-
"I just read the following in their Wikipedia entry: "In 2009, Boyz II Men announced plans for a new cover album, that covers 'artists I don't think people would expect us to cover!' according to Shawn Stockman." Can Popdose get in on this? Can we make a list of songs for Boyz II Men to cover? Because I want to start with "Detachable Penis" and just go downhill from there."
-
"There's also a lot of weird disrespect going on every which way, and somehow doesn't take into the fact that nobody who bothers to vote in the Hugos, much less even contemplate about the Hugos, is actually stupid, filterless, or thoughtless. They have their own reasons for picking what they did--reasons you may not understand and even hate. Again, it's culture. There are people who can analyze the intricate soap opera cycles of superhero comics with as much pizaaz as those of us who engage in mythopoeic play; there are those who can pick out the growth and development of story and character in Harry Potter as much as those who study the Golden Age classics of science fiction. Is it not enough that we fans are all, while disparate in opinion, still akin in our tendency towards taking many things as Serious Business?"
-
"I also very much love the aesthetics of the physical books themselves, and if/when electronic books finally displace the old paper copies it will be a sad day. But it could also be the dawn of the era that's been predicted almost since computers have been invented - the complete contents of the Library of Congress at your instant personal disposal. Two things stand in the way: copyright law and the limitations of technology. For the moment let's ignore copyright law. That's a discussion for another day. Suffice it to say that copyright is fine and good conceptually, but the life of the author plus 70 years is simply an abomination. As a thought experiment we'll assume that either the law has been reformed or the Library of Congress has been exempted at least for archival purposes if not public access purposes. The question becomes whether it's possible to put the entire library in digital format."
-
"A subcommittee of the panel studied several possibilities, including NASA's current program to send astronauts back to the Moon by 2020, a more ambitious plan to skip the Moon and aim directly for Mars and what the members called the "flexible path," which would avoid the "deep gravity wells" of the Moon and Mars, saving the time and cost of developing landers to carry astronauts to the surfaces of those bodies. Edward F. Crawley, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who headed the subcommittee, said, "The flexible path essentially goes across stepping stones" of progressively longer, more challenging missions by which NASA would learn how to operate long missions in deep space. "
-
"The purpose of the LIGO experiment is to search for gravitational waves in the universe. They haven't found any yet, but no good big-science experiment would be complete without a few cool spinoffs. They LIGO folks have an especially cool one: they've put a kilogram-sized pendulum and "cooled" it so effectively that it's almost in its quantum-mechanical ground state. To be honest, I'm not exactly sure what this is good for, but it's really cool. Ha ha, little physics humor there, get it? "Cool.""
-
"Planck's blackbody radiation law, formulated in 1900 by German physicist Max Planck, describes how energy is dissipated, in the form of different wavelengths of radiation, from an idealized non-reflective black object, called a blackbody. The law says that the relative thermal emission of radiation at different wavelengths follows a precise pattern that varies according to the temperature of the object. The emission from a blackbody is usually considered as the maximum that an object can radiate. The law works reliably in most cases, but Planck himself had suggested that when objects are very close together, the predictions of his law would break down. But actually controlling objects to maintain the tiny separations required to demonstrate this phenomenon has proved incredibly difficult."
-
"Students who entered college in 1995-96 and majored in a STEM field some time between then and 2001 earned a degree or certificate at a rate of 54.9 percent, compared to 50.6 percent for students who did not choose a science or technology major. Within science fields, the rates were highest for those in the physical sciences (68.4 percent), natural sciences (63.5), and mathematics (61.4 percent), and lowest for those in computer or information sciences (46.4). Fifty-three percent of engineering students earned a credential, but they were least likely among their STEM peers to earn a bachelor's degree (as opposed to an associate degree or certificate)."
-
"I have often thought that complexity classes could be viewed as our analog of particles in Physics. Really, I am not kidding. It is not April first. "
Uncertain Principles
Physics, Politics, Pop Culture
Search
Profile
You've read the blog, now try the book: How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold.
"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.
"Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)
Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.
Recent Posts
- Radio DogPhysics: Northern Great Plains Edition
- Non-Dorky Poll: Time to Rise and Shine
- Links for 2010-02-09
- Amazing Laser Application 1: Light Show!
- Laser Smackdown: The Finalists
- My Boskone Schedule
- Way Cuter Than the Puppy Bowl
- Links for 2010-02-08
- The Super Bowl Index of Economic and Cultural Indicators
- Talking to My Dog About Science: Why Public Communication of Science Matters, and How Weblogs Can Help
Recent Comments
- Peter on Opinions on WebAssign?
- Kaleberg on Amazing Laser Application 1: Light Show!
- Katherine on Non-Dorky Poll: Time to Rise and Shine
- Tommy BRO-hama on Radio DogPhysics: Northern Great Plains Edition
- Thony C. on Links for 2010-02-09
- Larry Steckler on My Boskone Schedule
- Geoffrey A. Landis on My Boskone Schedule
- Chad Orzel on Non-Dorky Poll: Time to Rise and Shine
- donna on Links for 2010-02-09
- Chuk on Non-Dorky Poll: Time to Rise and Shine
Greatest Hits
- What's With the Name?
- A Week in the Lab
- Domestic Security: A Dialogue
- "Perfect Albums"
- Poetry for Physicists
- Top Eleven: The Greatest Physics Experiment Ever
- How to Tell a True Lab Story
- Bunnies Made of Cheese
- Many Worlds, Many Treats
- What Everyone should Know About Science
- The Innumeracy of Intellectuals
- We Are Science
- Science Is What Makes Us Human
- This Is My Job
Chateau Steelypips
- How to Teach Physics to Your Dog
- Older Uncertain Principles
- The Library of Babel
- Japan Stories
- Outside of a Dog
- Kate Nepveu's LiveJournal
- Steelypips Main Page
- Chad's photosets on Flickr
- Chad's bookmarks on del.icio.us
- Chad on Twitter
- Emmy on Twitter
Blogroll
Scientists
- Mixed States
- Angry Physics
- Arcane Gazebo
- Backreaction
- bento-box
- BioCurious
- Cocktail Party Physics
- Cosmic Variance
- Entropy Bound
- Female Science Professor
- Horganism
- In the Pipeline
- Life as a Physicist
- Musings
- Nanoscale Views
- Michael Nielsen
- nOnoscience
- Not Even Wrong
- Not Exactly Rocket Science
- A Quantum Diaries Survivor
- Quantum Pontiff
- The Scientific Curmudgeon
- SciTech Daily
- Shtetl-Optimized
- Tales from the Learning Curve
- View From the Corner
- What's New
Academics
- Acephalous
- Chronicles of Dr. Crazy
- Confessions of a Community College Dean
- Crooked Timber
- Brad DeLong
- Easily Distracted
- Knowing and Doing
- Learning Curves
- The Little Professor
- Musical Perceptions
- Notional Slurry
- Pub Sociology
- Word Munger
- What Now?
- Yes, YelloCello
Interesting People
- Boing Boing
- Diary de la Vex
- Fafblog!
- Izzle Pfaff
- Making Light
- Open Reading Frame
- Paw Talk
- Republic of T.
- See You at Enceladus
- Snarkout
- Unmistakable Marks
- Whatever
Books
- Book Slut
- Tobias Buckell
- The Humblest Blog
- The Library of Babel
- Outside of a Dog
- Weasel Words
- Westerblog
Punditry
- Balkinization
- Grim Amusements
- Newsrack
- Off the Kuff
- Political Animal
- The Poor Man
- The Reality-Based Community
- Slacktivist
- Talking Points Memo
- Through the Looking Glass
- Unqualified Offerings
- Matthew Yglesias
Categories
- Academia
- Add category
- Basic Concepts
- Biking
- Blogs
- Book Writing
- Booklog
- Conferences
- Culture
- Data Presentation
- Dog
- Education
- Food
- Guest Bloggers
- Humanities
- Jobs
- Journalism
- Links Dump
- Maintenance
- Math
- News
- Personal
- Physics
- Pictures
- Politics
- Polls
- Pop Culture
- SF
- Science
- Science Writing
- Silliness
- Social-Science
- Society
- Sports
- Technology
- Travel
- Video
- War On Science
Archives
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
« Two-Word Lyrics: Proper Name Edition | Main | The First Steps Are a Doozy »
Links for 2009-08-01
Category: Links Dump
Posted on: August 1, 2009 9:56 AM, by Chad Orzel
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/116211
Comments
when objects are very close together, the predictions of his law would break down
An etalon is not the same as two panes summed? Well slap my butt and call interference.
Posted by: Uncle Al | August 1, 2009 11:32 AM