Now on ScienceBlogs: The Lights Stay On Inside a Black Hole!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

« Dude! Look At Those Equations! | Main | Bacon Robots »

War I Tell You

Category: Quantum ComputingSelf: Meet Center. Center: Meet Self.
Posted on: October 14, 2008 3:17 PM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

Self promotion for those around the University of Washington campus: I'm giving a talk in the physics department at UW. Mondays, October 20 at 4:00 P.M. Ronald Geballe Auditorium, Rm. A102 (cookies at 3:45):

Title: "Who Will Build a Quantum Computer: the Physicists or the Computer
Engineers?"

Abstract: Building a quantum computer large enough to perform a task beyond the capability of today's classical computers (breaking a cryptographic code or simulating a complex quantum system) is a daunting task. On the fundamental side, this difficulty arises from the fact that quantum systems like to decohere, and that we cannot control a quantum system with perfect accuracy. On the technical side, the obstacles toward build a quantum computer arise from the severe engineering constraints imposed by manipulating individual quantum systems. The theoretical solution to the problems of decoherence and lack of control was worked out in the nineties and is known as the threshold theorem for fault-tolerant quantum computing. The great debate in quantum computing today is how the technical difficulties of building a quantum computer will be overcome. In this talk I will outline two very distinct camps on how this will be achieved: one centered very squarely on engineering and the other with roots in condensed matter physics. This is a battle for the soul of future quantum computers and will determine whether quantum computers are years, decades, or centuries away from being built.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/83446

Comments

1

As long as I can code in Python on them...

Posted by: JohnQPublic | October 14, 2008 4:21 PM

2

Oh joy, I got to hear Sean Carroll's talk last Spring at the UW physics colloquium, and now another physics blogger will be stopping by.

Be warned, the auditorium was pretty much filled to capacity for Sean's presentation, so if your talk isn't as well attended I think he gets some sort of bragging rights.

Posted by: Darek | October 14, 2008 4:32 PM

3

Sean is a famous guy. I'm a hack who works in computer science. So I'm expecting a crowd of....

Posted by: Dave Bacon | October 14, 2008 5:42 PM

4

Dave: Good topic. Wish I could be there. Will you be distributing slides?

Posted by: Geordie | October 14, 2008 6:57 PM

6

I took a quantum computing class over the summer with Boris Blinov, who's hosting the colloquia this quarter, so even if your performance is not sold out I'm looking forward to maybe-kinda-sorta understanding some of it.

Posted by: Darek | October 14, 2008 9:52 PM

7

I predict nobody will build a quantum computer. Its a fantasy bigger than string theory ;)

Posted by: David McMahon | October 14, 2008 10:17 PM

8

Building quantum computer is beyond the point. As Scott Aaronson explains, it is important to first understand the physical limits of calculation and answer what kind of calculations we can't do with these computers that we don't have

Posted by: milkshake | October 15, 2008 8:43 AM

9

Thanks for the vote of confidence David. I'll add that with the appropriate weight into my probability estimate for building a quantum computer.

Posted by: Dave Bacon | October 15, 2008 12:45 PM

10

I predict that we will be prepared into a mixed state where we both do and do not have quantum computers.

I'm saying that here, because Scott Aaronson (whom I got to meet when Kip Thorne introduced us at Caltech) never lets me post weird or poetic stuff on his otherwise superb blog.

Posted by: Jonathan Vos Post | October 15, 2008 2:57 PM

11

Dave, I'll definitely be there ... your first slide (as you leaked it to me) is itself enough to make the talk worth attending! :)

Seriously, this looks like an outstanding talk on a wonderful subject. I'll see you there!

Posted by: John A. Sidles | October 17, 2008 11:05 AM

12

Any comments on Dwave System's new 128 qubit work ?

Posted by: Brian Wang | October 22, 2008 6:32 PM

13

Brian: Yes, it's AWESOME... I give it 5 roast beef sandwiches.

Seriously though Dave how did your talk go? I think we're speaking at the same event in a few weeks.

Posted by: Geordie | October 22, 2008 7:16 PM

14

The talk went okay I guess. I wish I had more time, as always.

Yeah it looks like I'm speaking write after you! Must...prepare...good...jokes.

Posted by: Dave Bacon | October 23, 2008 1:28 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM