Lest you think that people in the US are uniquely alarmist about threats to Chiiiiillllllldrruuuun, a picture from last summer’s trip to Japan:

I have absolutely no idea what that says, but it sure is lurid.
P.O. Box 98199
Washington, DC 20090-8199
800-647-5463
Lat/Lon: 38.90531943278526, -77.0376992225647
Lest you think that people in the US are uniquely alarmist about threats to Chiiiiillllllldrruuuun, a picture from last summer’s trip to Japan:

I have absolutely no idea what that says, but it sure is lurid.
Not that it really matters, but:
“Not allowed! Suspicious people, Degenerates!!”
Then (from right to left, and becoming very awkward for a straight translation):
“Community, look after the community children!!”
The small red text on the left:
“We are looking after the community children. Criminals are not allowed!!”
The bottom text seems to suggest this is a neighbourhood watch kind of poster, aimed at the residents. Pretty overwrought. Could I guess this was in a fairly rural or semi-rural area? It has that small-town claustrophobic feeling to it.
No, it was in Kyoto, on a back street somewhere between Ginkakuji and Marutamachi-dori.
Oh yes–thanks for the translation. Sorry I forgot to say that earlier.
Well, if you’d ask my wife who is from nearby Osaka she’d think describing Kyoto as a claustrophobic small town would be perfectly appropriate. :)
But yes, it has the feeling of a very local (and rather amateurish – look at the illustration) thing; a neighbourhood watch on that block or something like it.
Apparently you were about to enter a dungeon from the original Legend of Zelda on NES
I love Japanese signage. :) I saw a very similar sign once in a residential district maybe 20 minutes out of Tokyo. However the sign that I saw had a Spy vs. Spy lookalike kidnapping a boy and girl, not a giant devil hand.
Didn’t take a picture of that one, but I do have a couple pictures of something that’s apparently “this water will eat your children”:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/colinmcmillen/491494925/in/set-72157600198141998/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/colinmcmillen/491675694/in/set-72157600198141998/
I love Japanese signage. :) I saw a very similar sign once in a residential district maybe 20 minutes out of Tokyo. However the sign that I saw had a Spy vs. Spy lookalike kidnapping a boy and girl, not a giant devil hand.
Didn’t take a picture of that one, but I do have a couple pictures of something that’s apparently “this water will eat your children”:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/colinmcmillen/491494925/in/set-72157600198141998/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/colinmcmillen/491675694/in/set-72157600198141998/
Doh, sorry for double post. The first attempt gave me a “500 Internal Server Error” message, so I tried again. Apparently I didn’t need to.
I love that poster! Japan has the best signs.
You've read the blog, now try the books:
How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books. "“Unlike quantum physics, which remains bizarre even to experts, much of relativity makes sense. Thus, Einstein’s special relativity merely states that the laws of physics and the speed of light are identical for all observers in smooth motion. This sounds trivial but leads to weird if delightfully comprehensible phenomena, provided someone like Orzel delivers a clear explanation of why.” --Kirkus Reviews "Bravo to both man and dog." The New York Times.
How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner. "It's hard to imagine a better way for the mathematically and scientifically challenged, in particular, to grasp basic quantum physics." -- Booklist "Chad Orzel's How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is an absolutely delightful book on many axes: first, its subject matter, quantum physics, is arguably the most mind-bending scientific subject we have; second, the device of the book -- a quantum physicist, Orzel, explains quantum physics to Emmy, his cheeky German shepherd -- is a hoot, and has the singular advantage of making the mind-bending a little less traumatic when the going gets tough (quantum physics has a certain irreducible complexity that precludes an easy understanding of its implications); finally, third, it is extremely well-written, combining a scientist's rigor and accuracy with a natural raconteur's storytelling skill." -- BoingBoing