A comment I made at a meeting yesterday that I think is worth reproducing out of context:
A big part of making it from junior faculty to tenure is deciding which bits of unsolicited contradictory advice you’re going to ignore.
P.O. Box 98199
Washington, DC 20090-8199
800-647-5463
Lat/Lon: 38.90531943278526, -77.0376992225647
A comment I made at a meeting yesterday that I think is worth reproducing out of context:
A big part of making it from junior faculty to tenure is deciding which bits of unsolicited contradictory advice you’re going to ignore.
Even though I didn’t make it all the way, I figured that one out pretty quickly. It was bloody obvious in my case. My first year at Vanderbilt, several faculty members pulled me aside to talk to me about the department and my future, and it was clear that they viewed me as a political football who might be useful in advancing their own agendae. This was the year when my department was a huge, dysfunctional mess, mind you.
Even before I arrived at Vanderbilt, I had one astronomer telling me that what I did– you know, that stuff that just got that Gruber prize thing– was the “worst sort of astronomy,” and he asked me if I would do any “rigorous” science if I came to Vanderbilt.
-Rob
A comment I heard after getting tenure was that I had ignored ALL the advice given to me by senior colleagues from P&T during the pre-tenure phase.
I think that is accurate, in terms of research direction and priority of efforts, and my strategy for applying for funding.
My graduate advisor’s wife spelled out faculty hiring to me once: “To you, it’s a job. To them, it’s politics.”
You've read the blog, now try the books:
How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books. "“Unlike quantum physics, which remains bizarre even to experts, much of relativity makes sense. Thus, Einstein’s special relativity merely states that the laws of physics and the speed of light are identical for all observers in smooth motion. This sounds trivial but leads to weird if delightfully comprehensible phenomena, provided someone like Orzel delivers a clear explanation of why.” --Kirkus Reviews "Bravo to both man and dog." The New York Times.
How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner. "It's hard to imagine a better way for the mathematically and scientifically challenged, in particular, to grasp basic quantum physics." -- Booklist "Chad Orzel's How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is an absolutely delightful book on many axes: first, its subject matter, quantum physics, is arguably the most mind-bending scientific subject we have; second, the device of the book -- a quantum physicist, Orzel, explains quantum physics to Emmy, his cheeky German shepherd -- is a hoot, and has the singular advantage of making the mind-bending a little less traumatic when the going gets tough (quantum physics has a certain irreducible complexity that precludes an easy understanding of its implications); finally, third, it is extremely well-written, combining a scientist's rigor and accuracy with a natural raconteur's storytelling skill." -- BoingBoing