Official Comment Count: 1,034,834

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

jake-head-shot.jpgJake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine focusing in Neuroscience. He is due to graduate in 2032. He received a BS and a MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University -- where he spent most of his time drinking heavily and building vegetable catapults instead of learning information that would now be eminently useful. When he is not failing terrifically to perform his sworn duties, he enjoys watching bad movies, ethnic food, and running.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

Jake is joined periodically by two wonderful guest bloggers: Kara Contreary and Kate Seip. See the About Page.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own or those of my co-bloggers. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments we currently attend.

Search this blog

Archives

Blogroll


raptor.jpg

« Lies, Damn Lies, and Health Statistics | Main | Bizarre Experiments »

Mickey Kaus on Political Dark Matter

Category: Quotes
Posted on: November 5, 2007 4:04 PM, by Jake Young

Dark matter has worked its way into political cliche:

Rosenbaum's Political Physics: Do you ever sense there is some large mass of dark matter, an unseen Scandal Star, the gravitational pull of which is warping the coverage of what seems, on the surface, a pretty dull presidential race? I do. So does Ron Rosenbaum. I thought the Dark Star was the Edwards affair allegation. But Rosenbaum says "everyone in the elite Mainstream media" knows about another juicy scandal that the LAT is supposedly sitting on. I guess this is proof that I'm not in the elite, because I don't know what he's talking about. ... My vestigial Limbaugh gland tells me it must involve a Democrat, or else the Times would have found a reason to print it. ... P.S.: If it's just Richardson, that will be very disappointing. ... 3:16 P.M. (Italic emphasis mine. Links in original.)

It was only a matter of time before dark matter went the way of DNA into common verbiage. Let's just hope that people at least use the term correctly. I am not keeping my fingers crossed. I don't think that he is actually doing so here. Does dark matter come in "stars"? Wouldn't that imply that it is not in fact dark?

Comments

I sounds to me like he has heard the phrase "dark matter" but has no idea what it means and so assumes it must be a new name for black holes.

Posted by: John McKay | November 5, 2007 6:36 PM

Well, dark matter doesn't clump quite as well as normal matter, but it *does* still congregate around stars due to gravity. In fact, gravity is the only way that dark matter interacts with normal matter.

It doesn't come in 'stars', per se, insofar as it doesn't compress and ignite to produce fusion, but the usage is still mildly appropriate. We have dark matter swirling around our own Sol, and we would not be too far off calling it Dark Sol.

Posted by: Xanthir, FCD | November 5, 2007 6:37 PM

Well a small percentage of dark matter is ordinary matter in nonluminous (or with low ) luminosity form that we don't see it. That would include red and brown dwarfs (which can be seen, but beyond a certain distance usually aren't), as well as black holes & neutron stars which aren't actively accreting matter. Then you could have free floating planets and other chunks of ordinary stuff.

At one point there was a "theory" about a dark solar companion called Nemesis. It supposedly had a very long period elliptical orbit, and its close approaches supposedly perturbed comets into the inner solar system, where earth/comet collisions were invoked to explain supposed periodicities to the timing of mass extinction events. I don't know if this theory has any supporters left.

Posted by: bigTom | November 5, 2007 6:48 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Those crazy Brits 10.13.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. How low will he sink? 10.12.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. If McCain loses, God's Reputation Will Suffer 10.13.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. Infinity is NOT a number 10.13.2008 · Mark C. Chu-Carroll
  5. On racial discomfort and blogger diversity 10.13.2008 · DrugMonkey

Search All Blogs