Pure Pedantry : On Great Tits, Parasitism, and Immunocompetence: The Trade-Offs

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

Jake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine focusing in Neuroscience. He is due to graduate in 2032. He received a BS and a MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University -- where he spent most of his time drinking heavily and building vegetable catapults instead of learning information that would now be eminently useful. When he is not failing terrifically to perform his sworn duties, he enjoys watching bad movies, ethnic food, and running.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

Jake is joined periodically by two wonderful guest bloggers: Kara Contreary and Kate Seip. See the About Page.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own or those of my co-bloggers. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments we currently attend.

Search this blog

On Great Tits, Parasitism, and Immunocompetence: The Trade-Offs

Category: Evolution
Posted on: July 9, 2006 11:05 PM, by Jake Young

This paper in Proceedings of Royal Society Biology purports to show that there is an investment trade-off between immunocompetence and animal growth. In cases where parasitism is high, the trade-off tends to tilt towards investment in immunocompetence.

I love this article for two reasons.

1) It was conducted on a species that -- I &%^@ you not -- is called the Great Tit:

The study was performed in 2004 in a population of great tits breeding in nest boxes in a mixed forest near Bern, Switzerland. The great tit is a small (16-20 g) hole-nesting passerine that produces one or two broods per year.

I have to meet the people who are naming these birds. That is the most fantastic thing I have ever heard. And a lot of the study is done on the baby birds or the "nestlings." That's right...there is a model organism called the nestling great tit. Here would be a picture of the tit in question:

2) I think that they show rather elegantly that the investment of a species into a one area may make sense under one condition but may not in another. Evolution is a very dynamic business. Here is the money figure:

We found that after the experimental manipulation of the nestlings' investment in immune defence, i.e. after the methionine supplementation had stopped, immune-boosted nestlings grew at significantly faster rates in parasite-infested nests compared to controls, whereas in parasite-free nests, immune-boosted and control nestlings did not grow at significantly different rates. This result cannot be explained by compensatory growth alone because compensatory growth would lead to higher growth rates of methionine supplemented nestlings irrespective of their parasite treatment, (i.e. to a significant main effect of the methionine treatment, but a non-significant interaction effect between parasite treatment and methionine treatment). The significant interaction effect between parasite treatment and methionine supplementation thus emphasizes the beneficial effects of an increased investment in immune defence when exposed to parasites. This beneficial effect might be due to specific or unspecific immune reactions--against hen fleas and/or pathogens that are potentially transmitted by the fleas during the blood meal... -- which were stimulated by the methionine supplementation.

Hat-tip: Faculty of 1000.