Now on ScienceBlogs: Casual Fridays: What makes a good writer, and what motivates them?

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Uncertain Principles

Physics, Politics, Pop Culture

Search

Profile

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

You've read the blog, now try the book: How to Teach Physics to Your Dog will be published December 22nd by Scribner.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« Links for 2009-11-09 | Main | Academic Poll: All Greek to Me »

Why Editors Matter

Category: BooksPop Culture
Posted on: November 9, 2009 8:26 AM, by Chad Orzel

There's a nice post over at "The World in a Satin Bag" on the important things editors do. The emphasis is on fiction publishing, but most of it applies to non-fiction as well:

Editors make you into a better writer. Emphasis on better. They don't make you into the greatest writer ever, but they certainly teach you a few things. Ask anyone published by a major publisher or even a small press. Ask them if their editor taught them anything. They did, didn't they? I thought so.

This won't make any impact on the "Blogs Rule, Olde Media Drool" crowd, but it's always nice to see somebody else who feels the same way I do.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124342

Comments

1

To see why editors matter you only have to compare the third Harry Potter book to the second. Editor's smarten, and polish, and make you think more about what you're actually writing.

(and in the case of informal editors, they sometimes remind you that you don't have any corners in a circular room...I've made that mistake before...)

Posted by: Lab Rat | November 9, 2009 8:50 AM

2

I read several blogs by people from the editing business. Not so much editors of books, more like newspaper sub/copy-editors, but still. If I have to pick one to recommend, it would be John McIntyre of http://johnemcintyre.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Adrian Morgan | November 9, 2009 9:31 AM

3

There's a difference between blogging and books: people don't expect blogs to be well edited, but they do expect that of books. They don't want books that suck. That's reality. Editors make good books into better books to make sure all the suck is gotten rid of.

Thanks for the link! And I agree that my post applies very well to non-fiction too.

Posted by: SMD | November 9, 2009 1:05 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM