Now on ScienceBlogs: The Lights Stay On Inside a Black Hole!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

« 3.14159265 is Approximately 1 | Main | Google Sky »

Intergalactic Planetary

Category: Funny Ha Ha
Posted on: March 14, 2008 7:42 PM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

Paul Krugman proves that not only is a bad ass economist, but that he is also a pretty cool guy:

Thirty years ago I was an oppressed assistant professor, caught up in the academic rat race. To cheer myself up I wrote -- well, see for yourself. Joshua Gans of the University of Melbourne scanned a copy of the thing I wrote -- back then academics did their work with typewriters, abacuses, and stone axes -- and was good enough to send me a copy. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you The Theory of Interstellar Trade.
I wonder what the equivalent of that paper is for quantum computing? Oh, wait, ALL our theory papers are like "The Theory of Interstellar Trade."

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/66839

Comments

1

The link to the pdf is broken

Posted by: Mathew | March 15, 2008 2:16 AM

2

One of my roommates in grad school was in the economics PhD program at MIT, some years after Krugman. I remember him showing me this paper as (additional) evidence (beyond his own familiarity with Godel's theorem and some general relativity)
that economists actually know some math and physics.

Posted by: David Meyer | March 15, 2008 2:51 AM

3

I remember a math prof at Caltech telling me they sent a survey out to all departments asking what should be covered in the basic math courses. The economics department sent back "integrating on banach spaces." :)

Posted by: Dave Bacon | March 16, 2008 6:18 PM

4

Yes, I'm often bemused when I attend a microeconomic theory seminar at the kinds of real analysis details the speaker spends time on. Not because I'm not really interested in them, but because exactly which continuity conditions the utility function satisfies seem so unlikely to be relevant to economic scenarios in the real world.

Of course, I'm quite willing to believe that physical spacetime is discrete at the smallest scales, so I'm predisposed to bemusement at real analysis details.

Posted by: David Meyer | March 17, 2008 1:10 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM