Subscribe to RSS feed..asks a facebook application.
Apparently I am the kind of physicist who likes proper spelling and proper capitalization, and who thus, will not take a quiz with bad spelling. Which physicist is that? Gell-Mann?
The Quantum Pontiff
Theoretical Musings
Search
Profile
Dave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.)
Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.
Recent Comments
- Neil B on So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- Si-Hui Tan on Ecto and LaTeXiT
- evden eve nakliyat on Google Hella Cool
- Peter Lund on Google Hella Cool
- wolfgang on So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- Rod on So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- Art on So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- John Sidles on Dead Spins And The Dirty Ground
- Jonathan Vos Post on Dead Spins And The Dirty Ground
- John Sidles on Dead Spins And The Dirty Ground
Recent Posts
- So Long and Thanks For All the Fish!
- Dead Spins And The Dirty Ground
- Bacon Camp
- Best Paper at STOC
- Pr(Future Dave Bacons|Library Cuts) is Small
- De Took Er DataBs Jrbs!
- Google Hella Cool
- Portrait of a Reviewer as a Young Man
- Theory Matters Vision Nuggets
- What To Do With Scirate?
Other Information
The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.
Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
« Reducing Computer Power Consumption | Main | Best Paper Awards »
Which Physicist Are You?
Category: Funny Ha Ha
Posted on: April 3, 2009 11:49 AM, by Dave Bacon
Share:
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/105002
Click here to search for this post on the new blog.
Comments
Yeah, the "Einstein" result just popped into my feed, and it made me cry a little inside.
Posted by: Ben Lillie | April 3, 2009 12:27 PM
Which physicists is that?
What's the rule that says that any Internet post complaining about bad spelling has to have a typo or spelling error?
On topic: It reminds me of the story of how Einstein fended off one woman's advances. She pointed out that a child with his brains and her looks would naturally go far. He supposedly replied, "But what if the child has your brains and my looks?"
Posted by: Eric Lund | April 3, 2009 12:47 PM
You must have read the RSS feed. That error was up there for exactly 15 seconds :)
Posted by: Dave Bacon | April 3, 2009 12:50 PM
Don't be silly. Every physicist at Caltech knew that Gell-Mann named the quark to prove that he'd read all of James Joyce and the others had not. No, wait a minute. That supports your hypothesis. James Joyce is roughly equal to Shakespeare in the number of distinct words used in the corpus of their published oeuvre.
Posted by: Jonathan Vos Post | April 3, 2009 1:41 PM
> James Joyce is roughly equal to Shakespeare in the number of
> distinct words used in the corpus of their published oeuvre.
I suspect Joyce may have the edge, but then he took some liberties with the language.
I took the quiz for the hell of it and was told I am "Isaac Newton." I am disappointed. I had hoped to be "Dave Bacon."
Oh, and the guy who made the quiz does not appear to be a native English speaker and that may explain things a bit.
Posted by: Ian Durham | April 3, 2009 3:01 PM
I must be stuck on a CTC. I still get Which physicists is that? Gell-Mann?
Posted by: David | April 3, 2009 3:02 PM
Strange works for me. Oh, maybe you are looking at the html address? That's still messed up.
Posted by: Dave Bacon | April 3, 2009 3:05 PM
Oh *that* typo. Removes egg from face.
Posted by: Dave Bacon | April 3, 2009 3:12 PM
Re: your brains and my looks.
I take (minimal) pride in being smarter and stronger than O.J. Simpson and Stephen Hawking.
Posted by: Tracy Hall | April 4, 2009 7:18 AM
> I take (minimal) pride in being smarter and stronger than
> O.J. Simpson and Stephen Hawking.
Respectively?
Posted by: Ian Durham | April 4, 2009 9:43 AM