Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

The miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Categories

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Archives

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Non-Dorky Poll: The Creepiest Song in the World | Main | Assume a Spherical FutureBaby... »

If You Look Closely, You Can Make Out the Jet Pack

Category: FutureBaby!
Posted on: May 20, 2008 10:59 AM, by Chad Orzel

sm_30wk3.jpg

I think it's the bright thing right in the middle of this ultrasound image. Because, of course, in the Future we'll all have personal jet packs, even the babies...

A somewhat more recognizable picture:

sm_30wk2.jpg

That's a profile shot of FutureBaby's head. The other is a wider shot, showing some of the body. These are even less baby-like than the last set, because FutureBaby is now large enough to extend past the field of view of the ultrasound gizmo.

Estimated weight at the moment is 4lbs, which is a little big for 30 weeks. It's a little scary to think that FutureBaby will almost double in mass between now and the delivery date...

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Comments

# 1 | Jake B | May 20, 2008 11:19 AM

I have to admit the favorite ultrasound of my child was one of the early ones where my daughter was looking directly at the receiver. Her nickname, at least between the wife and I, was skull baby. Once her pictures stopped looking like Skeletor that is.

# 2 | Melissa | May 20, 2008 12:06 PM

A little big for 30 weeks, eh?? I wonder where FutureBaby gets THAT from!! ;)

# 3 | Wilson Fowlie | May 20, 2008 1:12 PM

I like that you used the word 'gizmo'.

# 4 | Kate Nepveu | May 20, 2008 1:31 PM

4lbs, which is a little big for 30 weeks

For values of "a little" equal to about 25% over the average . . .

Also, three different people have looked at the second picture by itself and thought the nose was actually a foot, after being told it was a head shot. Here I thought it was the *most* recognizable of the pictures . . .

# 5 | Uncle Al | May 20, 2008 2:23 PM

The Book of Mormon (C)19663, David O McKay, illustrated

Color plate facing page 397. Jet pack! How many daughters-in-law do you consider to be the optimal allocation?

# 6 | Monado, FCD | May 21, 2008 4:06 PM

The first one looks like a goat and a sheep. Is this "Mary had a little lamb?" The second one looks like a baby's head.

A little large, huh? How's mom's sugar metabolism? (I do remember feeling something like a time bomb...)

# 7 | Kate Nepveu | May 21, 2008 4:12 PM

Kate's glucose tolerance test was normal.

(While Kate does not normally speak of herself in the third person, she likes to emphasize that she does still have an actual name.)

Post a Comment

(A valid email address is required, for authentication and spam-fighting purposes. Email addresses will not be published, sold, or mass-mailed. Some comments may be held for moderation. If your comment is rejected claiming you didn't provide an email address, delete the cookies in your web browser, and try posting again. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are working to fix the bug.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com