Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Uncertain Principles

Thoughts on physics, politics, and pop culture, by a physics professor at a small liberal arts college, plus occasional conversations with his dog.

Search

Profile

sidebar_relativity_cover.jpg

sm_cover_draft_atom.jpgYou've read the blog, now try the books! How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner, and available wherever books are sold. How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books and will be available 2/28/2012, as foretold by the Maya.

"Uncertain Principles" features the miscellaneous ramblings of a physicist at a small liberal arts college. Physics, politics, pop culture, and occasional conversations with his dog.

Chad Orzel "Prof. Orzel gives the impression of an everyday guy who just happens to have a vast but hidden knowledge of physics." (anonymous student evaluation comment)

Emmy, the Queen of Niskayuna Emmy is a German Shepherd mix, and the Queen of Niskayuna. She likes treats, walks, chasing bunnies, and quantum physics.

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Winner!

Donors Choose challenge link

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Greatest Hits

Chateau Steelypips

Blogroll

Scientists

Academics

Interesting People

Books

Punditry

Categories

Archives

« SteelyKid's Weekend Excursion | Main | Links for 2010-09-06 »

Hugo Awards 2010

Category: ArtBooksPop CultureSF
Posted on: September 5, 2010 7:21 PM, by Chad Orzel

The 2010 Hugo Award Winners were announced on Sunday night. Of course, this being a science fiction award, it's only appropriate that they be announced from THE FUTURE, so the results were available early this morning, US time.

It turns out that I voted for 1.5 of the fiction award winners: China Mieville's The City and The City shared the Best Novel award with Paolo Bacigalupi's The Windup Girl, and I also voted for the Charlie Stross novella. The other two categories, I'm basically OK with-- I "NO AWARD"-ed "Bridsicle," but that whole category was pretty weak, and it wasn't as awful as "Spar." The Peter Watts novelette that won was at least had some clever and novel gee-whiz elements, and other people are less bothered by his "My angst, let me show it to you, and just in case you missed it, I'll tell you about it, too" presentation than I am.

Really, kind of an "Enh" result for a pretty "Meh" year. In other categories, Patrick Nielsen Hayden won a second "Best Editor, Long Form" Hugo, and Fred Pohl got a well-deserved "Best Fan Writer." Shaun Tan won "Best Professional Artist" as well, and we're fans of his here at Chateau Steelypips (Kate bought a Shaun Tan print a while back, from The Arrival, which is awesome, so it's nice to see him win prizes. the others, I really don't have any opinion of, as I don't think I saw any of the dramatic presentation nominees.

Anybody with strong opinions on the subject who hasn't already vented them somewhere else, though, feel free to talk about it in the comments.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/146250

Comments

1

You know, I'm actually reading The Windup Girl right now, mostly out of sheer, vicious-minded stubbornness; I don't actually expect it to get any better. I actually expect it to get worse.

When I finish, I expect I will review it in another venue, but it isn't going to be kind.

Posted by: John Novak | September 6, 2010 1:15 AM

2

I'm glad that Girl Genius won for Graphic Story, since I think that comic is great.

Somewhat impressive that a Doctor Who episode won Dramatic Presentation-Short form, even with the vote split three ways (although I was hoping "Epitaph 1" would sneak through).

Posted by: Michael I | September 6, 2010 6:33 AM

3

I'm with Michael I on Girl Genius; fantastic story, brilliantly told. I'm slightly concerned about GG getting the 'best graphic story' award in its first two years, though - GG deserves it, but there is other good stuff out there and I'd hate to see the award disappear because people assume there isn't enough of a field to support it.

As for that particular Doctor Who story, the less said the better. I mean, it was better than "The End of Time", but that's like being more functional than a cardboard jellyfish.

Fred Pohl getting an award for fan writing, however, is pure awesome.

Posted by: Chrisj | September 6, 2010 10:14 AM

4

Is it too early to place bets on next year's winners? For novel, I'd put the early $$$ on Peter Hamilton's "The Evolutionary Void" I just finished it, and it puts a sweet ending to the Commonwealth Saga Duology and The Void Trilogy. No Deus Ex Machina this time around. It's terrific.

Posted by: Steven Colyer | September 7, 2010 6:57 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.