Official Comment Count: 1,034,720

Reality is always more complicated than you think.

Profile

jake-head-shot.jpgJake Young is a MD/PhD student at Mount Sinai School of Medicine focusing in Neuroscience. He is due to graduate in 2032. He received a BS and a MS in Biological Sciences from Stanford University -- where he spent most of his time drinking heavily and building vegetable catapults instead of learning information that would now be eminently useful. When he is not failing terrifically to perform his sworn duties, he enjoys watching bad movies, ethnic food, and running.

Pure Pedantry is a blog about science -- social sciences and otherwise -- as well as academic and scientific culture. No one can live on science alone, so I also like to dwell on pop culture, periodically explore the humanities, and indulge in other types of geeky goodness.

Jake is joined periodically by two wonderful guest bloggers: Kara Contreary and Kate Seip. See the About Page.

DISCLAIMERS: 1) Jake Young is not a licensed physician (yet). He is merely a medical student. The information published on this site is not intended for use in medical decision making. Please seek advice from a licensed, medical professional before making any health decisions. 2) The opinions expressed are my own or those of my co-bloggers. They do not represent the views of SEED magazine or the educational establishments we currently attend.

Search this blog

Archives

Blogroll


raptor.jpg

« Internet Dating Addiction? | Main | For Prospective Alzheimer's Drugs, It's All About Location, Location, Location »

Podcast on Science Policy

Category: Science policy
Posted on: May 23, 2008 5:22 PM, by Jake Young

Back in April, Kate and the other peeps at SCC hosted a panel discussion on science policy. It was co-sponsored by NYAS, and now NYAS has a podcast up of it. (The wonderful and elegant Kate hosts the whole bidness.) The topic was 'Mixing Science and Policy" and the panelists were Joanne Carney, David Goldston, Michael Stebbins.

It was a really good talk, and I have a couple comments:

-- I really like how Joanne plugged some of my dream fellowships doing science on the Hill such as the AAAS Mass Media Fellowship and the AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellowship. There are really a lot of good opportunities out there to get involved. Alas...someday...

-- I really like David's idea of strategic visibility: basically, that there are times when you want a scientific issue to be high profile and times when having it be low profile is a better option. A low profile can allow legislative fixes that won't happen on controversial issues.

-- Mike and those guys at FAS are f'ing ninjas. That whole bit about redoing the entire Homeland Security preparedness website to make it accurate is just genius. (Listen to the podcast and you will understand.)

Anyway, click here and you can listen the podcast (.mp3). (Thank you to the NYAS for setting this up.)

Comments

Yay, Kate! =D Good podcast; a calm practical-minded contrast to all the ScienceDebates hubbub. There was an event here at Pacific Science Museum a few months ago, ostensibly on the topic of nanotech, but most of the group discussion afterward focused on the general intersection of science and policy. It was valuable, but less than it could have been because participants were asked to weigh in on the question of oversight of an emerging technology -- but without having first received any guidance on how the current process does and does not work.

Posted by: jope | May 27, 2008 5:31 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs