Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow dabacon on Twitter

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow dabacon on Twitter

« Bacon Home Shopping | Main | Die Sauerkraut ist in mein Lederhosen »

IWODD, Would You?

Category: PhysicsQuantum Computing
Posted on: June 12, 2009 12:08 PM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

The "International Workshop on Dynamical Decoupling (IWODD)" now has a web site with information on the conference Oct 5-6 in Boulder, CO:

Dynamical decoupling techniques show the potential to dramatically suppress errors in quantum information and quantum control systems. To date, research in this area has been scattered between magnetic resonance experimentalists and quantum information theorists. This workshop aims to foster new relationships between experimental and theoretical researchers in an effort to speed technical developments and to promote the adoption of dynamical decoupling techniques across a variety of qubit technologies. Follow this link to see the list of invited speakers which includes Erwin Hahn, who pioneered the spin echo, as a keynote speaker.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/112264

Comments

1

more like: don't shoot your iwodd

Posted by: anon | June 12, 2009 2:43 PM

2

I hope decoupling isn't an idea like "decoherence". Some of you may remember, as e.g. from Open forum, I don't think much of the IMHO flawed, circular "argument" that decoherence solves the collapse problem. BTW it isn't too late to add another comment there!

BTW, I think there should be an "honest density matrix" as a conceptual tool. It would show the distribution of possible wave functions directly. It wouldn't show the distribution of observable "outcomes" since the latter only happen because something supervenes to cause collapse. (No, not the other way around!)

Posted by: Neil B ♪ | June 14, 2009 8:50 PM

3

This Link is relevant and very interesting, about "Bang-bang decoupling used in quantum optics for the first time." Not the universe's "big bang" ;-)

Posted by: Neil B ♪ ♫ | June 14, 2009 10:04 PM

4

Dynamical Decoupling (DD) is a technique by which unwanted coupling of a qubit/qubit system to the environment can be effectively time-reversed using particular coherent control techniques. Bang-bang control is an example of a DD technique.

For another example I will shamelessly point interested people to

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v458/n7241/full/nature07951.html

Posted by: Michael J. Biercuk | June 15, 2009 10:22 AM

Comments have been closed as this blog has moved to http://dabacon.org/pontiff.
Click here to search for this post on the new blog.

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.