Now on ScienceBlogs: The Festival Recognizes Our First "Featured Fan"!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

The essence of humanity's spiritual dilemma is that we evolved genetically to accept one truth and discovered another. Is there a way to erase the dilemma, to resolve the contradictions between the transcendentalist and the empiricist world views?
"No, unfortunately, there is not. Furthermore, a choice between them is unlikely to remain arbitrary forever. The assumptions underlying the two world views are being tested with increasing severity by cumulative verifiable knowledge about how the universe works"

Edward O. Wilson, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, (First edition, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998), p. 264.

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Best summary of the Kurzweil nonsense so far | Main | Mary's Monday Metazoan: Sexy beast »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

How to make a famous SF/Fantasy writer happy

Category: Humor
Posted on: August 22, 2010 8:07 PM, by PZ Myers

This is Ray Bradbury. He's 90 years old.

raybradbury.jpeg

What is he doing?

He's watching this video (which is still not safe for work).

Word from witnesses is that he loved it!

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/145609

Comments

#1

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:14 PM

Happy birthday, Ray.

#2

Posted by: MosesZD Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:18 PM

I think it's a great video. Although I don't think he's actually the greatest science fiction writer in history. Good. Very, very, very good.

But not greatest.

#3

Posted by: Lynna, OM Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:19 PM

Awww, that's sweeter than a basket full of kittens. Happy birthday, Ray -- you da man!

#4

Posted by: Scote Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:22 PM

Well, so much for this guy, Dennis Rayburn

http://airlockalpha.com/node/7744/youtube-video-about-ray-bradbury-goes-too-far.html

who thinks that Ray Bradbury will be insulted by the video because:

* It's not funny.
* It fuels the concept that some actually believe that like the song says from the musical, Avenue Q, says, “The Internet Is For Porn.”
* It's totally disrespectful of a man that is a true, living legend in the world of science-fiction.
* It fails to take into account Mr. Bradbury's very well-known dislike of the Internet.
* It might make Mr. Bradbury angry.
(As summarized by http://www.filmfodder.com/scifi/archives/2010/08/bradbury_song_c.shtml )

I guess Dennis Rayburn doesn't think Ray Bradbury a) likes sex, or b) has a sense of humor. Guess he should have checked with Bradbury first :-)

#5

Posted by: Zeno Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:23 PM

Bradbury made a stop at my college during a speaking tour a few decades ago. I remember he said that "following your passion" is the most important thing in life, but even a fantasist like him probably wasn't anticipating eff-me videos sung in tribute to him.

He also said he liked dinosaurs a lot.

#6

Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:27 PM

Happy Birthday to Mr. Bradbury. Your home town still remembers you.

#7

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkqQXrl7yEsdEmCGIJY6e4vK85szmL2lf8 Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:28 PM

Send Dennis Rayburn a dollar to buy a sense of humor.

#8

Posted by: Furcas Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:33 PM

Okay, that was totally awesome.

#9

Posted by: MadScientist Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:34 PM

I didn't realize he was still around - now there's a SciFi writer who I admire.

#10

Posted by: Nakarti Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:37 PM

Makes me jealous of Ray Bradbury.

More jealous.

#11

Posted by: Scote Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:41 PM

"Makes me jealous of Ray Bradbury."

Yeah, I think I may have to dress up as Ray Bradbury for Halloween...

#12

Posted by: spaninquis Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:45 PM

I appreciate the authenticity of the video, using a book of his with his actual signature. They could have faked that.

#13

Posted by: Gorobei Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:48 PM

Good for him. And yes, I am aware of his work.

#14

Posted by: Don Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:50 PM

I'm sure Ray enjoyed this video. For many years, Ray Bradbury and I had the same literary agent--Don Congdon, who died last year. Ray dedicated FAHRENHEIT 451 to him. I met Ray at a writers' conference in Santa Barbara in 1974, where he regaled everyone with his stories. His career as a writer was somewhat compromised by his stubborn unwillingness to fly and by his refusal to get a driver's license, believe it or not. He's on the shy and timid side in some ways, but what a storyteller.

#15

Posted by: Tim Harris Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 8:56 PM

Happy birthday, RB, and the video's very funny. Horribly off-topic, I know, but it involves another writer who is near the end of his life: Christopher Hitchens. For a truly despicable 'take' on his situation read Bill Vallicella's recent post at Maverick Philosopher, where it is asserted that the real problem is the Luciferian pride of an intellectual like CH, a pride that prevents him from collapsing into the arms of a comforting illusion - something that BV thinks is an admirable thing to do, since 'truth' is so bloody unpleasant.

#16

Posted by: Taz Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 9:00 PM

So many science fiction authors have incorporated the idea of mankind losing it's absurd attitudes about sex. There's no sign of that actually happening, is there?

#17

Posted by: rippingrich Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 9:39 PM

@7 That would be a waste of a dollar.

I think this is my favorite video of all time.

I bet Ray watched this a many times and laughed every time.

Anyone that disses this is completely fucked.

#18

Posted by: seiryoden Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 9:43 PM

Thanks for posting that. Bradbury's in the news recently because of some comments he made about the US's (lack of) focus on space exploration. Wingnut fucksticks have tried to spin it into an endorsement of tea party drown-the-govmint nonsense.
Here's a great post by Driftglass that rips that bollocks apart (and pays due respect to a SF master):

http://driftglass.blogspot.com/2010/08/call-and-response.html

Apologies if the link's already been posted.

Plus: I wish I was the subject of a song like that. Better get writing...

#19

Posted by: Simulation of Sapience Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 9:43 PM

Ray Kurzweil could be capitalizing on his wild imagination by writing speculative fiction (officially),not only gaining him respect rather than derision but he could be the one to have videos like this made about him rather than leave it all to the senior Ray who can't possibly handle all of his fans by himself anymore (if he ever could after the rave reviews first started rolling in).
He'd better hurry. After all,there will be no sex after the Singularity occurs and everyone migrates to electronics,not even cyber-sex.

