Now on ScienceBlogs: The Chicago Tribune: Telling it like it is about the antivaccine autism "biomed" movement

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

Profile

davidog.pngDave Bacon is a theoretical ski bum who is also a pseudo professor. His research is on quantum computing, his scientific passions extend to everything in physics, mathematics, computer science and beyond, and his personal pleasures include making wine, playing poker, skiing, camping, and daydreaming (although not all of those at the same time.) Nothing he says on this blog should be construed as having anything to do with his employer or his dog.


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Other Information

The use of Occam's razor on this website is strickly prohibited.

Cows are well approximated by a sphere.
rss.jpg   Subscribe to RSS feed

« Feynman Lectures Online - Thanks Bill! | Main | Solid State Quantum Job »

Backwards Archive

Category: Off The Deep EndPhysicsScienceScience 2.0
Posted on: July 16, 2009 2:38 PM, by Dave Bacon

Share:

Via @mattleiffer, viXra.org:

In part viXra.org is a parody of arXiv.org to highlight Cornell University's unacceptable censorship policy. It is also an experiment to see what kind of scientific work is being excluded by the arXiv. But most of all it is a serious and permanent e-print archive for scientific work. Unlike arXiv.org tt [sic] is truly open to scientists from all walks of life.
Maybe I should submit one of my papers with all of the text reversed (yeah, yeah, it would still be incomprehensible.)

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/115037

Comments

1

Can we make all the P=NP cranks send their papers there instead of to the arxiv? Please?

And to what category of this new repository should Towards the Simulation of E-commerce be submitted?

Posted by: D. Eppstein | July 16, 2009 4:11 PM

2

Dave, you quoted "unacceptable censorship policy", do you agree or to what extent? I've heard of all that, I recommend not just blowing it off. They've got "kids" in there, we hear, who can't really distinguish good but odd looking work, but pass odd but not so good work, or etc.

Posted by: Neil B ♪ | July 16, 2009 9:31 PM

3

Niel B: My personal opinion doesn't matter much, you know. If I say I think that all works should be allowed into the arxiv, then my colleagues will complain about letting cranks in the door. If I say I think that there should be a strong moderation policy, then those excluded will raise all hell. Hence I can, and will, blow it off, until one side convinces me that they have a winning hand. Neither side has done so, from my perspective.

Posted by: Dave Bacon | July 17, 2009 12:17 AM

4

Is it pure coincidence that the name of the new site looks a little bit like vi@Gr@ spam ?
(Of course the original name of the arxiv was a little bit misleading too...)

Posted by: wolfgang | July 17, 2009 6:06 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM