Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Uncertain Principles

Thoughts on physics, politics, and pop culture, by a physics professor at a small liberal arts college, plus occasional conversations with his dog.

Search

Profile

sidebar_relativity_cover.jpg

sm_cover_draft_atom.jpgYou've read the blog, now try the books! How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold. How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books and will be available 2/28/2012, as foretold by the Maya.

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Winner!

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« Links for 2009-11-09 | Main | Academic Poll: All Greek to Me »

Why Editors Matter

Category: BooksPop Culture
Posted on: November 9, 2009 8:26 AM, by Chad Orzel

There's a nice post over at "The World in a Satin Bag" on the important things editors do. The emphasis is on fiction publishing, but most of it applies to non-fiction as well:

Editors make you into a better writer. Emphasis on better. They don't make you into the greatest writer ever, but they certainly teach you a few things. Ask anyone published by a major publisher or even a small press. Ask them if their editor taught them anything. They did, didn't they? I thought so.

This won't make any impact on the "Blogs Rule, Olde Media Drool" crowd, but it's always nice to see somebody else who feels the same way I do.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124342

Comments

1

To see why editors matter you only have to compare the third Harry Potter book to the second. Editor's smarten, and polish, and make you think more about what you're actually writing.

(and in the case of informal editors, they sometimes remind you that you don't have any corners in a circular room...I've made that mistake before...)

Posted by: Lab Rat | November 9, 2009 8:50 AM

2

I read several blogs by people from the editing business. Not so much editors of books, more like newspaper sub/copy-editors, but still. If I have to pick one to recommend, it would be John McIntyre of http://johnemcintyre.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Adrian Morgan | November 9, 2009 9:31 AM

3

There's a difference between blogging and books: people don't expect blogs to be well edited, but they do expect that of books. They don't want books that suck. That's reality. Editors make good books into better books to make sure all the suck is gotten rid of.

Thanks for the link! And I agree that my post applies very well to non-fiction too.

Posted by: SMD | November 9, 2009 1:05 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.