bill Dauphin, OM, 229:
Aaah, that's the last reference to MK I couldn't recall. Thanks. :)
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 24, 2010 4:13 PM
Bill Dauphin, OM
I could not find a public whishlist for him, I have sent a query through Amazon.com in case P Z wants to set one up.
--- --- --- --- ---
Other significant stuff today: "Richest planetary system discovered (w/ Video)"
http://www.physorg.com/news201850291.html
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 24, 2010 4:14 PM
Saw the Lions in Bath a few weeks ago and Elephants in Amsterdam last year.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 24, 2010 4:15 PM
You you guys with your five or six cattle.
Here in Dallas we have 50 steers!
http://www.dallasphotoworks.com/my_weblog/2010/03/cattle-drive-sculpture-dallas-texas-pioneer-plaza-worlds-largest-bronze-sculputure-cowboys-steer-longhorns-robert-summers-sh.html
No really, this city loves public sculpture. And it fucking seriously loves cows.
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 4:15 PM
chgo_liz (@254):
I stand... well, not exactly corrected so much as expanded upon: Herr Doktor Wiki informs me that the concept originated in Zurich, and that it was a Swiss artist who created (and owns the copyright to) the prototypical cow models, but apparently the first proper Cow Parade show was in Chicago in 1999, a 1998 event in Zurich having been called something else.
So I acknowledge Chicago's priority, but question your assertion of its causal role. ;^)
Posted by: casey.oneill.is
|
August 24, 2010 4:17 PM
Hope everything works out for ya PZ.
Posted by: blf
|
August 24, 2010 4:21 PM
Yes.
No, that's Teh Nameless Herd, fantasizing about cows.
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 4:21 PM
Ol'Greg:
Is that the same crew that also has a location in San Antonio, where they occasionally dance on the countertop? Many years ago, I had Shiner Bock ice cream there, and it was fucking awesome! Thanks for the memory!
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 4:24 PM
Nerd (@261):
Aww, spit out the toejam and have a nice cocktail, please! I didn't mean to make you feel bad; just trying to add some interesting info.
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 24, 2010 4:27 PM
I prefer Gary Larson´s style of cows; carnivorous and howling at the moon.
"Hunting the successful psychopath" http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/2010/08/hunting-successful-psychopath.html I think we have found Dexter Morgan.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 4:27 PM
Fargo has a leopard skin calf statue.
ND has buffalo. Lots and lots of buffalo statues.
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 24, 2010 4:32 PM
May you have the most skilled surgeons!
In the end, he didn't need any surgeons after all, just cardiologists. Highly skilled cardiologists hopefully. Ideally, highly skilled cardiologists who are bored because PZ is such a typical case and has no interesting complications at all.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 4:38 PM
Bill, I did goof (doh, fiberglass, not concrete), and I do acknowledge my mistakes. Just having my own fun while I do so. I'll have a drink when I get home, but only after I have installed the memory upgrade that arrived today.Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 24, 2010 4:41 PM
I'm not sure this virus would change PZ's hard drive significantly.
Posted by: The Bobs
|
August 24, 2010 4:41 PM
We can't have swearing thread without this new classic:
“All y’all dumb motherfuckers don’t even know my opinion on shit.”
Posted by: Jessie
|
August 24, 2010 4:42 PM
Bill #229 inter alia re washing
This sounds like mildew.
You could try one or two cups of clear vinegar on the hottest wash suitable for that fabric. Don't add anything else to the wash. This will also clean the machine if the smell has transferred. Rewash using normal washing powder but not too much of it and no fabric softener and then dry the clothes thoroughly, preferably by tumble-drying.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 4:43 PM
They did the painted cow series thing only with mules along the Delaware River a few years ago.
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 24, 2010 4:44 PM
These aint Cows
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 4:45 PM
Only for nine months. I had been accepted for graduate study at Sussex, but the funding body didn't offer me a grant (they didn't actually tell me this until after I'd started!), so I took a job as an RA at the OU. Eight months later, Sussex told me - to my complete surprise - that they'd held the place open for me and had funding for it, so I took it up. Given how long it then took me to finish my D.Phil, I might have done better to stay!
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 4:49 PM
I think that's the first time you've had anything good to say about central planning, Walton :-p
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawk8nuEGr2AboPw3B5JlVHLruh87cSf2gi4
|
August 24, 2010 4:52 PM
Hooray for medical marvels! Delighted to hear PZ came through with flying colors.
Blood type: A+ with a gallon pin to prove it. I donated regularly up until last year when I got pregnant, and will start doing so again when the bloodmobile comes back 'round.
I'm glad we're discussing cursing because I had a question, and this is just the group to answer it: My mother-in-law and I only sporadically get along, and one of her (latest) complaints is that she objects when I swear. I use the standard obscenities as well as interjections about the bearded sky fairy, his teenage girlfriend, and their zombie cannibal son.
So I have two questions facing me, each with two options:
1) Religious swearing
A) Continue saying things like "Jesus Christmas!" and ignore her whining about how I'm insulting her imaginary friend
OR
B) Make the effort to change over to swearing by the Greco-Roman pantheon. "Janus Cludo!" starts with the right letters, "Merciful Minerva!" and "Great Caesar's Ghost!" are funny and will tax her little brain, and "By Jove!" is from Jeeves and Wooster, which makes it relevant to the Stephen Fry clip above. :)
2) Obscenities
C) Continue saying things like "what the fuck is wrong with this piece of shit!" and ignore her whining about my potty mouth
D) Make the effort to change over to geek or silly obscenities like frak, frell, felgercarb, bindlestitch, p'taQ, and so on.
My daughter isn't talking yet... but she will at some point. And what mother says, daughter will repeat.
What say you folks?
--Lauren Ipsum
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 24, 2010 4:53 PM
(Off-topic, but I am forwarding it because the topic is relevant to outgroup hostility): Ed Brayton found an interesting article:
From Allahpundit, a (honest) conservative, on the phenomenon of people thinking Obama is a Muslim:
"It's all very lame and obnoxious, especially given the testimony from pastors that Obama takes his Christian faith seriously, but much like the Birther thing, there's virtually nothing you can say to convince someone who's sure that O is what he thinks he is. I recommend re-reading Karl's post from earlier this month on the phenomenon of polling Birthers, as it holds plenty of applicable wisdom in this case too. Essentially, when polling people who dislike candidate X, the specifics of the questions are almost irrelevant. As long as they're negatively inclined -- e.g., "Is Obama a werewolf?" -- you'll get a certain core percentage willing to say yes.
-----
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/08/19/pew-poll-18-think-obama-is-a-muslim/
The comments get almost universally toxic. It is as if people don´t like getting called out on being bigoted, or getting their view of Obama challenged. Some comments are unintentionally funny. A candidate for Pharyngulation?
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 24, 2010 4:58 PM
(Eyes light up...)
(Starts composing online poll to be dumped into Freeper forum somewhere...)
No. No! Bad Loki troll impulse! Bad!
(/Slaps own fingers...)
Posted by: Badjuggler
|
August 24, 2010 5:00 PM
Damn! This is not what I expected when I (finally) checked in today. Get well, PZ!!
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 24, 2010 5:01 PM
What's wrong with Milton Keynes? He was a successful chicken defeatherer for DeCoster Egg Farms until his untimely death from salmonella and herpes just a few days ago.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 24, 2010 5:03 PM
Bill Dauphin, may I ask a favor? Will you post the sucess/failure results of your laundering experiments? I've got some towels that behave just like you describe your clothes; initially smell okay, but when dampened, not so much. I'd hate to have to toss them.
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 24, 2010 5:05 PM
@283
E) Klingon
Posted by: KG
|
August 24, 2010 5:06 PM
Posted by: rident
|
August 24, 2010 5:15 PM
Well at least your beard doesn't need invasive surgery PZ, and here is justification to keep from ever needing it!
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/08/sullivan-bait-1.html
Posted by: jaranath
|
August 24, 2010 5:19 PM
Who said lycanthropy was a bad thing? I can think of worse ways to spend moonlit nights...
Ooh! Or cephalo-anthropy! I'd move to the coast for that!
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 24, 2010 5:19 PM
Birger Johansson @284
I made the mistake of reading some comments. Now I need brain bleach.
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 24, 2010 5:21 PM
"All y'all dumb motherfuckers don't even know my opinion on shit."
Classic.
PS: Chicago and Dallas have cows, ND has buffalo, and Lakeland has swans.
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
August 24, 2010 5:24 PM
Re polling stuff: We have a friend who is a professional pollster (or whatever they're called) and once included an "is Elvis still alive" question and ran a pool amongst his friends to bet on the percentage that would say yes. I forget what the final answer was, but yes, you can get people to say almost anything in response to polling questions.
Patricia Ignorant Slut, your dalek is AMAZING. My kids think you are incredibly cool. Now make another one for you-know-who (and if you have the thing charted, email it to me pleasepleasepleaseplease?)
I got to order the dissection specimens for my homeschool science class today. What a great life - getting to dissect earthworms etc as a supposed grownup. (The class voted on what to do and dissections won by a LOT, which is pretty cool.)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 5:27 PM
KG:
The Prez is not a werewolf, he's just morphologically gifted.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 24, 2010 5:32 PM
Lauren - depends on how tied your personality is to your language, and how much you think she's using it as a controlling mechanism or just a personal preference. I use different language in front of different people, and just consider it a variety of code switching. What is "bloody fucking hell" for Pharyngula translates as "darn it" in Mom language.
Posted by: lose_the_woo
|
August 24, 2010 5:34 PM
Shape shift, move swift, Earth's gift.Posted by: nonenonenone50
|
August 24, 2010 5:38 PM
Best wishes from this retired ICU Nurse. A word of advice: Do EVERYTHING the nurses tell you to do - e.x.a.c.t.l.y. as they tell you to do it. If you don't understand, ask.
A speedy recovery to you, sir.
Posted by: Dae
|
August 24, 2010 5:44 PM
As long as he's not a Black Spiral Dancer, all is well.
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 24, 2010 5:44 PM
My fucking brain fucking hurts.
I am sure it's nothing on the Great Old Squid, but I wanted to gripe.
My dad has a stent, it went well, he's going strong twelve years later.
Sick people stay in hospitals so it's nice to hear that PZ is heading home.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 5:57 PM
I let the monster dogs outside for a bit. Went out on the back deck to call them in, and my 120 lb monster came around the side of the house at a dead run, cleared the steps and power slid/slammed into me. My left ankle is now swelling up nicely, there's a huge scratch on my foot and my back is serious cranky from being slammed into the deck railing.
Frelling damn monster huge frakkin' dog. *Grumbles and hobbles off for ice*
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 24, 2010 5:59 PM
Nobody ever acknowledges all the good things the undead do in the community. In my town attacks by grizzly bears are unknown ever since the werewolves came in. Night time assaults and robbery is at an all-time low because the vampires deal with muggers hiding in alleys. What more could you ask for?
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 24, 2010 6:05 PM
Werewolves are also good for the local purveyors of garments and footwear. Economic benefit and pest control.
Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/c8vgv20epfOnyZYgaPKrcYfDk4TekTh7#ed6d2
|
August 24, 2010 6:08 PM
The fucking US government has a nasty fucking ban on queer men donating blood, under the auspices that queer men are all filthy and diseased. So, this always makes me get into an argument about gender (so...If I consider myself a man, then I can't give blood, but if I consider myself a woman I can? What about my nonbinary genderqueer identity? What about trans people?). After this argument, a detailed discussion of the homophobic history of the American Red Cross and how the ban promotes anti-queer sentiment, and some appreciative nods from the other queer people around, I inform the blood takers that I can't give blood because of my health conditions.
Oh, on the metaphysics note, I rather enjoyed study metaphysics in philosophy. I suspect that dumbasses like the poster above 'will for truth' and all, haven't every actually done an in depth study of metaphysics, or, they would know that physicalism (more traditionally known as materialism) which holds that the universe is composed purely of physical objects and forces is by far the most popular metaphysical theory amoung philosophers philosophy of space, time, physics, etc is usually considered to be metaphysics). No, metaphysics doesn't mean you can just sling whatever shit you want. If you have a philosophical theory about what sorts of things are in the universe, you still need evidence and a argument before anyone gives a shit what you think. Some people suck at philosophy, just like some people suck at science. Don't judge us by our equivalents of Deepak Chopra, please.
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 24, 2010 6:08 PM
From Caine's #87 link:
Ironically oblivious asshole referencing The Question from an atheist author whose books point out the absurdity of asking such question. Humor-challenged dumbass didn't get the joke.Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 6:08 PM
my 120 lb monster
meh, small taters...
http://webtrickz.com/giant-george-new-worlds-tallest-dog/
*gulp*
pooper scooper? Hell, that thing would need a pooper back-loader!
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 24, 2010 6:10 PM
The stupid...it hurts...(Jon Stewart points out more inconsistencies)
Fox News: Evil or stupid?
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-23-2010/the-parent-company-trap
They guy they accuse of being an evil terror enabler is also a part owner of their own company, so they "accidentally" did not mention his name...
Posted by: TCC
|
August 24, 2010 6:13 PM
I am not sure if these threads are basically open threads or what.
First off, as I said in the previous thread, I wish the best for PZ and his surgery and for his family that I am sure is very worried about him. I hope he gets well soon.
Anyway, I say this sarcastically: I thought you might all enjoy the Intelligent Design episode of 365 Days of Astronomy:
http://365daysofastronomy.org/2010/08/22/august-22nd-the-sound-of-strings-an-idea-of-design/
The podcast people seem to think it is just fine to have ID be part of Astronomy.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 24, 2010 6:17 PM
Humm. I'm can almost guarantee I know an Irish Wolfhound from a few years ago bigger than that.
Sweetest dog ever, but god damn that boy was HUGE.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 6:18 PM
Ichthyic, I'm no stranger to monster dogs, I used to have an Irish Wolfhound. 120 lbs is large enough for me, I felt guilty having the Wolfhound. Dogs bred for such huge size have very shortened life spans.
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 24, 2010 6:22 PM
I beg to differ on being smug simply because I call people lunatics when they are. I prefer the term "realistic." More than once I've saved Mom the trouble of wasting money and time because I dared to find out the facts instead of swallowing bilge water as though it is soda.
I think that's a nice name. Beats being named Aquanet or Shithead (note: that's to be pronounced "Shi-tee-ed" or something like that). Some people really are out to lunch when they pick names for their kids.
I'm not sure how any of the other tribes would take to having the Tentacled Overlord in their midst (why do you lot call him that anyway?)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 6:23 PM
Yahoomess:
Amazingly enough, a whole lot of the regulars here are members of the LGBT community and are aware of the issues with various types of bans in regard to giving blood. I'm banned, but it's not because of my sexuality.
There are indeed serious issues with ARC, however, that doesn't diminish how important it is to donate blood, if possible. That only helps people who are in dire need.
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 24, 2010 6:26 PM
Tis Himself, Dhorvath; "In my town attacks by grizzly bears are unknown ever since the werewolves came in. Night time assaults and robbery is at an all-time low because the vampires deal with muggers hiding in alleys. What more could you ask for?"
-See the Cal Leandros novels by Rob Thurman
http://www.amazon.com/Nightlife-Cal-Leandros-Book-1/dp/0451460758/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1282688217&sr=1-3
A boggle in Central Park eats muggers and would-be rapists, a troll under the Brooklyn Bridge provides similar services, and you have werewolves and ghouls keeping the population down. I was not at all surprised to find that Robin Goodfellow (the most sex-crazed of faeries) also lives in New York nowadays.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 24, 2010 6:26 PM
There was a girl named Aquanetta who worked at one of the Movie theatres in my home town when i was in high school. Always thought it was a joke.
Turns out it wasn't.
Posted by: joltster
|
August 24, 2010 6:36 PM
Dear PZ:
Good luck with the surgery, and have the TW run interference for you. With any luck, you'll have a minimally invasive procedure and you'll have a good team of people taking care of you(Surgeons, Physician Assistants-probably what you called the doctor's assistant- who are very highly trained, capable and caring. How do I know this? I'm a PA myself) Looking forward to reading and hearing you in all your crankiness again. Given, the current situation in the world today, we need more science and crankiness and engagement and not less. Good luck to you and regards to your family.
Posted by: Glen Davidson
|
August 24, 2010 6:39 PM
Comments seem not to work on the "seadragon" thread. Here's what I tried to say there:
Dazzling dance? Not obviously, but it looks like a choreographical means of getting in sync and of (briefly) bonding.
I was thinking that the attached eggs look like the probable transitional form between just laying the eggs somewhere and the male seahorse's pregnancy. Although no doubt such a transition is "impossible" by some IDiots "calculations."
Glen Davidson
Posted by: 朴競花/박경화 (Gyeong Hwa)
|
August 24, 2010 6:42 PM
Was there a whole thread on Seadragons that just disappeared? Or am I going crazy?
I was surprised to find out that my sexuality banned me from giving blood. I still think it's unfair.
I'm still a bone marrow donor though.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 6:44 PM
Was there a whole thread on Seadragons that just disappeared? Or am I going crazy?
the latter.
....
(really, the vid link was busted, and whoever is currently posting just took it down to fix it, then put it back)
Posted by: mrmonist
|
August 24, 2010 6:45 PM
I'm soooooo glad that none of you pharyngulites have not said "Oh wow, that guy is Doctor House!"
Thank you very much... and, like Stevie Wonder, I mean it from the bottom of my heart....
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 6:46 PM
There was a girl named Aquanetta who worked at one of the Movie theatres in my home town when i was in high school. Always thought it was a joke.
I dated a girl in HS named Dustin Hoffman.
parents can be bloody cruel.
Posted by: 朴競花/박경화 (Gyeong Hwa)
|
August 24, 2010 6:51 PM
Some folks from High School named their child ESPN, because they loved it that much.
Ah, that explains why my reflection has been talking to me. lol
(It hasn't btw. And if it did, it's probably cause friends are planning to slip something into my drink.)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 6:52 PM
Gyeong:
So do I, especially as we aren't in the bad old days anymore, like the ruckus which took place when Arthur Ashe contracted HIV from a transfusion.
There are a lot of bans which should at least be reviewed, like the ones involving travel, tattoos, mono, etc.
Posted by: Antiochus Epiphanes
|
August 24, 2010 7:01 PM
I had a baby-sitter once named Tampon .
*I didn't really*
Posted by: 朴競花/박경화 (Gyeong Hwa)
|
August 24, 2010 7:02 PM
Oh they could deny you for having mono? I knew about the tattoos and travel. Which is funny: my community service org doesn't do any blood donations because more than half of us are either gay, travelers, and/or have tattoos.
Posted by: Sandra Porter
|
August 24, 2010 7:08 PM
I wish you a speedy recovery! And hope your time in the hospital won't be too awful.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 7:12 PM
Gyeong:
Yep, if it was infectious mono. Like Susan, ^up there in the thread somewhere, I had mono in the '70s, it's one reason I'm banned. I'm also bi, tattooed and I've been known to travel. Among other things. ;)
Posted by: Antiochus Epiphanes
|
August 24, 2010 7:14 PM
I'll start giving blood again as soon as my Sub-Saharan Africa Probationary Death Period is over. Next year, I think.
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 24, 2010 7:18 PM
Yeah, I can't for the mono thing either. Probably just as well, I get weird everytime I do a blood test.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 7:21 PM
Did a Catholic priest assist an IRA murder in Northern Ireland?
yes.
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 24, 2010 7:26 PM
Chronic?!? Walton's is not chronic.
...And I've lived in fucking Paris for crying out loud. :-D
LOL! (Wherever Julesburg is.) However, their geology department (of all things!) is good. They do unspectacular, good paleontology there, no trace of delugionism.
Nope, because you started something funny that spread. Outsmarting all bullies put together only gets one called a brainer.
:-}
*snort*
Evidence?
(Those molars are crazy, and got moar crazier over time.)
Cave bears weren't that big.
France was plastered with roundabouts when a study showed they decrease the number of accidents. It has worked.
In some cases they took crossroads and painted a fat white dot in the middle... Most roundabouts are marvels, though, all with something unique in the middle.
1
2
Just consider yourselves warned. Some might appreciate the toothy goodness, but others might get nightmares.
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Broaden your horizon and expand into other languages. You can claim it all means "oops" and "dagnab it"; nobody will believe that, but nobody will dare ask.
If you can pull off a Spanish-style rr, many Slavic languages offer a wide range of satisfying possibilities; you might, for instance, want to simply talk about your cursed life (prrrrrrrroklllleti život in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian/Montenegrin) or about the addressee's mother's cunt (piiiička ti materrrrrrrrina in BCSM), or you might like to say "puta madre" in Polish (kurrrrrrrwa mać – literally).
If not, Hungarian is very imaginative with genitals and what you can do with them.
Or you might like to keep it simple. Fucking in Chinese is cào, where the c is a loudly aspirated [ts] – exhaling forcefully is exactly what you want to do anyway –, and the ` is an inbuilt exclamation mark. The full expression, though, is wǒ cào, "I fuck". – While I am at it, I'd like to ask the malcontent Pikachu to supply the character. (He did so during euphemism week; I'm too lazy to look for that or to burrow through the Windows character table.) It features three people on top of each other.
Alas, my active vocabulary is nothing like the above. <hanging head in shame> I'm simply not that verbal. I snarl, growl and tremble with cramped fingers when I get really angry, but that's basically it. All I ever say, no matter what the language, are "shit" (and its derivatives), "ass"*, and fuck (imported into German, too, because there the native equivalent isn't used as an interjection).
* Only in German, but there way more often than most German-speakers on this Thread would guess. That's what going to school in Vienna does to you. It even gets used as an adjective/adverb, as in "that's ass". Czech influence, like easily half of everything else in Vienna. ... Ooooh. The Czech word for "ass" is prdel, with a stressed, syllabic r. =8-)
Now that is interesting. "Intensifier, turns the whole phrase into an invective"? French has that: put espèce de in front of any noun, and it turns into an insult, espèce de pharynguloïde, toi.
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 24, 2010 7:38 PM
Used to know a girl who worked for The Vampires. She would hear references to this about every half hour. Drove her insane. Yes Peggy C******n, it's you I mean!
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 24, 2010 7:39 PM
speechless
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 24, 2010 7:40 PM
And I've lived in fucking Paris for crying out loud. :-D
Talking about virgins? That's awesome.
Posted by: John Morales
|
August 24, 2010 7:41 PM
Categorised offbeat: Sue Jedi Mind company, Lucas will.
Posted by: sandihj
|
August 24, 2010 7:46 PM
Bill Dauphin, late to the thread with this, but I have had excellent success with Clorox 2 Free powder. It has removed mildew odor as well as cat pee odor from clothing for us -- both things that often seem gone and come back at the worst times. I mean, imagine going to work and then smelling cat pee arising from your clothes.
I take about half a scoop of the powder and dissolve it in the hottest water that is safe for the particular fabric. Warm will do if need be. Then soak the item for at least half an hour in the solution. After that you can wash and dry as usual. I use the Free version because it has no scent of its own and you can tell if the bad smell is gone.
Good luck if you try it, and let me know if it works for you.
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 24, 2010 7:52 PM
Bill - Try soaking them in water w/borax, detergent and Oxyclean, about 1/4 c,. each, for 6 hours. If that fails, soak 'em in a solution of 1 c/ vinegar to 1 gallon water. If that fails, throw them out.
Lauren - Oh, do start swearing in Geek. It will annoy your MiL because she'll know you're swearing, but she won't be able to chastise you. FTM, try some archaic English: Zounds! Gadzooks! [Both religious in origin, but she probably won't know that.] Or get the Pharyngulinguists to post swear words in other languages for your pleasure.
And yes, sprogs do pick up on their parents' language all too quickly. When the Offspring was four and we were out in the car, an idiot cut me off and nearly caused an accident. As I sat there seething, letting the adrenaline jolt ease, a voice from the back seat enquired 'Mummy? Aren't you gonna call him a asshole?'
I subsequently taught him that "glutamate" was the Worst Word Ever, Never to be Uttered in Front of Grandmama. He used it for years when he was angry.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 7:53 PM
For fun, creative cussing, there's always Firefly Pinyin: http://www.browncoats.com/index.php?ContentID=42e83b412a309
I use a lot of that when I'm out and about.
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 24, 2010 7:55 PM
And now, for
something completely differentyour reading pleasure.Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 7:59 PM
David M (from the end of the last thread):
Hm. It's the same old recycled jokes from the first two. If you're okay with that, it's worth the rental. I didn't really care for it, but I'm not really a huge Austin Powers fan. Or a Mike Myers fan, for that matter.
Goldmember does get bonus points for Michael Caine, however.
*fingers crossed for PZ*
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 24, 2010 8:01 PM
Time to hide.
Wife is having the girls over for their Fantasy Football draft.
Yes, you read me correctly.
Goo thing there is music playing tonight at one of the local haunts.
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 8:04 PM
I can't help wondering if folks called her Tootsie as a nickname? ;^)
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 8:04 PM
I am Michael Caine
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 8:06 PM
I can't help wondering if folks called her Tootsie as a nickname? ;^)
actually, that came out a year AFTER we dated.
which rather dates ME, I'm afraid.
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 8:10 PM
Speaking of Michael Caine (but not Madness),
How cool would it be to hang out with these guys?
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 24, 2010 8:12 PM
So she was Benjamin instead? I hope you were Elaine, rather than Mrs. Robinson!
Jesus loves you more than you could know...
Posted by: Shala
|
August 24, 2010 8:12 PM
Fucking...Fallout 3...metro...
all of my hate
at least Charon is awesome
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 24, 2010 8:12 PM
Mattir, I've shot you an email; Octofail is finished.
Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula
|
August 24, 2010 8:12 PM
I wouldn't bother. Apart from what ODS listed in #340, there's the problem that Austin's character is subverted in that he's completely uninterested (by his standards) in the female lead, and that's just stupid, and the only reason I've heard for it is because it's what Beyoncé Knowles demanded in return for appearing since she didn't want to play an overtly sexual character - I can't find a source for that, though; however, I can't think of a better explanation for why else they might have done what they did.
It's like a parody of the early AP films but made by Mormons. I can't believe I actually went to the cinema to see it.
Oh, and Scott Evil is totally ruined in it.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 8:13 PM
I would assuredly like to be a fly at that pub.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 8:14 PM
Ichthyic:
Whippersnapper. I'd been married 3 years when that came out.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 24, 2010 8:26 PM
The Word of the Night is
Mudshark
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 24, 2010 8:28 PM
You mean like this?
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 8:28 PM
Wowbagger:
I was so bored with Goldmember that I didn't even pick up on the disinterest.
Related note: Apparently, there's a 4th Austin Powers movie in the works.
*sigh*
If anyone is wondering why I'm so goddamn picky about the movies I watch, I present Austin Powers #4 as exhibit A. Christ on a cracker, do we really need (or want) another one of those movies??
