Now on ScienceBlogs: The Future - And Present - of Maternal and Infant Health Care.

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Uncertain Principles

Thoughts on physics, politics, and pop culture, by a physics professor at a small liberal arts college, plus occasional conversations with his dog.

Search

Profile

sidebar_relativity_cover.jpg

sm_cover_draft_atom.jpgYou've read the blog, now try the books! How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold. How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books and will be available 2/28/2012, as foretold by the Maya.

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Winner!

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« The ScienceBlogs Diet | Main | Final Four Preview »

New Neutrino Masses

Category: Physics
Posted on: March 31, 2006 10:02 AM, by Chad Orzel

If you'd like some, you know, physics from your physics blogs, here you go: Andrew Jaffe points out new results on neutrino oscillations from the MINOS group, providing new limits on the differences between the masses of different neutrino flavors. You can also read the Fermilab press release, which as a bonus contains some wonderful examples of stilted "quotes" constructed by cutting and pasting text from emails.

I've recently become sort of tangentially (very tangentially) involved in efforts to detect both neutrinos and dark matter, so I'm a lot more interested in these sorts of stories than I used to be. My knowledge of the details of how this stuff works is still pretty sketchy (in particular, I'm not sure whether they can use the mass difference they measure to determine an actual mass), so any explanation I could give would be almost indistinguishable from just telling you to go read Andrew's post. So, go read Andrew's post.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/3456

Comments

1

(in particular, I'm not sure whether they can use the mass difference they measure to determine an actual mass)

Since masses are positive, the lower bound on A - B gives a lower bound on A...

Posted by: Roman Werpachowski | March 31, 2006 10:53 AM

2

Chad-

Alas, the answer is that they can't measure individual masses. I've added some more info to my post...

-Andrew

Posted by: Andrew Jaffe | March 31, 2006 11:06 AM

3

There are some interesting cosmological bounds on the sum of the masses, however. I think these are in one of the new WMAP papers or another. I'm not sure how much they depend on the modelling of structure formation, however.

Posted by: Aaron Bergman | March 31, 2006 1:31 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.