#20

Posted by: Ben Goren Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 9:47 PM

As raunchy as that video is, I also found it very enduringly sweet. I mean, here’s this buxom young lass throwing herself not at the latest teen heartthrob, but at a nonagenarian — and not for his money, but for his mind.

Really, what higher compliment could she possibly have paid him? In a decade or two, perhaps she’ll have the literary, artistic, or scientific experience (depending on what direction she steers her life) to offer a serious supplement, critique, or contradiction of his work. But right now she’s got enthusiasm, appreciation, humor, and sex appeal, and that’s exactly what she gave.

The only thing that would make me smile more than the video is if Mr. Bradbury took Ms. Bloom up on her offer.

Cheers,

b&

#21

Posted by: lynnai Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 9:54 PM

Aaawww that's sweet.. in a sorta sticky kinda way.

I love the expression on his face, I honestly don't know if he's about to keel over laughing or swallow his dentures.

I do have to wonder if that video was made with the assumption that Mr Bradbury wouldn't actually see it. Don't get me wrong, it's awesome, but I would think that picturing him in the audience would make it more difficult.... potential to give the guy a heart attack for starters.

#22

Posted by: Taz Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 9:56 PM

I bet Ray watched this a many times and laughed every time.

I hope he watched it many times and jacked off to it. That would be a excellent thing for a man of his age. As I said in a previous post, many sci fi writers have, as a matter of course, incorporated a more adult attitude toward sex in their works. People like Dennis Rayburn show we still have a long way to go.

#23

Posted by: arrenfrank Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:07 PM

So, you all like this? I'm so appalled as to involuntarily de-lurk!

Name-dropping Bradbury and the indefatigable "fuck" suffice to please, despite the absence of any other redeeming qualities.

This is to rock as ID is to science.

Enjoy, I guess.

#24

Posted by: llewelly Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:09 PM

* It's totally disrespectful of a man that is a true, living legend in the world of science-fiction.
Argumentum ad authoritarium.
#25

Posted by: abb3w Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:17 PM

arrenfrank This is to rock as ID is to science.

On the other hand, this is pretty good by F/SF Filk standards.

Cope; and happy birthday to the old goat.

#26

Posted by: Taz Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:17 PM

arrenfrank - Go clutch your pearls and faint somewhere else.

#27

Posted by: CanadianChick Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:20 PM

That was absolutely adorable - I hope he really liked it!

#28

Posted by: lynnai Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:30 PM

Name-dropping Bradbury and the indefatigable "fuck" suffice to please, despite the absence of any other redeeming qualities.

This is to rock as ID is to science.

Enjoy, I guess.

You're missing the point I think. The song itself is meh, but surprisingly well produced and clearly done with true fan-girl enthusiasm. Which in itself is adorable.

Ray Bradbury himself being amused by it however is nothing but pure win, the man is 90, let him have his bouncing fan-girl(s) in her little mini kilt.

#29

Posted by: dannystevens.myopenid.com Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:50 PM

Big LOLz at the Kurt Vonnegut fan getting a slap.

#30

Posted by: rturpin Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:59 PM

Yay! That's all. Just yay!

#31

Posted by: Karl Engels Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 10:59 PM

I'm wondering why there haven't been more "Fuck Me, Rachel Bloom" response videos!?

#32

Posted by: Matrim Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 11:07 PM

I prefer Isaac Asimov, myself . . . *ducks before someone can throw something at him*

#33

Posted by: Ben Goren Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 11:21 PM

Matrim, I normally encourage people to pursue their (consensual, non-harmful) fantasies with gusto, but I’m afraid I simply have to draw the line at necrophilia. Can’t you pick a living SF grand master to invite to engage in carnal relations with you?

Cheers,

b&

#34

Posted by: rippingrich Author Profile Page | August 22, 2010 11:24 PM

AH arrenfrank----

Your just jealous.

#35

Posted by: Ibis3, féministe avec un titre française de fantaisie Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 12:35 AM

@Ben Goren:

In a decade or two, perhaps she’ll have the literary, artistic, or scientific experience (depending on what direction she steers her life) to offer a serious supplement, critique, or contradiction of his work.

That's rather um...dismissive of you. What makes you think that she hasn't got enough brain cells so that she could offer serious blah blah blah now? You think she has to be either {fun & sexy} or {intelligent & thoughtful}, but for the gods' sake not both at the same time?

#36

Posted by: echidna Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 12:56 AM

Matrim@32,
me too. And Philip Dick was just...visionary.

But the Ray Bradbury thing is fun.

#37

Posted by: bombria Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:07 AM

I'll be in my bunk.

#38

Posted by: Furcas Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:09 AM

That's rather um...dismissive of you. What makes you think that she hasn't got enough brain cells so that she could offer serious blah blah blah now? You think she has to be either {fun & sexy} or {intelligent & thoughtful}, but for the gods' sake not both at the same time?

Seconded.

#39

Posted by: CanadianChick Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:10 AM

Thank you Ibis3 - god forbid Rachel Bloom should be seen as a multi dimensional person...

#40

Posted by: Equisetum Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:13 AM

Shorter Dennis Rayburn: "Since I don't know Ray Bradbury, and have no idea what he actually thinks of the video, I'm taking the liberty of feeling offended for him."

#41

Posted by: DrGonzo666 Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:40 AM

The 89-year-old science fiction author watches Fox News Channel by day, Turner Classic Movies by night.

Bradbury has been a relentless supporter of space exploration. Ascending to the heavens won't destroy God; it'll reinforce belief, he says.
"We're moving more toward God," he says. "We're moving toward more proofs of his creation in other worlds he's created in other parts of the universe. Space travel will increase our belief in God."

source of quotes above


The guy sounds like a first class douche.

