Seed Media Group

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

jake-head-shot.jpgJake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine focusing in Neuroscience. He is due to graduate in 2032. He received a BS and a MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University -- where he spent most of his time drinking heavily and building vegetable catapults instead of learning information that would now be eminently useful. When he is not failing terrifically to perform his sworn duties, he enjoys watching bad movies, ethnic food, and running.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

Jake is joined periodically by two wonderful guest bloggers: Kara Contreary and Kate Seip. See the About Page.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own or those of my co-bloggers. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments we currently attend.

Search this blog

Archives

Blogroll


raptor.jpg

« Hot cross-species toad sex | Main | Drew Carey Defends Medical Marijuana »

Health Risks of Oral Contraception?

Category: Women's Health
Posted on: November 13, 2007 2:41 PM, by Jake Young

Heidi Ledford at Nature covers a recent presentation at the American Heart Association of data showing that oral contraceptive use increases the amount of plaques in women's arteries over years of use. This is part of several studies that have shown that the use of oral contraceptives may have some health consequences for women, particularly women in high risk groups.

However, I like this article because it emphasizes the reticence with which most women should take these findings. Results with oral contraceptives are ambiguous, and they are confounded by the fact that most of the studies were done on older forms of the contraceptives that used much higher doses than are commonly prescribed today. Money quote:

Why is it so hard to get a straight answer?

In addition to differences between populations of women, study results can be muddied by differences in the composition and concentration of hormones in the many different birth-control pills on the market, says Hayes. "You can't lump all oral contraceptives together."

Many studies were begun years or decades ago, when birth-control pills contained higher overall levels of hormones and the hormones were derived from different sources. "The drugs we're using now are very different," says Hayes.

"This is one of the problems we often face in medicine. We start a study only to have the treatment evolve radically between the beginning of the study and its end. You can get good results, but they're not necessarily clinically relevant."

And, Hayes notes, study designs are often less than ideal. "It would be very hard to randomize an oral-contraceptive trial," she says.

Read the whole thing.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. IT'S A GODDAMNED CRACKER! 07.08.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. Templeton discovers mortality 07.08.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Thanks, Andrew Wakefield 07.08.2008 · Orac
  4. Arguments for God 07.07.2008 · Jason Rosenhouse
  5. "Diversity" at the Naval Academy 07.08.2008 · Ed Brayton

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com