Official Comment Count: 1,035,598

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

jake-head-shot.jpgJake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine focusing in Neuroscience. He is due to graduate in 2032. He received a BS and a MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University -- where he spent most of his time drinking heavily and building vegetable catapults instead of learning information that would now be eminently useful. When he is not failing terrifically to perform his sworn duties, he enjoys watching bad movies, ethnic food, and running.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

Jake is joined periodically by two wonderful guest bloggers: Kara Contreary and Kate Seip. See the About Page.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own or those of my co-bloggers. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments we currently attend.

Search this blog

Archives

Blogroll


raptor.jpg

« Question #1: Why was the condom filled with beer? | Main | Guns harder to come by in New York than you would think »

We Want a Presidential Science Debate

Category: Science politics
Posted on: December 10, 2007 3:02 PM, by Jake Young

Scientific issues are becoming more and more a staple of American life, which means that they should be becoming more and more included in the questions we ask our Presidential candidates. We want to know what they think about health care and the war in Iraq; we should want to know what they think about stem cell research, global warming, and implementing the Endangered Species Act.

This is why bloggers Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum are trying to organize a debate for the 2008 Presidential candidates about scientific issues:

Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for a public debate in which the U.S. presidential candidates share their views on the issues of The Environment, Health and Medicine, and Science and Technology Policy.

Check out their website to lend your support. Their petition has an long list of supporters including prominent members of the scientific community and bloggers.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Fossil daisy-chain 10.13.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. Whoa. Hitchens endorses Obama! 10.13.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Infinity is NOT a number 10.13.2008 · Mark C. Chu-Carroll
  4. If McCain loses, God's Reputation Will Suffer 10.13.2008 · Ed Brayton
  5. On racial discomfort and blogger diversity 10.13.2008 · DrugMonkey

Search All Blogs