A purely hypothetical situation for today's poll. Purely.
If anybody needs me, I'll be in an undisclosed location not responding to email.
Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets
Thoughts on physics, politics, and pop culture, by a physics professor at a small liberal arts college, plus occasional conversations with his dog.
You've read the blog, now try the books! How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold. How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books and will be available 2/28/2012, as foretold by the Maya.
"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.
"Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)
Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.
« DonorsChoose Payoff: Why AMO Physics? | Main | Thursday Baby Blogging 121009 »
Category: Academia • Funding • Physics • Polls • Science
Posted on: December 10, 2009 12:30 PM, by Chad Orzel
A purely hypothetical situation for today's poll. Purely.
If anybody needs me, I'll be in an undisclosed location not responding to email.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/126868
Orac 02.14.2012
Tim Lambert 02.01.2012
Jason Rosenhouse 02.12.2012
Orac 01.26.2012
ERV 11.26.2011
Comments
I recommend rejecting any and all proposals which employ the words "transformative", "revolutionary", "synergy" or the phrases "paradigm shift" or "cutting edge".
Posted by: a | December 10, 2009 12:46 PM
Do we want what I probably would do, or what I think I should do?
Posted by: Becca Stareyes | December 10, 2009 12:47 PM
Been there, done that. I worked several times on the tutorial advisory committee for an information security conference. The due date for the reviews was always the 4th of July. So, whichever day was our holiday at work was spent in an undisclosed location finishing the tutorial reviews.
I'll bet your 6 grant proposals are a lot more work than my ~25 tutorial proposals.
I don't have a t-shirt, though. I'll have to mention that to the tutorial chair of the conference....
Posted by: Lauren Uroff | December 10, 2009 12:55 PM
I'd go vacuum my cat. Sounds like more fun that reviewing grant proposals.
Posted by: Cecil | December 10, 2009 2:26 PM
Thankfully I only have 5 proposals to read for Sunday, and I've skimmed them all. Unfortunately, that was long enough ago that I've forgotten most of my thoughts.
But I still have to write a final for tomorrow morning and attend a two-hour meeting this afternoon and meet with the students in lab. So I'll be starting on the proposals tomorrow, and working through Saturday and Sunday.
So, answer 1 for now, and answer 4 starting tomorrow.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward | December 10, 2009 4:05 PM
I have five to review -- in 4 different fields. Maybe they think I'm an expert in each, but one of them is from my PhD field over 10 years ago, and two others are in fields that I only worked in briefly, so that's hardly the truth.
So on the proposals that I know best, I'm being very thorough. On the others, well, I'm being pretty generic but sending a note to the PM why that is (yes, I should I declined these when I first received them 3 months ago, but I didn't look at them until now, assuming that as in years past they'd give me ones in the field I've done for the past 7 years).
Time to go hide.
Posted by: frank | December 11, 2009 7:48 AM