Now on ScienceBlogs: 'My work has been plagiarized. Now what?'

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Uncertain Principles

Physics, Politics, Pop Culture

Search

Profile

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

You've read the blog, now try the book: How to Teach Physics to Your Dog will be published December 22nd by Scribner.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« Deep Thoughts from Pop Culture II | Main | Mars and Venus in Grad School »

Tim Powers, Three Days to Never [Library of Babel]

Category: Booklog
Posted on: August 29, 2006 10:43 AM, by Chad Orzel

Tim Powers is one of those authors who has carved out a niche for himself telling a particular type of story, sort of like Guy Gavriel Kay with his pseudo-historical fantasy novels. In Powers's case, the niche might be summarized as "supernatural secret history." His best novels are set in something that's more or less the real world, but with a twist. There are ghosts and spirits and poorly-understood magic in the world, and famous scientists and inventors and politicians turn out to be deeply involved in the supernatural underground.

His latest, Three Days to Never fits right in with Declare and Last Call and Expiration Date and the rest. In this case, the supernatural conceit is that Albert Einstein invented a way to travel through time in 1928. Sixty years later (more or less), a literature professor in California finds himself caught up in a struggle between the Mossad and a more sinister secret society, both of whom want Einstein's discovery, and are willing to kill to get it.

So, as I said to Kate, it's pretty much a Tim Powers novel. In addition to Einstein, Charlie Chaplin turns out to have played a key role in making the machine work, so you've even got the quirky and unexpected celebrity cameo. There are some lovely little character touches, too, such as the Mossad agent who keeps getting premonitions that he'll never again experience various things-- never swim in the ocean, never hear a telephone ring. If you like his other stuff, this one has most of the same features.

I had a problem with this book for an unusual reason: it ran afoul of my knowledge of physics. I'm usually pretty forgiving about daft fictional physics, but there's a bit late in the book where one of the characters provides a technobabble explanation of how the time travel phenomenon works, and it's absolute garbage. I can't even come up with a good way to retcon it as a misunderstanding by the characters or something like that. It's essential to the plot, and it absolutely butchers General Relativity.

As I said, that's somewhat unusual for me, and if you're not normally bothered by that sort of thing, well, it might not bother you here. Other than the technobabble meltdown, it's a pretty good book, though. It's no Last Call, but if you're in the right mood for a Powers novel, it'll get the job done.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/19978

Comments

1

Duuude! I love Tim Powers novels. Glad to hear he has a new one out!

Posted by: afarensis | August 29, 2006 11:09 AM

2

Getting the general "feel" right but a lot of the actual details wrong is a Powers trademark, although it's usually historians rather than physicists who are cringing. Not that I don't enjoy his books anyway.

My favourite example is from On Stranger Tides, where a significant plot point depends on the hero and villain both being familiar with a famous quotation ... from a book that won't be written for nearly 200 years.

Posted by: Ross Smith | August 29, 2006 6:07 PM

3

I find that I like the earlier Powers novels better than the later ones - Last Call is where I see the dividing line. I didn't care for Expiration Date and Declare all that much, having never really re-read them, and I've never read Earthquake Weather at all.

I'd be interested in hearing opinions on this latest book from people with a similar classification scheme. I'm still trying to work out just why his novels break down like this for me. It's hard to untangle their objective features from subjective ones (such as the order in which I encountered them).

Posted by: Derek Lowe | August 30, 2006 11:10 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM