Dorky Poll: Rorschach Numbers

It’s been a really long time since I’ve done a Dorky Poll here, but I’m pretty fried at the moment, so here’s a kind of mathematical personality test: two numbers that do not uniquely define a sequence, but suggest some possibilities that reveal your innate character type and/or appropriate career path:

Feel free to offer arguments for your chosen answer in the comments, and/or to speculate about what the hidden meanings of the options are. I’ll explain the logic some other time.

(This might be too abstract for a really great Dorky Poll, but I’m just punchy enough to find it amusing, so what the hell…)

Comments

  1. #1 featheredfrog
    July 17, 2013

    Each of the four options are possible, but keeping the razor, 1001 seems to be the next element of the “simplest” sequence.

  2. #2 featheredfrog
    July 17, 2013

    of course that should have been… what? ;D

  3. #3 Evan Berkowitz
    July 17, 2013

    People here are heavily arithmetical! I would have thought geometrical & arithmetical would be split evenly, roughly.

  4. #4 Eric Lund
    July 17, 2013

    @Evan: Sequence 1 is quasi-geometrical: A_n = 10^(n+1) + 1. Unless you are talking about counting zeroes: the second sequence is A_n = 10^(2^(n-1)) + 1.

    The third and fourth are arithmetical, but if you choose option 4, you might be a frustrated computer scientist.

  5. #5 RM
    July 17, 2013

    What does it say about me that I understood the rationale behind the fourth option (add 4 in binary) before I understood the third option (add 900 in decimal)?

    By the way, I used to hate (still do) those “spot the pattern” puzzles in math class. Basically for the very reason this poll points out – the “correct” answer often depended on what the person putting them together was thinking. And don’t get me started on those asinine “If 3+4 equalled 9, what would 6+2 equal?” problems.

  6. #6 Alex
    July 17, 2013

    There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don’t.

  7. #7 Andre
    July 17, 2013

    Where’s my 10101 option?

  8. #8 Jim Roberts
    July 17, 2013

    The next number is 1000000001.
    101 is prime. 1001 has three prime factors. 1000000001 has five prime factors.

  9. #9 Jim
    July 17, 2013

    Eric – Your second formula doesn’t give 1001.

  10. #10 quasihumanist
    July 17, 2013

    I also vote for the missing 10101 option.

  11. #11 Explosive Antelope
    July 17, 2013

    I tried figuring it out this way…

    ε > √T(d,α,J)P/P
    α⊗Ο×ς+W = w(Χ,Γ)
    (T³) = ℸ+⅘⁻¹-ℏ-T
    0ςΧ(ζ) = P
    D(∑Χ×T²) ≋ ∇×JK+P-J
    (PL)²⊠Χr = ∫cζdΝ
    v = ∫vdJ⊎ς!2
    σ∑D ⊅ α(η(P)⁻¹)
    ζ(x) = Pr[o]ζj
    ς(-Q(1),η+Χ,θ!ω) ≪ ζτ×√P⊘0
    η(J+¾,∫ℬdl) = d⊍∑D1
    α-ζℏ = ℴ⊕η(η)
    P-D ∝ √η(⅗D)
    d(P,w)+D×v⁻¹ ≫ Χ-⅘⊙1θ
    w-D+Χ-ζ = ςt(P)²
    -T⦻Ω+√(∑ℍ)⁻¹ ∝ ℐ×(∇×℘)
    ∛Χ(⅔T,⅛+d) = log(Χ)-Jζ
    φ(ζ(μ,d),ζ+η) ⋘ ζ(θ+d)
    η(d)∓1∖ς ⋘ D-ℭ1
    0-ζ = p∩-T+ς
    W(D(ο),❖) = θ(∑Χ-J,cd,℘⋇Χ)
    r(D,J)²+∇∙h+ς⁷ ≻ (wv)
    θ = vθ+(〈η|D〉)
    ⅓⦾R∕Ω(V) ≈ (ⅉ+Δ)
    φ(Ρ+H) ≫ ∑T+Ⅎ+γ-h
    D+ΗΧ = g(μ,(ζ(Ζ)))
    Zηζμ ≠ ∏∇×ι(1)-Χ⦾P
    Εj+Χ(θ,Ο) < ∏J+hη
    M(ℏ/Z) ⋘ ỹ(ℳ)÷1+Ο
    -Τ-ℐ⨕vdθ = ∇∙h+o∖μ
    v(η+m) ∈ ν(ⅇ)
    ζ(χ)⊙d = S⦾κ+6
    (Ο+ℏ) ≛ ζ
    ∏h+ο-D(Q) = I(D)²ηΒ²
    μℏℒ!v = v(HΦ,LP,(J(P)))
    P(hζ) ⋙ ξ⦿θℳθ

    … but I think I did something wrong. Can you fix it?

  12. #12 OMF
    July 18, 2013

    I picked 10001 principally because I am a boring old codger with no joy left in my life. This poll has made me grumpy!

  13. #13 Mark P
    July 18, 2013

    I choose to treat these as non-objective, geometric patterns. As such, the most correct choice should have been 101. Since that was not provided as a possible answer, I chose 1001 as the next-best choice to represent a printing error.

  14. #14 Jim
    July 18, 2013

    Explosive Antelope – You went wrong in the second line. The comma between w and big gamma should be a semicolon. Otherwise it is correct.

  15. #15 JamesM
    July 19, 2013

    Assuming this the fibonnacci sequence in written in binary, the next number should be 1101.

  16. #16 MJC
    July 30, 2013

    I wonder if there is some bias in selecting a specific answer due to the ordering of the possible answers.

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!