A few Christians are indignant over this video mocking Pollyannaish theology.
Unfortunately for them, and to our increased mirth, their excuses are just as ridiculous as Suzie.
Dr. Normal L. Geisler, author of If God, Why Evil?, said the video contains a lot of misconceptions.
"You look at all of that [and] you sympathize with Susie because you think they (disasters, illnesses, etc.) are evil," he said. "But if it's evil, then there must be a standard for good. If there is a crooked line in this world then there must be a straight line. If there is a straight line then there must be God."
Actually, I don't sympathize with Suzie at all. The whole point of this video is that she's silly and clueless.
I do have a standard for good: does it cause me or others harm? If not, it's good. If it does, it's bad. I don't need a god to define this for me; humans are the yardstick. The existence of straight and crooked lines do not imply the existence of intent, but only that there are lines.
The video also gives a very limited picture of God's presence in Suzie's life, said Geisler, who is a Christian apologist and philosopher. When it comes to Suzie's recovery from sickness, for example, the video fails to acknowledge that God is the one who designed her body with properties to heal naturally, said Geisler.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT A GOD DESIGNED HER BODY. Jebus, he's a philosopher…you'd think he'd be competent to recognize a circular argument when he saw one. There are alternative explanations with evidence in their support for the presence of self-repair mechanisms in evolved organisms, you know, so just point to the fact that someone can heal is not automatic evidence for the existence of a magic man in the sky.
The title of this article at the Christian Post is "Atheist Depicts Christians as Delusional". Yeah? Depiction confirmed.