-
"Pais also reports a distinguished younger colleague asking with puzzlement and scepticism "What did Bohr really do?"."
-
"But are the public and other scientists entitled to know about discoveries like this as soon as possible? Or is it right that research is embargoed, so that all journalists have an equal chance to report on it accurately?"
Search this blog
Profile
"Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)
The miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.
Recent Posts
- At the Kitchen Table: An Ad in One Act
- If You Were a Republican...
- links for 2008-09-04
- Baby Soothing Open Thread
- Find a Pattern
- links for 2008-09-03
- Colbert, Atheists, and Hermaphrodites
- "Quantum Mechanics Is Magic": The Making of "Spin polarization and quantum statistical effects in ultracold ionizing collisions"
- Spin polarization and quantum statistical effects in ultracold ionizing collisions
- Trying to Be Better Than That
Recent Comments
- Neil B on At the Kitchen Table: An Ad in One Act
- Kaleberg on At the Kitchen Table: An Ad in One Act
- Rebecca on At the Kitchen Table: An Ad in One Act
- Bob Hawkins on If You Were a Republican...
- Wade Walker on At the Kitchen Table: An Ad in One Act
- Art on At the Kitchen Table: An Ad in One Act
- Trent on Baby Soothing Open Thread
- Tom on Find a Pattern
- Neil B on At the Kitchen Table: An Ad in One Act
- Neil B on At the Kitchen Table: An Ad in One Act
Greatest Hits
- What's With the Name?
- A Week in the Lab
- Domestic Security: A Dialogue
- "Perfect Albums"
- Poetry for Physicists
- Top Eleven: The Greatest Physics Experiment Ever
- How to Tell a True Lab Story
- Bunnies Made of Cheese
- Many Worlds, Many Treats
Chateau Steelypips
- Older Uncertain Principles
- The Library of Babel
- Japan Stories
- Outside of a Dog
- Kate Nepveu's LiveJournal
- Steelypips Main Page
- Chad's photosets on Flickr
- Chad's bookmarks on del.icio.us
Categories
- Academia
- Basic Concepts
- Biking
- Blogs
- Book Writing
- Booklog
- Dog
- Education
- Food
- Guest Bloggers
- Links Dump
- Maintenance
- Math
- News
- Personal
- Physics
- Pictures
- Politics
- Pop Culture
- SF
- Science
- Silliness
- Society
- Sports
- Technology
- War On Science
Blogroll
Scientists
- Mixed States
- Angry Physics
- Arcane Gazebo
- Backreaction
- bento-box
- BioCurious
- Cocktail Party Physics
- Cosmic Variance
- Entropy Bound
- Female Science Professor
- Horganism
- In the Pipeline
- Life as a Physicist
- Musings
- Nanoscale Views
- Michael Nielsen
- nOnoscience
- Not Even Wrong
- Not Exactly Rocket Science
- A Quantum Diaries Survivor
- Quantum Pontiff
- The Scientific Curmudgeon
- SciTech Daily
- Shtetl-Optimized
- Tales from the Learning Curve
- View From the Corner
- What's New
Academics
- Acephalous
- Chronicles of Dr. Crazy
- Confessions of a Community College Dean
- Crooked Timber
- Brad DeLong
- Easily Distracted
- Knowing and Doing
- Learning Curves
- The Little Professor
- Musical Perceptions
- Notional Slurry
- Pub Sociology
- Word Munger
- What Now?
- Yes, YelloCello
Interesting People
- Boing Boing
- Diary de la Vex
- Fafblog!
- Izzle Pfaff
- Making Light
- Open Reading Frame
- Republic of T.
- See You at Enceladus
- Snarkout
- Unmistakable Marks
- Whatever
Books
- Book Slut
- Tobias Buckell
- The Humblest Blog
- The Library of Babel
- Outside of a Dog
- Weasel Words
- Westerblog
Punditry
- Balkinization
- Grim Amusements
- Newsrack
- Off the Kuff
- Political Animal
- The Poor Man
- The Reality-Based Community
- Slacktivist
- Talking Points Memo
- Through the Looking Glass
- Unqualified Offerings
- Matthew Yglesias
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Non-Dorky Poll: Fake News | Main | links for 2008-05-04 »
links for 2008-05-03
Category: Links Dump
Posted on: May 3, 2008 5:36 AM, by Chad Orzel
TrackBacks
(TrackBack URL for this entry: )
Comments
# 1 | CCPhysicist | May 3, 2008 12:05 PM
What did Bohr really do? Indeed. That might be a good lead for a general studies class or a week un-learning common misconceptions about QM based on the language derived from the Bohr model (saying orbits instead of orbitals, or any mention of a quantum jump between energy levels). Unless your chemistry faculty were really careful (having learned something about the Wigner-Eckart theorem in pChem class), your students could come in with as many misconceptions about QM as they might have about motion.
Epistemology:
Bohr came up with a model (one I like to call proto-QM because it is entirely unrelated to actual QM) that got one answer correct and just about every other answer wrong. This can be extremely stimulating to experimental physicists, who get quite bored spending a G$ to measure the width of the Z only to establish that the number of leptons is 3 to three or more sig figs. That model, or more importantly its many flaws, revived spectroscopy ... which continues to this day in what you do.
My main complaint about the article is the statement about "soon superseded". More than a decade of struggle, albeit with a World War in the middle, is not "soon". Just look at all that Bohr and Sommerfeld did to try to make it work. (Relativistic elliptical orbits!) The flash of insight that Heisenberg had could only come when you are so frustrated with the problems that you finally decide that everything you know is wrong.
Bringing Heisenberg to tears was probably the incident where Bohr might have made his greatest contribution. If you have never looked at the Uncertainty (unfocused) Principle paper, dig it up (or look in Cassidy's book) and read the note added in proof. Heisenberg had made a major, elementary physics error in proposing a "microscope" analogy (one that is still made today). Bohr saw it in a preprint and Heisenberg fixed it just before publication. (The referee and/or editor must not have noticed it.) That key idea might have been lost if Bohr had taken a different tack.
That would be a prime example of how his insistence on an "integrity of thought" helped improve the clarity of what QM was all about.