#42

Posted by: Jeanette Garcia Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:42 AM

Bradbury was my hero circa 58. I read everything he wrote. I would have rather stayed home with one of his books than go on a date.

#43

Posted by: badgersdaughter Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:44 AM

...god forbid Rachel Bloom should be seen as a multi dimensional person...[...?]

Well, chica certainly is three-dimensional, heh. (I'm not even gay and I think she, and her video, are just precious.)

I have also... um, "taken a few writers pretty seriously" from time to time. I'm sure you're not interested in which ones I had crushes on... but I double dog dare the rest of you to spill the beans on who got you hot and bothered based on their (presumably non-specifically-erotic) prose.

#44

Posted by: Krystalline Apostate Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:56 AM

Lessee...after writing stories for 72 years, he gets a video where young women sing his name & what they'd like to do to him?
That is what I call reach.

#45

Posted by: Jadehawk, cascadeuse féministe Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 2:23 AM

Can’t you pick a living SF grand master to invite to engage in carnal relations with you?
um... Fuck me C.J. Cherryh...?
#46

Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 2:31 AM

Happy Birthday, Ray! Like Zeno, I had the privilege of hearing him lecture a few decades ago at college. It was a great lecture.

#47

Posted by: GuyGene Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 3:33 AM

hahaha, PZ got powned by the New York Times. More "class-war claptrap" anyone????

#48

Posted by: Jadehawk, cascadeuse féministe Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 4:02 AM

powned? are you new to the internet or something?

also, wtf are you talking about

#49

Posted by: MinnieTheFinn, kaamea ateistifeministinarttu Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 4:14 AM

Something Wicked This Way Comes was, IICR, the first book I ever voluntarily read in English. It was slow going, and I'm sure I missed a lot of the true beauty of the language. I've reread it (and most of his other works) many times since.

Happy birthday, Mr. Bradbury, and thank you so much.

#50

Posted by: Alice Bluegown Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 4:42 AM

@ arrenfrank - fainting couch required stat!

@ lynnai -

the song itself is meh

I dunno, rocks harder than most of the drek currently infesting the UK charts.

@ badgersdaughter - don't I think I ever felt quite that intense about any author, but I do recall after reading Hunter S Thompson for the first time, I felt very, very dirty and very, very good...

#51

Posted by: james.haight Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 4:49 AM

@Jadehawk, 48: I think GuyGene's talking about a The Medium column on the big ScienceBlog kerfuffle a while ago by Virginia Heffernan. She was extremely offended sciblings did more than sit around in lab coats, talk about data, and look dignified all day. They '..chip off one-liners, promote their books and jeer at smokers, fat people and churchgoers..'

That's classism, don't you know?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/magazine/01FOB-medium-t.html

#52

Posted by: arrenfrank Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 4:59 AM

Ray Bradbury himself being amused by it however is nothing but pure win

I spoke no ill of Bradbury (space-exploration -> God drivel quoted above notwithstanding). I went through an intense Bradbury phase as a kid. If he got a kick out of this, more power to him. Song still sucks.


On the other hand, this is pretty good by F/SF Filk standards.

I can't tell you how pleased I am to be entirely out of my depth when it comes to F/SF "Filk". It smells like fan-fiction. Eww.


Go clutch your pearls and faint somewhere else.

For fuck's sake — I wasn't offended, champ — just utterly unimpressed.

It's swell that you have such an original* stock response at the ready, to obviate any need for the wit you so clearly lack..... you may wish to heed context more closely, though**. Such blatant, foot-in-the-mouth exhibition of your Magic 8-Ball-quality conversational skills is inadvisable.

You're welcome, Hall Monitor.

* Read: flaccid, generic, irrelevant.

** As in: at all.

#53

Posted by: arrenfrank Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 5:06 AM

Hey Alice, you and Taz should get together.

Maybe you can get take-out Chinese, and raid the fortune-cookies for better pre-fab rejoinders to regurgitate — chances are damned good!

#54

Posted by: Sven DiMilo Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 5:11 AM

Yeah, you guys, lay off. Arrenfrank's problem with the word "fuck" was that it is "indefatigable."

whatever that's suposed to mean

#55

Posted by: Karl Engels Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 5:19 AM

indefatigable (adjective): synonym for FUCKING AWESOME!! FUCK YEAH!!

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

#56

Posted by: alischinsky Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 5:33 AM

Well, Bradbury wrote for Playboy (where Fahrenheit 451 was serialised shortly after the original paperback print run), so I doubt he is as bemused as Rayburn had thought. (Of course, that was a different Playboy back then.)

I personally find his writing tired and kitschy, and far less interesting than Kurt Vonnegut's, but unfortunately I don't think there are any plans for my fellow fan (portrayed at 2:25) to make a video reply.

#57

Posted by: David Marjanović Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 5:42 AM

As raunchy as that video is, I also found it very enduringly sweet. I mean, here’s this buxom young lass throwing herself not at the latest teen heartthrob, but at a nonagenarian — and not for his money, but for his mind.

Really, what higher compliment could she possibly have paid him?

QFT.

That's rather um...dismissive of you. What makes you think that she hasn't got enough brain cells so that she could offer serious blah blah blah now

Also QFT.

This is to rock as ID is to science.

What do I care about rock? :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

Way to miss the point!

source of quotes above

Link doesn't work.

I double dog dare the rest of you to spill the beans on who got you hot and bothered based on their (presumably non-specifically-erotic) prose.

Then I'll have to show my true, nitpicking, spoilsports self. I've never got such feelings from reading a book. (The whole concept is alien to me. I'd more easily fall in love with a character than with the author!) But that may just be because I haven't read that much fiction in the first place, and because so little of it is written by women.

It's swell that you have such an original* stock response at the ready

Oh, you want more attention?

Earn it. :-)

#58

Posted by: David Marjanović Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 5:45 AM

Oh fuck. Looks like I'm still not quite awake, and it's almost noon. One single < instead of a >, and it became so ugly that I'll try again:

As raunchy as that video is, I also found it very enduringly sweet. I mean, here’s this buxom young lass throwing herself not at the latest teen heartthrob, but at a nonagenarian — and not for his money, but for his mind.

Really, what higher compliment could she possibly have paid him?

QFT.

That's rather um...dismissive of you. What makes you think that she hasn't got enough brain cells so that she could offer serious blah blah blah now? You think she has to be either {fun & sexy} or {intelligent & thoughtful}, but for the gods' sake not both at the same time?

Also QFT.

This is to rock as ID is to science.

What do I care about rock? :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

Way to miss the point!

source of quotes above

Link doesn't work.

I double dog dare the rest of you to spill the beans on who got you hot and bothered based on their (presumably non-specifically-erotic) prose.

Then I'll have to show my true, nitpicking, spoilsports self. I've never got such feelings from reading a book. (The whole concept is alien to me. I'd more easily fall in love with a character than with the author!) But that may just be because I haven't read that much fiction in the first place, and because so little of it is written by women.

It's swell that you have such an original* stock response at the ready

Oh, you want more attention?

Earn it. :-)

#59

Posted by: Sven DiMilo Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:06 AM

It seems that Ms. Bloom self-identifies as a comedian rather than a musician. So maybe some slack could be cut there.

#60

Posted by: Samantha Vimes Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:06 AM

Of course he liked it. How many guys his age get "hot schoolgirl" crush-porn devoted directly to them, by name, as a friendly tribute to their greatness, complete with praise for their career, spontaneously created (rather than some kind of special adult version of those personalized books popular for children)?

#61

Posted by: Ternon Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:21 AM

Looking at that picture of Ray Bradbury one is reminded once again that one can never get used to seeing how aging so thoroughly destroys a man.

Aging is a disease that needs to be beaten.

#62

Posted by: Alice Bluegown Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:29 AM

@ arrenfrank - great comeback, champ, but I'm still trying to figure out how you managed to de-lurk "involuntarily", or indeed why a Pharyngula lurker would be remotely troubled by the f-word.

Now leave me alone - I'm working on how to make my fucking "indefatigable", because that sounds completely awesome... ;-)

#63

Posted by: SteveV, Death's Pissant Haberdasher Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:32 AM

I guess Dennis Rayburn isn't a Far Side fan either.

One of Larson's more famous cartoons shows two chimpanzees grooming. One finds a blonde human hair on the other and inquires, "Conducting a little more 'research' with that Jane Goodall tramp?" The Jane Goodall Institute thought this was in bad taste, and had their lawyers draft a letter to Larson and his distribution syndicate, in which they described the cartoon as an "atrocity". They were stymied by Goodall herself, who revealed that she found the cartoon amusing. Since then, all profits from sales of a shirt featuring this cartoon go to the Goodall Institute.

Goodall wrote a preface to The Far Side Gallery 5, detailing her version of the "Jane Goodall Tramp" controversy. She praised Larson's creative ideas, which often compare and contrast the behavior of humans and animals. In 1988, Larson visited Gombe Streams National Park and was attacked by Frodo, a chimp described by Goodall as a "bully." Larson escaped with cuts and bruises.

#64

Posted by: arrenfrank Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:33 AM

Arrenfrank's problem with the word "fuck" was that it is "indefatigable."

That's a complimentary observation, not a "problem" — "fuck"'s just dandy, on its own merits.

You brainy science-types prompt middling minds like myself to look shit up ever and anon, but can't be troubled to discern the meaning of "indefatigable"? I see how it is.

Oh, you want more attention? Earn it. :-)

"More?" Certainly not, insofar as the ilk of Taz and Alice.

"Better" is more like it — but I won't hold my breath..... most likely, I'll just re-lurk and sift through the dross for the brilliance of Sastra, Brownian, et al.

.....Though it must be said that I'll continue to read and enjoy your comments, Mr. Marjanović, regardless of your dismissal.

#65

Posted by: Karl Engels Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:51 AM

arrenfrank gets all butthurt because a POP video isn't good ROCK & ROLL and then gets more butthurt after everyone goes WTF!! RACHEL BLOOM IS TEH AWESOME!! STFU DUDE!!

P.S. Rachel, if you're reading this, will you marry me? ;-)

#66

Posted by: JediBear Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:56 AM

I know listening to erudite criticism can be tiresome, but arrenfrank's exactly right.

"Indefatigable" means "incapable of suffering from fatigue." What he's saying is that it's impossible to "wear it out."

And he's right. Merely building a clever rhyme and a catchy tune around the word "fuck" is often enough to make a song immensely popular, regardless of its lack of other merit.

And the only other thing the song does is mention Bradbury and a few of his titles. Bradbury might not be offended, but think about why it's charming and funny.

1) Sex sells. (a) Cute girl (b) talking about sex. That's why it interests you. Don't even try to deny it.
2) Old men can't be sexy, that's a huge chunk of the reason why its funny. Her enthusiasm seems misaimed.
3) Smart men can't be sexy, that's a huge chunk of the reason why it's funny. Her enthusiasm seems misaimed.
4) Funny because "it's true." Common lore holds that if a girl likes reading, it must be a sex thing.

That's it. That (plus the word "fuck" and name-dropping Bradbury)'s the whole of the video's appeal. And I suppose you still don't think I have a right to be sickened by the video and the response it's getting?

#67

Posted by: KG Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 6:58 AM

I personally find his writing tired and kitschy, and far less interesting than Kurt Vonnegut's - alischinsky

Seconded - and far less interesting than many other SF writers too. Fahrenheit 451 was Ok-ish (but the title was the best bit - I guess that's why he was so peeved at Michael Moore), I couldn't make it through anything else of his I've tried. Still, and despite him being a right-wing goddist, I'm glad he enjoyed the video.

#68

Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:10 AM

It's kind of nice to see someone popular I don't care about at all get shredded, for once. I usually have to watch people I actually like expose massive stupidity that makes me at the least like them less, if not despise them.

3) Smart men can't be sexy, that's a huge chunk of the reason why it's funny. Her enthusiasm seems misaimed.
Um, smart people are sexy for some of us.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GeekyTurnOn.

I for one consider one of my girlfriends rambling on about history to be incredibly sexy. Mmm, branez.

#69

Posted by: orion Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:32 AM

Rutee, smart people for sure can be sexy, but I still get JediBear's point that one of the jokes of the video is the surprise element of a cute young woman singing about how she fancies a guy purely for his writing, rather than some jock in her college. And furthermore you have the incongruity of Bardbury's ideas-based writing against the crudity of the woman saying she wants him to f*** her,

I'm not saying I agree with JediBear's criticism of the video, but I get his/her point that this is one of the things that make it memorable.

#70

Posted by: Grahame Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:35 AM

"....here’s this buxom young lass throwing herself not at the latest teen heartthrob, but at a nonagenarian — and not for his money, but for his mind."

We live in hope.

#71

Posted by: Alice Bluegown Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:38 AM

@ JediBear - or how about...

1) song is ludicrously catchy in a bubblegum girly-power-pop manner reminiscent of the All-Girl Summer Fun Band or the Josie and the Pussycats soundtrack.

2) song features the phrase "fuck me" in the chorus, thus guaranteeing it will never be played on any radio station in my country, and thereby achieving instant awesomeness.

3) song & video both successfully spoof the "hot teen who wants to do you" genre exemplifed by Britney Spears et al, by invoking as lust object a geriatric author most of the cool kids will never have heard of.

All we need now is for someone to describe this video as "Hate Porn".

- Alice B (for a truly indefatigable fuck)

#72

Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:38 AM

Am I the only one who learned the word from Monty Python?

In war we're tough and able
Quite indefatigable
Between our quests
We sequin vests
And impersonate Clark Gable
It's a busy life in Camelot
I have to push the pram a lot.

#73

Posted by: Forbidden Snowflake Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:38 AM

Oy vey, humor reductionism...

1) Sex sells. (a) Cute girl (b) talking about sex. That's why it interests you. Don't even try to deny it.
You caught us, Sherlock! We like sex! Cuff us and take us to the jailhouse. [note: I don't usually speak for others, but I'm taking the liberty on this specific point]
2) Old men can't be sexy, that's a huge chunk of the reason why its funny. Her enthusiasm seems misaimed. 3) Smart men can't be sexy, that's a huge chunk of the reason why it's funny. Her enthusiasm seems misaimed.
"Misaimed" is the wrong word, and not just because my spell-Czech thinks so. The video presents an alternative reality, one in which hormone-crazed teenage gushing is sparked by intellect and talent rather than blond hair and nice pectorals. So it's a geek's fantasy-world scenario, not necessarily "it's funny because it's ridiculous". And the approval of Ray Bradbury himself lends it additional legitimacy.
4) Funny because "it's true." Common lore holds that if a girl likes reading, it must be a sex thing.
lolwut? Never heard this one before, are you sure it's all that "common"?
#74

Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:52 AM

All we need now is for someone to describe this video as "Hate Porn".
Really? You're going to try to compare a light, jaunty, voluntary one night stand spoken to celebrate an author to an even more trashy fanfic centered on the trope "As soon as the uppity bitch is laid, she'll stop being uppity", directed at someone the author legitimately despises (At least) and wants to see this happen to (At worst)?

I can admittedly think of stupider things that still didn't make me start a killfile, but we're talking Graemebird level of stupid, and that's not a high bar to jump.

#75

Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:54 AM

You caught us, Sherlock! We like sex! Cuff us and take us to the jailhouse. [note: I don't usually speak for others, but I'm taking the liberty on this specific point]
I think Janine is the one in charge of cuffs on Pharyngula, not that guy.
#76

Posted by: PZ Myers Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 8:06 AM

I am amused by the fact that someone felt compelled to delurk because other people were enjoying a bit of comic fluff that he didn't care for.

#77

Posted by: secularguy Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 8:38 AM

I have a gig as a lounge pianist this Friday. This will be on the playlist.

#78

Posted by: Paul J. Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 8:56 AM

I really like the song, but am I the only one who'd rather have her sing "Bradbury" instead of "Bradberry"?

#79

Posted by: Jan Witkowski Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 9:03 AM

This is a delight!

#80

Posted by: Adamvs Maximvs Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 9:15 AM

Aging is a disease that needs to be beaten.

As long as everyone stops having kids... Lets face it there's not enough resources for everyone to reproduce and keep kicking around. So let's only let the non-parental types live forever (though I may be biased as part of this group :)

It's a bit funny to see some people get all worked up over the video. It's not my thing, but I can see the humor in it (which is even better knowing the author actually watched it).

This is to rock as ID is to science.
Hey, could be worse, did you watch the Howl-e-lujah video *shudders*
#81

Posted by: Moggie Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 9:17 AM

Over-analysing humour FTW!

Humour often derives from juxtaposing concepts in an unexpected, incongruous way, challenging existing conventions. But the audience don't need to accept those conventions in order to find this amusing, they just need to recognise that they exist.

#82

Posted by: Alice Bluegown Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 9:18 AM

@ Rutee - no, of course I'm not going to make that comparison - it was a throwaway snark. I am, however, amazed that some people are expressing themselves as "sickened by this video, and the responses to it". I mean, really? I can see where they're coming from if we're discussing a piece of scabrous Internet satire (though I'd still disagree) - but this? When the hell did everybody get so goddamn censorious?

#83

Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 9:24 AM

"This is ludicrous."

I held my hand up, palm out, in what I hoped was a placating gesture. "Now, now, Mr. Frank . . . you are a Mister, right?"

He had stormed through my door unannounced. Timothy, my secretary, had been on lunch break for four years. Everyone storms in unannounced. I assumed he was a male, with his receding widow's peak and slight mustache, but I couldn't be sure. The bumps on his chest were larger than I'd expect on a such a scrawny man.

"Yes," he said. I relaxed. "You are Mr. TheBold, indefatigable investigator?"

I shook my head. "What's it say on the door?"

He minced his words like a line-order cook at the dinner rush. "It reads," he said, "nigeTheBold, Private Dick."

"Good," I said. "You're literate." I like "Private Dick" better than "Private Investigator." It makes me sound like a gigolo. Much classier.

"Of course I'm literate, you preposterous oaf! That's precisely why I require your help."

I don't get much call for literariness these days. Like the ability to drive a stick, or bake artisan bread, reading just doesn't mean as much as it did.

I expected he'd ask me to read him some Shakespeare or something. That happens occasionally; some pretentious bag of dog dung wanders in off the street and wants me to read them a bedtime story, or sing 'em some Liza Minnelli.

He surprised me, though. "SWSFOTI," he said.

"Huh?" Not my wittiest rejoinder, certainly, but it is one of my most versatile. "WTF?"

"Someone. Watched. Something. Funny. On. The. Internet." He sprayed this through teeth clenched tighter than a fish's anus.

I hate repeating myself, but I will for particularly dense clients. I assumed this uptight Ignatius Reilly of a man was here for paying business.

"Huh?" I said again.

His mouth was a rictus of fetid displeasure. I realized what I took for a light mustache was really a mad network of lines etched above his upper lip. It seemed haughty judgment was his natural state.

"Only it wasn't funny," he continued. "It was particularly unfunny. It was the kind of classless filth spewed forth daily by cretins like Eddie Izzard, or Jon Stewart (that terribly dis-humorous purveyer of leftist propaganda), or any number of self-promoting self-styled comedians with a distinct lack of humor."

"I see." I didn't, really. Sure, neither Eddie Izzard nor Jon Stewart were funny, but for me, humor died with Bob Hope, so who am I to judge?

I said, "What do you expect me to do about it? I can't go around stopping people from watching videos you don't find humorous."

He nodded, as if he were actually considering this. "No," he said. "Certianly not," he said. "But you can hold a gun to my head and force me to respond." He was lost deep in something analogous to thought. "Yes," he said. "That would be the best way. Force me to de-lurk. Then I can dispatch them all forthwith."

I shrugged. What the hell. I've had worse assignments.

I warned him, "Don't tempt me to pull the trigger," but he didn't hear me. He was already composing his message, his sensuous and spiderwebbed lips moving as he typed the words.

#84

Posted by: Ben Goren Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 9:40 AM

Ibis3 wrote:

Ben Goren wrote:
In a decade or two, perhaps she’ll have the literary, artistic, or scientific experience (depending on what direction she steers her life) to offer a serious supplement, critique, or contradiction of his work.

That's rather um...dismissive of you. What makes you think that she hasn't got enough brain cells so that she could offer serious blah blah blah now? You think she has to be either {fun & sexy} or {intelligent & thoughtful}, but for the gods' sake not both at the same time?

It has nothing to do with her sex appeal, and everything to do with her age. Even precocious geniuses don’t reach their full stride until their thirties, and Rachel is well short of that, now.

She’s got the “{fun & sexy}” thing in spades right now. She’s got at least a bit of “{intelligent & thoughtful}” right now, as evidenced by the video. However, also as evidenced by the video, she doesn’t have “{intelligent & thoughtful}” at the level of Ray Bradbury.

Will she in a decade or two? Perhaps. I sure hope so, even though the odds are as much against her as they are against 99.999% of the rest of us. But she at least has a chance at it, unlike 99.99% of the rest of us.

Cheers,

b&

#85

Posted by: Canuck Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 10:14 AM

I don't see anyone challenging the concept that old men aren't sexy.
They are - to us old women.
And Bradbury?
We don't mob him only because it is so hard to get up any speed in a walker

#86

Posted by: Andromeda Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 10:50 AM

Damn I can't get that first line of the catchy chorus outta my head!

I've never read any of his books, though I adore the television adaptation of The Halloween Tree...no Halloween was complete without it

#87

Posted by: otrame Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 10:54 AM

People who have only read Fahrenheit 451 or The Martian Chronicles (his two most famous books) have missed out. It's mostly his short stories I remember the best. And then there is Something Wicked This Way Comes,a little masterpiece, though it was much more fantasy/horror than SF. People have been stealing various aspects of that one for literally generations--including Stephen King. And the fact that he is a right-wing theist is irrelevant to that. I disagree with his politics but that doesn't have anything to do with his abilities as a writer.

It tickles me that he enjoyed the video.

Oh, and to the person above who disparaged fan fiction: If, as Sturgeon noted "90% of everything is crap", with fan fiction it is a little more complicated. I'd say about 50% of fan fiction is total crap, 45-47% is only good if you are a fan/girl-or-boy, and that last 3-5% is really great. There are a number of fan fic writers just in the two or three fandoms I read who should be published, but since the publishing industry has been focused almost entirely on prolific series writers in the past 15 years (the ones who can pump out a book every 9 months or so--I don't know what they are going to do since Robert B. Parker died--that maniac published 2 to 3 books a year) because they know people will keep buying the series long after the author has run dry. So there are a lot of excellent writers out there who will never get published and some of them write fan fiction as a hobby to "vent" that part of their creativity. I can understand a non-fan/girl-or-boy not being interested in culling through the dross to get to the gems, but that doesn't mean the gems aren't there.

So there.

#88

Posted by: Sven DiMilo Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 10:58 AM

oh for fucks sake I know what "indefatigable" means. Point is it don't mean shit applied to a word.

"Bradbury" instead of "Bradberry"?

