Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

me%20and%20pep.jpg Shelley Batts is a Neuroscience PhD candidate at the University of Michigan. She studies hair cell regeneration in the cochlea, and is just embarking on that quixotic quest called 'thesis.' She lies awake at night pondering how science intersects with politics, culture, policy, money, medicine, and religion in an attempt to be more than just a niche scientist sitting in the oh-so-lovely ivory tower. Follow me and my parrot on the quest to get funded, get a PhD, and stay sane.
for%20blog%20cropped.JPG

Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the earth, are never alone or weary of life. ~Rachel Carson

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Highlights from Retrospectacle

Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration

Interview With Dr. Irene Pepperberg

My Travels

Chemistry of Red Bull

On Religion and Taking the 'Red Pill'

Fibonacci Poems

Neuroscience of Cocaine Addiction

Basic Concepts: Hearing

Basic Concepts: Prions

Parrots Have Object Permanance

Video Game Addiction

Nicotine Makes You Sober

Buzz on Honeybee Cognition

Help Out A Grad Student (Me!)

My Amazon.com Wish List

Serotonin Jewelry

Alex Foundation Store

Technorati

Be My Friend on

MySpace

Commenter Policy

I love constructive comments! However, I reserve the right to delete comments that abuse this forum. Voicing your opinions is great, just be respectful. :D

Other Information

blogging_winner_2nd.jpg Openlab 2007 intel.jpg Badge.jpg thinking-blogger.jpg bloggeroftheday1.jpg bloggers%20rights.gif
I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

liberty_waits_badge.bmp B-List Blogger
synapse.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg


My blog is worth $164,845.68.
How much is your blog worth?

Joost™

« Irene Pepperberg and Steven Pinker Updates! | Main | Of Pinker and Pandas............ »

Abominations: Homosexuality, Football?

Category: Law and EthicsStupidity
Posted on: November 21, 2006 8:05 AM, by Shelley Batts

Some fantastic morning reading from a USA Today opinion article entitled '"When Religion Loses Its Credibility," critiques the current religious stance on homosexuality---and wonders, what if religion is yet again proven wrong? This was written by a well-spoken, pro-science Baptist Minister (yes, they do exist.)

Religion's only real commodity, after all, is its moral authority. Lose that, and we lose our credibility. Lose credibility, and we might as well close up shop.

It's happened to Christianity before, most famously when we dug in our heels over Galileo's challenge to the biblical view that the Earth, rather than the sun, was at the center of our solar system. You know the story. Galileo was persecuted for what turned out to be incontrovertibly true. For many, especially in the scientific community, Christianity never recovered

For quite a while, the "homosexuality debate" (as to whether it is a choice or innate) has been a rallying point for conservative Christian leaders. As to why they have settled on this particular behavior, as opposed to any other discrimination, is unclear to me. Ultimately, as with Galelio, science will bear out the facts--already mounting genetic evidence has pointed the way. It will be yet another bitter pill for the church to swallow.

However, one thing is clear: it is something that Christians feel strongly about. Conversely, things that they do NOT feel strongly about --handling pigskin, eating catfish, backtalking your parents--also incur the death penalty in Levitacus, the same area of scripture where homosexuality is called an "abomination."

For many of gay America's loudest critics, the results are unthinkable. First, no more football. At least not without gloves. Handling a pig skin is an abomination. Second, no more Saturday games even if you can get a new ball. Violating the Sabbath is a capital offense according to Leviticus. For the over-40 crowd, approaching the altar of God with a defect in your sight is taboo, but you'll have plenty of company because those menstruating or with disabilities are also barred.

The truth is that mainstream religion has moved beyond animal sacrifice, slavery and the host of primitive rituals described in Leviticus centuries ago. Selectively hanging onto these ancient proscriptions for gays and lesbians exclusively is unfair according to anybody's standard of ethics. We lawyers call it "selective enforcement," and in civil affairs it's illegal.

Go read the rest, certainly worth it.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

Good stuff, thanks. My theory as to why there's so much emphasis on homosexuality:

a) the "ick" factor;
b) sexual "sins" are more fraught just because they're about sex;
c) the church has a long history of trying to control sexual behavior, in particular;
d) there are not very many other sins, especially sexual sins, that Christians can criticize these days without the hypocrisy being really obvious.

Jesus talks about divorce, for instance; well, what is the church going to say about that, since divorce is so rampant now? And adultery, well, same problem. Masturbation? Pornography? Not a chance. But straight Christians can still condemn homosexuality without being hypocrites. For people like Ted Haggard, it's even worse; it's hard to imagine the level of self-loathing they must live with.

Speaking of Haggard, this website has a little ditty about him (via Making Light).

Posted by: Leslie in CA | November 24, 2006 1:56 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most German