Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab: Time is Ticking!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

« Change We Believe In, But Tenure? | Main | Now With 1.4 Percent More Physicists! »

Not Cuil

Category: QuantumTechnology
Posted on: July 31, 2008 10:57 AM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

Sure quantum computers can find a needle in an unstructured haystack quadratically faster than their classical brethren, but I didn't think the word "quantum" and "search" would appear in the press quite this soon: Ex-Googlers reinvent web search: Quantum porn (not safe for work! i.e. they show the quantum porn!) and Quantum porn engine foiled by strawberries and muffins: How the Cuil kids live. And yes, I "cuil"ed my own name, and no, this blog doesn't come up (nor any quantum porn.)

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/77748

Comments

1

It sounds like it was noticed too soon. They may have something cool there (no pun intended), but of course it's going to be wonky at first. Billing it as the project of a bunch of ex-Googlers is dooming it failure, as people expect it to be perfect out of the door.

Posted by: Chris Granade | July 31, 2008 11:29 AM

2

I guess by the title I was expecting to see a couple of qubits gettin' it on. Bummer. That would have been interesting.

Posted by: Ian Durham | July 31, 2008 12:37 PM

3

Well, that sort of explains (without really explaining) something I had been wondering about. When I first heard about Cuil I tried it on my own name, and it did find several instances of me (although not my blog for some reason). But it paired up each hit with an image that had no discernible connection to the corresponding web page. At least there was no porn, thankfully.

Posted by: Kurt | July 31, 2008 2:57 PM

4

Quantum porn? I guess superposition takes on a whole new meaning.

Posted by: JohnQPublic | July 31, 2008 4:00 PM

5

In all fairness, "Grattage" does rhyme with "frottage."

Ooh, I think I'll go look up "banal duck" and "loop spacial."

Posted by: HP | July 31, 2008 5:08 PM

6

Re: HP - not if you pronounce "Grattage" correctly...

It's easy to get entangled in quantum porn, but eventually you'll be observed and that just leads to collapse, etc, etc...

Cuil seem to have fixed this now, and have offered a nice apology.

Posted by: Jon Grattage | August 1, 2008 3:11 AM

7

Quantum porn! New ways for naked oscillating bodies to be entangled. Want to watch? Enter your credit card number now...

Posted by: Jonathan Vos Post | August 1, 2008 12:26 PM

8

The Register now has a further article, including multiple quantum porn jokes... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/01/cuil_apology/

Posted by: JG | August 2, 2008 3:53 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM