Quantum quantum quantum, quantum quantum. Quantum.
Search this blog
Profile
"Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)
The miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.
Recent Posts
- Scooped; or, The Making of "Suppression and Enhancement of Collisions in Optical Lattices"
- Suppression and Enhancement of Collisions in Optical Lattices
- Thursday Baby Blogging 082108
- Modest Proposals Regarding Underage Drinking
- links for 2008-08-21
- Make the Right Claims
- Security Theater
- In Defense of Short Papers
- The Relevance of Relevance
- links for 2008-08-20
Recent Comments
- carl on Olympic Comments
- Madhusudan Natarajan on In Defense of Short Papers
- cisko on Suppression and Enhancement of Collisions in Optical Lattices
- capella on Thursday Baby Blogging 082108
- AndyB on Modest Proposals Regarding Underage Drinking
- Chad Orzel on Scooped; or, The Making of "Suppression and Enhancement of Collisions in Optical Lattices"
- gg on Scooped; or, The Making of "Suppression and Enhancement of Collisions in Optical Lattices"
- jo in okc on Thursday Baby Blogging 082108
- Evan on Thursday Baby Blogging 082108
- Kate Nepveu on Modest Proposals Regarding Underage Drinking
Greatest Hits
- What's With the Name?
- A Week in the Lab
- Domestic Security: A Dialogue
- "Perfect Albums"
- Poetry for Physicists
- Top Eleven: The Greatest Physics Experiment Ever
- How to Tell a True Lab Story
- Bunnies Made of Cheese
- Many Worlds, Many Treats
Chateau Steelypips
- Older Uncertain Principles
- The Library of Babel
- Japan Stories
- Outside of a Dog
- Kate Nepveu's LiveJournal
- Steelypips Main Page
- Chad's photosets on Flickr
- Chad's bookmarks on del.icio.us
Categories
- Academia
- Basic Concepts
- Biking
- Blogs
- Book Writing
- Booklog
- Dog
- Education
- Food
- Guest Bloggers
- Links Dump
- Maintenance
- Math
- News
- Personal
- Physics
- Pictures
- Politics
- Pop Culture
- SF
- Science
- Silliness
- Society
- Sports
- Technology
- War On Science
Blogroll
Scientists
- Mixed States
- Angry Physics
- Arcane Gazebo
- Backreaction
- bento-box
- BioCurious
- Cocktail Party Physics
- Cosmic Variance
- Entropy Bound
- Female Science Professor
- Horganism
- In the Pipeline
- Life as a Physicist
- Musings
- Nanoscale Views
- Michael Nielsen
- nOnoscience
- Not Even Wrong
- Not Exactly Rocket Science
- A Quantum Diaries Survivor
- Quantum Pontiff
- The Scientific Curmudgeon
- SciTech Daily
- Shtetl-Optimized
- Tales from the Learning Curve
- View From the Corner
- What's New
Academics
- Acephalous
- Chronicles of Dr. Crazy
- Confessions of a Community College Dean
- Crooked Timber
- Brad DeLong
- Easily Distracted
- Knowing and Doing
- Learning Curves
- The Little Professor
- Musical Perceptions
- Notional Slurry
- Pub Sociology
- Word Munger
- What Now?
- Yes, YelloCello
Interesting People
- Boing Boing
- Diary de la Vex
- Fafblog!
- Izzle Pfaff
- Making Light
- Open Reading Frame
- Republic of T.
- See You at Enceladus
- Snarkout
- Unmistakable Marks
- Whatever
Books
- Book Slut
- Tobias Buckell
- The Humblest Blog
- The Library of Babel
- Outside of a Dog
- Weasel Words
- Westerblog
Punditry
- Balkinization
- Grim Amusements
- Newsrack
- Off the Kuff
- Political Animal
- The Poor Man
- The Reality-Based Community
- Slacktivist
- Talking Points Memo
- Through the Looking Glass
- Unqualified Offerings
- Matthew Yglesias
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« links for 2008-07-06 | Main | Uncertain Principles, Certain Results »
Quantum Quantum Quantum
Category: Book Writing
Posted on: July 6, 2008 7:52 AM, by Chad Orzel
Comments
# 1 | Bob O'H | July 6, 2008 8:27 AM
Chicken chicken chicken
# 2 | Michael Nielsen | July 6, 2008 8:58 AM
Consider this a look of little sympathy :-)
# 3 | Ian Durham | July 6, 2008 10:51 AM
I felt like that at my sister's wedding last week.
"What is it that you do exactly?"
"Quantum mechanics."
"What does that mean?"
"Depends on who you ask."
# 4 | Kathryn F | July 6, 2008 11:32 AM
@Bob O'H, let's not forget the video of the presentation of that masterwork:
Chicken Chicken Chicken
# 5 | themadlolscientist | July 6, 2008 4:23 PM
"Chicken chicken, chicken. Chicken chicken chicken chicken." I can't believe the guy managed to do that presentation with a straight face.
# 6 | HennepinCountyLawyer | July 7, 2008 4:19 AM
Thanks for the pdf link--I'd seen the video before, but not the written article.
I was particularly tickled by the questions in the AIR Teachers' Guide at the end:
"Is this scientist right -- and what does "right" mean, anyway?
• Can you think of even one different explanation that works as well or better?
• Did the test really, really, truly, unquestionably, completely test what the author thought he was testing?
• Is the scientist ruthlessly honest with himself about how well his idea explains everything, or could he be
suffering from wishful thinking?"
I find those questions extremely difficult to answer in this case.
# 7 | Neil B. | July 7, 2008 7:17 PM
What I find very odd in QM is that we can make a reliable specific superposition, like for a photon, but no one is supposed to be able to find out the details later. IOW, we can make a photon equivalent to elliptical polarization, given the wave function: A |R> + Be^(i theta) |R> and e.g. 0.6 for A and 0.8 for B. The phase then provides an angle, not just an ellipse shape, so we can be sure a filter tuned to that wave would let the photon through (as it would also have ideal 100% transmission for the equivalent classical polarized light beam.) If I am a confidante of the photon's creator, I can know just how to orient the right filter (say, combo of QWP and LPF) to get all "hits" etc. But if I don't already know, I can't find out for sure: all I can do is try a filter and orientation and I might get transmission or not. Either way, the photon is "ruined" by either being absorbed or changed into the new filter's base. (Projection postulate? I wonder why that doesn't have its own Wikipedia article.) All I really know is, that photon couldn't have been the orthogonal to the filter base if it went through. But if the trait is "real" (unlike the literal contradiction in Fourier analysis of exact momentum and exact position), why can't I find out? (I know, doing so might lead to weird effects in entangled states, like FTL communication, but suppose it didn't?)
This seems silly, like a kid saying "If you don't know, I'm not going to tell you!" In some other comments around, I explained how we might circumvent that restriction by using the accumulation of angular momentum: Keep reflecting a photon around with mirrors, sending it through the same half-wave plate over and over (re-flipped by a second HWP if needed.) The HWP reverses the rotational sense (spin) because it swaps the values of A and B (you may be surprised, but it does - known fact, and to be consistent with the affect on the classical wave.) If we did it enough, all those transits would build up detectable angular momentum in the HWP. It would be along a range, not an either/or because the result needs to be consistent with sending many many "separate" photons through (indistinguishability.) IOW, if the photon came out of a linear polarizer, the many transits wouldn't build up net spin since the average effect is no rotation. Maybe it wouldn't work, but it's worth mulling over. It seems to resemble "weak measurements" as propounded by Yakir Aharonov.