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 24, 2010 8:29 PM
What you call a lawyer who consistently gets down and dirty?Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 8:35 PM
Unrelated to Michael Caine, Madness, and Austin Powers:
I finished up Packing For Mars today. The last few chapters were GENIUS-- I was laughing out loud and educated at the same time. Definitely worth the read*.
*Although, I would not give it to anyone who wants to be an astronaut. Space exploration is cool and all, but no one ever thinks about the little things like turds escaping the toilet and floating around the cabin.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 24, 2010 8:39 PM
Caine, ouch! What was Monster Dog fleeing from?
Obama may or may not be a werewolf, but at least he doesn't ****sparkle****.
When you look under the sons-of-bitches that are lower than the worm-shit at the bottom of the deepest ocean, you find....the mudshark.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 8:43 PM
Cicely:
Nothing. He was running to me. He's not the sharpest crayon; he is, however, exceedingly enthusiastic.
Posted by: FossilFishy
|
August 24, 2010 8:55 PM
Ol'Greg. Thanks for answering my musical question a few thread ago. Your answer made me want to hear some of your stuff more than a straight "I play bluegrass" or "All deathcore, motherfucker." would have. Most of the music I like is hard to pin into a genre.
Your story about not playing gigs is a very familiar one. I've been thinking I should write a book about the huge numbers of musicians out there that make great music that no one ever hears. My experience in the smallest of the small time music industry shows that they are the vast majority of musical folk.
PZ. If you do decide to get on a bike for exercise I can provide you with some educated opinions on what and how. I own a bike store and my wife is an engineer who designs cycling infrastructure and is also a trained cycling instructor.
Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula
|
August 24, 2010 8:59 PM
ODS wrote:
I'm pretty picky, too - though, like everyone, I have my shlocky guilty pleasure films. As for sequels, I once wrote a blog post about the tendency for later ones to suck.
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 24, 2010 9:07 PM
Speaking of movies with over-the-top comedians... anyone else really liked Death to Smoochy?
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 24, 2010 9:10 PM
Caine - Our baby is only 95 pounds (yellow Lab) and I am a big guy, he can still rock me back.
However, and apologies if I have mentioned this before, he is very sweet. He sleeps with several stuffed toys, either with his head on them or clutched between his front legs and held against his chest. His most favourite toy is a stuffed duck. Once, when my foot was very painful, he stomped on it in his eagerness to get close. I yelled, he slunk off. Five minutes later he walked by with duck in his mouth, put it gently on my lap, and walked over to his bed. I got down on the floor with him and gave him a thorough scratching and stroking. What else could I do? He gives lessons in being cute and adorable.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 9:19 PM
Jeffrey:
Aaaaw. Doll, my coyote hybrid has a huge amount of stuffed animals and toys, and one of her most favourite is a large duck. She enjoys burying an assortment of her treasures in my bed.
Matoska, the one who body slammed me, gave me the sad puppy business after being hollered at; I gave him an empty plastic chocolate milk bottle, that's his fave thing to chew on.
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 9:19 PM
Andyo:
I didn't hate it, if that counts.
Wowbagger:
I haven't read your blog post yet, but for the most part, they suck (and the further out you go, the worse they get).
There are some notable exceptions (especially when the first movie is more like "proof of concept" [See Alien vs Aliens for example]), but as a general rule I avoid them like the plague.
And now I'm off to do some dishes and maybe squeeze in some time on the 360 before bed.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 24, 2010 9:24 PM
Some sequels aren't really sequels. The three Lord of the Rings films are really chapters of the same work.
Some movie sequels are good. The second Godfather is, in many peoples' minds, better than the first and the third sequel isn't bad either.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 24, 2010 9:33 PM
ODS, MoD and Wowbagger
When people ask me what* movies I like, I usually just say that I don't like movies. It's easier that way. It's not entirely accurate, but it's close enough. I'm a theater lover, through and through. I've had people treat my plays as stepping stones to film. Fuck that, says I. They are very different artistic forms. My biggest problem with film is that it is an often abused genre. Folks use it for shit that it doesn't really have any business being used for. This is one of my favorite film scenes of all time. I think it capitalizes on exactly what great film has to offer (not that it's comprehensive; film has a couple of special features).
In other news: I got a new puppy! Sort of. She's my brother and sister-in-law's pup, and they were living in the house here until two weeks ago. I missed the girl, and she's running a little too wild out on their country lot, so they're letting me take her. Her name is Wicket, and she is half-bloodhound, half-chow chow. Basically, she looks like an all-black bloodhound. And I loves her.
In other other news: I'm sick. It sucks.
*The first reaction is to suppress the urge to correct them by saying which.
Posted by: Rey Fox, Bird Caller Guy
|
August 24, 2010 9:36 PM
"Is Obama a werewolf?"
No, he's the Leopard King, remember?
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 9:48 PM
Jules:
There's plenty of movies that I like and when I love a movie, I love it hard. All that I want is to be treated like I've got an iota of intelligence. I do not like to be pandered to and I will not see a movie simply because it's a box-office hit, especially if it doesn't have any other redeeming qualities. (Yeah, I'm looking at you, Avatar*).
Shorter me: I hate having my time wasted and my intelligence insulted.
On that note, no video games for me tonight. Mr ODS (who has an amazing tolerance for schlock) found Drag Me To Hell on one of the HBO channels.
Me: Why are we watching this?
Mr ODS: Because you love Sam Raimi!
Me: *confused face*
Also, yay for puppies! Is there any way you can post pictures?
*If there are any fans kicking around Teh Thread&trade don't even bother. I'm not going to see it.
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 24, 2010 9:50 PM
Topics, topics.
Like everyone else here, I'm happy to hear that PZ made it through his procedure and is resting comfortably. Being able to go home tomorrow is a very good sign.
My blood type is O+, but I can't currently donate due to my weight (threshold being 110 lbs. (50 kg) and me weighing 99 lbs.(45kg)). When I weighed more I did manage to donate 4 pints, so I'm on my way to a gallon.
Caine, sorry to hear your big guy body slammed you. That hurts. Take it easy. I've learned to dodge pretty well since the boyfriend's dog weighs in at 20 lbs. more than me, but he also moves way faster than I do.
Sequels, where do I start. Sometimes you get Star Trek II: the Wrath of Kahn and sometimes you get Police Academy 2. The general pattern (as noted elsewhere) seems to be a good first movie, okay (maybe better e.g. X-Men 2) sequel, and terrible 3rd movie (again X-Men, who really liked Last Stand?). Sometimes you get a better third movie (Back to the Future: Part III) or maybe it picks up again with the fourth (Star Trek IV: the Voyage Home) but anything after the third movie in a series is generally terrible (Police Academy!). Of course, my opinions on good vs. bad movies can be odd. For example, I loved the Super Mario Bros. movie and really wish they had made the sequel. :(
I think books can develop much worse sequelitis than movies. The latter tend to be expensive to make and market whereas the former are (relatively) inexpensive to make, so you end up with Laurel K. Hamilton writing Anita Blake books long after she should have ended the pain of the readers. Though it does depend on the series. I'm a big fan of The Wheel of Time though it has lasted far longer than it should have, and the characters aren't too realistic (Brandon Sanderson is a better writer than Robert Jordan, though). I put this one down to an engaging world and complex story.
Finally, you get a TV series every so often that goes not one, but two seasons too long and you get the abysmal crap that was the last season of Scrubs (though I do think it was admirable for them to keep going to keep the crew employed).
And, always remember, Your Mileage May Vary.
Booyah, two tvtropes links in one post!
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 24, 2010 9:54 PM
Movies - I tend to like quirky, weird, odd movies. Loved Wristcutters and Dr. Parnassus and think Lebanon is superb (high nightmare quotient for me with that one - fair warning). Also loved La Horde; [REC] and [REC2] - ODS, two movies for you. Also love most of the Marx Brothers movies and, as stated before, Zombie films, the schlockier the better. A perennial favourite is Lifeboat because I adore Tallulah Bankhead.
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 10:01 PM
JeffreyD:
[Rec]2 was worth it? I've heard mixed things, but I'll watch it on your recommendation!
The movies I like vary wildly-- everything from Z films to the Cohen brothers to comic book adaptations. If it is well-written with passable acting*, I'll generally like it. Lately, though, it seems these qualities have been missing from most films.
*And for crap's sake, I hate a shitty editing job.
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 24, 2010 10:04 PM
ODS - Rec the second was not as good as the first, but still first rate Zombie fare. I am sure you will like La Horde, you do not even need subtitles, the French is easy to follow.
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 10:13 PM
Jeffrey:
Ha! You overestimate my familiarity with foreign languages. :P
Both [Rec]2 and La Horde have been added to the Netflix queue.
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 24, 2010 10:17 PM
I daresay I always preferred the first, myself. I just loved Michael Corleone's arc from boy-scout-with-misplaced-loyalty to Macchiavellian don. In the second, he pretty much already starts out like Richard III, and just goes downhill from there.
Wait - there's a Godfather IV?
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 10:19 PM
http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/story/garcia-gears-up-for-godfather-4
Posted by: Plainfieldrob
|
August 24, 2010 10:20 PM
Best wishes to you PZ.
Get well soon.
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 24, 2010 10:21 PM
I also love watching very early motion picture (not movies) like the very first, Roundhay Garden Scene. The odd way people seem to move in old motion pictures is fascinating to me (yeah, I know it's the frames per second stuff).
There's my odd love of German silent films like Metropolis and Faust. We watched them in German class back in high school. Weird now that I think of it. Why watch silent films in a class that was supposed to be teaching us a spoken language? Maybe my teacher was just a big silent film fan.
That reminds me, I'm going to stroll over to youtube and watch some silent film!
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 10:21 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dtf_Gxy9ZRY
GF 4: Freddo's Revenge
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 10:30 PM
PZ has posted over at Ophelia Benson's place - he had 5 stents installed!
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2010/in-minneapolis-news/#comment-57934
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 24, 2010 10:31 PM
Jesus Christ, that movie SUCKS. I watched it on an evening when I had nothing planned and was tired of playing games online. I'd have been better off staring at the wall all night.
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 24, 2010 10:31 PM
awesome
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 24, 2010 10:37 PM
I just had the most awesome image ever.
PZ with an artificial heart.
A steampunk artificial heart.
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 24, 2010 10:39 PM
Pygmy Loris - Oh, yeah! Also like those. Nosferatu is great as well.
Caine - thanks for the update tips, milady.
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 10:42 PM
Part-Time Insomniac:
Yeah, I'm feeling that. It's like Sam Raimi tried to remake Army of Darkness with a bigger budget.
This is another one for the list of "movies that didn't need to be made".
:( I just want my teevee back.
Speaking of zombies: here's the new trailer for AMC's adaptation of The Walking Dead. Wooo! (Although the hospital and the "going home to an empty house" bits look an awful lot like 28 Days Later.)
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 24, 2010 10:42 PM
ODS -
>How much French do you need for Bang, Scream, Crunch, Help, Arrrgggghhhhhhhhh?
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 10:42 PM
Pygmy Loris:
Thanks, my ankle is borked. Generally, I can manage to dodge Matoska, as he's huge (taller than me if he puts his front paws on my shoulders) and outweighs me by 4 lbs. My goofy monster.
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 24, 2010 10:47 PM
Jeffrey,
Man, silent horror films are freaking awesome. Nosferatu, Frankenstein and Das Kabinett des Doktor Caligari are great. Youtube is one of the most wonderful things about the internet. I can watch old and/or obscure films any time I want. Yay!
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
August 24, 2010 10:49 PM
Re cave-bear teeth - I have a molar in the box of knitting supplies that I carry in my knitting bag. Every knitter should have one. If I wanted to be really odd, then I'd stick the wheeler shale trilobite, the stromatolite, and the cross-section of meteorite (gift from an astronomer friend) in there as well. Just having the cave bear tooth makes for interesting conversations around the yarn table...
Barack Obama couldn't be more of a disappointment if he actually were a werewolf. This might even be an improvement. His administration's behavior on AGW is beyond appalling. Perhaps not as far beyond appalling as previous administrations, but still pretty far beyond...
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 10:49 PM
Jeffrey:
Hmmmm, not much, I suppose.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 24, 2010 10:51 PM
Bubba Ho-Tep.
It is quite possibly one of the best movies every made.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 24, 2010 10:55 PM
I suppose I must confess to a liking for cheesy parody movies---which, I hasten to mention, doesn't in any way prevent me from also liking fare more like The Fifth Element.
OTOH, I can't hardly stand to look at most movies conventionally labelled "Classics", particularly if they are in black and white. They just look...grubby. (Remember...Folger's Crystals? Miracle WhipTM? My tastes ain't refined enough for the nuances, or whateverthehell it is that has the sophisticates raving over the black and whites.)
Oh, and Monty Python and the Holy Grail is, without question or doubt, the finest movie ever made.
Mattir...more email, I'm afraid. Because 'Efficiency' is not my middle name.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 10:56 PM
Captain Smug:
Oh yes, absolutely.
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 24, 2010 10:56 PM
@nigelTheBold, CS
The whole spot on the pecker bit makes me giggle everytime.
Posted by: Frank b
|
August 24, 2010 10:57 PM
Ewan R #106 That's interesting that UK ambulances carried CMV neg blood. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)is only a concern for severely immunocompromised people, it would seem a waste for trauma patients. We used to test our donors for CMV all the time, but now we don't. Leukoreducing our units of blood renders them CMV neg. CMV reside in the White Cells of infected donors, so removing the White Cells removes the CMV.
Domin #200 The antigens of a patient don't affect how a patient tolerates a transfusions, so I am guessing that you had an indeterminate antibody. Those are a blood banker's nightmare, especially if they cause a transfusion reaction. If your plasma reacts with all the donors during testing, you are up sh*t creek. The doctors can try to control the reactions with drugs, or try other treatments.
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 24, 2010 10:57 PM
Caine,
Ack, and just as the weather is cooling down there, too.
:)
Mattir,
If he were a werewolf, Obama could probably actually make congressional Repubs shit their pants. Now he just makes the Tea Baggers shake with impotent fury and laughably misplaced fear of *gasp* a black man in the presidency.
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 24, 2010 10:58 PM
To amend my # 389:
I only speak two languages: English and bad English.
Posted by: ask-who-knows
|
August 24, 2010 10:59 PM
@Lauren
In the classroom in front of 8th graders, I'd growl, "¡A mí no me gustan las albondigas!" It means "I don't like meatballs."
"¡Albondigas!" by itself was often enough.
The few times I had Spanish-speaking students, they'd grow delighted smiles and play along when I told them they mustn't translate for others the horrible thing I'd just said.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 11:01 PM
big fan of the arpeggio
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 24, 2010 11:03 PM
Yeah for Bubba Ho-Tep!
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 24, 2010 11:06 PM
How much French do you need
cerveau!
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 24, 2010 11:07 PM
And off to bed to dream of ghoulies and ghosties and things that go bump in the night.*
*I am one of those things that bumps back. ;^}
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 24, 2010 11:09 PM
Ooooo, youtube fun
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpClbQCjF38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTwAaP4dNWI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wA3If87UhA
Warning, all are silent and in black and white.
cicely,
I like the now campy special effects of really old movies. I have not seen the overwhelming majority of the "classics because I just don't have the desire to. The only things besides silent films that I watch in black and white are Twilight Zone episodes and sci-fi B-movies.
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 24, 2010 11:13 PM
Hmm, I forgot a quotation mark there. Should be "classics"
More from youtube, but earliest photographs this time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOkd8ObhN_M
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 24, 2010 11:14 PM
Worst movie ever made: Santa Claus Conquers the Martians.
From the title you'd think there at least be some camp value to it. No. It's past so-bad-it's-good and well into unenjoyably bad terrority. Even with the witty commentary from MST3K I couldn't sit through the entire thing.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 24, 2010 11:15 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot, we're supposed to be padding this thread for our tentacled overload or Sven or somebody like that. Or unlike that, as the case may be.
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 24, 2010 11:21 PM
OMFSM! Isabella Rossellini's bug sex vids (the bed bug one) were on The Daily Show.
I'm trying my best to pad the Thread, but it's hard. How many youtube videos of stuff that's only cool 'cause it's old can I link to?
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 24, 2010 11:23 PM
'stent' is a strange word
it reminds me of 'frond' for some reason
Posted by: Markita Lynda: Healthcare is a damn right
|
August 24, 2010 11:27 PM
SteveV, maybe its time for a new motto: "I might be growing older, but I refuse to grow up!"
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 11:28 PM
Goodnight, M'dear, I'll bump you back in the multiverse. ;)
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 24, 2010 11:29 PM
5 stents in my experience is highly unusual, I don't think I've ever seen that before.Was this to save a few years before finally grafting those lesions ? I've really never seen this done before, not in the worst triple-vessel-disease-diffuse-plaque-everywhere diabetics.No wonder they did that under sedation.
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 24, 2010 11:31 PM
Which reminds me of frood.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 24, 2010 11:37 PM
Rorschach, I expect we'll just have to wait for all the details. Right now, I'm glad to see PZ posting with tone.
Posted by: Markita Lynda: Healthcare is a damn right
|
August 25, 2010 12:12 AM
Hi, PZ! I'm drawing in a stitch from a previous thread, about positive thinking and praying your way back to better eyesight, because I Suspect that Positive Thinking is to miracles as Creationism is to science. The review for Bright-Sided: How Positive Thinking is Undermining America points out that the positive thinking movement is massively funded in the U.S. by the Conservative Right. I'd guess that if you get sick or don't get better or don't get rich, it's your fault because you didn't think positively enough or, in a religious context, you didn't pray enough or have enough faith. It's just blaming the victim all over again, a very popular notion with fellows who started at Vice President and worked their way up.
Of course, prayer isn't necessary. Expectations are incredibly powerful, which is why cultural stereotypes are so bad. Another book called Counterclockwise mentions research that messes with people's minds, e.g. by putting the small letters at the top of an eye chart, does not send the message that At Some Point These Will Be Too Small to See. People tested with those charts can read, on the average, two or three lines smaller than they can on the descending ones. In fact, that might be the allure of Thinking Positively in the first place.
Posted by: Markita Lynda: Healthcare is a damn right
|
August 25, 2010 12:21 AM
Conversely, the reason that prayed-for people are more likely to die is not, of course, that prayer is harmful, but that when told that everyone is praying madly for them, some people feel, "OMG I must be sicker than I thought!" and so panic, stress out, and interfere with their own healing. It's the religious equivalent of a careless curse.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 12:21 AM
reminds me of 'frond' for some reason
word association.
hmm.
this help?
http://www.uwgb.edu/biodiversity/herbarium/pteridophytes/fern_frond01.jpg
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 12:25 AM
and so panic, stress out, and interfere with their own healing. It's the religious equivalent of a careless curse.
actually, that very thing was a primary concern of those who reviewed the previous STEP study from Templeton. I recall a note response that was published in one of the medical journals to such effect.
there was indeed a barely significant correlation that suggested to the reviewers that these kinds of studies might not be ethical in and of themselves; in that it might be exposing patients to unnecessary risk.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 12:25 AM
Alas, OurDeadSelves, Mother of Death, one important caveat I forgot was my uninhibited endorsement of all horror movies. I actually loved Drag Me to Hell, but I also spend my Saturdays knitting and watching SyFy's monster marathons. I can't say I love them the same way I love The King of Marvin Gardens (what I linked to above) or Raising Arizona, but I'll certainly watch any of them (assuming I don't actually have to pay money to do so).
Also, I actually get scared really easily. My ex, his brother, and I went to see Drag Me to Hell in the theater (the brother paid), and after we got back, I was supposed to meet some friends to go out dancing. Ex never did anything like that, so I had to go alone. At night. All the way from the front door to my car. Ex was a real joker and waited until I got out the door. He then slammed it behind me and started screaming at the top of his lungs (he's an actor, and a pretty damn good one too) and shaking the door. I panicked in a way no adult woman who clearly knows a joke is being played on her should ever panic. He had to walk me to my car (all of 30 feet away), and I called the friend I was meeting so that I wouldn't have to drive in silence.
No, I don't believe anything in that movie is actually possible. I'm just a big fat baby.
Yes, it is weird that I like to engage in activities that terrify me.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 12:34 AM
I know some one who has five stents (maybe more, or maybe those were replacements).
However this person is a man over 50 with juvenile diabetes and a lifetime of heart disease. It's more or less a keep you going as best we can thing because of the danger of surgery for him. He has, however, kept going.
So maybe it is something they're doing now, or doing here? Perhaps to delay surgery, as you kind of suggest there, either for financial or health reasons?
Posted by: llewelly
|
August 25, 2010 12:54 AM
Rorschach | August 24, 2010 11:29 PM:
Well. We do know cephalopods have two gill hearts in addition to the main heart. Maybe that has something to do with the need for all those stents ...
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 25, 2010 1:13 AM
Watching Mythbusters episodes on YouTube. I think I've learned more by watching those guys than I did in school.
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 1:21 AM
A concrete cow.
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 1:31 AM
That also happened in my German class. Whilst the teacher (a great guy and one of those amazing people who can speak five or six languages fluently) very probably did like silent films, as I recall the rationale was to learn a bit of the history, cultural, and cultural influences on history. Or something like that. (And, as I recall, we had to write a criticism of, or at least an essay about, the films in German.)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 1:35 AM
PTI:
Yep, good stuff. I do like their earlier stuff to the more recent, though.
Posted by: boygenius
|
August 25, 2010 1:41 AM
Which reminds me of frop.
Posted by: chigau (◦_◦)
|
August 25, 2010 1:48 AM
black and white "classics"
Casablanca
To Kill a Mockingbird
the first and last 15 minutes of The Wizard of Oz
etc.
sequels mostly suck.
What about re-makes?
Has any re-make been better than the original?
.
.
my left-hand shift key is dying.
Posted by: monado
|
August 25, 2010 2:20 AM
Philosophy: intellectual cotton candy.
Posted by: boygenius
|
August 25, 2010 2:28 AM
Maybe more like an intellectual taffy pull?
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 25, 2010 2:33 AM
His Girl Friday is better than The Front Page (the 1935? version)and better than both of the subsequent remakes.IMHO
Posted by: echidna
|
August 25, 2010 2:59 AM
I think I'll wait until the drugs have worn off before I trust any competitive statement from PZ about how many stents he has.
Posted by: monado
|
August 25, 2010 3:04 AM
I'd keep the peace in the family and switch to alternatives and sound-alikes.
My mum taught us to say 'Sacramento, San Juan, San Francisco," will maximum feeling, rolling the r's.
"Rusty tin can" for a car that's acting up. Or "son of a rusty tin can."
Mumbled crowd noises: "Rabble-frashus!"
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 25, 2010 3:17 AM
I mentioned Death to Smoochy cause it's almost universally ridiculed, but I just liked it. And self-aware bad actor Jon Stewart as the villain? Sign me up.
And I don't think people who believe that "there are no sequels better than the original" will ever like a sequel more than the original. I've seen plenty of sequels that I liked better than the original.
Posted by: Janine, The Little Top Of Venom, OM
|
August 25, 2010 3:21 AM
Has any re-make been better than the original?
The Fly. That was easy.
Oh, and The Maltese Falcon (1941) was made two times before. There was The Maltese Falcon (1931) and Satan Met A Lady (1936).
And that was also easy.
Posted by: Janine, The Little Top Of Venom, OM
|
August 25, 2010 3:29 AM
I am not so sure about that. But I did enjoy Bruce Campbell as Elvis and Ossie Davis as JFK. I have to admit I got a little lump in my throat when the two old men were walking down the hallway in order to confront the mummy.
Posted by: Usagichan
|
August 25, 2010 3:35 AM
Has any re-make been better than the original?
Cheating perhaps, but LoTR was originally made into an appalling animated movie version with a deservedly forgotten 'sequal'
Posted by: Janine, The Little Top Of Venom, OM
|
August 25, 2010 3:42 AM
As for sequels being better than the original, The Bride Of Frankenstein is better and more perverse than Frankenstein, but it is still a fine movie.
Posted by: Andyo
|
August 25, 2010 3:59 AM
I think the problem with most remakes is that Hollywood does them. As such, they cut out all the good parts that made the movie great. Even a good director like Cameron Crowe (loved Almost Famous) could not get it right with Vanilla Sky. There is a certain sort of grittiness in most "foreign" movies that is lost when Hollywood cleans up and "polishes" the movie (both script and photography) for mass consumption.
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 25, 2010 4:04 AM
@410 I could imagine how someone might end up with 5 stents, although I don't think it's standard (I'm not a cardiologist so SOC could have changed while I wasn't looking, but I don't think so.) Maybe someone who has medical contraindications to major surgery but poorly controlled with meds or had the stents put in one or 2 at a time over a period of a decade or so?
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 25, 2010 4:27 AM
podblack @ 56,
You see, I only asked because I have information that other attractive intelligent males were rather smitten with you at an unnamed recent global atheist event.....:-)
Not me, mind you.I prefer football these days.
Good point I guess..:-)
If it was indeed 5, as I wrote at Mrs Benson's place, maybe the cardiothoracic team there is on annual leave ?
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 25, 2010 4:48 AM
PZ is supposed to have had 5 stents placed? Missed that earlier. I agree with waiting until the drugs wear off before believing the count...
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 25, 2010 4:58 AM
Or...maybe not.
Ten year BARI outcomes.
Twenty year outcomes of early CABG and PTCA
Interesting. Anyone seen any other large studies that might support or refute the above?
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 25, 2010 5:10 AM
I'd be careful with interpreting those studies Dianne, the 20yr comparison study is from the 70s and 80s, the other one a 10 year study from 2007, so patients are from the 90s.Stent materials and surgery techniques, as well as secondary prevention measures, have changed dramatically since then.
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 25, 2010 5:14 AM
Roschah, I agree. (I put in a comment to that effect originally, but took it out as prejudicial to anyone else reading.) However, the BARI study was originally what people were using to support CABG over PTCA so considering the long term outcomes from it seems reasonable. Have you seen other data supporting continued preference of CABG? (Note also that both studies support CABG over PTCA in diabetics.)
Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/hairychris444#96384
|
August 25, 2010 5:22 AM
"Yojimbo" was remade as "A Fistful of Dollars" but both were equally awesome.
Does that count?
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 25, 2010 5:27 AM
On the other hand...
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 25, 2010 5:31 AM
Then again...
The bottom line seems to be that the earlier open and shut case for CABG in preference to PTCA is no longer valid after longer term follow up and further studies. It'd be nice to have a cardiologist who could comment on the literature as a whole, but at minimum there seems to be controversy as to the best treatment option.
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 5:32 AM
Good sequels: Conan the Destroyer, Terminator 2, Hot Shots 2. Terminator 3 is watchable, except I hate the basic idea behind it too much.
No idea of my blood type. If I tried to donate, they probably wouldn't let me because of my high bilirubin levels. (No detectable liver problems; I just seem to make more of that antioxidant.)
^_^
Ouch. I must never watch it.
Basically, yes, only without the girl. :o)
How good is the evidence? We've been promised Jurassic Park 4 every few months since before JP3 came out. The rumors have now ended, but that took a long time.
(Never trust aintitcoolnews.com.)
ROTFL!
Reminds me of an anecdote about a famous historical linguist (I think Eric Hamp): he had given students a list of papers to read, and some of those were in French. One student came to him and said "...well... actually... I don't... speak French" or something along those lines. Reply? "Oh, just learn it, it's easy".
X-)
<facepalm>
<headdesk>
<headdesk>
<headdesk>
Maybe there's just dust under it?
Posted by: Usagichan
|
August 25, 2010 5:47 AM
... and don't forget "Shichi-nin Samurai" as "The Magnificent 7" (again both were brilliant). Perhaps a less successful (and somewhat looser) transfer was of the many "Zatoichi" films (much re-made here in Japan) as the less-than-awesome "Blind Fury".
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 6:19 AM
Beck's recent sign of sanity seems to have indicated a temporary condition at best. He now preaches Mormon "history" on his show and, of course, the ongoing conspiracy to suppress it.
Have a look at comments 24 and 25. And 31, though I didn't click on the link in it.
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 25, 2010 7:39 AM
David M:
re: Austin Powers 4
IIRC, Mike Myers confirmed that there was a studio working on it back in March. I'll link to an article when I'm on an actual computer and not my iPod.
In other news: Mr ODS's great-aunt died last night.
I don't even know how to react. I'm feeling worse about what his aunt is going through than the actual death.
That makes me sound like a terrible person.
Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline.
|
August 25, 2010 7:43 AM
Sorry, David,
But I've been told that Beck is not a reliable witness as to Mormon doctrine, and not all Mormons agree with him.
/snark
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 25, 2010 7:49 AM
God dammit I hate my state...
Fuck Ken Cuccinelli
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 25, 2010 7:56 AM
I post this without comment
Just don't know what to say.
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 25, 2010 8:02 AM
@SteveV:
Why the hell would anyone do that?! Is she psychopathic or something?
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 25, 2010 8:04 AM
@my 453:
Sorry - sociopathic.
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 25, 2010 8:08 AM
Re #448:
Beck was showing signs of sanity?
What. He wiped the foam from around his mouth for once?
Somewhat more seriously: I'll be curious to see what happens to his ratings more medium term given this. Very, even.
There's a basic psychology critical to selling religion: bring it in a little at a time, get people emotionally invested (and/or effectively blackmailed by the social cost of leaving) before you start the hard sell on the truly loopy stuff...
Do that too early and from the wrong context, and you will drive people away. It's the reason $cientology doesn't tell you about thetans, DC-10s, hydrogen bombs and volcanoes during your first 'personality test'.
So how people react to this will say something either scary or encouraging about how successful a demagogue Beck really is...
The bright side: some will actually finally see him for the dangerous, manipulative nutbar he actually is. The very bright side: some may even succeed in generalizing from the revealed loopiness of Mormonism to the loopiness of their own faith. It does happen.
(/The not so bright side: others will say unto themselves: hey, reality's how I want to imagine it, and that's a good story, complete with fun evil gummit conspiracy noise... so I'm in. Or I'll give 'im my wingnut sympathy as a poor oppressed fellow sufferer, at least...)
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 25, 2010 8:09 AM
@Kevin:
I'm at acomplete loss - no clue.
Blind link - can't see ytube at work.
Kate
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 25, 2010 8:12 AM
Question for the day. Does PZ have enough stents in him to set off the metal detectors at airport security?
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 25, 2010 8:15 AM
Usagichan:
I preferred the remake of the remake...
... wait for it...
A Bug's Life.
Seriously.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 8:28 AM
Just, um.... acquired the full discography. I used to have that album a long time ago. Forgot it existed, was excited to re-find it again.
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawk8nuEGr2AboPw3B5JlVHLruh87cSf2gi4
|
August 25, 2010 8:41 AM
Thank you all for your feedback...
Carlie@297: I am familiar with code-switching as I come from a polyglot family (both parents were foreign language teachers as well). After considering your comment for a bit, I think my MIL's objection is definitely more about control than preference, which immediately raises my contrarian hackles. I would have cleaned up my language for my mother, because I loved her dearly, but I don't have much respect for my MIL.
DominEditrix@337: Oh, do start swearing in Geek. It will annoy your MiL because she'll know you're swearing, but she won't be able to chastise you.
I'm not sure it would have that effect, which is why I posed the question in the first place. Would she feel vindicated that I switched "frak" for "fuck," or would she still be annoyed that I was "swearing" at all? She would not in any case recognize Geek; she'd think it was just random syllables.
Now, I could combine both these suggestions with that of ask-who-knows@397 and switch to other languages. I can snarl about hating meatballs and comparing her earlobes to fish heads (™ Bloom County) and just sound rude, or I could use the genuine insults Nonna taught me. (My Sicilian grandmother swears like a sailor. When she and my grandfather squabbled, the paint would peel off the walls.)
This would have a bonus effect: my MIL is not very educated, and is resentful that I am (she thinks I was being "snotty" and "showing off" when I pointed out that she got the date of her son's birthday wrong. A son she BORE, mind you), so deliberately speaking in another language in front of her would annoy her.
And there is my sprog to consider. I would rather hear "figghio di putana!" chirped from the back seat than "sonofawhore!"
sounds like I have to spend some quality time with Nonna and a laptop...
--Lauren Ipsum
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 9:23 AM
The French transhumanist is reduced to whining about how much he'd like to reverse the burden of evidence. He says he can read and write English "very well", but he "excels" in French, which seems "more subtle" to him (because he knows it better, duh). :-)
Anyone following that link might like to read the next comment, too, because there he explains his typos and brain glitches.
How well did you know that great-aunt?
Three of my grandparents have died, and I didn't cry over any of them. I do miss them, but I hadn't met them often enough (at least recently) to get such a reaction, and the reasons why I feel lonely lie elsewhere. In contrast, I think that if a random stranger died in my arms, I'd cry a river or two.
Oh dear. <wringing hands> Someone will need to think of the children and teach the controversy.
Obviously. First, there's the sociopathic lack of empathy for "just a cat"; then, there's the psychopathic urge to do something just because it's possible, without thinking about consequences.
Jadehawk said last subthread that he doesn't care about gay marriage (anymore?). It neither picks his pocket nor breaks his leg.
:-o
That's really extreme.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:26 AM
I'm really wishing I'd found a doctor before I got sick. Ugh. This process is annoying. Every place I call opens at 8:30 or 9, closes for 2 hours midday, and closes at 5. I need drugs, dammit! I've got deadlines.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 25, 2010 9:45 AM
Even a broken clock finds an acorn once in a while.
Posted by: Ewan R
|
August 25, 2010 9:50 AM
Frank @ #394 - This was ~5 years ago so it might have changed - we had a whole fridge full of CMV- blood so I guess it was just a precautionary thing - you're not going to know if an emergency patient is immunocompromised when you pull 'em out of a car wreck - if I remember right we also had to use CMV- blood products for post-natal transfusions - which is odd because we'd nuke the crap out of that stuff(and put it in cutesy little blood bags - 1 adult unit --> 4 post natal units) so any CMV in there would be completely useless - again, I guess just precautionary measures. Generally that was one of the few uses for the massive quantities of CMV- blood we actually had - we'd often send CMV- blood in place of CMV+ just because it would otherwise expire and have to be chucked.
Posted by: Jadehawk, cascadeuse féministe
|
August 25, 2010 9:54 AM
Someone who'd do that is seriously messed up; someone who'd do that, and then be surprised that the internet is being aggressively vile to her for it is messed up and internet-illiterate. Cats are the gods of internet, and Anonymous are their holy warriorsPosted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:57 AM
Happy Monday.
Happy United States National Park Service Founder's Day -- August 26, 1916. Thank you Stephen Mather and Horace Albright (they (basically) told President Wilson he was doing a lousy job running America's National Parks and Monuments and the President, brilliant man that he was, said (basically), "You are right. Come up with a plan to run them." And they came up with the NPS. (Extremely shortened and simplified (obviously))).
And today, I need to design (and make proofs thereof) two 11 by 17 inch schedule posters, temporary parking signs, a 24 by 36 inch fall excursion poster, and two informational brochures with the schedule for the 4th and 5th of September at the park. I also need to move all of our exhibit materials (our arts and crafts area) to a new part of the office (foam core, plastic overlay, PMA, flexible adhesive magnets, cutting boards, etc.). And what am I doing on the thread?
Errrr. I'm, uh, planning. Yeah, that's it. Planning.
------------
Great. Now I have to start watching for the giant winged porcupines which will soon be flying out of my arse. Backwards.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 10:00 AM
What park are you at Obvorbis?
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 10:05 AM
Good plan, Billy.
I concur.
(no idea what it means, but it seemed like a good chance to 'concur')
Hokay. Off to battle the denizens of the Belt Parkway and Verrezano Bridge a couple of times. Hope there's no orcs today.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 10:11 AM
Ooh SteveV I watched that video before. What a nasty woman. She even checks like she's looking to make sure no one is around to see.
Psychopathy is amazing.
One of the many reasons I keep my kitty indoors all the time. One less thing to encounter :(
I'm glad her neighbors know what kind of person she is.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 10:15 AM
Rev. BDC:
Steamtown NHS in beautiful downtown Scranton, PA (and I know most of you have heard of Scranton -- The Office is set there (And I've never been able to watch The Office. The few times I have, I find myself wishing that my office was that normal.
Posted by: and7barton
|
August 25, 2010 10:17 AM
If you should have the misfortune to be given an enema - Ask them if you'll be able to play the tuba afterwards.
It makes a change from the violin joke.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 10:19 AM
Cool. My Bro in Law and my nephew are big into trains. I wonder if they've ever been through there.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 10:22 AM
My #470: Epic parenthetical fail. Which makes me feel really ashamed as they are (as some of you (only those who are more observant) may have noticed) my personal defense against reality (and cullions).
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 10:27 AM
Rev. BDC:
You don't even really have to be into trains to get a lot out of Steamtown. Rail history is a useful way to explain industrial history in America -- including labour, management, government regulation, technology, industry, finance, etc.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 10:27 AM
The other reason people may have heard of Scranton PA (actually, it's also mentioned as a fake destination in the original In-Laws, but that's a bit obscure):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZZqnVYB4UA
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 10:33 AM
Yeah looks really cool. Not sure when / if I'll be in Scranton but definitely somewhere I'd check out.
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 25, 2010 10:47 AM
re: trash can cat
A coworker of mine just sided with the "it's just a cat" philosophy and doesn't see how it's any different than putting it in a cage with food. I should have asked her which she'd rather spend 15 hours in. Then maybe she'd think about the difference.
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 10:49 AM
Oh PLEASE NO!
X-D
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 10:51 AM
Or not. Because... she's not just a cat.
Posted by: Aaron Baker
|
August 25, 2010 10:52 AM
I like trains, too. I'll keep Steamtown in mind.
On a completely unrelated matter:
The trial proper of Gregory Koger (victim of the Chicago Ethical Humanist Society) begins today. Yesterday was completely taken up with pretrial motions and jury selection. The mills of justice grinding extremely fine and all that.
I'm sure Greg would appreciate people's good wishes.
Something else that's worthy of good wishes: my daughter is taking a kind of pre-course at Mercyhurst College--she has significant learning disabilities (she was born very prematurely), and this course will determine a great deal about whether she can flourish in college or not. It's one of those times when the uselessness of prayer, and the sheer, cussed unfairness of the world, is borne in on me especially keenly. She's very tough, and very hard-working, but moral support has always put her in a good frame of mind. That's all.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 25, 2010 10:59 AM
Never happened. Not even with pictures.
Especially not with pictures.
Not to me. No amount of concern can do anything for or to the deceased; they are gone. Concern for the living is 'way more sensible, as they are the ones being actually affected by the death. IMO, you're doing it right.
What's this? Disagreement on fiddly points of religious dogma within a religion?
NOOOOOO! That would be...inconceivable. /snark
Re the cat-dumping psychopath: courtesy of Boing Boing.
Stealin' that!
Be sure to catch it on camera. Sounds like a sure-fire YouTube hit!
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 11:00 AM
A coworker of mine just sided with the "it's just a cat" philosophy and doesn't see how it's any different than putting it in a cage with food.
Access to air is a big factor. Like with bongkitty, enclosing an animal in a box with limited airflow (and I'm told this was even on a hot day) is pretty much a death sentence, although it may well be a sloooow death sentence. Dying over a period of 30 or so hours vs. dying over 30 or so seconds is actually a lot worse IMO.
Same goes with locked inside a car, especially with the windows rolled up.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 11:03 AM
Seems like something a small child would do though, expecting there would be no consequences.
I'm surprised she isn't sorry, but I imagine she's feeling pretty entitled due to all the harassment she's probably getting these days.
Oh and blockquote fail on my part. The first sentence in my post is KOPD talking.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 11:06 AM
All that being said I think the front end nature of technology and the increased visibility of everyday people is going to make us face a lot of hard realities about...
people.
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 25, 2010 11:15 AM
'Cities in Flight' - James Blish
One of the first SF stories I ever read.
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 25, 2010 11:18 AM
Sometimes I prefer animals over people. Especially non-primates. It's a lot less frequent that you see an animal do something we'd call dickish or insensitive "just because". Animals at least will often have an understandable (if selfish) reason, or can at least be called unintelligent enough to not be accountable. I'm aware I'm oversimplifying this, but surely you get my point.
Posted by: Frank b
|
August 25, 2010 11:23 AM
Ewan R #464 Our last blood center director was also a pediatrician, so his specialty was neonatal transfusions. He developed a procedure where we gently spin a fresh unit of blood upside down to pack it, and then drain small aliquots into a small bag & syringe set to send to the peds wards. The original bag was leukodepleted and we irradiated the aliquot. By reducing the supernatant (to remove the excess Potassium found in old blood) for each aliquot we could use the bag of blood until it expired, and we used it for the same patient to reduce exposure to multiple donors. I have heard that many hospitals across the world are adopting this system. So it would replace the small bags you used to make.
The idea of irradiation and CMV neg is complicated and often confused, but they are quite separate. Irradiation is for destroying the Lymphocytes' (a type of white cell) ability to proliferate in the immunocompromised recipient and cause graft vs host disease. Of course CMV is a virus that is dangerous to these same patients as well as to neonates with their immature immune systems. Residents and new doctors at our place are always struggling to understand this. I am glad PZ won't need blood just yet.
Posted by: Ewan R
|
August 25, 2010 11:25 AM
I may be misinformed on this, and it's also been a long time since I've seen the animated version but...
I remember it being stylistically pretty impressive - looked like live action which then had animation done over it, and the orcs and whatnot were scary as all hell (again, if memory serves)
Also it was misnamed (shoulda had a part I) because it ended with Gandalf saving the day at Helm's deep without actually resolving the story whatsoever. Dunno if the 2nd part was ever made.
Awesomely Tom Bombadil was completely skipped - which I love because that's exactly how I read the books.
Posted by: Aaron Baker
|
August 25, 2010 11:44 AM
There was an animated film version of The Return of the King,, apparently not a true sequel to the Ralph Bakshi LOTR, and I saw it on television years ago. Not very good. The elves, if I remember, looked something like Aztecs.
If you must, you can read about it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Return_of_the_King_(1980_film).
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 25, 2010 11:48 AM
Wow. I was just looking at the cover of the 1980 version of RotK. The first thing that came to mind was "magically delicious".
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 11:51 AM
Janine nailed it with The Fly.
Here are my other personal contenders: The Thing, Ocean's Eleven, The Departed.
Posted by: chigau (◦_◦)
|
August 25, 2010 11:53 AM
#465 Jadehawk OM
This.and I just noticed "Anonymous" was used as a plural. I think that should be correct and will use it that way from now on.
(Someone once told us he had seen a "link" near his cabin. It was puzzling only for a short time because he was emphatic that he had seen only one.)
.
"just a cat"
The cat was apparently familiar with Mary and 'trusted' her. Mary played on that trust and then violated it. That sounds a bit sociopath-y to me. What's her next trick? Setting fire to the neighbour's lawn? Cutting the brake-line? /paranoia
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 25, 2010 12:01 PM
Depends on which side of the pond you're on, etc. In American English it's common to use a singular verb when referring to a group (eg. "Shinedown is a group of four guys"), rather than a plural ("Shinedown are a group of four guys").Posted by: Jadehawk, cascadeuse féministe
|
August 25, 2010 12:05 PM
first, I pictured a hyperlink floating out in the wild; then I pictured a green-hatted elf. Only then did it dawn on me WTF you're talking about :-panyway, Anonymous with capital A seems like it should be used the same way legion is...
Posted by: Lynna, OM
|
August 25, 2010 12:05 PM
For your Moment of Mormon Madness for today, we expose a little history from 1852. Brigham Young gave a lovely speech which now resides in the LDS Church Historical Department in Salt Lake City, specifically in "Ms d 1234, Box 28, folder 3" -- Excerpt below:
["Bishoprick" is only one of many "sic" instances, but it may be the most accidentally accurate]If Glenn Beck wants to preach mormon history on Fox, he should include this. After all, it's more recent than Beck's "evidence" of Egyptian symbols in Native American mound burials, and more recent than his "evidence" of Jews migrating to North America, along with the risen Jesus.
Posted by: chigau (◦_◦)
|
August 25, 2010 12:09 PM
Fritz the Cat and Wizards were pretty good but Bakshi's Lord of the Rings was a bleeding, back-alley, coathanger abortion of a movie.
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 12:11 PM
nigelThe
SmugBold waaaay back @96: What a delicious, pithy takedown.I never get tired of seeing that canard dismissed. There's no guilty pleasure quite like kicking low-hanging, overripe, sophistic fruit with the steel-toecapped boot of reality-based wit.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 12:11 PM
Isn't "we are legion" that way because of the KJ english though?
Or am I out of my depth here?
Cause I don't feel the bottom and if I don't feel the bottom I'm usually out of my depth. Either that or lying down.
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 12:17 PM
Actually, for those who care, please scratch the phrase 'reality-based wit' (it seems almost superfluous, and in any case bizarre) from my 497 and just replace it with 'wit'.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 12:24 PM
Don't understand all the hatin' of The Return of the King. I grew up on that cartoon. My sibs and I used to play "Where There's a Whip, There's a Way" all the time. No, I don't mean we used to play the song. I mean we used to play it as a game. It mostly involved singing the song and hitting each other with towels until Mom came in and
ruined the funrescued whoever got ganged up on.Posted by: Lynna, OM
|
August 25, 2010 12:29 PM
For those who might feel the need to debunk Glenn Beck's rubbish, here are some sources. (You'll note that Beck's so-called "artifacts" were debunked in the late 1890s, but I guess you can't keep a good rumor down if it confirms your religious bias.)
More: http://www.hal.state.mi.us/mhc/michrelics/controversy.html
More: http://www.hal.state.mi.us/mhc/michrelics/people.html
And here is a rebuttal of the so-called Bat Creek stone that Beck featured. The rebuttal was written in 1993: http://www.ramtops.co.uk/bat2.html
Beck has, like many mormons, a visceral need to "prove" the "history" presented in the Book of Mormon accurate. Hence the revival of debunked hoaxes as "science" and as "anthropological artifacts" -- bullshit that a lot of Beck's viewers are eating up. Deseret books even published Beck's DVD and audio tapes.
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 25, 2010 12:39 PM
That cat video is one reason why I'm protective of my pets. You never know who in the neighborhood is most likely to pull a stunt like that and not really care what could happen. (I've also read The Sociopath Next Door, so unfortunately I've made myself just this side of paranoid about that kind of shit.)
Debating whether to see the tennis matches this evening or just stay home.
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 12:45 PM
Tennis matches. Home will still be there when you return.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 12:56 PM
Re: Sociopathic Cat-Hater
It's reminiscent of Gummo, albeit a far less severe version of it. The town in that film is extremely similar to the one I lived in before we moved to Alabama. I had cousins who pulled crap like that (stuff in Gummo and cat-hater lady) with cats and dogs. They shot my dog full of rock salt for kicks. I also heard stories of them throwing cats over the cliff into the river, though I never witnessed it myself.
I miss many aspects of rural living, but being surrounded by psychos* is not one of them.
*This is not a claim that all rural living involves psychos. It's a claim that the particular rural community I lived in had a lot of them.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 25, 2010 12:57 PM
ROTFLMAO!!!
Courtesy of Bad Astronomy: A tornado made of fire. Seriously.
Bah. The ones in my nightmares are bigger than this, and travel in packs. Move faster, too. Nonetheless, my imagination is vindicated.
(Now I'm having trouble with the link. At the moment, it's on the front page of the B.A. blog.)
Posted by: windy
|
August 25, 2010 12:57 PM
"Cow with 310 million tits"? Sounds kind of Lovecraftian.
Posted by: Chgo_Liz
|
August 25, 2010 12:59 PM
You didn't formally recommend it, P-TI, but I'll second your implied recommendation: The Sociopath Next Door is one of the few books I think everyone should read. The info is so valuable.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 1:01 PM
Two of Mrs. BigDumbChimp and my best friends had (they're fairly certian) a fuckheaded psychopath of a neighbor slit the throat of their 10 year old lab that had been with them through various moves across the country and their courtship, marriage etc..
Yes, slit the dog's throat. They found him dead in their driveway.
It was devastating. I can't even imagine how I'd react / feel.
I'm very protective of my dogs now.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 1:05 PM
Part-Time Insomniac and chgo_liz
I just added The Sociopath Next Door to my downloads at Audible at your suggestion. It sounds very interesting. Thanks.
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 25, 2010 1:06 PM
Thanks cicely,
Now I have Efreets on the brain.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 25, 2010 1:15 PM
Hey, no prob, Dhorvath! Just remember, if they offer you wishes, close those loop holes up tight. :)
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 1:25 PM
And, in my little liberal arts mind, I pictured cheerleaders (dressed in black with a squid on the front (of course)) chanting either:
WE ARE clap, clap LE-GION clap, clap, WE ARE clap, clap LE-GION clap, clap, WE ARE clap, clap LE-GION clap, clap, WE ARE clap, clap LE-GION clap, clap, etc, ad nauseum
or:
WE are LEgion clap, clap, clap-clap-clap, WE are LEgion clap, clap, clap-clap-clap, WE are LEgion clap, clap, clap-clap-clap, WE are LEgion clap, clap, clap-clap-clap, etc, ad nauseum.
And you know that you will wake up at 3:00am with one of those chants going through your mind and will then spend the next hour trying to remember what my moniker is. You need not thank me.
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 25, 2010 1:28 PM
Ogvorbis, SIotO
I am not so sure that it is the chant that will be resonating with my mind at 3a.m. Squid cheerleaders? Now that might come back for a second round in the wee hours.
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 1:37 PM
Now this is cool: Early Mesolithic Blubber Concrete
Perhaps the concrete cows are a modern version?
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 1:41 PM
The difference between what goes through my mind at 3 AM and what goes through others' minds at 3 AM is a never-ending source of fascination.
"Aw fuck, Bodie, we done pissed off that pimp but good this time. You keep the siphon goin' while I try to distract him. [Runs past angry pimp, chanting] 'WE are LEgion!' clap, clap, clap-clap-clap."
"What the fuck was that you were chantin', dude?"
"Somethin' normal people think about at 3 AM, I guess."
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 1:52 PM
Only if you define normal as a Park Ranger whose been run over a few too many times by steam engines. ;-)
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 2:00 PM
Hey, Threadites. I would like to submit an anecdote that might give some a chuckle:
---
My very gay buddy was being bothered one time by a clueless fundie gadfly, who was trying to convince him that he was just a malfunctioning straight person.
"For example," said the gadfly, "I'm sure you're attracted to some women."
"Why, of course," rejoined my friend.
"So! Describe your ideal woman, then," said the gadfly, thinking he had some kind of angle.
Matter-of-factly, my friend replied, "Well first off, she has to have a huge cock."
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 25, 2010 2:06 PM
@MrFire:
Haha! That's great.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 2:09 PM
Brownian:
Actually, my 3:00am musings are very normal: How the hell am I going to pay for TWO kids in college next year?
blf:
I try to avoid being run over by locomotives, steam or other. The paper work is a pain in the ass.
Though my place of employment does explain my occasional fascination with steam-punk. Mainly in terms of, "You mean people want to get this dirty and sweaty to make a fasion statement?"
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 25, 2010 2:14 PM
@MrFire,
Now I wish I would have some cause to use that approach. Pure awesome!
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 2:26 PM
The steam engine runs over one of them? ;-)
You might have to help with the paperwork, however…
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 2:28 PM
Oh, looky. Ground Zero controversy chickens might be coming home to roost:
Cab Driver Stabbed by Passenger who Asked: "Are You Muslim?"
Happy that the victim survived, though.
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 2:54 PM
What? You don't need to send two kids to college. Just the winner.
@ MrFire:
I gotta share that with my coworker. I think it tops her story:
She's gay, and was in a master's program with another student who wasn't so clever. This other student was fond of using "OMG, that's so gay!" to deride things she didn't like. (Kids today, amiright?) One day, my friend suggested that she not use that particular construction anymore, as it's derisive toward homosexuals. The student solemnly nodded.
[Wait: I think I've told this one before. Well, we're in this deep.]
About a week later, this student let "That's so gay!" slip out, but something must have stuck with her because as soon as she noticed the look on my friend's face she corrected herself: "I am so sorry! I meant to say, "OMG: that's so homosexual!"
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 25, 2010 3:00 PM
No, because his language is obviously superior to English, what with English being spoken by those who are not French. I suspect his English is a wee bit tortured, hence his decision to eschew it for his native tongue, lest he look more like an idiot than he does now.
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 25, 2010 3:02 PM
@Brownian:
Re: 'That's so gay':
I was in San Antonio with a few co-workers, and one of them continuously decided to use that terminology to describe those things he found distasteful or dumb... it bothered the heck out of me.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 3:06 PM
I don't think it's paranoia. I don't remember if I read it somewhere reputable or not, but I've heard that just about every person who tortures people started off torturing animals. At the minimum, it shows a callous attitude towards life and suffering in general.
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 3:07 PM
To be fair, when I don't like something, I'll say "Man, that's so Texan!"
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 25, 2010 3:08 PM
Lauren -
Perhaps, the next time you are called upon to introduce her to someone, you could begin with 'Non è una strega; è la mia suocera'.
Actually, uttering some commonplace in another language, in just those tones one uses for swearing, is generally effective wrt annoying people. [As is cuddling one's teething child and cooing 'If this doesn't end soon, Mummy is going to throttle you and bury you under the roses'.] Tone of voice is so much fun; it's what I miss most about written communication.
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 25, 2010 3:16 PM
@Carlie:
It's very sociopathic. She has a clear lack of empathy, is cruel towards an animal, has no common sense, and sees nothing wrong with what she did.
Posted by: MinnieTheFinn, kaamea ateistifeministinarttu
|
August 25, 2010 3:17 PM
Evening (European time), all.
I've been very busy with all sorts of things, and have given up on even trying to read through any of the threads apart from cursory glancing, so I have very little to contribute on any of the subjects.
Except that cows are cool - concrete, bronze, fiberglass or styrofoam =)
Re donating blood: unfortunately I can't do it. My blood pressure is very low (which isn't a bad thing), so even one measly pint is too much volume to lose. Last I tried, I couldn't get up for more than an hour without blacking out. So the nurses told me not to bother, they have more important things to do than babysitting the likes of me.
Also, went out today to meet an old and dear friend who's been abroad for a few years. He told me he's been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Not the kind of news I wanted to hear, but I trust that he's in good hands. Still, a bummer. Shit seems to happen a lot to all the wrong people nowadays. =(
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 3:18 PM
I don't recall that one myself, but in any case I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say that a Brownian StoryTM never gets old.
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 3:18 PM
I wrote two important e-mails that might one day advance the bureaucracy !! But the limiting factor on getting a date for my thesis defense is how fast the external reviewers can read.
And WTF are you talking about?
"We are Anonymous. Resistance is amusing at best. Your Intarwebz will be hacked"...?
BTW, Jadehawk, just out of curiosity, when was the last time you slept? ~:-|
Erm... Cain and his seed are part of the seed of Adam. Why not "the seed of Seth"???
Funnier still because Young repeated that mistake later in the same text.
It's remarkable how many right-wingers seem to make this mistake. I wonder if it's a Freudian slip and they can't come to terms with the fact that Israel is real.
It's pretty clear to me that she doesn't hate cats at all. She just can't tell the difference between a cat and a plush cat. Let's hope she knows how to distinguish between a human and a doll!
:-D
Well, of course. I only supplied the obvious real reason for why he thinks French is more subtle.
Dallas is not in Texas anymore. :-)
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 3:19 PM
Well during the Olympic trials a Christian site One News Now so worried about any references to "gays" mistakenly replaced sprinter Tyson Gay's last name with homosexual.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1400/christian-website-replaces-tyson-gays-name-with-homosexual/
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 3:22 PM
Oh, but they do. You guys are lucky; in RL I can't use the search function to see whether I've mentioned the time I got kidnapped in Boston before.
Posted by: MinnieTheFinn, kaamea ateistifeministinarttu
|
August 25, 2010 3:26 PM
Oh, and re sequels vs. originals: Evil Dead II is so much better than the first one =)
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 3:28 PM
One of my brothers consistently uses "that's so gay." It's pretty frustrating to me because he does it in front of our sister, who is gay.
Although, come to think of it, Sister's two boys* do the same exact thing. Moms are constantly having talks with them about it (unless their sister gets to them first--she lets her fists do the talking).
Brother claims he isn't homophobic because he still has a relationship with Sister and her wife (though he would never call her that), but I've explained to him that not disowning his sister is not exactly the same thing as truly being accepting.
*The younger one informed us that at his school, they also say things are "so Michael Jackson" to mean that they are lame. Of course, this is the same kid who regaled me with tales of a poisonous banana spider in Africa that has 6 inch long fangs that kill you instantly if they come into contact with your bones, but a man survived a bite to the head, although neon green gas came out of his nose and mouth. He totally saw it on Discovery. He's not making it up.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 3:28 PM
look blocky linky faily
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 3:34 PM
Makes 2 reminders of The In-Laws in one day, and that wins you the clip!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhfFwLewgmc
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 25, 2010 3:38 PM
Jules @ #509: It's one of the best books I've read. Very scary stuff, especially when you start to get into the many ways sociopaths will try to buy your trust and lure your in. If anything, it's made me start scrutinizing the behavior of my co-workers like I never did before; dating suddenly seems like more of a gamble, but at least now I know what to look for.
Probably another side effect is that you start wondering if you're giving off sociopathic vibes. The good news is that anyone who does question themselves in that way, isn't a sociopath. They truly lack any sense of morality aside from "Will this get me in trouble?" and thus have no real reason (in their eyes) to self-check.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 3:39 PM
A. That sounds like an interesting story.
B. Don't people just tell you if you're repeating yourself? I do. It doesn't stop my mother from telling the same stories over and over again (I know every detail surrounding my birth and the births of my siblings), but sometimes it makes her mix it up a bit, which can be fun.
I had a friend who would repeat conversations verbatim every time she got drunk. She'd come up to me and start the exact same conversation repeatedly, and at first I had fun with it, seeing how many times she'd do it. Then, it got pretty tedious, so I told her we'd already talked about it. Unfortunately, whatever it was that made her forget that we'd had the conversation also made her forget that I'd told her so. It was very Beckett. I stopped going to her parties.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 3:44 PM
oo! And here's the Scranton clip (mention at 2:39 & 2:52 despite the munged-up video):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2KylZ7ON4Y
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 25, 2010 3:47 PM
"That's so gay!"
"OMG: that's so homosexual!"
My coworkers/bosses say both of these constantly. I think I'm the only one here who doesn't. Drives me nuts. I wish I had the gumption to say something about it. Knowing that their response would be "are you a fag?" (or sim) doesn't help. Name an "ism" and I'm sure it's represented here. Makes me glad I spend most of my days being left the hell alone.
Posted by: Haruhiist
|
August 25, 2010 3:51 PM
Sorry to start about something new here, but here goes.
I just started watching Penn & Teller, and the first few episodes were good, with some nice doses of evidence.
Then just now I came across the Fast Food episode.. nothing but playing on feelings, some experiments that have little to do with why people feel badly about fast food, and very little evidence...
Basically they say we should be able to decide what we want to eat ourselves (ok, fine with that) and not spend any money educating people on what's good for them.. I agree, fast food is fine once in a while (once a week, maybe even more if you can offset that with extra exercise). However, people eat it a lot, way more than is necessary and don't exercise nearly enough.
At least, that's what I always thought. Am I wrong here? Or are Penn and Teller being irrational for some reason? What's your take on the Penn & Teller shows?
Posted by: chigau (◦_◦)
|
August 25, 2010 3:52 PM
David M
There is a species of wild cat called "lynx", the plural is also "lynx". pronounced like "links". The person telling the story did some kind of back-construction to 'singularize' "links" to "link". i think.
And my shift-key does not have "dust" under it. Like the whole keyboard, it contains several grams of dirt, cat hair, human hair, crumbs, ashes, etc.
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 3:52 PM
Yeah, they decay immediately—often before even being told—into the putrefying stage. Some even fossilize.
</snark>
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 25, 2010 3:54 PM
I *love* being secure in my sexuality.
"That's so gay!"
"Dude. Not cool."
"What, are you some kinda fag?"
"I'm whatever you want me to be, honey! *air-kiss*"
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 3:54 PM
Believe it or not I used to be guilty of saying "that's gay" without thinking about it until one of my friends said something like "and by that you mean awesome, like me... right?"
oops. Ever since then I've avoided the phrase because, well, if you stop for a second to think the implications of the phrase are completely shitty.
I hadn't realized how soaked in that phrase (and others) I was, and now it bugs me when I hear it too. Yeah, I used to be one of those "the words aren't what you should be going after" types, actually.
I changed my mind about that in the last few years. I think they have a more pervasive influence than people give them credit for.
I don't think they should be censored, but I think it's good to remind people.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 3:54 PM
Part-Time Insomniac
The main reason it grabbed my attention so much is that I'm pretty sure my ex-husband is a sociopath. I've had more difficult relationships than that one, but none have been as disturbing. People who don't know him well think I'm just an angry ex, but people who have known him for a while tend to agree that the guy has issues. They think I'm going overboard with I say psychopath, but none of them were married to him. They all think it implies that he's violent. He's not. He just doesn't have a conscience, as far as I can tell, and it often manifests itself in ways similar to Cat lady--casual nonchalance in the face of real damage to another being, damage that was often done for little more than entertainment. I'd like to have some way to articulate exactly what it is about him that distinguishes him from just being an asshole (which, oddly enough, is only some of the time; he's often quite charming).
Posted by: KG
|
August 25, 2010 3:55 PM
They are fanatical glibertarians. Anything that suggests there should be any limitations on or obstacles to corporations' ability to sell whatever they want is evil - witness their lies about climate change.Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 3:57 PM
Extremely hit or miss.
Extremely.
However they can be entertaining. To me they are kind of like Bill Maher. They have some of their own pet issues.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 25, 2010 3:57 PM
MinnieTheFinn, I'm sorry to hear about your friend' cancer. Unfortunately, reality doesn't distinguish between "all the wrong people" and 'all the right people'; and I think that this is one of the ways that religion jumps to the wrong conclusions. The flip-side of the mantra that "everything happens for a reason" is "this thing has happened; there must be a reason", and then they look for a "reason" when what they should be looking for is a cause. Christmas Tsunami? Caused by the heathenism of the victims. (Certainly not by the shifting of plates undersea.) Katrina? Caused by tolerance (by other people, not generally by those pointing to the "reason") of 'homasectuals'. (Definitely not by hot and cold air masses interacting with the Earth's rotation!) And does anybody off-hand know of an instance where the "reason" wasn't a "confirmation" of the finger-pointer's (usually religious) bias? I can't think of one.
*sigh*
Nonono. You're only part right.
"We are Anonymous. Resistance is amusing at best. All ur Intarweebz are belong to us."
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 3:58 PM
*raises eyebrow*
You've told a story about being kidnapped in Boston? Do you have a link to that, perchance?
Keep in mind, though: if the story doesn't involve you in a gimp suit at some point, I'm going to be quite put out.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 3:58 PM
(((Wife))) wants me to make her a sign which reads "Warning: Fire Story" that I can hold up everytime I start to tell one of my myriad stories stemming from experiences at fires, hurricanes and 9/11. Most are amusing, but (((Wife))) has heard them all, more than once, and wants a chance to leave the room. I say, "No way, woman. If I have to tell them again, you have to hear them. It's in the marriage contract. No, don't look for it. It's there. Trust me."
And then I duck.
So, Brownian, until friends or family start asking you to hold up warning signs prior to starting a story, I wouldn't worry about it.
I would, however, start to wonder about my friend's and family's long term memory.
Posted by: MinnieTheFinn, kaamea ateistifeministinarttu
|
August 25, 2010 4:02 PM
Jules:
I think I'm turning into your mother =) Most of the times I do know I'm repeating myself, but I just don't care. I like telling 'em stories, it is the lads' duty to listen to them (until they can afford to move out).
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 25, 2010 4:05 PM
Personlly, I'd rather not hear again how during a testicular exam he nearly poked out the poor doctor's eye. :P
Posted by: MinnieTheFinn, kaamea ateistifeministinarttu
|
August 25, 2010 4:16 PM
Cicely:
you're right, reality just happens to random people (well, all people), as it always does. I merely commented on it because for the past few weeks there has been a lot of bad shit happening around me.
If there was such a thing as karma, this particular guy would most definitely NOT get a cancer =)
I just wish there was some good news in my life one of these days for a change (as there most definitely will be, sooner or later).
Oh, wait.
There was =)
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 4:17 PM
“Huston, we've had a problem.”
“Say again.”
“We've had a problem. There was a loud bang and we've lost Dallas.”
“That's a problem?”
“Roger. A free-floating Dallas might be anywhere.”
“Ok, we're looking for it…”
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 4:20 PM
Oh. I suck at getting this kind of pun.
That's incidentally where skunk comes from: the original ends in -s, which was misinterpreted as the English plural ending.
That's what I thought. Turn your keyboard around and beat it a little, preferably not right after you've vacuumed the floor.
Perfect!!! I'm too phobic of misunderstandings to pull that off. Congratulations to you!
I managed "I'm whatever threatens you"* on Pharyngula once, but I don't remember what the question actually was...
* Not original, of course.
You win. :-)
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 4:20 PM
Me @552:
Actually, scratch that.
An unlikely sequence of events that results in you setting fire to a stadium full of obnoxious Boston sports fans will do quite nicely.
Posted by: KG
|
August 25, 2010 4:21 PM
Surely the plural of anonymous is anonymice?
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 4:32 PM
Anonymous is the plural of anonymou.
More seriously, anonymous is usually considered an adjective; the related noun is anonymity. However, anonymous as proper noun (proper name) is common, but proper nouns generally(?) don't have plurals. However, anonymous is perhaps an usual case, since it does make sense for there to be a plural form; as others have mentioned, it can be considered its own plural.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 4:34 PM
anonymouses
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 4:36 PM
anony(ed)meeses
Posted by: Algernon, elle sans chapeau
|
August 25, 2010 4:37 PM
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/08/25/nyc-cabbie-slashed-a.html#comment-869698
Wow.
Disturbing.
Sorry this is turning into the boingboing thread.
Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies
|
August 25, 2010 4:41 PM
cicely:
Thanks. I'm feeling better about the whole situation now-- still sad about Mr ODS's great aunt's death, but better about myself as a person. What you said is absolutely right.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 25, 2010 4:42 PM
It's whatever they say it is. Unless you really, really, really have a hankering for pizza? :P
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 4:45 PM
Ol'Greg:
So I guess that if it wasn't a Muslim attacking a real 'Murcan then it must be a hoax. Scary.
Posted by: Paul
|
August 25, 2010 4:45 PM
@543
Keep in mind that Penn and Teller are big-L Libertarians. Their conclusions in that case follow from that premise.
This is true, but not any different than if people were doing the same with large portions of Betty Crocker potatoes Au Gratin. The issue is people being aware of caloric intake, nutritional value, and exercise levels. Not fast food per se. And some people do have an irrational bias when it comes to fast food, so it's helpful to have people like P&T* point out where those biases are ill-founded or ridiculous.
*I'm not unconditionally supporting the episode or anything, as I have not seen it. They do sometimes get the facts horribly wrong, and sometimes they even admit it. But I can see where Fast Food would be good Bullshit! red meat.
Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher
|
August 25, 2010 4:49 PM
Just watching a repeat (rerun) of Channel 4's The God Delusion. I had forgotten what an arrogant fuckwit Ted Haggard is:
" If you have faith you can be as great as me"
(not exact, but close)
Fucking unbelievable.
Posted by: KG
|
August 25, 2010 4:50 PM
I must tell my friends the Smiths. They're going on a continental tour soon, so they can tell the Germans, Poles, Hungarians and Italians! :-p
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 25, 2010 4:50 PM
My eldest just posted this on her FB page. Worth sharing further in my opinion. YMMV.
10 Reasons Why Gay Marriage is Wrong
by Will McGarvey on Sunday, August 15, 2010 at 11:12pm
10 Reasons Why Gay Marriage is Wrong (reposting Mitchell Sturges)
01) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.
02) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.
03) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.
04) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.
05) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Britany Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.
06) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children.
07) Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.
08) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America.
09) Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.
10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.
Posted by: Patricia, OM
|
August 25, 2010 5:00 PM
Dallas is in Oregon. So is Rome, Drain and Crack-in-the-Ground.
Posted by: JackC
|
August 25, 2010 5:00 PM
David M:
I am inclined to doubt
JC
Posted by: KG
|
August 25, 2010 5:00 PM
Nonsense. Why do you think the fast food purveyors advertise? Do you think they would do that if it made no difference to their sales? Fast food is high calorie, high fat, high salt, high refined carbohydrates, highly addictive, and very, very profitable. Basically, they are killing people for profit, like the tobacco companies.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 25, 2010 5:01 PM
These are the Daves I know I know
These are the Daves I know
Some of them are Davids
(But most of us are Daves!)
Or:
30 Helens agree.
Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom
|
August 25, 2010 5:03 PM
Hah! I had that when they got to 2nd Amendment episode. They're glibertarians, and they're idealogues. A true skeptic might have, if they wanted to argue Founding Fathers' intentions, have pointed out that the Founding FAthers HATED mob rule, hated hte idea of common people doing shit without the approval of their betters, and that the whole point of a lot of systems was to restrict them from ACTUALLY REVOLTING, regardless of their claims to the intention. But no, they just said "Even though the FF had a qualifying clause, they wanted us to own AKs and Tanks without barrier". Yawn.They're funny, and they /can/ be right. The PETA episode debunks a lot of the "Animal testing is wrong, both ethically and scientifically" nonsense, but take whatever they say with a big grain of salt. You should probably do your own research.
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 5:04 PM
When do they arrive in the Germanies, Polands, Hungries, and Italies? O:-)
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 25, 2010 5:04 PM
That brings to mind the unit of measure of beauty:
The milliHelen.
It's the amount of beauty required to launch one ship.
Posted by: JackC
|
August 25, 2010 5:05 PM
If Anonymous is plural, if you have a lot of them in one place, do you have an Anonymass and will it affect the tides?
JC
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 5:06 PM
Dallas is also in Pennsylvania. Not too far from Wilkes-Barre (which is (as far as I know) the only hyphenated town in the US (and if I am wrong (which happens frequently) someone will point out my idiocy (as also happens frequently)) which is close to, you guessed it, SCRANTON!!
Though there is also a Scranton in North Dakota. A railroad town, actually.
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 25, 2010 5:07 PM
anonymous
anonymoum
anonymoi
anonymoi
anonymoo
anonymoi
anonymoos
anonymorum
anonymis
anonymis
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 25, 2010 5:09 PM
From a coworker who just read my comment at #578:
"Going by mass, that joke is about a picoHelen. It's enough to launch one guy *off* a boat."
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 25, 2010 5:10 PM
When they're done in the Bahamas.Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 5:11 PM
Abenaki? Isn't that a bit far away geographically? I've read that a language in... Virginia or somewhere had skõks.
That would also fit the qu in the attestation from 1634 better (I didn't know that, BTW).
Posted by: Patricia, OM
|
August 25, 2010 5:14 PM
Benjamin - How did a co-worker read your comment? Is she sitting on your lap?
Posted by: Haruhiist
|
August 25, 2010 5:14 PM
Ahh ok yeah that all does seem to explain rather much :) Strange how they hammer on evidence in one episode and then ignore evidence altogether in another.
@Paul, 568:
I agree, didn't mean to pick on fast food per se, excessive amounts of high-fat food will obviously make you fat. The point is, that they're saying we shouldn't point out fast food is often too high in calories to eat it daily.
It just ticks me off a bit, those people who go:
"I can be big and still beautiful" - beauty is not the point. The point is, in extreme cases it's unhealthy and a burden on society. (Personally I think a lot of people would be prettier if they were less fat, but for some the reverse is true.)
Also, the people who follow silly unfounded diets to stay thin, but end up doing no exercise and switching back and forth between eating whatever they want and dieting. Not really useful either..
(I once had a very heated discussion with some friends who insisted that olive oil was much less fat than butter. I'm not very familiar with the chemistry here, but I doubt it makes much difference that can't be offset by using a tiny bit less. It might be a bit healthier (different kinds of fatty acids), but again, not if you use large amounts of it where you would only have used a small amount of butter. They were Italian and Spanish, so they used _plenty_ of olive oil)
Posted by: JackC
|
August 25, 2010 5:15 PM
Penn and Teller have their issues and I generally dont much care for them - but the first minute of Creationism is absolutely priceless.
JC
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 5:15 PM
They probably should never leave the United States. Unless they're looking for a Dallas in a Bahama.
Waddles off to fix dinner and throw peas out of the lair…
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 5:16 PM
Ogvorbis explaining how the National Park Service was invented:
One of my prejudices is about Woodrow Wilson. He was the only person with a PhD to be Maximum Leader. He was also the man who segregated the federal civil service.* He was convinced his opinions were not only correct but also moral, so if someone disagreed with Wilson's opinion that person was not just wrong but wicked.
I've never been impressed by Wilson either as a president or as a man. To get a reasonably unbiased view of Wilson I recommend Margaret MacMillan's book Paris 1919.
*After the Civil War and before Wilson, the federal government was one of the few employers who let an educated Black rise to a position of authority and responsibility with a salary to match (more or less). Wilson changed the rules by Executive Order so the only federal jobs Blacks could have were janitorial and other menial, poorly paid labor.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 25, 2010 5:17 PM
JeffreyD, *applause* for your eldest. I can see the fundies floundering now! "But...but...but...she's doing it wrong!" "Oh, really? In what way?" "Um...ur...ahhh....."
Posted by: KG
|
August 25, 2010 5:17 PM
blf,
I believe "the Germanies" was common usage when there were lots of German states. Oh, and we still have "The Netherlands" - though oddly enough, not "a Netherland"!
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 25, 2010 5:18 PM
Patricia:
No such luck. First, it was a male coworker, and second, he was reading over my shoulder.
And on the subject of Penn and Teller: I second the comparison with Bill Maher. Neither (and I consider Penn and Teller to be one entity for the purpose of this discussion) pulls any punches, though both of them can be misguided. (Maher is a woo-ster, Penn and Teller are glibertarians.) That means that when they're right, they're excellent, and when they're wrong, they're annoying.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 5:23 PM
Ogvorbis, Soul Inhabitant of the Ogvorbisverse #580
Poor Billy, he's never heard of Ho-Ho-Kus, New Jersey.
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 25, 2010 5:24 PM
'Tis:
Or Howey-in-the-Hills, FL.
Posted by: JackC
|
August 25, 2010 5:26 PM
David M @ 584 - not saying that is an absolute, but Mel and Mike tend to do their homework - and though they have been shown to be wrong a few times, it is generally a VERY few times. I love that site.
I frankly had never visited the derivation of "skunk" and that was an interesting introduction - particularly the quip at the end.
If you like words though, Take our Word is a nice place to stop in now and then.
As a small aside, I have an image there that won their weekly contest in Laughing Stock. Shortly after taking that image, I was a juror in a town court presided over by the subject of the photograph - Judge Martini. Yes - that really is his name.
Anyway - turns out that Judge Martini was an English major! I gave him (after trial) the photo and link to the site - whereon Mel and Mike promptly shut down for several years :(
JC
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 5:28 PM
Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
August 25, 2010 5:29 PM
Southern Poland is full of place names that are plural (all in -ice, plural of -ica), and there are some in France, too (les Eyzies off the top of my head).
Also, the Netherlands, every single one of them.
Internets won, all of them. I can go to
workbed.Winsome.
Posted by: Rey Fox, Bird Caller Guy
|
August 25, 2010 5:34 PM
"Dallas is in Oregon. So is Rome, Drain and Crack-in-the-Ground."
Don't forget Boring. Also, Milton-Freewater, what I'm sure will be the first of many counterexamples to comment #580.
Meanwhile, if you want to see America, you can do it without leaving the state of Missouri. See California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Florida, Louisiana, Maryland (Heights), Oakland, Pomona, Houston (in Texas County), or for a little south-of-the-border flair, you can travel to Mexico and Cuba. You can even hitch a ride to Rockaway Beach.
And we also have more saints that you can shake a censer at.
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 5:39 PM
Some more from The Pffft! of All Knowledge:
Posted by: CJO
|
August 25, 2010 5:39 PM
Mel and Mike tend to do their homework
In this case they appear to have taken the etymology straight from the Online Etymology Dictionary (or they got it from the same source.), and other online dictionaries do the same. The Oxford concurs but notes that cognates occur in many Native North American languages.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 25, 2010 5:45 PM
"Share and Enjoy" - Chalk Edition, Part II.
Part I introduced the reader to a piece of "peer reviewed", "cutting-edge", creation (i.e. YEC) research entitled, 'Chalk and “Upper Cretaceous” Deposits are Part of the Noachian Flood' which can be found at:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/contents/379/arj/v2/Chalk_Part_of_Flood
Just a minor correction and a point about pseudonyms to start.
I suggested that the paper presents the views of Answers in Genesis. This is not correct. The Copyright notice at the bottom of the first page is written in some of the smallest 'small print' I have seen. The Journal website states (in normal-size print):
Be that as it may, it appears on the Answers in Genesis website so draw your own conclusions.
On the use of pseudonyms. The 'Instruction to Authors' contains an open invitation to use a pseudonym, if desired:
We have a partial address, Lampton Close, Wool, Dorset, BH20 6EW but we know nothing more about the author.
If you, like me, wonder what cachetical means then I can tell you (having looked it up) that cachetic is the adjective associated with the noun cachexia which is: 'Weight loss, wasting of muscle, loss of appetite, and general debility that can occur during a chronic disease.' It would appear that John D. Matthews - real or pseudonym - doesn't like it!The 'target' of the paper appears to be our favourite of old - the European Flood Geology or Recolonisation model with the Flood being over at the end of the Palaeozoic or Mesozoic (take your pick). Thus, the first footnote states:
[Splitting here because of length ...]
Posted by: Lynna, OM
|
August 25, 2010 5:46 PM
I think we should just start saying, "That's so Beckett" as a replacement for the offensive "That's so gay."
'Tis Himself, as I was speed reading through bits of the endless thread, I passed a comment about Woodrow Wilson. Didn't see your name, but knew it was you immediately.
Posted by: KG
|
August 25, 2010 5:49 PM
Wilkes-Barre (or its chess club) gave its name to one of the wildest chess openings:
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5!?
Both sides now have dangerous attacks, but black's 4th is probably unsound.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 25, 2010 5:52 PM
"Share and Enjoy" - Chalk Edition, Part III.
Right, now onto the 'meat'.
This paper [assume when I refer to it that it is contained in "scare quotes"] occupies pages 29-51 or 23 sides of A4. The Abstract is about half the first page (while looking less, it is in smaller type size). This is followed by numerous sections with no numbering nor any clear indication how they fit together. I have tried to get the upper/lower case distinctions correct. The headings are:
Introduction
Uniformitarianism
Comparison of the "Upper Cretaceous" Period with the Noachian Flood
Extinctions
Other major extinctions
Tectonic sedimentation
The amount of land submerged
The quiet phase
The basic premise of this paper
Chalk
The nature and location of chalk
The origin of chalk
A uniformitarian viewpoint
Towards a young-earth creationist model
Explaining Chalk Deposition
Capturing coccoliths
Support details for the model
Chalk slumping
Monoclines
Smectite coating
Flow at basin edges
Flow within the basins
Rate of lift of land
The Scratchy Bottom* Dry Valley
Groundwater flow
Dish structures
"Pipes"
The presence of hydrocarbons
Diagenesis
Fluid pressures
Hydraulic isolation
Breachings of cap rock
Example details from Ekofisk
Implications for Flood Models
Dealing with Uniformitarian Geological Questions
The common ordering of fossils
Hardgrounds
The Geological Column
The Ballard Down Unconformity
The map of the "Upper Cretaceous" landscape
Other issues
The ages of the rocks
Warping
Origin of coccoliths
Circular arguments
Summary-Coming to a Conclusion
Decision-making
Bringing matters to a head
The MUA system
Implications for Decision-Making
The final decision
Implications
References [73]**
* Yes. This is the real name. It may have come from 'Scratchey's Bottom' where Scratchey was the owner's name and 'bottom' referred to low-lying land.
** Just a few comments about references.
1) There a lots of them!
2) Many of the References are to whole books or major articles. For example, I have the book referenced as House (1989), Geology of the Dorset Coast. It is not the easiest of books to follow without a reasonable background of geology and knowledge of the coast: essentially, it is notes describing 26 itineraries along the Dorset coast. It has 164 pages, 43 Figures and 32 Plate pages. The Plate pages often have several pictures. To what, exactly, is the author referring when he calls up House (1989). No doubt the point could/might be located but why should anyone bother?
3) Since it is difficult to see how references refer to his argument, I am driven to the assumption that the author does not intend the reader to follow them up.
4) I know that some of the references are available on the Internet. The paper is dated 2009 yet not a single link is given. With a bit of effort the author could have directed us to easily available material. Otherwise, it is Google or Google Scholar and hope that the paper is not behind a paywall.
5) Professor Ian West is not referenced. I know I have a bee in the bonnet about this guy but he has a giant site that describes the area being discussed in detail with excellent annotated photographs.
I make this 53 sections - I may have miscounted. There is no numbering, lettering or sub-division. Some have all the major words beginning with an upper case letter, some are in italics, some are on a line of their own while in other situations they are the merely the first word(s) of a new line. With enough effort the reader could probably put some structure into the paper (maybe).
My First Impression? If this had been written by a member of my Section I would have sent it back for a major rewrite. To have signed it off would have been close to committing professional suicide. I don't expect a piece of "peer reviewed", "cutting-edge", research to be written like a stream of consciousness. I cannot remember a paper (outside of creationist writings) that is so badly constructed and hence so difficult to read. What were the "peer reviewers" and the Editors doing? Why did the Senior Editor of this professional technical journal allow this to be published? Remember how it was described:
There is no way I can comment on all 23 sides of un-structured material with 73 references other than to call it disgraceful. They will not impress anyone who is not already convinced. Indeed, as a YEC scientist or technologist, I would probably have had my confidence shaken!
I have yet to think how much further to take the commenting on this "paper" ...
Why should I bother if the author, peer-reviewers and Editors aren't prepared to do a professional job to start with?
Posted by: KG
|
August 25, 2010 5:54 PM
England has (at least) two Newcastles: Newcastle-on-Tyne, and Newcastle-under-Lyme. As a child, I thought the latter was Newcastle underlined, and wondered why this particular place-name got that distinction.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 6:04 PM
There is an entire ad campaign dedicated to getting rid of "that's so gay". Unfortunately, they have an open area to suggest alternatives and one of the most popular is "that's so lame". Disability fail, anyone?
But I do like the Wanda Sykes commercial. "That's so 16 year old boy with a cheesy moustache."
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 25, 2010 6:11 PM
#599 blf
Longest place name in the UK (Wales, of course):
Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch
or, in vocal form:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_FIdFQtqo8&feature=related
The longest place name in the world (reputably):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wNZ9wtmyu0&feature=related
(I love it when the lady doesn't quite catch it and says, "Say it again"!)
Or, if you believe it, the native name for Bangkok
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGjb0hGOX-Y&feature=related
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 6:12 PM
hey my home town
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 25, 2010 6:13 PM
Carlie: Many insults began as a slight against the disabled. "Stupid", "idiot", and "moron", for instance, were all terms for mental retardation. A "fool" was someone with a mental illness. "Dumb" referred to muteness.
I seriously doubt that paraplegics consider themselves "lame". (If I'm wrong, let me know.) There's a thin line between using a current descriptor to demean something unrelated (using "gay", a word still used to describe people, as a general insult) and using a word that has lost its prior meaning to all but the most educated ("lame").
Granted, this can backfire. I've heard people claim that deaf people were considered stupid, and as 'proof' they trot out "deaf and dumb". Buh.
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 25, 2010 6:17 PM
Between the return of my wandering spawn and a busy patch at work, I'm almost entirely unfamiliar with the current ebb and/or flow of the Thread©, but I thought I'd share a link. I loooooove me some public radio, but some of the NPR shows are a skosh too tolerant of religion to suit my current condition. Thus it was with great pleasure that I listened, today, to the podcast of this edition of To the Best of Our Knowldege. Enjoy!
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 6:17 PM
Is there an Oldcastle anywhere? Google doesn't show any places with that name but what do they know?
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 25, 2010 6:24 PM
While I fucking love 'So Beckett, and expect it to be somewhat useful in my life, it strikes me that it's not really generally much of a synonym for what is generally meant by 'so lame' or 'so gay'...
So me, I think I'd like to see this latter category of pathetic things referred to as being 'So Beck'...
As this is both more suggestive of the actual meaning, methinks, and also far more richly deserved.
(/Cf. 'Santorum')
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 6:31 PM
Agreed.
Wish I'd thought of that.
Posted by: Benjamin "pardon my French" Geiger
|
August 25, 2010 6:35 PM
Divide and Conquer: a video from 1947 that is even more relevant today.
Posted by: Paul
|
August 25, 2010 6:35 PM
I agree, but that's not some mystical, unique property of Fast Food itself. It's a matter of marketing and sociopathic corporations (although no real need to use two words when one would have sufficed).
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 6:35 PM
Towards a young-earth creationist model
later I see a section titled:
Circular arguments
but where is a section explicitly titled:
the epic fail of the creationist model
...'cause that should really be in there if you're going to even HAVE a section with the first mentioned title.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 6:35 PM
AJ Milne
Wish I would've waited another minute to comment. You make a good point. "Beckett" would refer to something absurd/difficult to understand.
"Beck" fits more with the stupid. Unless you mean this Beck, in which case, we're right back to absurd.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 25, 2010 6:39 PM
#605 KG
In England there is also Newcastle (or Newcastle on Clun*) Shropshire
In Wales there are:
Newcastle, Bridgend, Glamorgan, Wales
Newcastle, Monmouthshire, Wales
Newcastle Emlyn, Carmarthenshire, Wales.
In Northern Island there is:
Newcastle, County Down
That seems the complete UK list ... Unless anyone knows better!
* Clun is the name of a town and a river in the Welsh Marches. In 'A Shropshire Lad', A.E. Housman wrote the verses:
Posted by: blf
|
August 25, 2010 6:41 PM
The place of stuffed full of Ye Olde Castles, or as I tend to refer to them, mouldy stoneworks.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 6:41 PM
Carlie:
Perhaps "That's so teen" then. ;)
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 25, 2010 6:43 PM
Hrm. This does present a problem... Trouble being, people are about as likely to think of that other, actually sporadically interesting Beck, depending on their background and the general context...
Still, I gotta argue 'Beck' is such a great word for related purposes, partly for its sonic qualities...
See, it could also work as a verb. You could tell a particularly obnoxious/obtuse troll just to go Beck at someone who cares...
(In fact, I like that so much, I may just have to find a troll right now to say it to.)
In other news, I'd forgotten how much I liked that song. Still do, apparently. I would ask forgiveness, in case he's gotten all 'Seinfeld isn't funny' in the intervening years, but honestly, I don't care who knows it. Still weirdly great. I regret nothing.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 6:46 PM
Champaign-Urbana?
well, OK, it's not official or anything
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 6:46 PM
Ben - there are a lot of disability activists who specifically call out lame, like here. But it also can get wrapped up in the reclamation issue, as dissected here (same source blog). And then there's the view from the outside on the use of lame. I figure there's that much discussion about it, and obviously a lot of people who are hurt by it, it's easy enough to find substitutes that aren't so fraught.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 6:50 PM
via googlecheat:
Dover-Foxcroft, ME
Fuquay-Varina, NC
Sedro-Woolley, WA
Posted by: CJO
|
August 25, 2010 6:51 PM
Many insults began as a slight against the disabled. "Stupid", "idiot", and "moron", for instance, were all terms for mental retardation. A "fool" was someone with a mental illness. "Dumb" referred to muteness.
Mm. "Stupid" I'm not so sure about. I mean, there are people who are just stupid, who are not technically in any way disabled. The word or its cognates have been used since Latin (lit. "struck senseless" from a PIE word meaning just "to strike") and I'm not sure the word ever had the primary meaning of someone who was clinically retarded, though obviously before such distinctions it would have been used to describe such persons also.
"Idiot" and "moron" were used as technical terms in early 20th c. psychology to indicate sub-normal IQ ranges. Interestingly on that score, "idiot" had a long pedigree in English before the technical usage, with more of the flavor of "uneducated or ignorant" while "moron" was actually coined by Goddard to mean a high-functioning person who scored low on his tests. He needed the term because there were so damn many of them he couldn't believe it, which was a classic case of a theory-bound crank who should have seen it as a flaw in his metric when great numbers of seemingly normal people were demonstrated to actually be hopelessly stupid.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 6:52 PM
OK, but my question is, are any of those 'Newcastle's pronounced differently. Like, maybe one is 'Nuksil' and one is 'Throatwarblermangrove' or like that?
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 25, 2010 6:55 PM
I'd also add I'm sympathetic to the confusion, as there are so very many things that are clearly so Beck as also so Beckett...
As in: if it's the same stupid conspiratorial tinfoil hat shit you've heard way too often, and it might be actually entertainingly incoherent if it weren't also so droningly repetitive, and you feel like it's the umpteenth unintentional slightly more surreal parody of Godot you've seen enacted by the same generic nutter/troofer/Elvis-is-alive freak who somehow manages to change his physical appearance but is following you from bar to bar just to annoy a fresh new crowd with the same ravings, and who may or may not realize you've already heard this act and it was incredibly stupid the first five hundred thousand times, too...
Well, then, that's both Beck and Beckett. And these people must be stopped.
Posted by: Alan B
|
August 25, 2010 6:56 PM
#611 'Tis Himself OM
For Oldcastle(s) Go to:
http://www.gazetteer.co.uk/
and enter Oldcastle.
You will find 2 Oldcastles in Wales and an Oldcastle Heath in Cheshire.
For some slightly different place names, try:
http://www.philbrodieband.com/jokes-jokes_town_names.htm
I note Scratchy Bottom is there along with Shitterton (which repeatedly had its name sign stolen and finally replaced with a great boulder with the name carved on it). And many others.
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 6:56 PM
This very topic of discussion came up with my "so homosexual" coworker, and we brought up the potential trouble with "that's so lame" just as we rounded a corner and almost ran over a man in a wheelchair.
I have before told the story of how when I was in junior high, "That's so Jewish" was all the rage until I said it any number of times in front of a friend-of-a-friend who was Jewish. The friend in question bawled me out. I had no idea and was mortified to realise I'd been insulting this other guy all day like some kind of asshole.
It's like I had no idea Jewish referred to a group of people. Fuck, am I dumb..
Yes. At first. Not long after, they realise punching a glacier would have more effect, and quietly smile until I get to the point where they're supposed to laugh.
No, but it starts with "Hey, you like Jethro Tull?" and ends with me running through Mission Hill getting directions on a cellphone from a friend back in Edmonton who'd spent some time in the area while simultaneously watching over my shoulder for a pursuing vehicle.
That was a fun conference. I blogged about it, way back when I used to do that (Original blog site is now defunct, but I retained some posts on a mirror site. This entry is one of them.)
Oh Sweetness, he was only joking.
Posted by: maureen.brian#b5c92
|
August 25, 2010 6:57 PM
There's an Oldcastle in Cheshire - population 54 in the 2001 census - near the Welsh border - mostly fields and the odd very expensive house. Hardly worth the trip, 'Tis.
Posted by: KG
|
August 25, 2010 6:57 PM
Paul,
I don't take "fast food" to refer exclusively to the physical substance people ingest, but to a style and context of eating - the fact that you can absorb large quantities of calories, fat, salt and sugar in a standardised package without doing any more than pay a relatively small amount to a low-wage worker in a standardised emporium.
Posted by: Cannabinaceae
|
August 25, 2010 6:59 PM
@Rey Fox:
Boring, OR is near Oregon City, OR.
There is a sign (I would guess it is often stolen, so maybe there isn't one now, or maybe I should say was a sign) that read:
Boring
Oregon City
Next Left
(Or maybe it was "Next Right", it's been a while since I lived in Oregon).
My favorite place specification ever (I must admit, I was rather drunk at the time. Old Speckled Hen, I think it was) was when I was doing laundry while vacationing in York. A passing bus was headed, of all places to:
Nether Poppington
So British.
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 25, 2010 7:02 PM
We use ridiculous a lot when trying to express how much something doesn't fit our criteria for appropriate existence.
It's even fun to say.
Posted by: Cannabinaceae
|
August 25, 2010 7:04 PM
Oh, and I wanted to mention, W.U.'s dad is a fan of the TV program "Waiting for God"
I asked him if it was written by Samuel Beck.
He, too, is hyperliterate (as is W.U.), so they all (we were in a crowd of the hyperliterate: my family) laughed politely at my attempt to seem like I could make a joke.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 7:04 PM
Brownian, with stories that involve sentences like those, you can tell them as many times as you want.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 7:22 PM
Well this geographical-names stuff reminded me of one of the all-time greatest things ever on the internets IMO:
http://www.madeyoulaugh.com/funny_photos/college_weed/college_weed.jpg
But then just now it occured to me-- why is it that there exists only the one photograph of this sign? Could it be fake?
After a bit of poking around, I think that if it ever existed, it must have been somewhere in the area depicted here.
My best guess at specific location, though, now has this sign instead.
I love the internets.
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 25, 2010 7:24 PM
Frank @ 394: - yes, you're right, it's antibodies. The labs at Cedars-Sinai had a field day with that. I have an intensely over-active immune system. Fortunately, I didn't need more blood than that first transfusion.
Re: Odd towns: I used to live not far from Sodom, Connecticut. There was no neighbouring Gomorrah. However, there was a Sin Patch Road nearby, with many speculations on the origin of the name.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 7:29 PM
Wait! I found another photo! My worldview remains intact!
phew!
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 7:41 PM
Always nice to be right. I was wrong, but I was right. (hyphen city discussion)
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 7:43 PM
About 10 miles from here are the Lymes. There's Lyme itself (after which lyme disease is named), Old Lyme, East Lyme, North Lyme, South Lyme and Hadlyme (near Haddam).
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 7:45 PM
Weird towns:
Near Keedysville, Maryland, is an unincorporated town called Dog Town. And, oddly enough, it is on Dogtown Road.
Up in New Hampshire, I lived in a summer house (during the winter) that was on Benny Hill Road.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 7:47 PM
Worth reading re: 'Hausergate':
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/08/hausergate-scientific-misconduct.html
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 25, 2010 7:48 PM
I'm surprise there isn't a Chicago suburb of Forest Park Lake with a View. Certainly those words appear very frequently.
Posted by: cicely (Inadvertent Phytocidal Maniac)
|
August 25, 2010 7:52 PM
Peculiar, Missouri.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 8:02 PM
Don't forget Halfway, Missouri.
(named for the distinction of being halfway between Bolivar and Buffalo)
Posted by: Becca the Over Socialized
|
August 25, 2010 8:03 PM
My first husband was a sociopath - the only thing that kept him from being a successful con man was he was afraid of being caught (plus he wasn't that bright) -- for awhile, he made a living as a used computer salesman. His hobby/vocation is a close-up magician. At least when we were married, he didn't get a lot of repeat business because his humor was very much of the "you're so stupid, and I can prove it" variety.
My blood type is A pos - and he got upset at me because he's B neg, and he was angry that I scored better on the test than he did. Yes, I'm serious.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 8:13 PM
Not to mention Halfway, Oregon. Near as I can make out, it's halfway to nowhere. I was at a wildland fire up there. The Twin Lakes complex. The fire camp was up near the top of the mountain -- hot as hell during the day and freezing at night. The only thing that shut the fire down was the six inches of snow we got.
Damn. Forgot the sign: "WARNING: Fire Story."
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 25, 2010 8:19 PM
All the above attempts to find an insult to replace gay or lame are just soooooooooo Palin.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 25, 2010 8:23 PM
Sounds like the fire we had in Dah YooPee over at the Seney Wildlife Refuge (peat bog fire started by lightening). Took a good YooPee winter's snowfall to put that *#$^&* out.Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 8:23 PM
Fire stories are welcome. Your wife may have heard them a bazillion times but we haven't.
I tell sea stories occasionally and nobody complains. Your fire stories are much more interesting than those.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 8:25 PM
Jeffrey:
+5
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 25, 2010 8:27 PM
Weird place names: Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Kind of a forbidding name for a spa city.
@ Becca: Seriously, he translated B negative as a B-minus? Like on a report card? He really wasn't very bright then . . .
Jules: Lots of things that don't get seen by outsiders, the spouse sees. It's frightening what some know about their exes, and all the while no one else has a clue.
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 25, 2010 8:28 PM
Sarah or Michael?
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 8:29 PM
Lemme 'splain somethin' to you, Ogbillyverse: you're not picking your audiences. I know a few individuals with whom you just need to start with "So, I'm a firefighter," and they'd stare at you with rapt attention while you read the ingredients off a stick of butter.
On the other hand, I have a friend who worked as a civilian analyst for the RCMP, but couldn't divulge much about his work. Unfortunately, if someone asked about it, he'd respond with "I work for the federal government" which would only prompt more questions, to his growing discomfort (he's not very social). Instead, I advised him to respond with the most tedious and technical details he could safely share: the more boring, the better. "I analyse communication networks looking for key nodes" is guaranteed to curtail nosiness at a pot luck.
Posted by: Becca the Over Socialized
|
August 25, 2010 8:31 PM
PTI: yep. He tried to make a joke of it, but he was genuinely upset. (he had ways of making me pay for little upsets like this that were unmistakable)
I really traded up when I married (current husband).
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 8:34 PM
Sounds like it. Good thing you got out of that one, Becca.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 8:35 PM
Here's a Classical Top Forties number: Andre Rieu's orchestra playing Franz von Suppé's "Light Cavalry Overture" ("Leichte Kavallerie"). Students of old Warner Brothers cartoons will immediately recognize the piece:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJXjyTdTxrY&feature=related
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 25, 2010 8:37 PM
Hey Americans, what's up with this ?
Senator Lisa Murkowski in danger of losing to Palin-backed Tea Party candidate
This better be an exemption, not a trend.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 8:38 PM
Brownian:
But I'm NOT a firefighter. I'm redcarded with NIFC* as an SEC2** or and SECM*** for Type I, II or III teams. Which basically means that I staff roadblocks (Yes, ma'am, I understand that Triple-A of Ohio told you to take the road over Skalkaho Pass, but, well, you see the smoke up there? That's a forty-thousand-acre forest fire and we have almost a thousand people up there, with their vehicles, plus helicopters, air tankers, and spotter planes, and, well, the road is closed so you really do have to take a two-hundred-mile detour around the north end. Or you could take a three-hundred-mile detour around the south end. Have a nice day.), keep lookylous out of fire camp (Yes, sir, I understand that you always wondered about what goes on in a fire camp but, well, we've got a thousand people here, one third of whom are trying to sleep during the day in 100 degree heat, and there are far too many vehicles and too much noise in the camp, so no, you cannot go in and take a look around.), or I'm in charge of the SEC2s and SEC1s (the gun toters) and plan how to use my scarce resources to staff the necessary roadblocks, road patrols, and fire camp.
So alhthough I go to forest fires (and hurricanes and such), I'm not a firefighter. I'm what is referred to as overhead. Along with the kitchen, the laundry, transportation, communications, etc.
That boring enough?
* NIFC: National Interagency Fire Center
** SEC2: Security Specialist Type 2
*** SECM: Security Manager
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 8:41 PM
Rorschach,
That election's taking place in Alaska, the state that elected Palin governor.
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 25, 2010 8:43 PM
Blasphemer! Michael is a minor, small g gawd. Sarah is...the only thing that comes to mind is intellectual toejam.
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 8:43 PM
Love that piece, 'Tis.
Did you read the first comment?
Yoi.
Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom
|
August 25, 2010 8:45 PM
I'd like to second the use of Palin as an all-purpose negative epithet. Third it, I guess.
Unrelated:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/08/bush-campaign-chief-and-former-rnc-chair-ken-mehlman-im-gay/62065/
Apparently, Bush's campaign manager was gay, and also Palin. Seriously, listen to this little gem:
I don't think I need to explain to Pharyngulans the epic fail of that statement.
WARNING:
DO NOT READ THE COMMENTS TO THIS ARTICLE. They are Youtube-level dumb.
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 25, 2010 8:46 PM
One of my new favorite quotes.
"If atheism is a religion then abstinence is a sex act."
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 8:46 PM
Hey Americans, what's up with this ?
I'll make an attempt to explain, even though I don't live there any more.
It's the same reason Palin got elected governor there to begin with.
there is a relatively low population in Alaska, and by and large the idiots (who are readily influenced by the Fox Media crowd and teabaggers) crowd around population centers, and heavily influence voting there.
been that way since at least the first time I visited there back in 1984.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 8:46 PM
I would have thought you couldn't play soccer with your knee.
That's okay. Your stories are still interesting.
So tell us, Uncle Ogvorbis, what did you did for Katrina?
Posted by: Cannabinaceae
|
August 25, 2010 8:48 PM
Duh. I don't text neither, nor tweet. Ow. Is my neck supposed to do that when I twist my head fast?
Boring Oregon City
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 8:48 PM
This better be an exemption, not a trend.
exceptional?
sadly, I think not.
dooooooooommmmmmeeed, I tells ya.
Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom
|
August 25, 2010 8:51 PM
Ichthyic, not to be a nuisance, but wouldn't it be better to look at the overall picture for incumbents and palin backed candidates and such? TDS did a special on this lately, about how the numbers didn't match the media narratives; It might be wise to keep in mind that the media narrative is based on what sells, not reality.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 8:53 PM
Dooomed!
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
August 25, 2010 8:54 PM
WAIT?!?!?
Ken MEHLMAN IS GAY?
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 8:56 PM
'Tis:
You asked.
I was sent down to Hammond, LA, as and SECM(T) and was in charge of twelve law enforcement officers (which quickly went down to three as LEOs were demobed and not replaced). Basically, I worked the night shift and handled the morning meetings while the guntoters worked three overlapping shifts so that we had all three on in the evening. We provided security for the team providing support for the National Guard troops providing relief in Southern Louisiana. We called the place the JCP Bed and Breakfast as the troops were sleeping in an abandoned JCPenneys at the mall.
We were all demobed early because FEMA wanted to make sure that locals got the jobs. So security was replaced with 24 security guards, at $10 bucks an hour, plus 3 supervisors, at who knows what per hour, plus the 'supervisory and overhead costs' at who knows what per person per hour. And they were from Florida.
Other than that, I smoked cigars, stayed out of the fire ants, kept the lookylous out, and let the troops sleep peacefully. It worked.
And watch the 'uncle' crap. I'm not that old.
Wait. I am an uncle. I am that old.
Good story, sonny?
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 8:58 PM
Yeah, and I could tell people about the public health geocoding conference I was at in Boston rather than the kidnapping, but I don't want them to make me hold up a sign.
Again, it's all about reading your audience.
For instance, when I'm around doctors, I like to tell the testicular cancer exam story Feynmaniac referred to in #555. But when I'm getting a "testicular exam" in an alley, I like to tell the, um, care professional that I know doctors, because sometimes it pays to have certain people think you've got access to script pads.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:03 PM
That would be great. I've got this pain in my knee . . . .
Yeah, I have some great stories, but I'm not out there digging fireline or felling trees.
---
By the way, (((Wife))) calls me the Gabe Kaplan of fire stories. She's heard 'em all. More than once. Of course, she refers to fire camp as 'summer camp.' She just has no idea how hard I work, smoking cigars, reading my history books, sipping water and Garorade, eating bag lunches, eating in the mess hall. Tough work.
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 25, 2010 9:05 PM
For Doxycycline ?
;)
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 9:10 PM
Thanks, Uncle Ogvorbis, that was a neato spiffy keen story!
I know the problem. I cannot convince my wife that sitting in an office reading The Economist and The Wall Street Journal can be so tiring I have to recover by going sailing. It's a hard life we manly men must live.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:14 PM
'Tis:
Sometimes just staying awake is the hard part. Of course, at a fire, I work 15 hour days, so . . . .
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:19 PM
Becca
My ex-husband basically was a conman. He was an "organic" baker. He'd make the first batch or two with organic stuff, then he'd quietly remove the word organic from the label, keep the price the same, and talk it up as he used to (without explicitly saying organic anymore). Then, after a while, he'd go to his customers (should mention he did wholesale to coffee shops) and tell them he needed to up the price because he was going back to all organic. One of them said, "I thought you already were." He replied, "I took it off the label." She kept using him anyway. I have no idea how that motherfucker pulled that shit off.
Of course, he talked me into marrying him (which is a pretty crazy story that I may share at some point), and I haven't exactly figured out how that happened either. I'm pretty sure I'm smarter than he is. I suppose that pesky conscience gets in the way.
By the way, the anniversary of my divorce is coming up in a few days. If I kick this fever, I'm going out to celebrate. Just as I do every year.
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 25, 2010 9:24 PM
Brownian @ #656: Seconded.
Well, it's a nice change from that bit about not collecting stamps, or the one about baldness. Actually, it's even better . . . because it's downright funny.
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
August 25, 2010 9:28 PM
And that's why I love this community.
I understand that. Just don't make the mistake of thinking you should be sailing instead, becuse then you'll need to find an office in which to relax and read The Economist and The Wall Street Journal to recover from a tiring day of sailing.
Every time I turn a hobby into a job I start hating it.
I hope it starts with Jethro Tull...
Alrighty folks, I'm dryin' out here, and am off to find a cool pint. Fortunately, I know of a pub in which they can be had in exchange for these stupid scraps of paper...Have a good evening y'all.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 9:32 PM
No telling about this portcullis.
>1K?
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 25, 2010 9:36 PM
PZ seems to have fallen off the face of the blog. Earth, I can't say. Let's get going. Nothing like raising his blood pressure first thing in the morning...Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:40 PM
Does this mean we get to go to the 'one sentence per comment' maximization plan?
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:41 PM
Not every kidnapping story can start with Jethro Tull, but the world would probably be a better place if they did.Not that marrying him was the same as being kidnapped. But it was pretty close.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 9:49 PM
Why
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 9:51 PM
not?
Posted by: John Morales
|
August 25, 2010 9:54 PM
What Is A Plethora?
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:56 PM
Sounds
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 25, 2010 9:58 PM
good.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
August 25, 2010 10:01 PM
John Morales #287
What Is A Plethora?
I've often wondered that. Many nights I've cried myself to sleep because I do not know what a plethora is. If only there was some way to find out from books or the internet. But those ways are closed to me.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 10:06 PM
Top Chef - pick the bacon! Pick the bacon! Yes!
"Hide the sausage", Padma? Really?
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 10:08 PM
Okay, so far Top Chef has been in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, New York City, Las Vegas and Washington, DC.
Where should they go next?
Posted by: Katrina, radicales féministes athées
|
August 25, 2010 10:10 PM
Cannabinaceae, I grew up not far from that sign. I used to tell people I lived "on the road to Damascus" - which could be very enlightening at times.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 10:11 PM
So the Indian restaurant I go to at least a few times a week has a sign from the local temple up in their entry asking for a donation of a washer and dryer for the deity's clothes.
It's so pedestrian, and yet still so divine.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 10:17 PM
New Orleans
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 10:20 PM
Caine - I'd say lower Midwest; Kansas City or Memphis.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 10:22 PM
Jules:
That would be good. I was thinking Atlanta myself, they'd had some good talent from there throughout the show.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 10:25 PM
Carlie, is there a lot of good eatin' in Kansas? The only time I was ever there, I was 8 years old, so I wasn't doing a foodie trip. ;)
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 10:29 PM
Caine
Atlanta sounds pretty good to me, too. And, even though you didn't ask me and I'm by no means an expert, Kansas City does have some really good food. I went up there a few times to visit friends back when I only lived 4 hours away. I was well fed every time.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 10:29 PM
Caine - I think of Kansas City more on the Missouri side, but its specialty is barbeque. Really, really good barbeque.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 10:32 PM
Amanda is going to poison the entire ballpark. And though it will be bad for those people, it will be awesome for the show. That's the last I'll say about it, since I know we almost ruined Bill's day last week when he hadn't watched it yet.
This is from Wikipedia for KC:"Along with Texas, Memphis & North Carolina, Kansas City is a "world capital of barbecue." There are more than 90 barbecue restaurants in the metropolitan area and the American Royal each fall hosts what it claims is the world's biggest barbecue contest."
It's also well-known for steak.
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 25, 2010 10:33 PM
Back to the Future 3. Ah, nostalgia.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 25, 2010 10:35 PM
Quick responses. Thanks. I hope you don't mind me asking a few more questions? Of course, you can always ignore them if you do. Sorry for thread-jacking.
Ichthyic:
frankly, we're tired of believers attempting to shift the burden of proof.
I'm confused. Burden of proof means that whoever wants to convince another that something, God in this case, exists has to provide the compelling argument. In my first post I was only saying that if a believer found arguments for the existence of God reasonable, the it wouldn't be irrational to believe in the God. Not that those arguments prove the existence of God. So, wouldn't you be begging the question against such a believer by stating there's no need for an argument for disbelief? Switch places, you do not believe there is a God, correct? So, for you there is no need of an argument. If a believer said you did need an argument not to believe in God, then that'd be begging the question against you. Does that make sense?
Nerd of Redhead:
It is irrational.
OK, good. What are the arguments?
Absolutely no good and conclusive solid physical evidence for an imaginary deity.
I never said there was conclusive solid physical evidence for any deity, imaginary or real. What I said was given an existing belief, and the logical possibility of arguments such as fine tuning, or cosmological argument, or similar then is it not reasonable to feel that a belief, which was inculcated when one was to young to be rational, might serendipitously coincide with reality? At least, it doesn't seem logically impossible.
Now, what is your problem delusional fool? Apparently I'm a delusional fool.
This is the typical atheist attitude at this blog. Either show your conclusive physical evidence for your imaginary deity, or acknowledge it is reasonable to consider you a delusional fool.
So from what I gather, you are arguing as if I have to presented some compelling evidence for the existence of God? Correct? Which is what I've not done. So were the same page. But I never said I'd try to prove that God existed. I asked what arguments you'd give to a liberal believer, who found the arguments for God reasonable and thus gave rational support the faith.
Choose wisely cricket...
I shall try.
John Morales:
Belief should not be squandered on supernatural and irrational wishful thinking, but should be indulged in on a justified basis for it to be meaningful.
So your argument would be epistemological? That there is no justification for believing in the supernatural? You've begged the question against believers by already stating that belief is irrational, but your argument has legs.
I don't get this need you have for some magic man in the sky. You're not a child.
Well, I'm not sure where you get the idea that I have a need for some magic man in the sky, it certainly wasn't from my post. I only posed a scenario. But thanks for answering.
'Tis Himself OM:
The most used argument we have against belief in god(s) is the lack of evidence for god(s).
OK, so you're arguing to the best explanation. The conditional being that given (if) there's such a lack of evidence for god(s), then it's reasonable to assume there are no gods? From this it follow that it's unreasonable to assume there is a God? I can see that argument being compelling to an atheist, in fact, it's just restating atheism. But I'm not so sure it'd be compelling to a believer who thinks the existence of the universe, spiritual insight which I understand you do not class as evidence, and other forms of evidence such as testimony and revelation are good evidence.
Island Brewer:
I won't quote your text. I see that your argument isn't so much an argument as a rhetorical technique. Place Fairy in for God and mutatis mutandi, faith is shown to be irrational? I'm not sure how many believers would find that compelling. Though it is funny.
Sven DeMilo:
You're right. Apologies for derailing the thread.
Carlie:
There isn't a single argument for the existence of God that survives the "prove it" test
There isn't a single argument that proves that we're not in a matrix type scenario as I understand it. There was no attempt to prove that God exists by me.
"Throughout history
Every mystery
EVER solved has turned out to be...
Not Magic."
And those not solved? I think you'll run up against the problem of induction soon.
I think that's all. Apologies for the derail.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 10:37 PM
Carlie & Jules, thanks. While I'd still like to see Atlanta, I'm wondering about a Hawaii based season. That could be fun.
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 25, 2010 10:39 PM
Charleston, SC - lots of fine eating.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 10:40 PM
I'll say one thing about this ep [Top Chef], baseball players are very easy to please. They loved everything.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 10:41 PM
Part-Time Insomniac
I'm fixin' to* start listening to the book now. I'm really looking forward to the days-long psychoanalytical diagnoses binge I'm sure to embark on. The last time I copy edited a psych text book, no one would hang out with me because I kept assigning them personality disorders. (Frankly, I think their unwillingness to face up to their shortcomings only reinforced my diagnoses.)
*You guys like how I threw a lil' of my Southerness in there? The first time one of my Okie friends heard me say fixin' to he laughed hysterically for several minutes. Guess it's something I lost while in Oklahoma and re-picked-up when I moved back to AL.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 25, 2010 10:42 PM
Philomath.
'Nuff said.
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 25, 2010 10:45 PM
Enjoy, Jules. Just don't be like Abe Simpson and start shrieking, "Sociopath!" at anyone who comes round the corner ;).
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 10:45 PM
It is a collection of data. Every single time that any religion has posited God as an explanation for a phenomenon, and that the explanation has been found, it has turned out to be not supernatural. Every. Single. Time. Hundreds of times. At some point it becomes ridiculous to keep positing the same answer that has been wrong so many times before, and never right.
Hawaii elimination challenge: Use poi in your dish, and make us like it. :)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 10:45 PM
Jeffrey:
Oooh, hadn't thought of that. It would be good.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 25, 2010 10:47 PM
Usagichan:
Ducky
:) May I call you Usagichy?
and that the various fantasies and hallucinations of literary figures through the ages is not adequate reason.
Isn't that begging the question against the believer in such things though?
Perhaps it would help to make it clearer to ask a believer why they believe in God and not a pantheon of gods, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or the Voodoo Spirits... In which case why choose one in particular and call it 'real'?
Well, if it's not logically possible that one belief is true. Then the fact that there are a billion other beliefs that all seem more or less barmy is no guide. To a Christian, atheism is as barmy as Hinduism. Thus that argument doesn't seem compelling at all. Perhaps I've misunderstood it.
Of course, the main problem with believers is getting a definite definition of God - As soon as there are characteristics defined then argument can take place but my experience is that believers freely change definitions as each one becomes unsupportable. That is a good one. I suppose telling you that we're to limited in mental capacities to comprehend what God is wouldn't fly?
I have yet to see a definition that was supportable.
How do you define the ineffable? I'm not expecting you to like that answer, but then I'm not trying to convince you. But given that God is ineffable, then trying to define God wouldn't make a great deal of sense.
On a break from pin-head dancing duty?
What makes you think it's my duty to dance on pin-heads? Or is it because you think I have a pin head and am duty bound to dance?
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 10:50 PM
dux:
Burden of Proof. Click the link and read. Don't toss terms around when you don't understand them. You cannot posit "God Exists" when there is zero evidence for that claim then yell the burden of proof belongs to the other guy.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 25, 2010 10:50 PM
Pharyngula the Opera. Act III opens at the Pharyngula Saloon and Spanking Parlor. The Lady of indeterminate age behind the bar, talking on the phone. Appears to be making wedding preparations from the snippets of song heard. There is still the picture draped in black at one end of the counter, but next to that is picture of the same woman sitting in the sidecar of a motorcycle, grinning up a storm. The usual crowd is at the bar. Working in the back room is a fat bald-headed guy. Several young folks are crowded around a table typing madly at their computers. The overhead shows names like Jadehawk, David Marjanović, Cerebrus. At the back end of the bar is a table with a bunch of folks, mostly female, knitting. They keep mentioning "Hitchens", and keep an eye on their computers while the stitch away furiously. Some men of more mature nature are sitting and discussing bacon, geology, songs and economics, in no particular order. A young guy with a British accent chimes in periodically in a clear tenor.
Another lady of indeterminate age comes from the upstairs transporter area, and everyone does a double take, and in unison say "Hi Janine". The lady behind the bar puts her call on hold, draws a beverage, and quickly serves the newcomer with a hug and drink. The saloon lady goes back to her arrangements, and the new lady heads for the jukebox and complains loudly, but good naturedly, about the lack of selection.
Two men in white shirts and solid narrow navy blue ties come in. The lady behind the bar yawns, and reaches under the bar. Out the back window, a sign with a cross and M inside of a circle and slash is seen in the sky. The pullets all look up, and head for the trebuchet in the background. The men ask if they can talk about the book of Mormon. Everyone else looks up and smiles. A middle aged man looking faintly chimpish sings the equivalent of "talk away". The door to the back room opens, and the fat bald-headed man wheels in a cask on a dolly. He heads for the casks of grog, and starts by removing the oldest, and moving every other cask along a notch, and with a grunt puts the new cask in place. The oldest cask is nowhere to be seen.
A sound of the transporter comes from the upstairs, and a petite woman radiating attitude enters from on upstairs side door. She looks down behind the bar and smiles, and continues toward the thin necktied men with all eyes upon her. She sings of Mormon perfidy, and while the two men are totally engrossed rebuting her, the fat guy puts a low form juicer on the bar, grabs a few oranges and lemons, draws two steins from the oldest grog. Adds a couple of drops from a vial, and the smoking from the stein stop. Sets up a couple of empty steins near the juicer, and with a lot of noise and ostentatious moves starts juicing the fruit, getting the semi-attention of the men in narrow ties. The overhead shows all the juice going to the empty steins.
When the two steins are full of fresh juice, the DJ mistress goes behind the bar, and brings two steins to the thirsty missionaries, asking if they would like some freshly squeezed fruit juice. Meanwhile, the pharyngula groups starts a roving chorus that winds between the two missionaries. The bald headed man wheels the oldests grog cask to the back room, taking time to avoid an knitting kneedle thrust from a Redheaded knitter. The missionaries take one sip of the juice, and start drinking even faster. The last half their steins are swallowed in in big gulp. The Pullets appear to be returning with a cart from the trebuchet. The crowd around the missionaries becomes more frenzied as do their attempted rebuttals, until the two men slump to the ground, untouched, and out cold. The chimpish looking guy holds the back door open as the pullets rush in with a cart, and everybody helps move the inert bodies to the cart. The pullets pull the carts out back heading for the trebuchet. Meanwhile, all sing a victory song over irrationality. After a few minutes, the sound of the trebuchet firing is heard, and an overhead shows an approximate trajectory toward the Great Salt Lake. The petite lady sings victory, and the curtain comes down.
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 25, 2010 10:52 PM
ODS - downloaded and started Packing for Mars, enjoying it so far. Thanks for the tip. I need books as I am finding that enforced rest means I do about one or one plus books a day. Kindle has been wonderful for me while I have to be still.
Caine - we did shrimp in various forms for dinner tonight at my favourite semi-dive, Gilligan's. The one we go to is about three miles from the house, they know us, we exchange hugs and "honey"s with the staff, and they have the best hushpuppies in the area. Not sure where we will try tomorrow, kinda have a hankering for ribs. Bottom line, lots to eat here.
Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom
|
August 25, 2010 10:56 PM
Oh, is that why someone on Anarchy Online was spree of quotes from it? Figures.I always liked "You're not thinking 4-dimensionally!"
No, no it would not. If you can't define it, you can't measure or detect it. If you can't measure or detect it, you have no evidence. If you have no evidence, the belief is unreasonable. It is within the realm of possibility that you are correct, but no moreso then Winston Churchill's belief that the McCloud clan could summon faerie to defeat the Nazis. Boy Howdy, I can tell you've never dealt with atheists. or anyone else with very little patience for metaphysical bullshit. Not familiar with the meaning of hte phrase "Why not just count the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin?" It means "Why not continue asking a meaningless question?"Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 25, 2010 10:56 PM
Not really.
"Begging the question" is a specific logical fallacy in which the conclusion of a line of reasoning is hidden in the assumptions. Something like, "Complex things need a creator. The universe is complex. Therefore, the universe needs a creator," is begging the question, because the assumption that a creator exists is embedded in the first assumption.
Now, as for burden of proof:
The burden of proof lies on the one not taking the default position. The default position is, generally, that something does not exist until there is overwhelming evidence that it does. Since there is no overwhelming evidence for God, the default position is that God does not exist. Those proposing God exists must take up the burden of proof. If they can muster overwhelming evidence, then God must exist; otherwise, we assume God does not exist.
So, no. Simply assuming God exists does not relieve the theist of the burden of proof, even if they feel the evidence is sufficient. For evidence to become proof, it must be overwhelming. And as God is an extraordinary claim, the evidence also must be extraordinary.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 10:56 PM
Nerd, about the Opera: Hey! I'm not mentioned, dammit! This flower of evil is giving you a major stinkeye right about now.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 25, 2010 10:57 PM
dux anglicus,
And if they found arguments for astrology reasonable it wouldn't be irrational to believe in astrology. In fact, people generally don't believe in arguments they find to be irrational.
What's irrational, however, is finding arguments for astrology/God reasonable.
Then that believer doesn't understand what 'evidence' means.
Rather than focus on what's compelling focus on what's rational and logical.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 11:00 PM
Caine - me either; I think you and I must be the executive producers, sitting calmly in the seats watching the action while sipping on some brandy. :)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 11:01 PM
Jeffrey:
Sounds fabulous! I think Charleston would be a great location for Top Chef.
Posted by: Jules, Bride of Death
|
August 25, 2010 11:05 PM
JeffreyD
I almost listed Charleston as well, but I don't really have as much experience with Charleston as I do with New Orleans, so I went with what I knew. Gotta keep my street cred.
dux anglicus
But believing in him/her does? How exactly does that work? Ineffable, undefinable, undetectable, but it's rational to believe in it if you're inclined towards the belief?
Just. No.
Go read The God Delusion or God: The Failed Hypothesis. They are more comprehensive than a blog comment, though less fun than pulling word soup arguments out of your ass.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 11:05 PM
Carlie:
Aaaah. Works for me. ;) At least [redacted] went home!
Posted by: Kel, The Privileged View From Nowhere
|
August 25, 2010 11:05 PM
The easiest way to assess the burden of proof is this. What's the difference between the negative position and the lack of a positive one? They look exactly the same, all the negative position (in this case non-belief) can ever do is shoot down the positive claims because otherwise there's nothing to discuss. The negative position has to be the default position and the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claims.
If there's no positive arguments for belief, then what is there for the non-believer to argue against?
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 25, 2010 11:09 PM
Rutee: They were showing all three movies on Nickelodeon. I think that poster watched them all, which would explain the quote-vomit.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 25, 2010 11:10 PM
dux anglicus,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
How do you know God is ineffable?
Look, it's not enough to say all other religions are barmy. Why is Christianity right and all other religions wrong? How do you know?
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 25, 2010 11:11 PM
Aw, I should go to bed, but there's an Iron Chef on with a Kenichi sea cucumber battle. I haven't seen a Kenichi episode in forever.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 25, 2010 11:13 PM
I reckon I should apologize for using the word "proof" in my previous post.
dux anglicus, there is a great epistemological corpus defining the roll of data in relation to hypotheses. From Sir Francis Bacon all the way through modern day (most notably, the work of Karl Popper). In the current model, there is essentially no such thing as "proof" outside of mathematics and symbolic logic. In essence, even "overwhelming evidence" does not constitute "proof," so much as it eliminates competing hypotheses without contradicting your own hypothesis.
I dumbed down my previous response in an attempt to avoid all the nuances and subtleties of the epistemology of science. Yet now I find myself compelled to mention them anyway.
Le sigh. You just can't avoid that fact that science is dark and subtle and fearfully powerful.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 11:17 PM
Feynmaniac:
In other words: provide evidence.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 11:17 PM
Michael Ruse on Hausergate
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 25, 2010 11:19 PM
Delusional thinking and mental masturbation, in other words. Evidence implies reality. Lack of evidence implies delusion.But it is. Delusional fool. No solid evidence equals the null hypothesis of non-existence. Show your conclusive evidence, or shut the fuck up.Yes, that is now a given. Work to demonstrate we are wrong with solid physical evidence.Absolutely. Only delusional fools think otherwise.None, delusional fools are beyond reason. Which is why they are delusional and believe in imaginary deities.Absolutely, and you claim to be rational? I'm not seeing it.Without evidence your imaginary deity doesn't exist. End of story delusional fool.No, evidence does away with that problem. Reality check. Show us your reality check with solid physical evidence.Actually it is. Beliefs without evidence are delusions. Simple.No perhaps about it. You have. Totally.No, god isn't. God can be a deist type god, who doesn't interact with the world, and is essentially worthless for anything other than delusion, or your deity exists and interacts with the world, like the Xian deity, in which case there is evidence that should be available of its existence. Put up or shut the fuck up.All trolls like you dance here. Until you explode. Boom....Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 11:20 PM
Rev BDC lives there, I believe; he could show them chefs a thing or 2 about pork bellies, I reckon.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 11:23 PM
No, you can't, Captain Smug. The science will get you every time, it's seductive.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 25, 2010 11:26 PM
Look, it's somebody's ECO!
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 11:27 PM
Sven:
Having been a chef, I have no doubt he could.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 11:34 PM
Michael Ruse on Hausergate
Ruse is an idiot.
example:
Hurd's near namesake? THAT'S how he connects such two horrendously disparate cases?
yes, I waded through the rest.
he's wrong.
It DOESN'T matter what the fucking creationists do with what happened to Hauser.
The story is, and Ruse knows it, that science is self-correcting unlike any other endeavor known to man.
It's why we have peer review, and frankly, it IS what caught Hauser's mistakes on certain papers. It was only confirmed by eyewitness testimony of his grad students. It was really other scientists in the same field that realized something was up.
let the fucking creationists try to play this up. Ruse is a moron for failing to see the strength in the story FOR science, instead of the weaknesses.
but then, that has been Ruse's failure for decades.
It's why he went on tour with Dembski to talk about ID.
Fuck, it's why he took ID seriously to begin with.
It's also why I tend not to pay any attention to what he has to say anymore.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 11:37 PM
Thanks, Sven! That was a nice read.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 11:37 PM
...
more critique of Ruse:
the damage was done... BY PEOPLE LIKE RUSE!
yes, by people playing up the so called "impact" of the very misinformation the AGW deniers were making out of the researchers involved in "climategate".
fuck Ruse, and fuck the media that supports this shit.
sorry, but it's been a pet peeve of mine for years.
people like Ruse, given a voice, inevitably cause more damage than the stories they talk about.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 25, 2010 11:38 PM
Caine, flower of death, my sincere apologies. I missed a few regulars in Act III, so they will appear in Act IV or later. Given how long the eternal thread is likely to go, you will skewering your share of trolls. Of course, given the nature of the Pharyngula Opera, you can write Act IV or later to make sure that happens. Have the women in lead parts and the men cowering in fear off on the sides. But whatever you do, have some fun doing it.
Posted by: Rey Fox, Bird Caller Guy
|
August 25, 2010 11:38 PM
"Boring
Oregon City
Next Left"
Naturally, I had to Googlemap that, and as best I can tell, that would be the OR 212 exit off the Mt. Hood Expressway. And it's a right on a cloverleaf offramp.
And that reminded me, Wankers Corner is not far away from all that. Interestingly enough, according to Google Maps (but not the satellite or street view), Wankers Corner is now a roundabout. Make of that what you will.
And OMG, while I was mousing around Google Maps, I even found an Idiotville, Oregon. Wow.
Now that I'm in Missouri, I suppose I really should stop into one of those BBQ joints that I've seen all over the highways here.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 25, 2010 11:38 PM
It was. I was pleased to see our gracious host, while enjoying his iPad and liking the Kindle, takes DRM seriously.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 25, 2010 11:40 PM
Thanks again for your answers.
Carlie:
It is a collection of data. Every single time that any religion has posited God as an explanation for a phenomenon, and that the explanation has been found, it has turned out to be not supernatural. Every. Single. Time. Hundreds of times. At some point it becomes ridiculous to keep positing the same answer that has been wrong so many times before, and never right.
I agree totally. But that's beside the point. The problem of induction is that from past and present evidence it does not follow that the future will be uniform.
Caine, Fleur du mal OM:
You cannot posit "God Exists" when there is zero evidence for that claim then yell the burden of proof belongs to the other guy.
I haven't tried to posit God exists to you. At least I don't recall any point where I've said 'God exists prove me wrong non believers or convert!'
From your link:
"Burden of proof" is the obligation that somebody presenting a new or remarkable idea has to provide evidence to support it.
What I said:
Burden of proof means that whoever wants to convince another that something, God in this case, exists has to provide the compelling argument.
How do they substantially disagree? Evidence is part of a compelling argument for existence isn't it? You seem to be banging on an open door.
nigelTheBold, Captain Smug:
"Begging the question" is a specific logical fallacy in which the conclusion of a line of reasoning is hidden in the assumptions. Something like, "Complex things need a creator. The universe is complex. Therefore, the universe needs a creator," is begging the question, because the assumption that a creator exists is embedded in the first assumption.
True, but you beg the question against someone when you assume that there position is false, then use that assumption in your argument against that position. For example, if you were to say: 'All religious faith is irrational, Christians have religious faith, therefore all Christians are irrational', then you've begged the question against Christians, because one of your assumptions, the 1st premise here, already contains what you'd like to prove.
I don't think I disagree with your remarks about burden of proof. But again I'm not trying to prove that God exists. The position I'm positing is that a believer, who came to believe via irrational means, but has found arguments that he/she finds reasonable or rational would like to know what arguments there are against his/her belief being rational. It's difficult to keep up, so I hope I haven't changed my starting position or moved the goalposts.
Feynmaniac, Chimerical Toad Superhero: (best nickname ever!)
And if they found arguments for astrology reasonable it wouldn't be irrational to believe in astrology. In fact, people generally don't believe in arguments they find to be irrational.
Good point, yet some other posters seem to thing that yes, it would be irrational.
How do you know God is ineffable? I don't claim to know that. I'm saying that if God was ineffable, then...It's a hypothetical.
Why is Christianity right and all other religions wrong? Brute fact perhaps. That a bunch of backward goatherds in the middle East just lucked upon the answer to the why of the universe?
How do you know? I never said I did know. How do you know not?
What constitutes knowledge in such cases? If it's probability then maybe this will help you see why belief in only one of thousands of religions might seem plausible. Do you play lotto? Imagine you've bought a ticket. I'm not sure of the odds, depends on the particular lotto, but they're sure to be minute. So, given the odds are stacked against you, wouldn't you say you know that you are not going to win the lotto? And if you know this, wouldn't you throw your ticket away before the draw? It doesn't seem irrational to buy a lotto ticket, and wait until the draw. I'm not sure what level of certainty one requires for knowledge. Perhaps if you tell me what you require for something to be knowledge we can work out where we stand...
nigelTheBold, Captain Smug
Le sigh. You just can't avoid that fact that science is dark and subtle and fearfully powerful. Je suis d'accord. Science is brilliant isn't it, but to me, most of it I just accept as being true or knowledge because I am only familiar with basic biology, physics, etc.
I'm struggling to keep up, so apologies if I've missed anyone. Thanks for your answers.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 11:45 PM
Thanks again for your answers.
it will never be enough for you, until you frame your question properly, as has been pointed out to you numerous times.
[psychic mode on]
I foresee a running set of goalposts...
[/psychic mode]
Posted by: Ch'tturgha
|
August 25, 2010 11:46 PM
FFS... I don't have time left tonight to read everything that was added to the comments since I started reading them today. I'll try to catch up tomorrow, but I only made it through #600 or something tonight. Sincerest apologies, especially since it looks to have gotten mighty interesting and argumentative recently.
That being said...
@ #153:
I actually wrote that character into a storyline I'm still working on, except the gun she was so fond of was a family heirloom, and she'd used it to kill her abusive father in the middle of a forest.
@ #571:
Heartily approved of list, thank you.
@ #578:
Excellent unit of measurement, as was the follow-up from the coworker.
And finally...
To PZ:
Thanks for being, and thank you for continuing to be. Don't forget to tip the serving staff on your way out, though, or they might do something nasty... like demand you be catheterized for the next few weeks "as a precaution". Best wishes for a speedy recovery.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 11:48 PM
Nerd, I'll leave the opera writing to you, that's heavy lifting! Alas, these days which are upon me, I must actually work in exchange for cold, hard cash, which is something I seriously enjoy having in my hand.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 25, 2010 11:50 PM
Good point, yet some other posters seem to thing that yes, it would be irrational.
this would be called quotemining, given you ignored his explanation for that which came immediately after.
I smell a dishonest hack.
And I don't see why I should waste my time answering dishonest questions, and feeding your need to play "move the goalposts".
run along and play with people who don't see through you.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 25, 2010 11:50 PM
dux anglicus,
Some of the best arguments for non-belief are the the weaknesses of the arguments for belief. In all other aspects of our lives we assign a degree of belief in a proposition based on the evidence in support of it. Yet, when it comes to religious claims lack of evidence is not a problem. When presented with no evidence or reason to believe a claim the default position should be disbelief.
Now, you'd think an intervening supreme deity that regularly interferes with human affairs would leave some decent amount evidence. However, there is none. All the so-called miracles and acts of God have always either turn up to have a perfectly good natural explanation or were just fabricated.
Of course this doesn't rule out a deistic God that just made the universe and hasn't done shit since or a sneaky God that's very good at hiding his tracks. However, there is a reason to discount those. It's quite unparsimonious. By Okham's razor, with competing hypotheses that equally satisfy the evidence the simplest one is the most probable. Now, an all-knowing intelligent being is extremely complicated while the alternative is way simpler.
Most believers realize the weakness of the physical evidence so they attempt logic arguments. However, these are all really bad. We've argued plenty of them here. Transcendental argument, cosmological argument, ontological argument, argument from morality, argument biblical evidence, etc. If you have a favourite name it and we'll tell you what's wrong with it.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 25, 2010 11:52 PM
Ichthyic:
Hmmm, seems I'm psychic too! How about that...
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 25, 2010 11:55 PM
Not to a scientist. Still the delusional sophist.You came here and mentioned it. Same thing. You have the burden of proof upon you to show conclusive physical evidence for one. Otherwise, we have grave suspicions upon your reasoning capacity.Ignorance is the refuge of the sophist. Stand up for reason. Or shut the fuck up. Wafflers don't get the derision they deserve.The lack of evidence closes the door. Except for unthinking sophist delusional fools. Which you appear to be.Then you would just shut up about the whole argument. To many fools come here and try to prove their deity by talking, instead of presenting evidence, and keep saying "I'm not trying to prove anything". You are, if you talk about it.True. Show me otherwise. By showing a real deity exists.Yep, mental masturbation. Worthless to even consider. If there is no evidence, why bother with mental masturbation? That's for sophist philosophers and other low lives.Yep, you are definitely failing in keeping up with the evidence.Don't bother. Your argument so far is number 11 to a tee on our system for idjit philosophers taking up air and electrons that could be used by thinking folks. Which isn't you.Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 25, 2010 11:59 PM
Nerd of Redhead:
Delusional thinking and mental masturbation, in other words. Evidence implies reality. Lack of evidence implies delusion. Well, as I understand it, when the Ptolemaic system was popular, the evidence equally supported it, and the Copernican system. The Ptolemaic system was more entrenched and had equal support of evidence, did that make the Copernican system 'delusional thinking and mental masturbation?'
But it is. Delusional fool. No solid evidence equals the null hypothesis of non-existence. Show your conclusive evidence, or shut the fuck up.
OK, this is obviously what psychologists would call a 'hot button' issue for you. I'm sorry if my presence here antagonises you. I don't know if there's anything I can say that will allow us to have an amicable discussion. In any case, you've given a contingent explanation and said it's logically impossible. I'm afraid you don't seem to grasp that as philosophers so pictorially say logically impossible is impossible in all worlds, your lack of evidence which supports the null-hypothesis is a contingent, contingent on evidence, and so is not impossible in worlds that contain that evidence.
Yes, that is now a given. Work to demonstrate we are wrong with solid physical evidence.
A believer is using solid physical evidence, the existence of the universe.
Absolutely. Only delusional fools think otherwise.
Your argument seems to be the question begging one I outlined earlier: Believers are delusional fools, you're a believer, therefore you're a delusional fool. QED.
None, delusional fools are beyond reason. Which is why they are delusional and believe in imaginary deities.
Then why are you bothering with me? You've already said I'm a delusional fool. I can't quite grasp why you'd bother, especially with such vitriol.
Without evidence your imaginary deity doesn't exist. End of story delusional fool.
I guess then that Black Swans and Kangaroos didn't exist in Australia until sighted by Europeans? Before then there was no evidence known.
No, evidence does away with that problem. Reality check. Show us your reality check with solid physical evidence.
An appeal to evidence, which relies upon the uniformity of nature, to justify the uniformity of nature is circular. You haven't done away with the problem at all.
Actually it is. Beliefs without evidence are delusions. Simple.
What's the evidence for string theory again?
Skipping a bit....
All trolls like you dance here. Until you explode. Boom....
OK, I can see we are going to no where. If I stay, then I'm delusional. If I get angry at your vitriol, then I've exploded. If I leave then you've another notch in your belt. I'm surprised that for someone who demands evidence before reaching a conclusion that you've reached conclusions about what I believe when I've never said what I believe. Thanks for your responses. I appreciate how difficult it must have been for you.
Posted by: Antiochus Epiphanes
|
August 25, 2010 11:59 PM
It doesn't seem rational to by a lotto ticket in the first place. To extend your metaphor.
Posted by: Ch'tturgha
|
August 26, 2010 12:00 AM
Maybe I'm not done for the night yet.
If I'm reading this correctly (which is definitely up for debate), I think the issue answers itself. If you believe something because of a hallucinatory experience but later find some evidence that indicates you might be onto something, that's one thing. If, however, you simply find other people who believe the same thing because of a similar experience (near-death, alcohol-induced and tape-recorded nigh-incoherent ramblings, whatever), then anybody arguing against you can simply say you lack supporting evidence and, so long as they have something resembling evidence to support their position, they would be right.
Thinking about it, this is reminding me of some book I found in the local university library, where some guy went down to either South or Central America, got loaded up on some hallucinogenic substance or other, had visions of a snake (or two snakes around each other) and bright light, and proceeded to believe the Mayans knew the structure of DNA and had been worshipping it. Admittedly, I skimmed the book rather briefly and this was several years ago, but it doesn't change "revelation" being inadmissable as evidence.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 12:03 AM
A believer is using solid physical evidence, the existence of the universe.
you're a complete idiot if you think that is evidence of anything but circular reasoning.
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 26, 2010 12:04 AM
Where this falls down is on the reasonable vs rational. I find people generally use a reasonable argument to mean something more akin to intuitive and use very little reason in evaluating them. A rational argument tends to be regarded as based in logic and evidence. It is reasonable to continue to believe based on the reasonable (intuitive) argument. It is irrational to believe because of rational arguments since there is no evidence and solid logic for belief in a deity.Posted by: Ch'tturgha
|
August 26, 2010 12:04 AM
Whoa there... The available evidence only supported the Ptolemaic system because they decided to make objects go through epicycles and, uh, there's nothing "perfect" about a circle that has to add another, tiny circle into its orbit in order to match the actual observations. The existence of epicycles alone tipped the scales in favour of the Copernican model.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:04 AM
Icthyic:
this would be called quotemining, given you ignored his explanation for that which came immediately after.
What followed after what that belief in astrology/God was irrational. Why is it irrational? Isn't that the where we started? I asked about a believer who found their naive believe to be rational due to certain arguments, and what would be the best arguments against non-belief. So the thing to do would be to say why religious beliefs are irrational, not declare them irrational and have a victory party with a good tongue lashing for the person who asked you. That's assuming you want to answer. If not, why say anything?
Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom
|
August 26, 2010 12:05 AM
Look, Dux, if you want to be the Devil's Advocate, you have to actually defend your positions. You can't say "Well /I/ didn't say that..."
Of course, none of us here thinks that's what you're ACTUALLY doing, I suspect.
A wiser woman would say "Back to my exp grind".
You have a fact? As in, serious evidence for the existence of a deity? Holy Shit, I wanna hear this. I don't have to argue against something that hasn't provided evidence. Do I expect people who already believe to be convinced? Not particularly, they've already proven they don't give a shit about evidence or the lack thereof.Posted by: ronsullivan
|
August 26, 2010 12:05 AM
Og: Dallas is also in Pennsylvania.
Don't I know it. I spent four years there, and A/ half my magazines went through Texas before they got to me; and B/ the place was so boring I used to hitchhike to Scranton for fun and excitement.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 12:06 AM
seriously, the fucking black swan argument, misused again?
*sigh*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability
dishonest.
hack.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:07 AM
Whoa there... The available evidence only supported the Ptolemaic system because they decided to make objects go through epicycles and, uh, there's nothing "perfect" about a circle that has to add another, tiny circle into its orbit in order to match the actual observations. The existence of epicycles alone tipped the scales in favour of the Copernican model. The existence of epicycles was something that offended the taste for elegance that mathematicians and scientists feel. But that itself isn't evidence against it. Ockam's razor is not a rule of logic, it's a aesthetic appeal that has served science well.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 12:08 AM
dux:
Oh, FFS, you're already enough of an idiot, don't go all Tone Troll™ too. You were called a fool and advised to shut the fuck up. That's not a "hot button", it's 1) truth and 2) good advice.
You don't seem to realize that people here deal with idiots of your type all the time, the same arguments, over and over and over and over. You aren't offering anything which hasn't been heard before, you aren't offering evidence, you aren't offering anything except extreme softness of the brain and shifting goalposts, so you've decided to cry "aha, I struck a nerve, looky!" like every other idiot before you.
We deal with substance here. Not fluff, not idiocy and not Ex equus pyga. This is far from a "hot button" issue, it's standard fare around here. We're just colourful. Deal with it or get the fuck out.
Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom
|
August 26, 2010 12:09 AM
Ch'tturgah, did you get your name from the red Eldritch Horrir in Eternal Darkness?
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 12:09 AM
Ockam's razor is not a rule of logic, it's a aesthetic appeal that has served science well.
It sickens me you copy and paste without understanding.
you no more understand rules of logic than you understand why it is stupid to ask an atheist why they don't believe.
you're a dishonest hack.
leave.
Posted by: Ch'tturgha
|
August 26, 2010 12:11 AM
I can't think of any good arguments against nonbelief grounded in proper logic. The only way I can think of arguing against nonbelief is with the same old useless, worn-out "unmoved mover" and/or "divine clockmaker" tripe.
If we're talking about arguing against belief, however, there are plenty of good arguments, namely anything involving logic. Faith is the belief in something without evidence to support it. Evidence for the existence of God would, in fact, utterly undermine faith because then it would be something observable and would cease to allow anybody to have faith.
Regardless, arguing the nonexistence of something is always easier than arguing for it. All one has to do in arguing for nonexistence is make sure the opponent can't actually find something supporting existence of the object in question. And by supporting, I mean very obviously doing so, none of the "well, it's awfully orderly in this universe, so somebody must have ordered it!" bullshit.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:12 AM
Icthyic:
dishonest.
How? He/she said that nothing exists without evidence. It follows that for anything we have no evidence for, it doesn't exist. I didn't make that claim.
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 26, 2010 12:16 AM
Duck Angelicus
Posted by: Bill Dauphin, avec fromage
|
August 26, 2010 12:18 AM
The Keeper of the Portcullis is apparently still sleepin' it off. Just dropping in before bed, myself.
When we moved to CT, my wife and I looked at a house on Gin Still Road, and then eventually bought one on Olive Lane. They were in different towns, alas, but I always wished that those two roads crossed, so the house at the intersection could be called Martini Place.
Also, within 5 min. drive of my house is a Christian church at the corner of <BoringName> Road and... wait for it... Beelzebub St. I shit you not!
G'night, all....
Posted by: Dhorvath, OM
|
August 26, 2010 12:19 AM
Uhh, did someone just say the Ptolemaic system was supported by evidence? Really?
The evidence was constantly disproving the Ptolemaic system which is why it kept getting epicyclic additions to try and catch up with observed reality. These are the sorts of clues we use to determine that a system is inadequate.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 12:19 AM
Duck Angelicus
that's the appropriate level of response.
:)
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 12:19 AM
Ichthyic:
In spades. QFT.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:20 AM
you no more understand rules of logic than you understand why it is stupid to ask an atheist why they don't believe.
you're a dishonest hack.
leave.
The idea that simple, straightforward explanations of phenomena are most likely to be correct is called Occam's razor, after William of Occam (or Ockham), the fourteenth-century English philosopher who first expressed it. (The "razor" refers to shaving extraneous details from an argument or explanation.) Although Occam's razor has no proof [my emphasis] or verification, it appeals to scientist's sense of beauty and elegance, and it has helped lead to the simple and powerful laws of nature that scientistss use today.
Universe 8e, Roger A. Freedman, William J. Kaufmann III Page 67-68.
I guess Freedman and Kaufman don't understand the rules of logic either when they say that Occam's razor has no proof or verification (which means it's not a law of logic or even provable in logic)?
The only thing dishonest about me is that I haven't given my name, but then neither do most people on blogs. Instead of leaving, can I ask others who might still wish to discuss with me? If nobody wants to talk to me, I'm sure I'll get bored and leave.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 26, 2010 12:22 AM
dux anglicus,
If that's what you were trying to say then it is not all clear from what you wrote:
That's not an explanation.
Nope.
I'd say with 95%+ certainty I'm not gonna win, given the extreme odds against it.
Buying a ticket would be irrational. However, once you're already in possession of a ticket it would be rational not to throw it away until you're certain it's worthless.
This is more about utility than epistemology though.
Yes it does, given the odds.
We don't need to get into the finer points of epistemology for this discussion. My basic point is that everywhere else in life we accept that propositions should be weighed on the evidence that supports them. Religion shouldn't get a pass from this.
More than just that. It's information theoretic principle.
_ _ _
Off to bed. Night all.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:22 AM
Oh, and I didn't ask any atheists why they don't believe, so I'm not sure why you bring that up.
Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula
|
August 26, 2010 12:22 AM
Dux Anglicus wrote:
Do you know of many people claiming that their acceptance of string theory tells them how to live their lives, or that they should oppose gay marriage, or support evil institutions like the Catholic church?
If you Christians treated your religion like string theorists treat their hypotheses, we wouldn't give a crap what you did. But you don't; instead, your unjustifiable nonsense causes humanity great harm.
So, we're going to continue pointing out there's as much validity to your claims as there is to astrology, and forcing you to - as you have so aptly demonstrated here today - make laughably fallacious attempts to defend your superstition and reveal just how intellectually dishonest a believer needs to be to 'keep the faith'.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 12:22 AM
Ah, but that's not quite the argument, is it? Of course I assume the theist position is false; the null hypothesis (default position) is that there is no God. This is not begging the question. This is skepticism, a necessary (but not sufficient) attribute of rationality.
Also, I do not claim to have "proved" that God does not exist. I admit freely it is an assumption. However, in the circumstance, it is the rational assumption.
I apologize for lecturing you on the term "begging the question." Your construct of "begging the question against X" is a bit idiosyncratic.
I think the problem is with your understanding of rationality. In most cases, that which is rational is also that which is supported by both reason and evidence. Also, we must take into account how we know what we know. (In philosophy, this is known as epistemology.)
Currently, we have one proven and effective epistemology: that of science. We are quite fortunate, as the epistemology of science has translated into a practice and methodology confusingly also called science. And then we have the body of knowledge gained by the application of the methodology derived from the epistemology. This body of knowledge is often referred to as science.
This is all pretty important stuff, though it's all called "science." When you say you are "only familiar with basic biology, physics, etc," you are referring to the body of knowledge. When we talk about discovering new things, we are referring to the practice of science.
But when we talk about rationality, we are talking about the epistemology of science. And this is where the irrationality of the theist position becomes obvious.
Now. I wish to make sure this is very, very clear: I am not talking about the actual existence of God. God may or may not exist. You may be right in your assumption that God exists, and I may be wrong. (This is not a 50/50 proposition, though, so don't think we have even odds.)
This is all about the rationality of that belief. That is, what is the basis of what you believe, and is it based on a solid epistemology?
As Caine, Fleur du mal OM said, science is seductive. But it's also a demanding taskmaster. The epistemology of science has no truck with things that aren't supported through empirical evidence. Then there's the logical side of science, which insists that new hypotheses must be based on that which we already know. Sometimes, though rarely, new ideas displace the old, but they do so from the same base of knowledge.
When I say that the arguments for God are irrational, I mean one of three things: either they contradict what we already know, or they do not fit within the structure of the epistemology of science, or they are just flat-out illogical.
(Actually, most all philosophical arguments for God simply beg the question, and are therefor illogical. Most of the rhetorical arguments for God are simple appeals to incredulity, and so do not fit the epistemology of science. The rest generally contradict what we know from the application of science.)
It isn't that my assumption of God's non-existence begs the question "against" anything. My assumption is simply far more rational than the converse. That's the whole point of a null hypothesis (default position), and why the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim.
You've got a lot of folks responding to you. But, if you read what most of us have written, we're pretty much saying the same thing:
1. The default position has stronger ontological standing than the baseless positive claim. As a result, atheism is more rational than theism.
2. You haven't presented a rational argument for the existence of God yet, so we can't really judge the rationality of your specific claims, can we?
3. You don't seem to understand the epistemology or practice of science.
4. You don't seem to understand the position of atheism. The foundation of atheism isn't that we have evidence against the existence of God. It's that theists have no evidence for the existence of God. Therefore, look at issue 1.
Now, if you kept claiming you had an invisible elephant in your garage, and we kept asking for evidence, and you consistently avoided providing evidence, what should we believe? That you do indeed have an invisible elephant in your garage?
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 26, 2010 12:23 AM
I'm not a big rally-round-the-cause type, but this is about a particular part of the world that means something to me personally. I've linked the issue before. Anyway, if anybody can write a letter in the next few days it may save some habitat that's worth saving and otherwise doomed for "green" energy profit$.
http://faultline.org/index.php/site/item/how_you_can_help_save_ivanpah_a_concrete_action/
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:28 AM
Wowbagger OM:
Do you know of many people claiming that their acceptance of string theory tells them how to live their lives, or that they should oppose gay marriage, or support evil institutions like the Catholic church?
Excellent comeback! But I still think that people do believe in string theory, in spite of no compelling evidence. (Though I could be wrong, I don't know the latest.) Which was my point. I didn't mean that string-theorists were in all senses like believers.
If you Christians treated your religion like string theorists treat their hypotheses, we wouldn't give a crap what you did. But you don't; instead, your unjustifiable nonsense causes humanity great harm. What evidence do you have to support the conclusion that I'm a Christian? I never said I was.
So, we're going to continue pointing out there's as much validity to your claims as there is to astrology, and forcing you to - as you have so aptly demonstrated here today - make laughably fallacious attempts to defend your superstition and reveal just how intellectually dishonest a believer needs to be to 'keep the faith'.
Those laughably fallacious claims would be? I've made no positive claims. I've offered a few hypotheticals. Pointed out the problem of induction and that Occam's razor isn't a rule of logic.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 12:32 AM
dux, it seems you're only capable of copy pasta. Please go be a stupid dipshit somewhere else. Thanks.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 12:36 AM
You do know that Karl Popper pretty much put the problem of induction to bed, right? Hell, even David Hume, the philosopher that expounded on the problem of induction, pretty much showed induction works in specific situations. It just isn't as universally-applicable as deduction.
So what, specifically, is the problem of induction with respect to science?
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 26, 2010 12:37 AM
Thread needs more Oz-ites and insomniacs! Big big numbers achievable here! Opportunity not to be missed!
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 12:39 AM
The position I'm positing is that a believer, who came to believe via irrational means, but has found arguments that he/she finds reasonable or rational would like to know what arguments there are against his/her belief being rational. It's difficult to keep up, so I hope I haven't changed my starting position or moved the goalposts.
lying sack started this in the OTHER thread.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/08/curl_up_and_die_already_huffpo.php#comment-2752631
lying sack is... lying.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 26, 2010 12:39 AM
Well, maybe they were ignorant of some recent developments.
The first thing you wrote here was:
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 12:40 AM
Opportunity not to be missed!
I'm gonna have to miss it. It's after midnight, and I'm not about to let it all hang out. I really just popped in to post the Philomath link.
But then I had to gird my loins for battle. I'm not sure what girding the loins means, so I just made some assumptions.
Sorry about the mess.
Now I gotta go to bed. Work and all.
G'night, all. It's been fun.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 12:41 AM
Assclown antics 101. Brute fact? Where's the evidence supporting the fact?
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 12:41 AM
like i said...
dishonest.
hack.
Posted by: SC OM
|
August 26, 2010 12:41 AM
dux anglicus:
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2010/the-freeedom-not-to-respect/#comment-58002
Posted by: Menyambal: Making sambal (it isn't dragon magic).
|
August 26, 2010 12:44 AM
Ducky sez:
They have found arguments that they believe to be reasonable.
The argument against his/her belief being rational is simply that they are a believer.
They aren't likely to be rational people, nor do they recognize rational arguments. They just believe.
It's kind of like arguing with a drunk. Someone who is slobbering drunk is quite likely to be stupid, and is guaranteed to be drunk.
A person who believes in things, whether gods, fairies or the superiority of the local sports team, is by definition not a reasoning being.
When we talk about "believers", most folks think the word means followers of a particular religion. But it doesn't, sometimes it means a person who just puts their faith in whatever the hell happens to be passing, instead of applying some due-diligence skepticism.
You believe you are putting forth good arguments, Ducky, but you ain't.
It's like the spoiled-brat 14-year-old in my family. She's a bitchy, irrational, bossy, ignorant, stuck-up, lazy little shit who really acts retarded, but she believes everybody else in the world is bitchy, irrational, bossy, ignorant, stuck-up, lazy big shits who really are retarded. And there's not a damn thing anybody can say to her to change a damned thing.
Christians, conservatives and other believers are just like that. And so are you, Ducky.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 26, 2010 12:45 AM
Well, that was a big waste of time. Night all.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:46 AM
nigelTheBold, Captain Smug:
Your response is nearly worthy of its own blog post. Thanks for the effort!
Ah, but that's not quite the argument, is it? Of course I assume the theist position is false; the null hypothesis (default position) is that there is no God. This is not begging the question. This is skepticism, a necessary (but not sufficient) attribute of rationality.
Also, I do not claim to have "proved" that God does not exist. I admit freely it is an assumption. However, in the circumstance, it is the rational assumption. But is it a rational assumption if you don't start of with your assumptions? That's why it seems to me to be begging the question against believers. If you start out saying: 'the rational position is this default position, theists don't hold this default position, therefore theists are irrational', you've begged the question.
I apologize for lecturing you on the term "begging the question." Your construct of "begging the question against X" is a bit idiosyncratic. Don't apologize. But when you assume a position false, then use that assumption as a premise to conclude that position false, then you're begging the question against someone who holds that position.
http://analysis.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/220.extract
But when we talk about rationality, we are talking about the epistemology of science. And this is where the irrationality of the theist position becomes obvious. I can't agree. We know things uncontroversially from logic and mathematics. Neither of which are part of sciences methodology. Science uses both, but they are much more than just a subset of scientific knowledge or methodology.
When I say that the arguments for God are irrational, I mean one of three things: either they contradict what we already know, or they do not fit within the structure of the epistemology of science, or they are just flat-out illogical. That's a good argument. There might be wriggle room there, but I'm not seeing it just now.
It isn't that my assumption of God's non-existence begs the question "against" anything. My assumption is simply far more rational than the converse. That's the whole point of a null hypothesis (default position), and why the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. Well, I think it does beg the question against the believer.
1. The default position has stronger ontological standing than the baseless positive claim. As a result, atheism is more rational than theism. I guess it depends on what one takes the default position to be. As I said, a believer already believes a God created world is the default position.
2. You haven't presented a rational argument for the existence of God yet, so we can't really judge the rationality of your specific claims, can we?
I wasn't asking you to judge any rational argument for the existence of God. So this doesn't seem relevant.
3. You don't seem to understand the epistemology or practice of science. You also seem to misunderstand what knowledge we get from science and what comes from maths and logic. Science isn't all there is to epistemology. When you perceive a field in front of you, you don't need science to know it's in front of you.
4. You don't seem to understand the position of atheism. The foundation of atheism isn't that we have evidence against the existence of God. It's that theists have no evidence for the existence of God. Therefore, look at issue 1. I've not argued against atheism and it's rationality to atheists. I don't see the relevance of this point.
Now, if you kept claiming you had an invisible elephant in your garage, and we kept asking for evidence, and you consistently avoided providing evidence, what should we believe? Glad I'm not claiming such a silly thing.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 12:47 AM
Am not. You take that back.
Okay. That I am.
Srsly. That's my last post.
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:47 AM
Bugger, foiled by that chimerical toad!
Posted by: dux anglicus
|
August 26, 2010 12:50 AM
Oh well, that was fun. Thanks guys. Some of you do read more than what is said. But I guess with believers prancing in each day, that's understandable. Nerd of Redhead has issues I reckon.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 12:50 AM
Sven, I'll do my best writing for the cause, it's a good one. [See Sven's post @ #776, this is important]
Alas, I won't be able to help you with your thread quest throughout the night, the lure of money makin' will force me to bed shortly. (Damn stuff is demanding!)
Posted by: SC OM
|
August 26, 2010 12:56 AM
You're acting like a real ass, Brian.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 12:57 AM
Well, that was a big waste of time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABWyXKT5qt4
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 12:57 AM
SC:
Thanks, SC. Gee, a liar. What a surprise. *eyeroll*
Brian, Nerd does have an issue - he doesn't like lying trolls. However, that applies to a lot of us. You can get the fuck out now.
Posted by: Usagichan
|
August 26, 2010 12:58 AM
Oh dear Ducky...
you're not reading the replies are you? The argument is that the default position is rational, and therefore for any departure from the default position to be regarded as rational it must be supported either by irrefutable logic or by adequate evidence.Of course if you have some compelling reason one should start from a position of making unsupported assumptions, I would be interested to hear it.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
August 26, 2010 1:00 AM
dux anglicus/ Brian,
Actually, it was SC OM @ 786 that outed you not me.
(Seriously need to go to sleep now.)
Posted by: Brian English
|
August 26, 2010 1:04 AM
OK, first the consensus appears that I've acted like an arse. Fair enough. I didn't set out to upset anybody, just a simple experiment if you like. I thought by asking what were the best arguments against belief posed by a hypothetical believer that I'd get some good responses. Most of them were good. I didn't expect the vitriol from Nerd of Redhead. Perhaps it was deserved. Just kidding about you having issues.
Anyway, I apologise to whomever I've upset, that wasn't intended. I thought it would be a bit of fun. Sorry again.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 1:05 AM
Okay, just one more post. I plomise.
It seems you do not understand the epistemology of science. At all.
There is a specific meaning for "null hypothesis," which I have called the "default position," to help make it clear.
A "default position" (or null hypothesis, if you wish to use the technical term) is the one in which a positive claim is not being made. Claiming God exists is a positive claim. Therefore, the default position is that God does not exist.
You don't get to choose a default position, or null hypothesis. If you are making a positive claim (you are), you do not have the default position.
So, if you weren't asking us for our arguments against God, and you weren't asking us to look at a specific argument, what were you asking, exactly?
That seems to have been lost in all your verbiage.
Uhm, yes, you do use science to know the field is in front of you. If you see a field in front of you, you might be watching TV. If you are outdoors, and you feel the air on your face, and you can walk into the field, you are most likely in an actual field, and not watching TV.
That's science. Only without the precision and accuracy and formalized methodology.
Science is nothing more than the formalization of what we do every fucking day to sieve fact from fiction. In fact, it's the times we suspend our natural tendency to figure out what is true that we get into trouble, and we end up asking questions like, "What if I have a rational argument for God?" when you haven't presented a single argument at all.
And so far, there has been no other epistemology that has proven effective at all. If I am wrong, I'd be pleased if you could correct me on that.
I'm not sure if I suffer from analogy fail, or if you are very dense, or if you are equivocating.
That is exactly what you are claiming. Only, I presented it in analogy form.
And you still didn't answer the question: Should we believe you have an invisible elephant in your garage, if you can provide no evidence? How about if your evidence is, "But he bumped into my car!" and you showed us a dent in your fender?
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 1:06 AM
You're acting like a real ass, Brian.
Master Thespian, he is not.
Posted by: Brian English
|
August 26, 2010 1:07 AM
Oh, I didn't use this login because you might remember me from the thread with Barney Zwartz, and that would then influence your responses. I just wanted to see how you'd respond to a random who didn't come in claiming that he had proof for God's existence or that atheists were irrational, but instead wanted arguments against the rationality of light (liberal) belief.
The only dishonesty that I can see is that I didn't use my usual login. I certainly didn't claim to a believer or anything.
My bad.
Posted by: Chgo_Liz
|
August 26, 2010 1:07 AM
Jules @ #548:
Yep. That's it. You've just described a sociopath.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 1:08 AM
just a simple experiment if you like.
yup, you proved you could act as if you're an ignorant ass.
you mean that wasn't what your experiment was about?
ooops.
sucks to be you.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 1:10 AM
Brian:
You wouldn't need an experiment if you bothered to read here much. If you bothered to read and follow threads, you'd find exactly how the regulars here respond to different people.
In your persona as Dux, you were caught out lying, time after time. That sort of shit irritates people and regulars here have a very good nose for people who are simply out to be an assclown, which is what you were doing.
As for 'joking' about Nerd of Redhead, OM, I'd suggest you get a humor upgrade.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 1:11 AM
The only dishonesty that I can see is that I didn't use my usual login.
that's the truly pathetic part, and it really doesn't matter if you WERE using a sock puppet.
you showed a profound lack of understanding, of just about everything.
again, if it was your intent to show off your abilities to act like a complete idiot, then kudos.
if not...
well, I'd be embarrassed if I were you.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 1:12 AM
Jesus on a dildo-ended pogo stick! I was thinking dux was too fucking stupid to be real. And then I didn't follow SC's link, so I bothered fucking responding again.
Brian, two things: Congratulations. You came across as a dense believer.
Second: take a rusty knife. Dice some habeneros. You know what to do with it after. Sideways.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 1:13 AM
Brian:
If that's the only dishonesty you can see, you have a problem. A big one.
Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula
|
August 26, 2010 1:17 AM
Brian, you could have just asked the questions as yourself and explained why you were asking. Posting what you did and as you did you set off the (admittedly sensitive) troll alarms.
We get people saying exactly what you said all the time, and for the regulars it can be bit frustrating to have to lay out the same arguments time and time again, only to have to the same ineffectual dodges offered in return.
Posted by: SC OM
|
August 26, 2010 1:18 AM
By the way, the subject of behavior here arose because this ridiculous Quinn O'Neill person plucked out some comments (including one from Rev. BDC) as "examples." See this comment thread:
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2010/08/secularism-and-religious-freedom-a-place-for-everyone.html#more
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
August 26, 2010 1:20 AM
Carlie,
I'm sorry, but I have to say this. Memphis is not now, nor has it ever been, part of the Midwest. It is in the South.
On an unrelated note, I once traveled to a house that was on a dirt road. The road's actual name I can't remember but it ended in boulevard. Ever since then I've thought that "dirt road boulevard" should be part of a country song. :)
One can always travel through Egypt by going to Cairo (Illinois) and taking the river (Mississippi) south to Memphis (Tennessee).
Of saints in Missouri, Ste. Genevieve has most of the bare handful of French colonial poteaux-enterre (post in ground) buildings left in the US.
Posted by: John Morales
|
August 26, 2010 1:22 AM
Dux: Oh well, that was fun.
Weak, is what it was.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 1:23 AM
just to post here what I said to there:
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 1:24 AM
Also, Brian, your decision to play the assclown? You decided that now was a good time for you idiot game, when PZ is in the hospital, after having had a major procedure done? And you decided to email him at this time to confess your sockpuppetry?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 26, 2010 1:29 AM
SC ex machina!
Posted by: Hekuni Cat, Champion of Oriana
|
August 26, 2010 1:32 AM
Hi Thread! I have been trying to get caught up for days (and I'm still not), but my meatspace life has required nearly all my concentration and energy lately. So, I've decided to post a few things before reaching the end of the thread.
Caine - I hope your ankle heals quickly and as painless as possible.
nigel the Bold and Gyeong - I'm very sorry to hear that you have lost your kittehs. In 2006 (six months apart), I lost both of my 18-year-old cats, Max and Miriya. I still sometimes find myself hearing or seeing something that reminds me of them--and then smiling and remembering the good times and joy we shared. Our new Mistress of the House, Chloe, joined us in late 2008; she keeps me and Mr. Hekuni Cat in line.
JeffreyD - I'm glad you got good news regarding your skin.
'Tis Himself - Thank you for the economics lessons. I'm learning (and occasionally relearning) a lot.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 1:36 AM
I read Quinn's comments SC.
I basically pointed at that people that say things like she did, have never actually looked for evidence of the efficacy of ridicule.
they simply assume it to be ineffectual, probably because they are projecting that it wouldn't work on THEM, but I'd bet that a bit of self-history analysis would indicate otherwise.
there is a f-tonne (read: metric fuckton) of evidence supporting the power of ridicule out there.
I linked to the essay I typically do:
http://www.iwp.edu/news_publications/detail/ridicule-an-instrument-in-the-war-on-terrorism
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 1:39 AM
Hekuni Cat, thanks. :) I won't be back to walking thoughtlessly for a few more days yet. Not the worst thing in the world, I have work to do.
Posted by: SC OM
|
August 26, 2010 1:39 AM
O'Neill:
This is the comment he was responding to:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/07/speaking_of_ridiculous.php#comment-2650346
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 26, 2010 1:40 AM
Nerd was probably more emotionally engaged in the crossword he was filling while talking to you.
Posted by: Part-Time Insomniac, Zombie Porcupine Nox Arcana Fan
|
August 26, 2010 1:40 AM
I'm not going to remark on the undercover experiment, as I don't think I could top anything that's been said already. Actually I'm quite tired now, so my brain doesn't want to formulate comments. Oog.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 1:44 AM
SC:
What paints O'Neill and others in such an idiotic light is that taking things out of context is taken for the whole picture.
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 26, 2010 1:45 AM
out. Filling out.
Mere mention of Rev. BDC seems to cause typos. Nothing to do with my personal competence, naturally.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
August 26, 2010 1:47 AM
Also, SC, the person Rev. BDC was responding to was shown to be a poe, a la christwire.
Posted by: Hekuni Cat, Champion of Oriana
|
August 26, 2010 1:47 AM
Kevin:
As another resident of Virginia, I share these sentiments exactly! Thank you for providing the link. I'm calling Cuccinelli's office tomorrow... for all the good it will do.
Posted by: Hekuni Cat, Champion of Oriana
|
August 26, 2010 1:55 AM
Nerd of Redhead:
They probably will issue him a card. I believe they gave my mother one after she received her stents--but I could be mistaken. Mom definitely has a card collection of at least 4 for her knees and shoulders. She hasn't flown much since she acquired all the metal replacements, but I'm sure it would be an involved procedure to watch TSA scan her.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 26, 2010 1:56 AM
The guy went through the whole ordeal of registering a new log-in account just to go sockpuppeting about like a slightly threadbare Fac*l*s or something?
And why again? to see if anyone would be mean?
"bit of fun" he sez
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 1:56 AM
the person Rev. BDC was responding to was shown to be a poe, a la christwire.
there's irony in there, somewhere...
Posted by: Hekuni Cat, Champion of Oriana
|
August 26, 2010 2:01 AM
JeffreyD:
This was definitely worth posting. Thank you.
Posted by: SC OM
|
August 26, 2010 2:05 AM
Yeah, I think the person Holbach (no comment) was responding to was as well. And E.V.(no comment)'s was a response to an anti-atheist rant. Those were real comments, though, so she's already doing better than Mooney's sock drawer.
Posted by: DominEditrix
|
August 26, 2010 2:08 AM
Hekuni - They're surprisingly blasé about internal metal bits. I've got no proof that my knees are titanium other than the scars on my knees, but I only have to mention their existence and TSA just wands me. The wires in my bra bothered them more.
This coming Sunday, my brother and I will be flying my mother's husband to Chicago - he's got 7 or 8 stents, I have metal knees... should be interesting.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
August 26, 2010 2:09 AM
What paints O'Neill and others in such an idiotic light is that taking things out of context is taken for the whole picture.
rusty knife sideways = fomenting murder and rape
(formula ala M&K)
comes to mind.
Posted by: AJ Milne OM
|
August 26, 2010 2:29 AM
Re the latter (the self-history analysis), quite.
Ridicule is frequently persuasive. Mockery, too. Strong language, actually, as well.
Anyone who thinks about it should know it from their personal history, to borrow words from the same comment. And discovering you're being laughed at--especially in the province of religion--may even, I have begun to suspect, be even more frequently effective than it is in other areas of argument for a complex of reasons. A few of which follow:
1) It's likely to be relatively novel. And thus memorable. Frequently, within their own communities, believers are very insulated from such reactions.
2) It may well ring as self-evidently justified--even to the believer--given that context. Especially considering that they may well have been ready to laugh at the absurdity of what they now hold as sacred tenets, themselves, once. Probably were, even, given how religion has to be taught. They're emotionally and socially invested in upholding their holy truths now, sure, and possibly dug in hard, but they can't ever entirely forget, no matter how hard they try, what it looked from a little outside, before they were so entirely bought. Laughter can cut through that fog, shame them, remind them of this. That they may not be able easily to admit as much notwithstanding.
... consider this, and remember also that even outside the province of religion, mockery that catches you defending the indefensible generally stings. It may motivate you to find a harder defense for next time, but for the believer in the deeply irrational, even that motivation can be corrosive to what they believe. Forced to defend it harder, they're forced to think about it harder. Very probably harder than they ever have previously. Yes, they may engage in all matter of rhetorical double-dealing merely to survive the encounter with some plausible claim they might have 'won' once they're so foolish as to open their mouths. But then they must also maintain to themselves the illusion that such double-dealing is itself just. Here, too, you open yet another minefield for them: one more thing they have to tell themselves makes sense...
So many of the religious want mockery as a tactic killed, and they want it killed very, very badly. They know it's effective even without daring to think too hard about why this is so, and they're leaning hard on trying to rule it out, drive it off, make it forbidden territory again.
And in so leaning they lean on standard levers that have an equally massive metric fuck-tonne of history behind them: first this notion that religion is somehow special, that it's to be protected, that frank speech about it is somehow impolite, inappropriate, even inapplicable. And second the very normalization of religion and apologetics in the first place--the twin facts that people have become inured to the spectacle of adherents claiming confident belief in something that's actually prima facie absurd, and that in defending the same, the normal rules of reasoned defense can be expected to be discarded entirely. So arguments that would get you laughed out of any other sort of discussion are somehow permitted to pass... You're supposed to allow this, not mention as much, either...
Add this to the general dynamic that many decent people, when told they're 'offending' will move to avoid doing so rather instinctively, and on top of the fact that many of the religions are organized congregations with significant social standing to this day--a fact that leans hard on the psyche of almost anyone in our species, and well...
And, well, otherwise sensible people fall for it, and they fall hard, and they fall all the time. And even if they really would be happier if every religion in all the world were given its walking papers, they start to second guess their own instincts, start worrying maybe they're not being sufficiently polite, start looking for excuses to give ground in exactly the worst place they can--and leave the best weapon they have against unreason forever in its sheath, unused. Too afraid to draw it--frightened, effectively, into believing their sharpest blade may be cursed.
Concluding simply: Phil sez don't be a dick...
My advice is more: don't be a sucker.
(/But then, as if anyone here even would be.)
Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom
|
August 26, 2010 3:20 AM
Uh, it's irrational. I mind significantly less that it's irrational, when it's harmless, but just because you're not annoying doesn't make you rational.Jesus Tapdancing Christ, what answer did you fucking expect? Did you honestly believe our dislike was thoroughly politically motivated or something Palin like that?
Also, you haven't engaged in an experiment. There's no control condition. You behaved like a fucking moron, and a passive aggressive one at that (Look at that stupid 'oh but *I* didn't say that...'). If you wanted to see how we treat a well meaning Christian, you should have come in and been 'honest' in claiming you're a Christian, and that you had questions, and respectfully argued, rather then the bullshit you did do.
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 26, 2010 3:21 AM
Brian English, way to waste everybody's time !
I'm suffering writer's block, but not because my brain is mush, but rather because I miss my feed aggregator, don't have it on this netbook, and have to find all the interesting news by hand, which is rather tedious, and by the time you've found something blogworthy, a million other punters have already written about it.
Hey, does anyone know how to, ahem, upload videos to your blog when you're not meant to, like, the site charges you extra for it ? Tried renaming the file to an allowed format, but then once uploaded you can't change it back !
Posted by: Dania
|
August 26, 2010 4:22 AM
Dammit, I can't believe I just wasted my time reading through that crappy "simple experiment" right after waking up.
*yawn*
*wanders off to bed again*
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 26, 2010 4:34 AM
Good morning!!
Miscellaneous stuff: Scientists say natural selection alone can explain eusociality http://www.physorg.com/news201957206.html
Hurricanes: My name is Earl http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/08/td_07_--_ts_earl.php#more
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 26, 2010 4:41 AM
Crazy scientists wanting to reanimate a corpse, look here: “Electricity collected from the air could become the newest alternative energy source” http://www.physorg.com/news201958072.html
Useful in case P Z messes up his eyes, too :) "Seeing the world with new eyes: Biosynthetic corneas restore vision in humans" http://www.physorg.com/news201957290.html
And these biosynthetic corneas might even be used in high-risk cases where ordinary cornea transplants are out.
Posted by: windy
|
August 26, 2010 5:09 AM
From the article:
"we prove that inclusive fitness theory is not an extended theory of evolution and is not needed to explain eusociality. Standard natural selection theory represents a simpler and superior approach"
but then:
"If these steps are followed and a species becomes eusocial, the evolutionary costs of individuals foregoing reproduction are compensated by the greatly reduced mortality of the queen and her larvae"
*facepalm* And how is that so different from inclusive fitness, again? This sounds a lot like the "it's not competition, it's niche space!" false dichotomy.
Posted by: Dania
|
August 26, 2010 5:09 AM
You know what? I just went outside and it's cold. Fucking cold, more precisely. And foggy and cloudy. Yesterday it was already way too hot by this time and the sun was shinning. And the day before it was raining. WTF?
(+1)
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 26, 2010 5:12 AM
Hitler 'had Jewish and African roots', DNA tests show http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/world-war-2/7961211/Hitler-had-Jewish-and-African-roots-DNA-tests-show.html
A chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b1 which showed up in the samples is rare in Western Europe and is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews.
The Onion: Smart, Qualified People Behind the Scenes Keeping America Safe: 'We Don't Exist' http://www.theonion.com/articles/smart-qualified-people-behind-the-scenes-keeping-a,17954/
Posted by: Dianne
|
August 26, 2010 5:19 AM
Hitler 'had Jewish and African roots', DNA tests show
Technically, we all have African roots. Too bad they couldn't have gotten this result 70 or so years ago. Maybe Hitler would have shut up or jumped off a cliff or something.
Actually, I can't say I'm terribly surprised by this result. My (supposedly Irish, German, and Dutch derived) father's Y-chromosome suggests that he's descended from people from Pakistan. Really, how people from a country sitting right in the middle of a continent that has undergone numerous invasions and massive immigration ever thought they could be "pure" anything...
Posted by: MrFire
|
August 26, 2010 5:58 AM
It's only apocryphal, but I was told my maternal great-great-great grandmother (my mother's mother's mother's mother's mother) may have been whisked out of Russia during a mid-nineteenth century pogrom. I may be a fully-credentialed member of God's chosen yet!
Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline.
|
August 26, 2010 6:02 AM
Having just tried to rehearse some Greek, I think the plural of Anonymous is Anonymoui.
Thanks for the explanation of the link/lynx pun.
Posted by: KG
|
August 26, 2010 6:53 AM
a) No, they don't, except in the trivial sense that we all had African ancestors.
b) Why is it supposed to be of any interest?
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 26, 2010 6:54 AM
What fucking idiot went and said something like.. *linkclick*... E.O. Wilson???? What the hell is wrong with him? Good lord, if anyone ought to understand kin selection...
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 26, 2010 7:06 AM
Brian English- bad form. Seriously. Once you've established an identity, you keep it. No one takes kindly to arguing with puppets. And as was mentioned, the persona you took on didn't have much to do with what you said you were trying to "test". It kept saying things and then retracting them and claiming not to have said them, and in general was fairly obviously dissembling about something, which triggers people's shitmeters and lowers their tolerance.
I'm still mad about Wilson. I'll have to try and get that paper today and see what the hell is going on with it.
Posted by: windy
|
August 26, 2010 7:23 AM
Actually he's been on some weird crusade against kin selection for a while now. I don't remember where I read it, but in one interview he even said that people who study kin selection must "know in their hearts" that it can't work. WTF?
Posted by: FossilFishy
|
August 26, 2010 7:34 AM
I got my first incoherent anti-atheist comment on my blog today. Some idiot called DM tracked me back from a comment here and left it on a post that had nothing to do with atheism. For some reason this makes me happy. I'm sure if s/he keeps it up it'll be annoying, but for now I feel like I'm somehow a more legitimate skeptic. :)
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 7:38 AM
Hekuni Cat,
Thanks for the wishes RE: Seamus the cat. He didn't actually die until Tuesday night. We buried him last night.
My wife took my beer from my hand, dumped the remaining couple of swallows over his grave, and said, "For you, Brotha."
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 26, 2010 7:49 AM
Brain, you could have done things differently. As others said, you set off troll alarms.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 26, 2010 7:57 AM
Oh wow. I had no idea. That's... aaargh.
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
August 26, 2010 8:01 AM
So here it seems that his position is now that it's group selection rather than kin selection, (and I'm two years late to the game) but he seems to not take into account that pretty much every single one of those groups is also a family unit. (?)
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 26, 2010 8:03 AM
Dang, can't even spell Brian's name right. Not the best way to start the day.
Posted by: Antiochus Epiphanes
|
August 26, 2010 8:07 AM
Brian: I found your experiment extremely dull. It sent me to bed early. Thanks for the good night's sleep.
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 26, 2010 8:08 AM
"b) Why is it supposed to be of any interest?2
-Because there are still eejits around who believe "race" is something more fundamental than a stochastic aggregation of characteristics. Also, Neo-Nazis still have a Hitler fetish, despite the huge number of mistakes that loser made.
Reducing bird deaths: “Bird-friendly glass looks like spider web to birds” http://www.physorg.com/news202023577.html
This is nice. And since the "spiderweb" only shows up in UV, we mammals won´t notice a thing.
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 26, 2010 8:12 AM
Yet another hoax floating around internet for years: "The mutating Mars hoax" http://www.physorg.com/news201962860.html
If I could figure out a way to get a nickel from everyone who believes this crap...I would have a lot of nickels.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 26, 2010 8:27 AM
PZ or Mary, an update please...
Posted by: Shala
|
August 26, 2010 8:28 AM
My left ankle is now swelling up nicely, there's a huge scratch on my foot and my back is serious cranky from being slammed into the deck railing.
I hope things get better for you soon.
Brian, I hope you now realize that we at Pharyngula...
...Have all our dux in a row.
Posted by: KG
|
August 26, 2010 8:36 AM
Birgir JohanssonI still don't see why it's of any interest. It will not persuade anyone who doesn't already know it that races are social rather than biological categories. There have long been (AFAIK, unfounded) rumours that Hitler had quite recent Jewish ancestry (a grandparent IIRC), and they have not put off any neo-Nazis; instead, they have been used by idiots to "explain" his pathological antisemitism.
Posted by: JeffreyD
|
August 26, 2010 9:07 AM
brian -
Correction, it was deserved, the perhaps can be dropped.
I did not believe in your sincerity at the start of the discussion and do not believe in your apologies now. If you have ever read this blog, and I know you have, then you are fully aware of what reaction you could expect. You came and posted only to have a little fun. The people responding to you take education seriously and try to teach and engage. You are just the kid in the back that makes fart noises.
Maybe you are not the definition of a sock puppet, but you do define liar and fool well.
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 26, 2010 9:10 AM
Ignoring Hitler for a moment, but wtf is "jewish ancestry" ? Is that like mormon ancestry, muslim ancestry, hindu ancestry ?
It doesn't make any sense to make claims of ancestry from traditions of religious beliefs.You can trace the people who lived in the Israel area 2000 years ago genetically to living descendants today, but the other way round it makes no sense at all.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 9:19 AM
Yes, but in the aftermath of supper, complacency was deadly.
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 26, 2010 9:26 AM
My blog thingy uses akismet for spam protection, and so far none of the shit that slips through here makes it through there ever.
Nike sucks donkey cock.
Repeat after me.
Posted by: Birger Johansson
|
August 26, 2010 9:30 AM
Rorschach: "Ignoring Hitler for a moment, but wtf is "jewish ancestry" ?
Genetically, it is simply (relatively) recent middle-eastern ancestry, going back ca. 2000 years. There is one sub-group that for religious reasons have maintained cohesion after two millennia -but plenty of them intermarried. In pre-Cristian Austria and onwards, there would have been a lot of accumulated gene-swapping.
KG: "they have not put off any neo-Nazis"
No, but Neo-nazis must recruit new little nazis, or go extinct. The more the Neo-nazis and their belief "system" get exposed as the dumbass wankers they are, the harder it gets to recruit. This is where ridicule is useful.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
The Brits make fun of the “mosque” debate:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/23/charlie-brooker-ground-zero-mosque?CMP=twt_gu
The planned "ultra-mosque" will be a staggering 5,600ft tall – more than five times higher than the tallest building on Earth – and will be capped with an immense dome of highly-polished solid gold, carefully positioned to bounce sunlight directly toward the pavement, where it will blind pedestrians and fry small dogs. The main structure will be delimited by 600 minarets, each shaped like an upraised middle finger, and housing a powerful amplifier: when synchronised, their combined sonic might will be capable of relaying the muezzin's call to prayer at such deafening volume, it will be clearly audible in the Afghan mountains, where thousands of terrorists are poised to celebrate by running around with scarves over their faces, firing AK-47s into the sky and yelling whatever the foreign word for "victory" is.”
-Goddamn limeys! Don't they know that it is bad form to ridicule ridiculous beliefs!
--- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Ian Stewart: Why I'm going to the Discworld convention http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2010/aug/26/discworld-convention-terry-pratchett
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 26, 2010 9:33 AM
Damn. I read through all of the the Angelicus/English part of the thread, thinking about wonderful things to say. And then, nothing. I got nothing. Except
Does this mean I should go back to "Billy, A Liberal Disabled Vet", my original moniker (which became Billy (ALDV), then (((Billy))) (it was bestowed upon me by another blogger for obvious reasons), then (((Billy))) The Atheist (which is still my blog name (not blogwhoring)), to iambilly (because Wordpress login just uses your blog url), back to (((Billy))) The Atheist, and then to Ogvorbis (because, just once in my life, I wanted a name that I chose)?
Happy Tuesday, all.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 26, 2010 9:35 AM
It seems that E.O. has fallen under the evil charismatic sway of D.S. (speaking of whom, does anybody ever read his "blog"?), who has to get rid of kin selection so people will buy into his quixotic crusade that it's all really group selection.
The older I get, the more theory bores me. Show me some fucking data!
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 26, 2010 9:37 AM
Just caught up:
@Hekuni Cat:
Cuccinelli is an asshole. But it really is the way to deny rights - by making it so difficult to do the things that we're guaranteed the right to do that no one will do it.
@FossilFishy:
Just ignore DM - they shit all over any blog having anything to do with atheism. I had to turn on comment moderation because of them.
Posted by: Dania
|
August 26, 2010 9:37 AM
No, no. Didn't you hear the spambot? It's Happy Everyday!
Posted by: Erulóra (formerly KOPD)
|
August 26, 2010 9:38 AM
FossilFishy,
He does that a lot.Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 26, 2010 9:43 AM
@Rorschach:
There's a difference between the Jewish faith and the Jewish people - the former is a monotheistic religion created by the latter, who are a people who came from the Middle East.
Posted by: Rorschach
|
August 26, 2010 9:47 AM
Exactly, although i suspect you didnt mean it tha way.
Coming back to Hitler then, "jewish" describes genetic ancestry with people who lived in the area of Israel/Palestine 2000 years ago, not any relation to people of a certain religious belief.I hate the term "jewish ancestry", it gives a completely wrong idea.Hitler's "jewish" ancestors might have been egyptian polytheists who worshipped cats, for all we know.
Posted by: Ogvorbis, Parenthetical Death
|
August 26, 2010 9:50 AM
Dania:
Will you accept "Happy, Happy, Joy, Joy!"?
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
August 26, 2010 9:53 AM
@Billy - You can keep your identity and change your name, which is not what Brian/Dux did. Plus using the Endless Thread for a your personal experiment wank is freaking obnoxious at the best of times, and incredibly self-centered and oblivious when the Squidly Overlord™ has just had some really scary medical interventions.
Posted by: Ewan R
|
August 26, 2010 9:56 AM
On not expecting that sort of vitriol from Nerd (late to the show.. apologies!) - what the hell sort of experimentalist are you to run an experiment without even a rudimentary awareness of the conditions of the system you are experimenting upon.
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 26, 2010 9:57 AM
@Mattir:
I kinda wanna change my 'nym. Half because of the whole trans issue and half because of the fact that just 'Kevin' is a little common.
Hmm...
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 9:58 AM
A poor one? Just guessing here.
Am I right? Did I win anything? Please tell me I won something.
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
August 26, 2010 9:59 AM
@my 877:
There we go - added my blogname to my 'nym. I'll slowly weed out 'Kevin' from it as people'll get used to it.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
August 26, 2010 10:00 AM
Of course, you'd get an argument there from most jewish leaders/scholars. The lineage is a big deal.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
August 26, 2010 10:00 AM
Ogvorbis, Soul Inhabitant of the Ogvorbisverse, keep your monicker. Nobody here gets upset if any changes that occur with monickers are transparent or obvious. Janine, for example, changes her epithet regularly, but always has Janine there, making it obvious. KG has changed too, but at each change made public the change. Yawn. As you have done. What ever monicker makes you happy.
Changing a monicker to troll and not letting folks know is a different story.
Posted by: Dania
|
August 26, 2010 10:06 AM
Well, I just hope I don't wake up at 3 AM with that going through my mind. And you better hope too.
Posted by: PZ Myers
|
August 26, 2010 10:09 AM
Out of control! Go somewhere else now.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
August 26, 2010 10:09 AM
It sounds like you're not happy enough.