Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Uncertain Principles

Thoughts on physics, politics, and pop culture, by a physics professor at a small liberal arts college, plus occasional conversations with his dog.

Search

Profile

sidebar_relativity_cover.jpg

sm_cover_draft_atom.jpgYou've read the blog, now try the books! How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold. How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books and will be available 2/28/2012, as foretold by the Maya.

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Winner!

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« Dorky Poll: Presidential Questions | Main | Why Cesium? »

Laws of Discourse?

Category: Politics
Posted on: May 9, 2007 10:19 AM, by Chad Orzel

Two more quick observations from last night's Wesley Clark event. Or, rather, one from the event, and one from dinner beforehand. Both strike me as fairly general principles about political discourse:

1) Your current political opinions are interesting in inverse proportion to the number of times you use the word "fascist" or variants thereof. Likewise "communist" and variants thereof.

2) A colleague observed at dinner that a really remarkable number of problems are, at their base, due to people failing to understand irony or metaphor. Or, in his more colorful phrasing, "People who can't handle the metaphorical use of language are completely fucked."

Of course, an interesting question would be whether these two principles are in conflict...

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/40145

Comments

1

Both of those are wonderful quotes. I think the two principles actually work in conjunction.

Posted by: rev_matt_y | May 9, 2007 10:58 AM

2

Of course, those described so aptly by point (2), who cannot handle the metaphorical use of language may be quite happy. If they happen to be dying for sex, then the notion that they are "completely fucked" (while in reality metaphorical) has suddenly become a blissful. This is proof that "ignorance is bliss" (though I'm not quite sure what the latter phrase itself would mean to someone who is metaphorically challenged).


Posted by: A | May 9, 2007 12:20 PM

3

Oops. "become a blissful" is supposed to be "become blissful", or something similar...

Posted by: A | May 9, 2007 12:22 PM

4

A, that's not a metaphor, that's a pun.

Posted by: Coin | May 9, 2007 2:41 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.