Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow dabacon on Twitter

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow dabacon on Twitter

« Beginnings... | Main | Searching For Feynman »

8.7 Percent Less Likely

Category: PoliticsScience
Posted on: January 28, 2008 2:40 PM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

The CRA Policy Blog has the latest info on the impact of the underfunding of science in the budget. In particular

NSF will likely fund 1,000 fewer research grants in FY 08 than planned and the average award size will be smaller.
Sweet! Data to update my probability of employment. Oh wait. (Note for those playing along at home, I think the relevant total number of NSF grants is on the order of 11500.)

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/62560

Comments

1

Yes, but that will be money better spent on finding those darn elusive WMD's.

Posted by: JohnQPublic | January 28, 2008 4:53 PM

2

Will changes for FY08 mean that my chances of getting an NSF grad fellowship are already reduced by 23%? (I applied this year.)

Posted by: Stephan | January 28, 2008 5:45 PM

3

Stephan, my guess would be yes. :(

Posted by: Dave Bacon | January 28, 2008 6:02 PM

4

Dave, you've got to learn how to spin better:

- American science will be 8.7% stronger because the bottom 8.7% will no longer be leaching off the system!
- These budget cuts will mean that less money will be spent on scientific bureaucracy and will instead be spent on science that will impact your life!
- Real world science will not be affected by these budget cuts.
- This money was only for mathematicians anyhow. Don't you remember how much you hated math in school?

See, you just need to be positive...

Posted by: mick | January 28, 2008 6:10 PM

5

Makes me glad I left last year rather than "try one more time" to get that NSF grant that my institution demanded I have for tenure....

Posted by: Rob Knop | January 29, 2008 8:48 AM

Comments have been closed as this blog has moved to http://dabacon.org/pontiff.
Click here to search for this post on the new blog.

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.