Now on ScienceBlogs: Live Organ Transplants

Seed Media Group

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

jake-head-shot.jpgJake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in NYC getting a PhD in Behavioral Neuroscience. He holds a BS and MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University. If a volcano were to erupt Pompei-style in Central Park, his body would be preserved in a scoliotic posture over his lab desk. Archeaologists would later conclude that he spent most of his day training rats to perform tricks, until he went blind building electrical equipment by hand using a dissecting microscope. But, still, he died happy...because science is cool.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision-making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments I currently attend or attended in the past.

Search

Archives

Blogroll


The Daily Read Science News Science Blogs Medicine Blogs Econ Blogs Papers to Read Comics Links to Pure Pedantry via

« Kobayashi wins Nathan's hot dog eating contest for 6th time | Main | Background to the 20 year coma recovery »

Software as an assistant to physicians

Category: MedicineTechnology
Posted on: July 4, 2006 4:28 PM, by NotoriousLTP

Neurodudes has an excellent article on software intended to reduce medical errors.

Just from my limited personal experience, I would say that such software would be useful if people understand that it is limited in scope. There are three general reasons I think that software is useful in medicine:

Standardization. There are many diseases for which there are clear standards of care. For example, chest pain has a very straightforward heuristic that we follow in diagnosing a patient, and for each possible diagnosis there is a clear set of treatments. In areas for which there is not a lot of wiggle room, software can help bring relatively consistent care to 100% consistent care.

Clear records. Software can help in record keeping. When you actually have to type out or punch in physical diagnosis and lab values into software -- and thus have those become part of the patient's record -- you remove all the gaming that happens when attendings deliberately have poor handwriting or omit observations to avoid liability. (You would think that in this day in age this wouldn't be a problem, but I have had attendings tell me that this why they have bad handwriting. In many cases it is totally unreadable.)

Rare diagnoses. Software can be useful in reminding physicians of diagnoses that may be rare, but still need to be ruled out. A lot of the time chest pain is a heart attack, but some of the time it is something really, really weird. Good physicians rule out the rare even if they don't think they will ever see it.

People need to understand, however, that perfection in medicine is not possible. In a system where everything is a donkey until it is a zebra, where only a subset if any of the symptoms are present with a lot of unrelated nonsense just to distract, where the individuals that you are relying on for a history has no idea what is important and what isn't, error is inevitable. Software is helpful and should be embraced, but it should be embraced with an awareness that there is a reason people spend their entire lives trying to be good doctors: it is a lot harder than it looks.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM