Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

The miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Categories

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Archives

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« The ScienceBlogs Diet | Main | Final Four Preview »

New Neutrino Masses

Category: Physics
Posted on: March 31, 2006 10:02 AM, by Chad Orzel

If you'd like some, you know, physics from your physics blogs, here you go: Andrew Jaffe points out new results on neutrino oscillations from the MINOS group, providing new limits on the differences between the masses of different neutrino flavors. You can also read the Fermilab press release, which as a bonus contains some wonderful examples of stilted "quotes" constructed by cutting and pasting text from emails.

I've recently become sort of tangentially (very tangentially) involved in efforts to detect both neutrinos and dark matter, so I'm a lot more interested in these sorts of stories than I used to be. My knowledge of the details of how this stuff works is still pretty sketchy (in particular, I'm not sure whether they can use the mass difference they measure to determine an actual mass), so any explanation I could give would be almost indistinguishable from just telling you to go read Andrew's post. So, go read Andrew's post.

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Comments

# 1 | Roman Werpachowski | March 31, 2006 10:53 AM

(in particular, I'm not sure whether they can use the mass difference they measure to determine an actual mass)

Since masses are positive, the lower bound on A - B gives a lower bound on A...

# 2 | Andrew Jaffe | March 31, 2006 11:06 AM

Chad-

Alas, the answer is that they can't measure individual masses. I've added some more info to my post...

-Andrew

# 3 | Aaron Bergman | March 31, 2006 1:31 PM

There are some interesting cosmological bounds on the sum of the masses, however. I think these are in one of the new WMAP papers or another. I'm not sure how much they depend on the modelling of structure formation, however.

Post a Comment

(A valid email address is required, for authentication and spam-fighting purposes. Email addresses will not be published, sold, or mass-mailed. Some comments may be held for moderation. If your comment is rejected claiming you didn't provide an email address, delete the cookies in your web browser, and try posting again. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are working to fix the bug.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com