Pure Pedantry : On the superfluity of nations

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

Jake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine focusing in Neuroscience. He is due to graduate in 2032. He received a BS and a MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University -- where he spent most of his time drinking heavily and building vegetable catapults instead of learning information that would now be eminently useful. When he is not failing terrifically to perform his sworn duties, he enjoys watching bad movies, ethnic food, and running.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

Jake is joined periodically by two wonderful guest bloggers: Kara Contreary and Kate Seip. See the About Page.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own or those of my co-bloggers. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments we currently attend.

Search this blog

On the superfluity of nations

Category: Philosophy
Posted on: September 9, 2007 2:03 PM, by Kara Contreary

Who knew anybody, much less the Economist had an opinion on whether or not Belgium should exist?

One question: if Belgium goes through a 'velvet' divorce, who gets custody of the chocolate?

Comments

"Name a famous Belgian" is one question that is usually unanswerable, whereas "Name a famous Dutchman" is ... Well, Rembrandt for one.

Hercule Poirot is fictitious, Rene Magritte is not as famous as Rembrandt, nor is King Leopold, the genocidal colonizer of the Congo. Flemish artists like Rubens or Breughel do not count as Belgian since it did not exist until 1830.

Will the U.K. go the way of Belgium ?... Many Scots feel they might as well deal with the EU directly and the First Minister of the Scots Assembly is a Nationalist (though in a minority Government). They why not Wales, Northern Ireland, Catalonia, the Basque provinces of Spain, Lombardy, and the many residual isolated minorities of Eastern Europe (e.g. the Hungarian parts of Romania)?

Personally, I think these centrifugal movements will come up short, like Quebec in Canada. Despite the cultural differences, the Parti Quebecois could not must the 50%+ necessary to carry secession. And is 50.000001% of the electorate enough to establish a new "nation", not just a new state?

If the state cannot command the allegiance of a pretty clear national majority, then it is better off being conservative and leaving things as they are. The problem for Belgium is agreeing in which state Brussels will lie, if they get to that point.

Posted by: Toby | September 9, 2007 5:39 PM

Who knew anybody, much less the Economist had an opinion on whether or not Belgium should exist?

How about the 10 million Belgians? Contrary to what the Economist claims, we are not indifferent to the future of our country.

Anyway, the secession of Flanders is not quite as imminent as some people outside Belgium think. It will happen eventually, but not quite yet.

Posted by: Dd | September 12, 2007 7:52 AM

Well... there's also Justine Henin, the best female tennis player in the world.

Posted by: Russell Blackford | September 13, 2007 9:15 AM