Sure quantum computers can find a needle in an unstructured haystack quadratically faster than their classical brethren, but I didn't think the word "quantum" and "search" would appear in the press quite this soon: Ex-Googlers reinvent web search: Quantum porn (not safe for work! i.e. they show the quantum porn!) and Quantum porn engine foiled by strawberries and muffins: How the Cuil kids live. And yes, I "cuil"ed my own name, and no, this blog doesn't come up (nor any quantum porn.)
The Quantum Pontiff
Theoretical Musings
Search

Profile
Dave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.)
Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.
Recent Comments
- Neil B on So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- Si-Hui Tan on Ecto and LaTeXiT
- evden eve nakliyat on Google Hella Cool
- Peter Lund on Google Hella Cool
- wolfgang on So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- Rod on So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- Art on So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- John Sidles on Dead Spins And The Dirty Ground
- Jonathan Vos Post on Dead Spins And The Dirty Ground
- John Sidles on Dead Spins And The Dirty Ground
Recent Posts
- So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- Dead Spins And The Dirty Ground
- Bacon Camp
- Best Paper at STOC
- Pr(Future Dave Bacons|Library Cuts) is Small
- De Took Er DataBs Jrbs!
- Google Hella Cool
- Portrait of a Reviewer as a Young Man
- Theory Matters Vision Nuggets
- What To Do With Scirate?
Other Information
Cows are well approximated by a sphere.

« Change We Believe In, But Tenure? | Main | Now With 1.4 Percent More Physicists! »
Not Cuil
Category: Quantum • Technology
Posted on: July 31, 2008 10:57 AM, by Dave Bacon
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/77748
Click here to search for this post on the new blog.


Comments
It sounds like it was noticed too soon. They may have something cool there (no pun intended), but of course it's going to be wonky at first. Billing it as the project of a bunch of ex-Googlers is dooming it failure, as people expect it to be perfect out of the door.
Posted by: Chris Granade | July 31, 2008 11:29 AM
I guess by the title I was expecting to see a couple of qubits gettin' it on. Bummer. That would have been interesting.
Posted by: Ian Durham | July 31, 2008 12:37 PM
Well, that sort of explains (without really explaining) something I had been wondering about. When I first heard about Cuil I tried it on my own name, and it did find several instances of me (although not my blog for some reason). But it paired up each hit with an image that had no discernible connection to the corresponding web page. At least there was no porn, thankfully.
Posted by: Kurt | July 31, 2008 2:57 PM
Quantum porn? I guess superposition takes on a whole new meaning.
Posted by: JohnQPublic | July 31, 2008 4:00 PM
In all fairness, "Grattage" does rhyme with "frottage."
Ooh, I think I'll go look up "banal duck" and "loop spacial."
Posted by: HP | July 31, 2008 5:08 PM
Re: HP - not if you pronounce "Grattage" correctly...
It's easy to get entangled in quantum porn, but eventually you'll be observed and that just leads to collapse, etc, etc...
Cuil seem to have fixed this now, and have offered a nice apology.
Posted by: Jon Grattage | August 1, 2008 3:11 AM
Quantum porn! New ways for naked oscillating bodies to be entangled. Want to watch? Enter your credit card number now...
Posted by: Jonathan Vos Post | August 1, 2008 12:26 PM
The Register now has a further article, including multiple quantum porn jokes... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/01/cuil_apology/
Posted by: JG | August 2, 2008 3:53 PM