-
"Pais also reports a distinguished younger colleague asking with puzzlement and scepticism "What did Bohr really do?"."
-
"But are the public and other scientists entitled to know about discoveries like this as soon as possible? Or is it right that research is embargoed, so that all journalists have an equal chance to report on it accurately?"
Uncertain Principles
Thoughts on physics, politics, and pop culture, by a physics professor at a small liberal arts college, plus occasional conversations with his dog.
Search
Profile
You've read the blog, now try the books! How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold. How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books and will be available 2/28/2012, as foretold by the Maya.
"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.
"Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)
Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.
Recent Posts
- How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog Photoshop Contest Results
- Upcoming Appearances: Boskone
- Links for 2012-02-13
- Syncretic Pre-Schooler Blogging
- Links for 2012-02-11
- Language and Statistics Poll: Define "Vast"
- Links for 2012-02-10
- Random Note That Wouldn't Bother Normal People
- Links for 2011-02-09
- Course Report: A Brief History of Timekeeping 04
Recent Comments
- Tristan on How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog Photoshop Contest Results
- Andrew on How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog Photoshop Contest Results
- SPratapsi on How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog Photoshop Contest Results
- Chad Orzel on Upcoming Appearances: Boskone
- Edi on Upcoming Appearances: Boskone
- HP on Upcoming Appearances: Boskone
- anon on Syncretic Pre-Schooler Blogging
- Michael Kelsey on Syncretic Pre-Schooler Blogging
- Kate Nepveu on Syncretic Pre-Schooler Blogging
- reesei on Syncretic Pre-Schooler Blogging
Greatest Hits
- What's With the Name?
- A Week in the Lab
- Domestic Security: A Dialogue
- "Perfect Albums"
- Poetry for Physicists
- Top Eleven: The Greatest Physics Experiment Ever
- How to Tell a True Lab Story
- Bunnies Made of Cheese
- Many Worlds, Many Treats
- What Everyone should Know About Science
- The Innumeracy of Intellectuals
- We Are Science
- Science Is What Makes Us Human
- This Is My Job
Chateau Steelypips
- How to Teach Physics to Your Dog
- Older Uncertain Principles
- The Library of Babel
- Japan Stories
- Outside of a Dog
- Kate Nepveu's LiveJournal
- Steelypips Main Page
- Chad's photosets on Flickr
- Chad's bookmarks on del.icio.us
- Chad on Twitter
- Emmy on Twitter
Blogroll
Scientists
- Mixed States
- Angry Physics
- Arcane Gazebo
- Backreaction
- bento-box
- BioCurious
- Cocktail Party Physics
- Cosmic Variance
- Entropy Bound
- Female Science Professor
- Horganism
- In the Pipeline
- Life as a Physicist
- Musings
- Nanoscale Views
- Michael Nielsen
- nOnoscience
- Not Even Wrong
- Not Exactly Rocket Science
- A Quantum Diaries Survivor
- Quantum Pontiff
- The Scientific Curmudgeon
- SciTech Daily
- Shtetl-Optimized
- Tales from the Learning Curve
- View From the Corner
- What's New
Academics
- Acephalous
- Chronicles of Dr. Crazy
- Confessions of a Community College Dean
- Crooked Timber
- Brad DeLong
- Easily Distracted
- Knowing and Doing
- Learning Curves
- The Little Professor
- Musical Perceptions
- Notional Slurry
- Pub Sociology
- Word Munger
- What Now?
- Yes, YelloCello
Interesting People
- Boing Boing
- Diary de la Vex
- Fafblog!
- Izzle Pfaff
- Making Light
- Open Reading Frame
- Paw Talk
- Republic of T.
- See You at Enceladus
- Snarkout
- Unmistakable Marks
- Whatever
Books
- Book Slut
- Tobias Buckell
- The Humblest Blog
- The Library of Babel
- Outside of a Dog
- Weasel Words
- Westerblog
Punditry
- Balkinization
- Grim Amusements
- Newsrack
- Off the Kuff
- Political Animal
- The Poor Man
- The Reality-Based Community
- Slacktivist
- Talking Points Memo
- Through the Looking Glass
- Unqualified Offerings
- Matthew Yglesias
Categories
- Academia
- Add category
- Basic Concepts
- Biking
- Blogs
- Book Writing
- Booklog
- Charity
- Conferences
- Culture
- Data Presentation
- Dog
- Education
- Food
- Guest Bloggers
- Humanities
- Jobs
- Journalism
- Links Dump
- Maintenance
- Math
- News
- Personal
- Physics
- Advent
- Atoms and Molecules
- Condensed Matter
- Course Reports
- Everyday
- Experiment
- Funding
- How-to-Teach
- Lab Stories
- Laser Smackdown
- Lasers
- MXP
- Meetings
- My Lab
- Optics
- Physics Books
- Physics with Emmy
- Precision Measurement
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Optics
- Relativity
- String Theory
- Theory
- Thermo/StatMech
- Time
- Pictures
- Politics
- Polls
- Pop Culture
- ResearchBlogging
- SF
- Science
- Science Writing
- Silliness
- Social-Science
- Society
- Sports
- Technology
- Travel
- Video
- War On Science
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
« Non-Dorky Poll: Fake News | Main | links for 2008-05-04 »
links for 2008-05-03
Category: Links Dump
Posted on: May 3, 2008 5:36 AM, by Chad Orzel
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/71023
Comments
What did Bohr really do? Indeed. That might be a good lead for a general studies class or a week un-learning common misconceptions about QM based on the language derived from the Bohr model (saying orbits instead of orbitals, or any mention of a quantum jump between energy levels). Unless your chemistry faculty were really careful (having learned something about the Wigner-Eckart theorem in pChem class), your students could come in with as many misconceptions about QM as they might have about motion.
Epistemology:
Bohr came up with a model (one I like to call proto-QM because it is entirely unrelated to actual QM) that got one answer correct and just about every other answer wrong. This can be extremely stimulating to experimental physicists, who get quite bored spending a G$ to measure the width of the Z only to establish that the number of leptons is 3 to three or more sig figs. That model, or more importantly its many flaws, revived spectroscopy ... which continues to this day in what you do.
My main complaint about the article is the statement about "soon superseded". More than a decade of struggle, albeit with a World War in the middle, is not "soon". Just look at all that Bohr and Sommerfeld did to try to make it work. (Relativistic elliptical orbits!) The flash of insight that Heisenberg had could only come when you are so frustrated with the problems that you finally decide that everything you know is wrong.
Bringing Heisenberg to tears was probably the incident where Bohr might have made his greatest contribution. If you have never looked at the Uncertainty (unfocused) Principle paper, dig it up (or look in Cassidy's book) and read the note added in proof. Heisenberg had made a major, elementary physics error in proposing a "microscope" analogy (one that is still made today). Bohr saw it in a preprint and Heisenberg fixed it just before publication. (The referee and/or editor must not have noticed it.) That key idea might have been lost if Bohr had taken a different tack.
That would be a prime example of how his insistence on an "integrity of thought" helped improve the clarity of what QM was all about.
Posted by: CCPhysicist | May 3, 2008 12:05 PM