Now on ScienceBlogs: Surgical masks versus respirators for flu protection

Seed Media Group

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

« Ecologists Can't Handle Their Beer Like Physicists | Main | Crayon Physics Game »

Room Temperature?

Category: PhysicsScience By Press Release
Posted on: March 20, 2008 12:00 PM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

Dear Digg, no, this article and press release do not mean that Scientists Invent Room Temperature Superconducting Material. It means that scientists have put molecular silane under hundreds of giga-Pascals presures (for comparison, atmospheric pressure is 100 kilo-Pascals) at a temperature of around 20 Kelvin, and gotten it to superconduct. While this is certainly cool, it is not "room temperature" as far as I can tell.

One day I was driving down the road and listening to AM radio when Paul Harvey came on and did his schtick ("and now you know, the rest of the story.") At one point in the show, Harvey made a statement that physicists had recently discovered how to get superconductivity at room temperature. I almost drove off the road hearing this and ran home to see if it was true. Unfortunately it was not, and I will never, ever, forgive Paul Harvey for making me think this amazing discovery had been made. And now you know the rest of the...ah, whatever.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/67299

Comments

1

I did a summer project in the Francis Bitter Magnet Lab, over on the east side of MIT, the better part of a decade ago. Scotch-taped to a door was a photograph of two men standing knee-deep in billowing clouds, working on some piece of laboratory equipment. The caption read, "Prof. Foner and assistant achieve room temperature superconductivity by filling room with liquid nitrogen."

Posted by: Blake Stacey | March 20, 2008 6:18 PM

2

The claim comes from extrapolating 5 data points in a Tc Vs Pressure graph. It looks like Tc increases rapidly in the 100-125 GPa region. Unfortunately, I can't imagine the sort of pressure control you would need to maintain superconductivity at liquid nitrogen temperatures, let alone room temperature.

Posted by: laserboy | March 21, 2008 6:48 AM

3

This is the same joke like about NMR or D-wave quantum computer...

Posted by: qs | March 21, 2008 10:57 AM

4

This is not room temperature but still it is quite impressive:
http://reducedmass.com/2008/03/20/more-superconductor-fun-now-with-levitating-frogs/

Posted by: Patrick | March 26, 2008 6:44 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM