Seed Media Group

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

jake-head-shot.jpgJake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine focusing in Neuroscience. He is due to graduate in 2032. He received a BS and a MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University -- where he spent most of his time drinking heavily and building vegetable catapults instead of learning information that would now be eminently useful. When he is not failing terrifically to perform his sworn duties, he enjoys watching bad movies, ethnic food, and running.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

Jake is joined periodically by two wonderful guest bloggers: Kara Contreary and Kate Seip. See the About Page.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own or those of my co-bloggers. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments we currently attend.

Search this blog

Archives

Blogroll


raptor.jpg

« The Moral Problem of New Atheism vs. Religion -or- The Majesty of Creation | Main | Blogging on Peer-Reviewed Research »

The Size of an Ant's Eyes Correlates with Diurnal Variation in Foraging

Category: Evolution
Posted on: October 31, 2007 1:55 PM, by Jake Young

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchMyrmecia.jpgThere is a really cool paper in Current Biology about the how even an animal's sensory apparatus adapt to their particular evolutionary niche.

Greiner et al. looked at four closely-related species of ants from the genus Myrmecia. (As you can see from the picture, these ants are also huge.) These four species are all relatively similar lifestyles, going out to forage on daily intervals. The four species differ, however, on when they go out to look for food. Some of them go out in mid-day; some go out only at night.

The authors compared the time when the animals would forage with the size. The data is shown in the following figure (Figure 1 in the paper, click to enlarge):

antssmall.jpg

The left column shows a picture of the ant species in question. The middle column shows a histogram of the ant species' activity at different times of the day. The right column shows an section of the ants eye for the comparison of size. You can see that the ant species with the smaller eyes are spend most of their time foraging during the day whereas the ant species with the larger eyes are either nocturnal or forage at dawn/dusk.

The authors went on to calculate the optical sensitivity of the ants eyes to show that it follows a similar trend. This trend was not accounted for by difference in the relative size of the ants i.e. the ants with the largest eyes were not necessarily the largest overall.

The authors conclude that this suggests that the eye sizes and sensitivities have adapted for each ant species relative foraging times. They present these four species as a model organism of adaptation to a visual niche -- meaning I think that the visual stimuli associated with that animals food and world. To whit:

In conclusion, the large differences in photoreceptor and lens dimensions in these ants do not scale with body size but are clearly related to periods of foraging activity that occur in different ambient light conditions. Both superposition and apposition compound eyes have been modified in relation to ambient light conditions in a number of insect groups [10], [11] and [12]. Myrmecia ants, however, represent an ideal model system to investigate the evolution of visual niche specialisation, including the metabolic and space constraints on eye design, as they exhibit such a tight correlation between the timing of foraging bouts and the structural adaptations of their apposition compound eyes. Moreover, in contrast to many flying insects, the walking, central place foraging ants may allow us to identify the range of visual tasks they are confronted with during their regular excursions.

The full citation for this paper is:

Greiner B, Narendra A, Reid SF, Dacke M, Ribi WA, Zeil J. "Eye structure correlates with distinct foraging-bout timing in primitive ants." Curr Biol 2007 Oct 23 17(20):R879-80

Hat-tip: Faculty of 1000

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Baylor rededicates itself to bible college status 07.25.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. One goofy site 07.25.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Comments from the McDonald's Boycott 07.25.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. When Political Labels Become Useless 07.25.2008 · Ed Brayton
  5. Oh no! My cell phone's going to kill me! 07.25.2008 · Orac

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com