Now on ScienceBlogs: Q: How do you sex a Smilodon? (A: Very carefully)

Seed Media Group

Retrospectacle: A Neuroscience Blog

The trials, tribulations, and joys of a Neuroscience gradute student writing her thesis in the postmodern, post-Y2K world.

Profile

me%20and%20pep.jpg Shelley Batts is a Neuroscience PhD candidate at the University of Michigan. She studies hair cell regeneration in the cochlea, and is just embarking on that quixotic quest called 'thesis.' She lies awake at night pondering how science intersects with politics, culture, policy, money, medicine, and religion in an attempt to be more than just a niche scientist sitting in the oh-so-lovely ivory tower. Follow me and my parrot on the quest to get funded, get a PhD, and stay sane.
for%20blog%20cropped.JPG

Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the earth, are never alone or weary of life. ~Rachel Carson

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Highlights from Retrospectacle

Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration

Interview With Dr. Irene Pepperberg

My Travels

Chemistry of Red Bull

On Religion and Taking the 'Red Pill'

Fibonacci Poems

Neuroscience of Cocaine Addiction

Basic Concepts: Hearing

Basic Concepts: Prions

Parrots Have Object Permanance

Video Game Addiction

Nicotine Makes You Sober

Buzz on Honeybee Cognition

Help Out A Grad Student (Me!)

My Amazon.com Wish List

Serotonin Jewelry

Alex Foundation Store

Technorati

Be My Friend on

MySpace

Commenter Policy

I love constructive comments! However, I reserve the right to delete comments that abuse this forum. Voicing your opinions is great, just be respectful. :D

Other Information

blogging_winner_2nd.jpg Openlab 2007 intel.jpg Badge.jpg thinking-blogger.jpg bloggeroftheday1.jpg bloggers%20rights.gif
I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

liberty_waits_badge.bmp B-List Blogger
synapse.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg


My blog is worth $164,845.68.
How much is your blog worth?

Joost™

Retrospectacle is now Of Two Minds!

« A Seed Is Planted | Main | Hear, Hear: A Primer on the Cochlea »

Brain Areas Implicated in Cocaine Relapse and Addiction

Category: Drugs and the Brain
Posted on: June 9, 2006 1:59 PM, by Shelley Batts

Cocaine abuse is a major public health issue, with estimations of as high as 1% of the US population over 12 as abusers. Addiction to cocaine, and most substances for that matter, results in physical modifications in your brain which are persistant, and detrimental to many mental fuctions like learning. During and following cocaine addiction, changes occur in a brain region called the nucleus accumbens (NAc), which is important in natural reward pathways. It is a key player in the reinforcement of drug-taking.

A recent brief communication in Nature Neuroscience (Martin et al. 2006) describes a facinating study which provides a neural explantion as to why learning and memory is abnormally disrupted in drug abusers, due to modifications in activity in the NAc region. (More below the fold...)

What this group found that was so different was this: there exists a difference in NAc activity between rats that can control their drug intake vs. those who receive it passively. The group compared four animal groups: rats which controlled their drug intake by pressing a lever, rats which received drug (via a catheter) passively, rats which received nothing (sham controls), and rats which could control their food intake. Following a 19-day training period where each group received either drug, food, or nothing, synaptic plasticity in each group was recorded in an attempt to measure LTD. (LTD refers to "long term depression" which is a form of neural activity which, like "long term potentiation," is necessary for types of learning and memory. More on that here.

nn1713-F1.jpe
The results were surprising. The group which self-administered cocaine had a significant decrease in LTD in the NAc following a one-day abstinence. The groups which received no drug and the ones that received self-administered food had no change in NAc activity, which could be expected, but the group which received passive cocaine also had no significant change in LTD.

What this translates to is this: it was not the pharmacological properties of cocaine which triggered the change in LTD (or else it would have occured in passive cocaine animals too) but rather the control over cocaine administration made all the difference. This suggests that an important component of addition is the drug-seeking behavior, as well as making a "choice" at some level to administer. The authors speculated that it is this mechanism which contributes to the difficulty of avoiding relapse following drug abstinence, insofar that the drug-seeking behaviors are biologically reinforced at least as much as the physical addition itselt.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/7507

Comments

1

Wow, Shelley, the new banner looks fabulous - what an excellent idea to characterize the temporal transition of the modern woman neuroscientist! And a new headshot to boot - very authoritative!

The issue of personal control in substance abuse is a very important issue; just as important as social setting and positive or negative reinforcement from the environment, completely independent of the drug itself. Gotta say that I learned a lot from the post - keep it up, welcome, and congratulations!

Posted by: Abel PharmBoy | June 9, 2006 4:57 PM

2

Just popping in to say welcome to your new digs!

Posted by: dan dright | June 11, 2006 1:00 AM

3

Thanks for coming by guys!

Posted by: Shelley | June 11, 2006 10:17 PM

4

I've been wondering whether a stimulant like ritalin could increase the addictive potential of, well, behaviors with addictive potential.

For instance, would gambling be more addictive, or a gambler more likely to get hooked, if it were done while under the influence of ritalin or a similar stimulant.

I'm not sure if 'internet addiction' is considered to be a genuine condition, but if so I would think it would be especially likely in people on the legal stimulants.

Posted by: Jon Hendry | June 11, 2006 11:49 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM