Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

me%20and%20pep.jpg Shelley Batts is a Neuroscience PhD candidate at the University of Michigan. She studies hair cell regeneration in the cochlea, and is just embarking on that quixotic quest called 'thesis.' She lies awake at night pondering how science intersects with politics, culture, policy, money, medicine, and religion in an attempt to be more than just a niche scientist sitting in the oh-so-lovely ivory tower. Follow me and my parrot on the quest to get funded, get a PhD, and stay sane.
for%20blog%20cropped.JPG

Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the earth, are never alone or weary of life. ~Rachel Carson

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Highlights from Retrospectacle

Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration

Interview With Dr. Irene Pepperberg

My Travels

Chemistry of Red Bull

On Religion and Taking the 'Red Pill'

Fibonacci Poems

Neuroscience of Cocaine Addiction

Basic Concepts: Hearing

Basic Concepts: Prions

Parrots Have Object Permanance

Video Game Addiction

Nicotine Makes You Sober

Buzz on Honeybee Cognition

Help Out A Grad Student (Me!)

My Amazon.com Wish List

Serotonin Jewelry

Alex Foundation Store

Technorati

Be My Friend on

MySpace

Commenter Policy

I love constructive comments! However, I reserve the right to delete comments that abuse this forum. Voicing your opinions is great, just be respectful. :D

Other Information

blogging_winner_2nd.jpg Openlab 2007 intel.jpg Badge.jpg thinking-blogger.jpg bloggeroftheday1.jpg bloggers%20rights.gif
I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

liberty_waits_badge.bmp B-List Blogger
synapse.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg


My blog is worth $164,845.68.
How much is your blog worth?

Joost™

« African Grey Parrot Apparel for a Good Cause | Main | Hillary for President? Not If You're Old. »

Hair Cell Regeneration as a Therapy for Deafness

Category: Inner Ear BiologyTastes Like Neuroscience
Posted on: August 9, 2006 9:18 AM, by Shelley Batts

In addition to the below post on gene therapy, keep a watch out for a review paper on the topic (by yours truly) that was just accepted into Hearing Research.

Deafness and hearing impairment are serious medical concerns in America, with nearly 30 million Americans affected to some degree. This is such a widespread problem in our society due to the combined effects of loud noises, aging, and heredity. Hearing loss happens when cochlear hair cells are lost (for a primer on the cochlea and hair cells, go here). Mammals, including humans, are unable to re-grow hair cells although birds and a few other species can. This is one reason I am so fascinated by birds---you can deafen them repeatedly, and within 2 weeks, they regenerate hair cells and their hearing is restored! If people could also do this, no one would ever suffer from deafness ever again. This aim, the regeneration of hair cells in humans, is the focus of my lab and my thesis. (continued......)

In order to sum up a very large body of research stemming from our lab, I'm going to talk about a Nature Medicine paper from 2005 which was the realization of a lot of our theories.

The idea goes like this: a certain gene, called Atoh1, is solely expressed in hair cells during their development and differentiation. It is necessary and sufficient for hair cell development, and in Atoh1-knockout mice, no hair cells are seen. This convinced us that Atoh1 was an excellent candidate for viral over-expression, possibly resulting in new hair cells in the deaf ear.

Viral over-expression refers to the ability to insert a gene of interest into an inactivated virus. The virus is no longer harmful, and no longer replicates its DNA when it infects a cell. Instead it replicated the gene of interest, forcing the cell to express that protein. Our lab used a type of virus called an adenovirus, and inserted Atoh1 under the control of the promiscuous human-CMV promoter. The next step was to inject the modified virus into the fluids of the deaf inner ear, and observe whether hair cells regenerated as a result.

To deafen an animal, we use a combination of the antibiotic kanamycin and the diuretic ethacrynic acid. These two drugs, when administered in close succession, result in the death of all hair cells in the cochlea. Five days following the deafening procedure, we administered a very small volume of the modified virus into the scala media, the area where the hair cells lie. Then, we waited. During the interim, we tested the animals' hearing thresholds ever few weeks with Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) measurement. With this technique, we can measure the activity in the brain while an animal is perceiving a sound of a controlled intensity. In this way, we can "step down" in the decibel level of the presented sound, and when the ABR gets no response, we can infer that that is the level of the animal's hearing threshold.

Here is a scanning electron micrograph of a normal hair cell region (called the organ of Corti):
normal%20corti%20sem.bmp

And here is what the same region looks like after all the hair cells are eliminated (deafened):
f1a.GIF

It is immediately obvious that the ordered structure of the previous picture has completely changed. The "V" shaped structures are the "hairs" of the hair cells. These are called stereocilia, and they project into the fluid space to receive vibrations when sound waves pass through.

So, what were the results of our study? Not only did we find a significant amount of regenerated hair cells in the virus-treated ears, but their hearing was significantly improved as well. As a control on all animals, only the left cochlea received the virus, the right cochlea received nothing. There was a large difference in hearing between the left and right ears of the guinea pigs (left was better). I will explain the figure below in some detail:

fig%202.gif

A-C: SEMs of virus-treated organ of Corti 2 months post treatment. Many hair cells have regenerated and the organization is in rows, like normal. Some hair cells are ectopic. These are three representative levels of recovery with A being the best and C being the worst. Even C has a significant level of regeneration.
D. This is an organ of Corti which was deafened and received no treatment (a right ear). There are no hair cells.
E. This cochlea received a sham virus surgery. Instead of Atoh1, there was no gene insert in the virus. No regeneration was seen.
F. This is a higher magnification of an inner hair cell.
G. This is a higher magnification of an outer hair cell.

It is clear that there is an increase in hair cells after Atoh1 virus therapy, and no hair cell regeneration in controls. In addition we also observed some improvements in ABR thresholds 2 months after the virus therapy (below). In the figure below, A represents a "hearing waveform" of the treated ear corresponding to a threshold of about 60 decibels, while on the right, B represents a "deaf waveform" of the control ear, with no response even at 105 decibels.

fig%205%20ab.GIF

We concluded that virally-mediated overexpression of Atoh1 in the deaf ear resulted in numerous hair cells as well as hearing improvement after 2 months. This therapy is still in its infancy and very far away from being developed for humans

Reference: Izumikawa et al. 2005. Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammals. Nature Medicine. 11, 3, pg 271-276.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

Congrats on getting the paper accepted!!!

If people could also do this, no one would ever suffer from deafness ever again

and not to be picky, but there are other types of hearing loss that have nothing to do with loss of hair cells. and i know you know that. but as a fellow hearing researcher who doesn't work on hair cells i felt the need to comment. your work is still crazy awesome. :)

Posted by: jen | August 9, 2006 11:20 AM

Yep, you are absolutely right Jen! There can be nerve damage, infections, etc. What I meant to say was "hair cell-related hearing loss."

Posted by: Shelley Batts | August 9, 2006 11:25 AM

I'll volunteer for experimentation. Use me.

Posted by: aw | August 12, 2006 9:24 AM

Every now and then the popular press runs a story about this research - interesting to discover the blog of someone actually doing it.

I'm one of the people your research may help. I've no hearing on the right, a 90 db loss on the left. It's a progressive sensioneural loss, but I'm not certain whether that means hair cell restoration would make a difference (How do I find out?)

I had some hearing on the right before age four and the left held out long enough for me to acquire normal speech, use the phone, enjoy the radio, watch TV, etc.

Nowadays, my speech remains clear, but I perceive incoming speech as babble - and that's with a full-power BTE hearing aid. Without the hearing aid, I can't even hear my own voice. TV, radio, phone - forget it, even with the hearing aid.

I could probably get a CI, but installing a CI destroys the original cochlea and once that's done, there's no turning back. The current CIs are terrible at rendering music, and I want to hear Elton John banging out Bennie and the Jets at full throttle again.

I know your research is still in early stages, and may not even be the answer for me, but know that I and others are very interested in your work and progress.

Posted by: Kevin McLeod | February 20, 2007 7:53 PM

hey, just stumbled across this post... i will have to read your paper now. anyway, random question - do you know if the ectopic hair cells are innervated? has anyone looked at that? my lab studies HC regeneration also - mostly in fish, but in a few other models as well - but i haven't heard of any studies that looked specifically at innervation of regenerated hair cells.

