Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Uncertain Principles

Thoughts on physics, politics, and pop culture, by a physics professor at a small liberal arts college, plus occasional conversations with his dog.

Search

Profile

sidebar_relativity_cover.jpg

sm_cover_draft_atom.jpgYou've read the blog, now try the books! How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold. How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books and will be available 2/28/2012, as foretold by the Maya.

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Winner!

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« Identity and Exclusion | Main | Peer-Reviewed Blogging »

links for 2008-01-23

Category: Links Dump
Posted on: January 23, 2008 4:24 AM, by Chad Orzel

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/62070

Comments

1

Most Diversity Training Ineffective, Study Finds

I don't quite follow the logic there:

1) The goal of typical diversity programs is to insulate against lawsuits while providing employment for diversity trainers. Presumably they are cost-effective in this.

2) They are ineffective, as measured by counting heads.

3) Instead, voluntary programs emphasizing business benefits should be used.

4) Those are effective, as measured by counting heads.

So, programs that accomplish the desired result, A, are bad because they don't accomplish B. Instead, people should be told that a different program will accomplish C, not because its proponents know or care whether that's true, but because saying so does accomplish B!

It may not sound like it, but I'm largely in sympathy with Alexandra Kalev and company, certainly as compared to the alternative. But an honest discussion about these issues seems as alien to them as it is to their rivals.

Posted by: JSinger | January 23, 2008 11:16 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.