Dialect. Mary, marry, merry. Let it go.

nigel, nice piece.
Have you read Inherent Vince?

#89

Posted by: Krystalline Apostate Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 11:14 AM

2) Old men can't be sexy, that's a huge chunk of the reason why its funny.
Oh my. How terribly ageist.
#90

Posted by: dsmwiener Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 11:20 AM

Bradbury is good, but he's no Heinlein (or Niven).

#91

Posted by: mmelliott01 Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 11:25 AM

Oh for fu Bradbury's sake! I haven't seen so much handwringing over nothing since early August.

The video tells us nothing about how smart Rachel is. The lyrics are vaguely clever but then we don't really know whether she wrote them or if she had help. She might have been capable of "smarter" lyrics but chose what she did because it fit her intent.

And "fuck me" is not the core of the song. The core is "Ray Bradbury" and all of the rhymes with it. "Ray Bradbury" gives it a flow that balances the punch of the "fuck" in "fuck me".

Now please excuse me. I'm going to write a letter to Bud Selig, the Commissioner of Major League Baseball. I need to complain about all of the leagues and teams, from teeball all the way up to the Boston Red Sox, on the grounds that they do not match the lofty standards of the New York Yankees and therefore should be banned from existence. Because as we know, we live in a world where only the best possible exemplar of any given phenomenon can be allowed to exist.

Oh, and "Indefatigable" to you too, though in this case I refer to the various warships of the same name rather than to the prosaic usage in the comments above.

Oops, sorry. I accidentally started writing like the priggish asses I was attempting to mock. When you stare into the abyss, blah blah blah...

#92

Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 11:46 AM

Have you read Inherent Vince?

I have not. I shall, though. This sounds right up my alley. Which is dark, dank, and generally plays home to several drunks (usually one with a mostly-empty bottle of muskatel wrapped up in a brown bag like a burrito), a couple of sad-sack drug dealers, and an ex-prostitute name Mari who just likes the atmosphere of the place.

Thanks for the suggestion. I do like Pynchon.

#93

Posted by: Rik G Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 11:58 AM

"I am amused by the fact that someone felt compelled to delurk because other people were enjoying a bit of comic fluff that he didn't care for."

That was very amusing, but it was worth it to see his response to the "pearl clutching"/"fainting couch" clichés. Touché!

Anyway, thanks for posting the video. Who cares if it wasn't brilliant; it was funny and it made me start my day with a smile and a laugh.

#94

Posted by: ronsullivan Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 11:59 AM


um... Fuck me C.J. Cherryh...?

This.

#95

Posted by: Buster Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 12:22 PM

My favorite Ray Bradberry is Martian Chronicles. IIRC she didn't sing about that book in her song.

It's a bit difficult to make a modish innuendo from it though.

I wonder if he is happy with this song. I shouldn't think so he is a conservative and didn't like that Michael Moore ripping off his book. Then again he is red-blooded male so maybe he just watched it with the sound turned off and the rather risque language tuned out.

IMHO Arthur C Clarke and Isaac Asimov are the best SF writers. Truly great! I like the Fountains of Paradise best.

#96

Posted by: David Marjanović Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 12:30 PM

nigelTheBold for Molly.

#97

Posted by: Moira Manion Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 12:41 PM

It's not a bad video, or song. Bradbury's my favorite SF writer, too, but, kid......he's 90.

This is why author's bio photos should be updated...or maybe it's why they shouldn't be.

#98

Posted by: Ewan R Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 12:43 PM

nTB - one has to wonder, how many sets do you work? I'd assume four, Your office, the bar, a dimly lit back alley, and the roof where you face down the villain in the final scene.

(if not I apologize, but Barry told me that you seem an awful lot like Lazlo Woodbine)

#99

Posted by: Moira Manion Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 12:52 PM

@ Don (#14)

His career as a writer was somewhat compromised by his stubborn unwillingness to fly and by his refusal to get a driver's license, believe it or not. He's on the shy and timid side in some ways, but what a storyteller.

Huh? Farenheit 451 is fmeekin' brilliant -- reality gets closer to it every decade-- and so are his short stories and many of his essays. His work is read around the world. How on earth has no flying or driving "somewhat compromised" his career as a writer? There's lots of wonderful writers, and actors by the way, who are shy and timid.

I mean, young things are writing sex songs to him. When he's 90. Seems like not driving or flying hasn't effected him much.

And as someone who's never had a driver's license, I can testify that you can have a great quality of life without one.

#100

Posted by: rolan.le.gargeac Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:22 PM

nigelTheBold #83

Most classiest post I've seen in many a dark and stormy night ! I raise my hats to thee !

I'm off to reread the Dresden series, and Garrett...

#101

Posted by: Eriol Tolkien Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:30 PM

Is it just my imagination, or is old Ray havin' a fap?

#102

Posted by: Sal Bro Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:33 PM

nigelTheBold, author of the indefatigable Fuck Me You, arrenfrank:

nigelTheBold for Molly

This!

#103

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawntbkLlJwiX1gbzB1e7Fo4BfJhgc2TJuek Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:33 PM

A good laugh a day adds a day to your life. Going to
live an extra month after this.

#104

Posted by: otrame Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 1:43 PM

Working my way through Dresden now. I love these books. Each one is better than the last. And James Marsters reads them to perfection. They are real performances. (Silly me, I thought the guy was British, but he does a slight Chicago accent,along with others as required, perfectly).

Jim Butcher is an example of the good side of serial writers. And he hasn't come near to running out of inspiration yet, it seems.

Oh, and nTB, loved your #83. Have you ever heard the Fire Sign Theater's take on noir detectives, Nick Danger, Third Eye? "Out of the fog and into the smog {coughing sound}; relentlessly, ruthlessly {I wonder where Ruth is?}, doggedly {dog barking}, toward his weekly meeting with... the unknown. At Drucker and 4th he turns right, at 4th and Drucker he turns left. He crosses McCarther Park and walks into a great sandstone building {ow, my nose!}. Groping for the door...."

Well, that gives you an idea.

(Not bad, considering it's been several years since I last heard it.)

#105

Posted by: Karl Engels Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 2:02 PM

Silly me, I thought the guy was British, but he does a slight Chicago accent,along with others as required, perfectly.

The British accent was fake.

#106

Posted by: Thaddeus Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 2:05 PM

Ooh! Ooh! Mistah Kottah!

Put me down for "Fuck me C.J. Cherryh", though I'm pretty sure she doesn't swing that way... :(

#107

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkyh3UkHtoWi978AdjZr7Nlsm63DtQhPzU Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 2:15 PM

Something wicked this way will come... and a girl with a Kurt Vonnegut T-shirt appears... Ursula LeGuin is my fave.

#108

Posted by: Karl Engels Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 2:48 PM

This is why author's bio photos should be updated...or maybe it's why they shouldn't be.

Fark.com ran a story about the top earning authors recently and some of the photos of the authors looked nothing like their jacket photos. I think they must have 'shopped the hell out of Stephanie Meyers's jacket photo. In the more candid shot she really does look like the kind of woman who (unfortunately) would have developed the self esteem issues required to author a series like Twilight.

#109

Posted by: Xenithrys Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 3:03 PM

@96&102: Yes, Nigel for Molly.

#110

Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 3:08 PM

Ewan R:

nTB - one has to wonder, how many sets do you work?

I'd never heard of Lazlo Woodbine before, nor his rules. Except for some Raymond Chandler, and a couple of Dashiell Hammet books, I've not read much in the roman noir genre.

I shall have to rectify that deficiency.

#111

Posted by: Leon Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 3:16 PM

I hope I look so good at 90! Judging by my family history I'm not likely to quite make it there.

#112

Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/4P90SUx_0uSAJUGZ.3QDuNA-#02cb2 Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 5:56 PM

OH MY! OH MY! I JUST MADE PHARYNGULA! I'm Swooning!

Mark Edward is his friend and when I showed him the video he said "let's call Ray and go see him, maybe show him the video?" Mark called him up and a few hours later I was sitting in front of the great man himself, we didn't know it was his birthday week.

I had just been introduced two minutes before and here I was being asked to start this video for Ray. I was so embarrassed (and that never happens) but the photographer in me crept out and I covered up my phone with a piece of paper in my lap and snuck the picture.

Later Mark asked if we could take pictures so I did with my "real" camera I had brought.

I wish I knew what part it was that he chuckled at on the video (as I was still trying to recover from the craziness I was in) but I think it was the part where she sings "greatest prolific writer in hissstoory" or maybe when she sings "I carved our initials on a Halloween Tree".

When we were all done, Mark Edward asked what he thought. Can't remember if he said "it was great" or "loved it" or what? But he did say he hadn't seen it before and thanks for showing it to him.

Mark Edward is in the middle of writing a blog all about this event and more...www.skepticblog. Should be up this week sometime.

I'll still thrilled that one of my pictures is on Pharyngula!

Susan Gerbic

#113

Posted by: dae Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:00 PM

Please, please, please make one titled "Fuck me Jesus Christ, greatest biblical prophet in history"

#114

Posted by: Karl Engels Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:13 PM

Please, please, please make one titled "Fuck me Jesus Christ, greatest biblical prophet in history"

Because that would a lie. Everyone knows that Moses is way awesome-er than Jesus.

#115

Posted by: dae Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 7:52 PM

Well lets have a trilogy with Mohamed thrown in for good measure.

#116

Posted by: acrannymint Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 8:13 PM

I'm a so-so Bradbury fan myself. I do find the premise for a "Medicine for Melancholy" very funny.

#117

Posted by: Herk Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 8:17 PM

I can only imagine about a million blog viewers rushing to iTunes to download this and make this sweet lady very rich. I know I did! Woo Hoo!

#118

Posted by: Karl Engels Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 9:01 PM

I got it for free. Before she put it up on iTunes there was a free link that she put up. (which may still exist) I'd gladly pay this woman $0.99 or more for this song, but I'm not install iTunes to do it.

#119

Posted by: murtagh Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 9:12 PM

Nothing can take away from the man's work, but I lost a deal of respect for Ray Bradbury himself when he said he was considering legal action against Michael Moore for the title "Fahrenheit 9/11".

No doubt his lawyers told him he didn't have a legal leg to stand on, but given that "The Golden Apples Of The Sun" is from a Yeats poem, "Something Wicked This Way Comes" is a Shakespeare quote, and "I Sing The Body Electric" is word-for-word the title of a Walt Whitman poem, he should have had more class than to even think of attempting such a thing.

#120

Posted by: Gadfly47 Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 10:36 PM

Even though I'm an atheist, I got to say god bless Ray Bradbury.

#121

Posted by: rewarp Author Profile Page | August 23, 2010 11:35 PM

It seems there are comments questioning Rachel Bloom's intellectual prowess. She does have other productions which are quite enjoyable.

Standup

Comedy

I hope that will shore-up the sex-centred defences with empirical evidence of a brilliant mind as well.

Unless you happen to find Mr Deity unfunny.

#123

Posted by: Jack Flynn Author Profile Page | August 24, 2010 8:28 PM

I don't want to nick pick at the video, but the Earth is spinning backwards. The sheer awesomeness of this video is still overwhelming though... :P

#124

Posted by: NitricAcid Author Profile Page | August 25, 2010 1:31 AM

Every time I read about Ray Bradbury, I'm shocked to hear that he's still alive.

I have long loved many of his works. I've always wanted to make a dandelion and honey wine, so I could call it...


A Metheglin For Melancholy.

#125

Posted by: deetee Author Profile Page | August 27, 2010 7:26 PM

I see that Steven Hawking is just a wee bit jealous.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47h3EsRvM0Q

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.