Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Retrospectacle: A Neuroscience Blog

The trials, tribulations, and joys of a Neuroscience gradute student writing her thesis in the postmodern, post-Y2K world.

Profile

me%20and%20pep.jpg Shelley Batts is a Neuroscience PhD candidate at the University of Michigan. She studies hair cell regeneration in the cochlea, and is just embarking on that quixotic quest called 'thesis.' She lies awake at night pondering how science intersects with politics, culture, policy, money, medicine, and religion in an attempt to be more than just a niche scientist sitting in the oh-so-lovely ivory tower. Follow me and my parrot on the quest to get funded, get a PhD, and stay sane.
for%20blog%20cropped.JPG

Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the earth, are never alone or weary of life. ~Rachel Carson

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Highlights from Retrospectacle

Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration

Interview With Dr. Irene Pepperberg

My Travels

Chemistry of Red Bull

On Religion and Taking the 'Red Pill'

Fibonacci Poems

Neuroscience of Cocaine Addiction

Basic Concepts: Hearing

Basic Concepts: Prions

Parrots Have Object Permanance

Video Game Addiction

Nicotine Makes You Sober

Buzz on Honeybee Cognition

Help Out A Grad Student (Me!)

My Amazon.com Wish List

Serotonin Jewelry

Alex Foundation Store

Technorati

Be My Friend on

MySpace

Commenter Policy

I love constructive comments! However, I reserve the right to delete comments that abuse this forum. Voicing your opinions is great, just be respectful. :D

Other Information

blogging_winner_2nd.jpg Openlab 2007 intel.jpg Badge.jpg thinking-blogger.jpg bloggeroftheday1.jpg bloggers%20rights.gif
I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

liberty_waits_badge.bmp B-List Blogger
synapse.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg


My blog is worth $164,845.68.
How much is your blog worth?

Joost™

Retrospectacle is now Of Two Minds!

« Bonnie and Clyde 2006 (Well, Me and Pepper) | Main | Left and Right Hands Rely on Different Senses »

Saturday Shocker: US Trends in Obesity 1985-2005

Category: Health Care
Posted on: October 28, 2006 9:58 AM, by Shelley Batts

I was stunned as I scrolled through this short Powerpoint presentation composed by the CDC, published in JAMA over the years. Its a compliation of obesity rates beginning in 1985, going up until 2005. What might be the cause for the surge in obesity rates? Possibly the over-availability of cheap oils and starches, says the International Task Force on Obesity.

Makes this recent news release regarding the risk of polycystic ovary syndrome even more important.

Want better gas miliage? Some suggest shedding the pounds. A new pill from a Belgian group, called Rimonabant, may speed the process.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/24549

Comments

1

Obesity on the rise? Makes sense to me. I weigh more than I did in 1985, and I'll bet you do too.

Posted by: Mustafa Mond, FCD | October 28, 2006 1:44 PM

2

I don't find it shocking, perhaps only because I have been following this trend for a while. I do find it many other things, however: frightening, sad, a little baffling.

I've taught in a summer theatre program for the past 4 years and the things that kids spend their time on now-a-days is quite different (obviously). It is sometimes difficult to get the students to go outside or get off their rears and do something physical (even if it was related to class). they would much rather sit and play PS2, or sit and text-message friends, or sit and watch DVDs.

Lots of sitting going on. Now, I also sit some, but I'm old, and I still sit less than I do anything else. Strengthening this culture of sitting, a school in Attleboro, MA has outlawed tag at recess. Wouldn't want to create any activity that might lead to litigation or some such non-sense.

Posted by: blipey, FCD | October 28, 2006 6:50 PM

3

Very unlikely to be any connection (though I'd want to get definite word on it), but the rise in obesity rates coincides fairly well with the introduction of growth hormones as feed supplement in large-scale farming in the US, and we do know there's still traces of it in the slaughtered meat.

I kind of wonder if having a steady diet on such meat and thus constantly dosing yourself with very small amounts of growth hormone could possibly exacerbate the trend of increasing body weight? My own gut reaction is that the doseage is much too small to make any difference even when taken near-daily, but it would be nice to know it for a fact.

Posted by: Janne | October 28, 2006 9:27 PM

4

Mustafa,
Unless that picture on the previous post was from a long time ago, I would bet that Shelley has gained a LOT of weight since 1985...like a whole body's worth.

Posted by: Robert P. | October 30, 2006 12:40 PM

5

Considering I was about 5 years old in 1985, yeah, I agree with that logic. :)

Posted by: Shelley Batts | October 30, 2006 1:05 PM

6

They're on to my subtle humor.

Posted by: Mustafa Mond, FCD | October 30, 2006 2:46 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.