What do you call a quantum computer built in the shape of a cubic lattice and containing 450000 qubits?
Noah's ark, of course! Genesis 6:14. Sorry, I just couldn't resist.
Now on ScienceBlogs: Science blogs and public engagement with science: practices, challenges, and talking out of your ass
Theoretical Musings
Dave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.)
Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.
« Ski Day: Mt Shasta Ski Park | Main | Quantum Gravity - Topological Quantum Field Theory Blues »
Category: Funny Ha Ha • Quantum
Posted on: December 26, 2007 8:00 PM, by Dave Bacon
What do you call a quantum computer built in the shape of a cubic lattice and containing 450000 qubits?
Noah's ark, of course! Genesis 6:14. Sorry, I just couldn't resist.
Find more posts in:
Physical Science
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/59676
The World's Fair 03.11.2010
Oscillator 03.11.2010
The Frontal Cortex 03.10.2010
Genetic Future 03.10.2010
Built on Facts 03.10.2010
Comments
Well I guess I got it wrong. I thought it might be a Rubik's qubit.
Posted by: Phil Warnell | December 26, 2007 10:09 PM
You mean Genesis 6:15?
Posted by: p | December 27, 2007 3:42 AM
And Solomon's Temple was 60 qubits by 20 qubits — no wonder the stories from that era always sound so decoherent.
Posted by: Blake Stacey | December 27, 2007 9:56 AM
Don't forget, on the first passover, the angel of death used the First Born Approximation.
Posted by: tonyl | December 27, 2007 10:07 AM
logical or physical qubits?????
Posted by: Perry | December 27, 2007 5:37 PM
I think they must be logical qubits or else the whole ark would fall apart. On the other hand maybe this is why they haven't discovered the remains of the ark: all those cubic cubits decohered. (Though this leaves the problem of where the classical bits are...)
Posted by: Dave Bacon | December 27, 2007 6:40 PM
Didn't "the classical bits" get left behind, along with dinosaurs and "the last unicorn"?
Posted by: Jonathan Vos Post | December 27, 2007 8:55 PM
i thought it was rubik's cube hehehe
Posted by: Gene | December 28, 2007 6:23 AM