Now on ScienceBlogs: "Global Warming is not real because weather patterns have stabilized in the last 10 years!" Why statements like this need a little context.

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

« Minority Report Like Interface | Main | More on the Science Funding Disaster »

No Dice?

Category: ArtMathematics Basterdizations
Posted on: January 3, 2008 5:37 PM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

From a New York Times article describing the Nature Theater of Oklahoma's production of "No Dice:"

"Poetics," for example, was choreographed using dice. Each face on the die represented one of six possible gestures, and each appendage -- two arms, two legs and the head -- got its own roll of the dice. Dice determined where the actors stand and for how long. There are four actors in "Poetics," but, alas, no such thing as a four-sided die. So, to determine who did what, the directors used a dreidel.
No such thing as a four sided dice? Obviously no one among the choreographers has played Dungeons & Dragons:
4-sided_dice_250.jpg

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60255

Comments

1

I am disgusted and appalled at this lack of dice knowledge.

Posted by: Xanthir, FCD | January 3, 2008 6:56 PM

2

Indeed, this is deeply disturbing! Then again, back in the days of oldfashioned pen & paper cons, I remember a friend of mine asking for "six-sided dice" in a mom-and-pop store around the corner, and total incomprehension ensued---until one of us slightly rephrased the question.

(Just got here after reading the article "Blog life: The Quantum Pontiff" on physicsworld.com, http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/32282 , and wouldn't you know! The first posting I come across is about D&D ...)

^_^J.

Posted by: gyokusai | January 3, 2008 9:44 PM

3

I happen to be a collector of odd dice (as I think I mentioned in the lengthy probability debate). The strangest are two perfectly round dice that always show a number exactly face up (there's a ball bearing rolling around inside and indentations into which it falls, thus forcing a particular number face up). I also have an interested pair of Kama Sutra dice, all the usual D&D dice, and plan to someday purchase a set of weather dice: http://www.dicecollector.com/THE_DICE_THEME_WEATHER.html. I've also seen a huge (and unwieldy) 100-sided die once.

Posted by: Ian Durham | January 7, 2008 10:15 AM

4

Oh, I forgot to mention I also happen to own an old copy of the logic game Wff 'n' Proof whose game pieces are dice covered in logic symbols. (see http://wffnproof.com/)

Posted by: Ian Durham | January 7, 2008 10:19 AM

5

Really, though, a dreidl is most likely far better at achieving a random result than using a tetrahedral die - and you don't have to worry about the dreaded "caltrop effect" with a dreidl!

Posted by: M | January 7, 2008 3:02 PM

6

I guess the later point would be even more important for dancers :)

Posted by: Dave Bacon | January 7, 2008 3:04 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM