Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow dabacon on Twitter

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow dabacon on Twitter

« Minority Report Like Interface | Main | More on the Science Funding Disaster »

No Dice?

Category: ArtMathematics Basterdizations
Posted on: January 3, 2008 5:37 PM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

From a New York Times article describing the Nature Theater of Oklahoma's production of "No Dice:"

"Poetics," for example, was choreographed using dice. Each face on the die represented one of six possible gestures, and each appendage -- two arms, two legs and the head -- got its own roll of the dice. Dice determined where the actors stand and for how long. There are four actors in "Poetics," but, alas, no such thing as a four-sided die. So, to determine who did what, the directors used a dreidel.
No such thing as a four sided dice? Obviously no one among the choreographers has played Dungeons & Dragons:
4-sided_dice_250.jpg

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60255

Comments

1

I am disgusted and appalled at this lack of dice knowledge.

Posted by: Xanthir, FCD | January 3, 2008 6:56 PM

2

Indeed, this is deeply disturbing! Then again, back in the days of oldfashioned pen & paper cons, I remember a friend of mine asking for "six-sided dice" in a mom-and-pop store around the corner, and total incomprehension ensued---until one of us slightly rephrased the question.

(Just got here after reading the article "Blog life: The Quantum Pontiff" on physicsworld.com, http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/32282 , and wouldn't you know! The first posting I come across is about D&D ...)

^_^J.

Posted by: gyokusai | January 3, 2008 9:44 PM

3

I happen to be a collector of odd dice (as I think I mentioned in the lengthy probability debate). The strangest are two perfectly round dice that always show a number exactly face up (there's a ball bearing rolling around inside and indentations into which it falls, thus forcing a particular number face up). I also have an interested pair of Kama Sutra dice, all the usual D&D dice, and plan to someday purchase a set of weather dice: http://www.dicecollector.com/THE_DICE_THEME_WEATHER.html. I've also seen a huge (and unwieldy) 100-sided die once.

Posted by: Ian Durham | January 7, 2008 10:15 AM

4

Oh, I forgot to mention I also happen to own an old copy of the logic game Wff 'n' Proof whose game pieces are dice covered in logic symbols. (see http://wffnproof.com/)

Posted by: Ian Durham | January 7, 2008 10:19 AM

5

Really, though, a dreidl is most likely far better at achieving a random result than using a tetrahedral die - and you don't have to worry about the dreaded "caltrop effect" with a dreidl!

Posted by: M | January 7, 2008 3:02 PM

6

I guess the later point would be even more important for dancers :)

Posted by: Dave Bacon | January 7, 2008 3:04 PM

Comments have been closed as this blog has moved to http://dabacon.org/pontiff.
Click here to search for this post on the new blog.

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.