Seed Media Group

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

jake-head-shot.jpgJake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine focusing in Neuroscience. He is due to graduate in 2032. He received a BS and a MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University -- where he spent most of his time drinking heavily and building vegetable catapults instead of learning information that would now be eminently useful. When he is not failing terrifically to perform his sworn duties, he enjoys watching bad movies, ethnic food, and running.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

Jake is joined periodically by two wonderful guest bloggers: Kara Contreary and Kate Seip. See the About Page.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own or those of my co-bloggers. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments we currently attend.

Search this blog

Archives

Blogroll


raptor.jpg

« Should parents be allowed to choose whether their child has a genetic disease? | Main | Reminder: Submit to the Synapse »

Of toilet seats and trembling hands

Category: Haha, a funny
Posted on: December 8, 2006 7:15 AM, by Kara Contreary

Falling under the broad category of "papers I never thought I'd see written" comes this article by Hammad Siddiqi about the social norm of leaving the toilet seat down and whether or not it represents a Nash Equilibrium. He models the situation in terms of a two-player, non-cooperative game with payoffs given in terms of C "cost of changing seat position" and D "cost of husband getting yelled at by irate wife". Needless to say, D>>>C. Not exactly gender-neutral, but read on if you're curious...

Structure of the Game There are two people, one is a representative of the male species, call him John and the other is a representative of the female species, call her Marsha. They use the toilet for two operations; #1 and #2. Marsha performs both with the seat in the down position whereas John performs #1 with the seat in the up position and #2 with the seat in the down position. That means, he must change the seat position appropriately before performing the corresponding operation.1 Assume that the inconvenience cost of changing the seat position is C. Further assume that the need for #1 arises with a probability p....Consider the situation in which John and Marsha decide to cohabit and both use the same toilet. This situation is popularly known as marriage. That changes things for the worse for both parties as far as the toilet operations are concerned. John argues 'Why does it matter if the seat is up or down? Let's leave the seat in the position used." Let's call that strategy J. Marsha fights back, "It must be down or else." Let's call this strategy M.

Too see the payoff matrix, click below:

Download file


Siddiqi concludes that while the social norm of leaving the toilet seat down is inefficient, it represents a trembling-hand Nash Equilibrium. You can see in the payoff matrix that both JJ (leaving the seat in the position in which it was last used) and MM (always leaving it down) are Nash Equilibrium strategies, but if Marsha "trembles" to M, the formulation of D>>>C means that JJ cannot survive. The seat will remain down.

Sorry boys, we've got Game Theory on our side.


Hat tip: Crooked Timber

Comments

The equation could use a few more points. I have a tendency to leave toilet seat up because of an experience with a roommate who left the toilet seat as he found it and who also had bad aim. A couple of times of coming in, finding the toilet seat down, and sitting in liquid convinced me to always leave with the toilet seat up no matter what I'd just finished doing. The couple of women I've had as roommates since that time agree that the ick factor is enough to excuse my trouble in leaving the toilet seat down.

Posted by: Roger | December 8, 2006 9:45 AM

Since many men are sufficiently deaf and deficient in long term memory such that D=C, maybe the real-world Nash equilibrium is JM...

Posted by: JW Tan | December 8, 2006 11:40 AM

What if Marsha has bad aim? And if the cost to John of pointing this out is also >>C? Or is this just my own small hell?

Posted by: John | December 8, 2006 3:31 PM

"trembling hand", indeed! I learned long ago to just sit when I pee. Problem solved. Besides, I can use that moment to do some reading.

Yes, I am a total loser.

That, plus my wife keeps my nuts in her purse.

Posted by: boojieboy | December 9, 2006 6:58 PM

What might I ask would be the perturbation in this Nash Equilibrium if the "trembler" in question was a transexual??

Posted by: kelvin | December 11, 2006 10:20 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs