Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Uncertain Principles

Thoughts on physics, politics, and pop culture, by a physics professor at a small liberal arts college, plus occasional conversations with his dog.

Search

Profile

sidebar_relativity_cover.jpg

sm_cover_draft_atom.jpgYou've read the blog, now try the books! How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold. How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books and will be available 2/28/2012, as foretold by the Maya.

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Winner!

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« Links for 2009-09-28 | Main | Don't Be Such a Scientist by Randy Olson »

Nobel Prize Betting Pool

Category: HumanitiesPhysicsScienceSocial-Science
Posted on: September 28, 2009 9:15 AM, by Chad Orzel

It's that time of year again, when the Nobel Prizes are announced-- the official announcements will be made starting next Monday. And, as usual, people are speculating about who will win, on both an amateur and professional basis.

Meanwhile, as we've done in the past, I will offer a valuable prize to anyone who predicts the winners of any of this year's Nobel prizes:

Leave a comment on this post predicting the winner(s) of one of this year's Nobel Prizes. Anyone who correctly picks both the field and the laureate will win a guest-post spot on this blog.

Rules and conditions are the same as last year. Comments must be posted by 11:59 pm Sunday, October 4 to be eligible. One entry per commenter per field, please.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/120948

Comments

1

I understand that Pete Seeger has been nominated for the Peace Prize. I have no idea what his chances are, but a win would be wonderful -- both for the environment and for recognition of the rights of everyone worldwide.

Posted by: chezjake | September 28, 2009 9:29 AM

2

I tip Emmy the Queen of Niskayuna for the Literature Prize ;)

Posted by: Thony C. | September 28, 2009 10:14 AM

3

Physics: Vera Rubin.
Chemistry: Harry Noller.

Posted by: Steve | September 28, 2009 10:25 AM

4

I've got a list somewhere of people I think should definitely win Nobel prizes, mostly in physics. Last year, the top pair on my list, Kobayashi and Maskawa finally won. Since somebody has suggested Vera Rubin, I'll suggest that she wins half the physics prize and the other half is split between the Toomre brothers, for their work on colliding galaxies and galactic evolution. Alas, Fritz Zwicky, the other pioneer in that area is long, long deceased.

Posted by: Brett | September 28, 2009 11:04 AM

5

Stefan Hell for physics.
Eric Betzig for physics.
John Pendry for physics.

All of these guys have done important work on overcoming the diffraction limit.

Posted by: Alex | September 28, 2009 11:25 AM

6

Stephen Hawking - in physics,

F. Ulrich Hartl and Arthur Horwich - in chemistry

Posted by: Misha Lemeshko | September 28, 2009 11:51 AM

7

As much as I'm a big fan of Stephen hawking, I don't really see how he'd the prize. His contributions to mathematical physics have been enormous but Hawking radiation has yet to be observed.

Posted by: Josh | September 28, 2009 1:19 PM

8

Thomson Reuters 2009 Predictions:
http://scientific.thomson.com/nobel/

Posted by: David Pendlebury | September 28, 2009 2:08 PM

9

For Physics I'll predict it will be A. Geim and K. Novoselov

Posted by: Neil Robinson | September 28, 2009 2:39 PM

10

I will be PC and suggest a woman. Either Very Rubin for dark stuff, or Mildred Dresselhaus for nanotubes.

Posted by: Thomas Larsson | September 28, 2009 2:50 PM

11

Kimble, Wineland, and Zeilinger. Quantum info.

Posted by: perry | September 28, 2009 3:06 PM

12

Chemistry: George Whitesides

Only because he's the only person I've collaborated with who is realistically in the running.

Posted by: MRW | September 28, 2009 3:40 PM

13

Physics: Aharonov and Berry
Chemistry: Richard Zare

Posted by: Sujit | September 28, 2009 4:03 PM

14

For the last few years I've taken the long odds and guessed Stephen Hawking. Since we haven't yet seen any strong evidence for Hawking radiation, I'll go ahead and guess Guth and Linde for inflation.

Posted by: Stephen | September 28, 2009 4:19 PM

15

Physics: Aharonov and Berry (same pick as last year).
No Hawking until experimental observation of Hawking radiation. No Higgs until experimental observation of Higgs boson. No graphene b/c it's too soon.
Chemistry: Possibly Ijima, though Zare is a good one. Perhaps Whitesides?

Posted by: Douglas Natelson | September 28, 2009 10:13 PM

16

Chemistry: Michael Gratzel or Richard Heck

Posted by: ASG | September 29, 2009 9:13 PM

17

Same predictions as last year, except for the Physics Prize.

Physiology or Medicine: Elizabeth Blackburn & Carol Greider
(Shinya Yamanaka will win eventually, but perhaps it is too soon.)

Chemistry: Harry Noller, Peter Moore & Thomas Steitz

Physics: Alain Aspect? & Anton Zeilinger?
(I'm ignorant about the field, but a prize for quantum measurement and quantum information seems possible.)

Posted by: HI | September 30, 2009 11:13 AM

18

Chemistry: Ada Yonath (ribosome)
Medicine: Akiro Endo (statins)

Posted by: Curious Wavefunction | September 30, 2009 4:23 PM

19

Chemistry: Zare and Moerner
Physiology or Medicine: Weinberg
Physics: Kleppner

Posted by: bvincent | September 30, 2009 11:12 PM

20

it's gonna be Genzel in physics. They completed a full orbit around the black hole in the galactic center!

Posted by: jonny the bonnie | October 1, 2009 5:59 PM

21

Either Physics or Chemistry: Geim & Novoselov
Economics: Nordhaus
Medicine: Burgdorfer

Posted by: Rahul Khopkar | October 1, 2009 9:29 PM

22

Just in:
Elizabeth H. Blackburn, Carol W. Greider and Jack W. Szostak
have won the Nobel Prize for Medicine! Congratulations!

Posted by: Cathy Sander | October 5, 2009 5:46 AM

23

Physics: Vera Rubin

Posted by: Thomas | October 5, 2009 11:29 AM

24

Physics: Wineland/Aspect/Zeilinger

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2009 12:32 AM

25

Chemistry- Professor Robert S. Langer MIT

Posted by: Jyoti Ballabh | October 6, 2009 9:22 PM

26

Economics: Paul Romer

Posted by: Chris Buzzard | October 2, 2011 6:42 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.