Posted by: kat | March 30, 2007 11:56 PM

hey, just stumbled across this post... i will have to read your paper now. anyway, random question - do you know if the ectopic hair cells are innervated? has anyone looked at that? my lab studies HC regeneration and toxicity also - mostly in fish, but in a few other models as well - but i haven't heard of any studies that looked specifically at innervation of regenerated hair cells.

kevin - there are studies being done on music appreciation in CI patients. of course the earlier implants are getting pretty horrible reviews, but as they are able to cram more electrodes into the implant, improving the resolution of the sound, music rendering should improve. though i wonder, could you get an implant in the "bad" ear, and leave the "good" ear alone? that way you could turn it off when you felt like rocking out......?

Posted by: kat | March 31, 2007 12:01 AM

Kevin, Just wanted to let you know that i have just had a cochlear implant and am enjoying listening to music again. It's good enough for me to appreciate 'new' music i.e melodies and tunes that i had not heard before and I can recognize them again. Prior to the implant my hearing had got to the stage where I couldn't really distinguish between the instruments or the singer and I even had trouble identifying music that i knew! As Kat says, you could always have the implant in your 'bad' ear - that still leaves you with one ear left for future developments! I look forward to spending the rest of my life exploring music - i have so much to catch up on! I'm sure your memory of music will stand you in good stead - I was never a real music fan, but i am now!
By the way, i can also listen to the radio again (fantastic) and use the telephone again, including a mobile.I still wear a BTE in my other ear but I can easily manage on just the implant alone.

Posted by: Jan Hinsley | May 12, 2007 8:16 AM

My daughter is deaf, so you can guess how thrilled I am about this information. How long before humans can benefit from this therapy? Can I volunteer my daughter for candidacy in a test program?

Doug: This is only in the research phase, quite far from human therapy at the moment.

Posted by: Doug Bailey | September 6, 2007 10:08 AM

Thank you Shelley. Thank you UofM. I'm always thankful to learn of new research that is pushing the limits of science in the efforts to help millions. As the father of a son born deaf, I dream one day for him to be able to hear me play guitar. He is a beautiful person and I love him greatly - exactly how he is; but it breaks my heart when he wishes he could hear. Some day I believe that wish will come true. Be proud Shelley knowing every lost hour of sleep is another hour closer to aiding his and many others dreams.

Posted by: ken | September 7, 2007 1:39 PM

Ken, thank you for that beautiful sentiment. I hope one day to make your dreams come true.

Posted by: Shelley Batts | September 7, 2007 3:53 PM

Yow, very cool! I just bounced over here due to a reference by GrrlScientist. How long have you been mentioning the hair-cell stuff in your bioblurb? I'm not a regular reader here, but even so, I'm surprised that I hadn't noticed it before.

Posted by: David Harmon | October 13, 2007 9:26 PM

Does this you can also correct for hearing loss where older men gradually lose the ability to hear higher pitched sounds making it harder or impossible for them to hear womens and children's voices? If so you might save more than just people's hearing but might also be able to help out a lot of marriages. You are super dope, keep up the good work on your blog and offline.

Posted by: s | December 27, 2007 12:39 PM

hello, i accidently bumped into this site. im still finding it hard to believe what i just read. Well, im completely deaf in my right ear and wear a hearing aid in the other. The problem with this ear is.....well, from what i was told, is that, my hair cells are all tangled and therefore, sounds does not travel well. So for u to say u can degenerate and regenerate hairs is exciting and of course risky. just like as one says, once u degenerate the hair, there is no turning back., but im willing to take the risk. so, if u discover that it will work on humans, pleaaaase let me know. im dying to hear better.

Posted by: jamal dejong | January 19, 2008 5:12 PM

Good work.I have been interested in transdifferentiation.My uncle Dr.B.V.Shenoi has done some pioneering work.www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252004/491.pdf.We have been able to stimulate cells morphologically resembling endothelium to transdifferentiate to epithelial cell types.The factor8 which is a marker for endothelium is carried to the epithelium.My uncle passed away recently.The work has also been published as a monograph.Would it be of some interest to you?Kindly refer also to nature network where I have dealt with in more detail.Jagesh

Posted by: Dr.M.Jagesh Kamath | February 24, 2008 3:29 AM

Hello, my name is andreas I am from Austria.
I have TTus after small arms fire and a high rate from hearing loss.
Congratulations to your work!
When does it works for patients?
Andreas

Posted by: Andreas | March 4, 2008 6:11 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most Active

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com