Now on ScienceBlogs: Telegraph: blame the rape victims - science says you can! [bioephemera]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Uncertain Principles

Physics, Politics, Pop Culture

Search

Profile

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

You've read the blog, now try the book: How to Teach Physics to Your Dog will be published December 22nd by Scribner.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« Cover Songs That Shouldn't Be | Main | Christopher Moore, You Suck [Library of Babel] »

Bunnies Made of Cheese

Category: PhysicsPhysics with EmmySilliness
Posted on: January 27, 2007 9:58 AM, by Chad Orzel

sm_bunnies_cheese.jpgThe dog is standing at the window, wagging her tail excitedly. I look outside, and the back yard is empty. "What are you looking at?" I ask.

"Bunnies made of cheese!," she says. I look again, and the yard is still empty.

"There are no bunnies out there," I say, "and there are certainly not any bunnies made of cheese. The back yard is empty."

"But particles are created out of empty space all the time, right?"

"Have you been reading my quantum physics books again?"

"It's boring here when you're not home. Anyway, answer the question."

"Well, yes, in a sense. They're called 'virtual particles,' and the zero-point energy of the vacuum can occasionally manifest as particle-anti-particle pairs."

"See?" she says, wagging her tail harder, "Bunnies made of cheese!"

"I'm not sure how that helps you," I say. "The virtual particles that are created from vacuum fluctiations have to annihiliate in a very short time, in order to satisfy the energy-time uncertainty relationship. A virtual electron-positron pair lasts something like 10-20 seconds before it disappears. They're not real particles."

"But they can become real, right?" She looks a little concerned. "I mean, what about Hawking radiation?"

"Well, yeah, in a sense. The idea is that a virtual pair created near the event horizon of a black hole can have one of its members sucked into the black hole, at which point, the other particle zips off and becomes real. The energy to account for the mass has to come from somewhere, so the black hole loses a tiny bit of mass."

The tail-wagging picks back up. "Bunnies made of cheese!"

"What?"

She gives an exasperated sigh. "Look, virtual particles are created all the time, right? Including in our back yard?"

"Yes, that's right."

"Including bunnies, yes?"

"Well, technically, it would have to be a bunny-anti-bunny pair..."

"And these bunnies, they could be made of cheese."

"It's not very likely, but I suppose in a Max Tegmark sort of 'everything possible must exist' kind of universe, then yes, there's a possibility that a bunny-anti-bunny pair made of cheese (and anti-cheese) might be created in the back yard, but..."

"And if I eat one, the other becomes real." She's wagging her tail so hard that her whole rear end is shaking.

"Yeah, but they wouldn't last very long before they annihiliated..."

"I'm very fast."

"Given the mass of a bunny, they'd only last 10-34 seconds. If that."

"In that case, you'd better let me outside. So I can catch the bunnies made of cheese."

I sigh. "If you wanted to go outside, why didn't you just say that?"

"What sort of blog post would that be? Anyway, bunnies made of cheese!"

I look out the window again. "I still don't see any bunnies, but there is a squirrel by the bird feeder."

"Ooooo! Squirrels!" I open the door, and she goes charging outside, in the wrong direction.

She's a very silly dog.

(Update 5/15/07: After another dog post got Digged, the folks at CNET's "Buzz Out Loud" podcast did a dramatic reading of this entry. I don't see a way to permalink individual episodes, but it's the May 11, 2007 podcast, and at least at the time of this writing this is a direct link to the MP3. It's way at the end of the show, and I'm inordinately amused by this. Of course, the dog think it's only her due...)

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/31661

Comments

1

This post brought to you by Rabbit Hole Day...

Posted by: Chad Orzel | January 27, 2007 10:02 AM

2

That's absolutely hysterical! What a great, simple, engaging presentation of a bit of science most people don't understand—or even know about. Bravo!

Posted by: jason | January 27, 2007 10:49 AM

3

Great stuff.

Also, thank you for the warning. I'll have to make sure our dog doesn't get into my microbiology books - who knows what'll happen if she notices Lourens Bass-Becking's comment about "Everything is Everywhere"...

Posted by: SMC | January 27, 2007 12:57 PM

4

Delightful and enlightening. Thank you, Chad.

I am surprised however that Emmy didn't bring up the absolute proof of the existence of bunnies made of cheese -- Welsh Rabbit. ;-)

Posted by: chezjake | January 27, 2007 1:38 PM

5

That was hilarious!

Posted by: Ed Martz | January 29, 2007 9:29 AM

6

What a wonderful, engaging article. I've bookmarked it as an example of popular science done right (not to mention forwarded it to all my dog-loving friends :)).

Posted by: Martin DeMello | January 29, 2007 2:55 PM

7

Yes but what KIND of cheese were the bunnies made of?? It seems to me that some kinds of cheese bunnies would be more likely than others... in the grand scheme of cheese bunnies... you know...

Posted by: kt | February 3, 2007 10:10 PM

8

(\__/)
(+',')
(")_(")

Posted by: Josh | February 14, 2007 5:33 PM

9

No discussion regarding bunnies made of cheese would be complete without a link to the following story:

The Velveeta Rabbit

Highly recommended to read aloud to friends.

Posted by: Deef | May 10, 2007 11:29 PM

10

Hello Dog, my name is Cheese (yes really) and I'm a greyhound. Sometimes I catch bunnies, not very often I grant you mainly because my stupid humans don't like it and stop me given the chance. Anyway, on the basis of "you are what you eat" I suggest that although bunnies made of cheese are a dubious idea, Cheese made of bunnies actually does exist.

Licks and buttsniffs.

Cheese.

Posted by: Tom and Cheese | May 11, 2007 12:31 PM

11

Hello Dog, my name is Cheese (yes really) and I'm a greyhound. Sometimes I catch bunnies, not very often I grant you (mainly because my stupid humans don't like it and stop me given the chance). Anyway, on the basis of "you are what you eat" I suggest that although bunnies made of cheese are a dubious idea, Cheese made of bunnies actually does exist.

Licks and buttsniffs.

Cheese.

Posted by: Tom and Cheese | May 11, 2007 12:34 PM

12

I've always understood Hawkings radiation as an anti-virtual-particle entering the black hole's event horizon, while the "positive" particle escapes into the universe. The black hole would then be reduced by the anti-particle.

What's confusing is that, given that these virtual particle pairs appear randomluy, wouldn't it work out to about 50% of the time where the positive particle enters the black hole and the anti-particle escapes? That is, wouldn't it work out that the mass of a black hole remains constant? (You would still have radiation, it just wouldn't reduce the black hole's mass because it would consist of a roughly equal amount of particles and anti-particles.)

I'm pretty sure my understanding of this process has a hole somewhere...

Posted by: Shalev | May 20, 2007 3:47 AM

13

What's confusing is that, given that these virtual particle pairs appear randomluy, wouldn't it work out to about 50% of the time where the positive particle enters the black hole and the anti-particle escapes? That is, wouldn't it work out that the mass of a black hole remains constant?

The mistake you're making is in assuming that anti-particles have negative mass. In fact, both particles and anti-particles have positive mass, so whichever one escapes being eaten by the black hole increases the total mass of the larger universe. That mass increase has to come from somewhere, because energy needs to be conserved on longer time scales, and the mass of the black hole is reduced as a result.

Posted by: Chad Orzel | May 20, 2007 6:51 AM

14

Ahh, well there goes the intuitive reason then. Who'd have thought that a black hole gaining a particle would actually reduce it by the mass of two particles?

Strange world, ain't it?

Posted by: Shalev | May 20, 2007 2:31 PM

15

Hi, as soon as I saw the link (below) I remembered this post. I think maybe this advertising company reads your blog? Bunnies of cheese indeed ...

http://www.scaryideas.com/print/2592/

Posted by: Luke | May 29, 2007 8:40 PM

16

The Buzz Out Loud CNET Podcast hosts are off doing holiday stuff today (7/3/2009) and they did a hilarious mashup using their past episodes. The dramatic reading of this was included, which is how I found this entry. You made me laugh, cry, and look confused at the same time. =) Love the post!

Posted by: Sprite | July 3, 2009 5:36 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement

Science News from NYTimes.com »

Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM