Now on ScienceBlogs: Respiratory disease outbreaks in nursing homes

Seed Media Group

Retrospectacle: A Neuroscience Blog

The trials, tribulations, and joys of a Neuroscience gradute student writing her thesis in the postmodern, post-Y2K world.

Profile

me%20and%20pep.jpg Shelley Batts is a Neuroscience PhD candidate at the University of Michigan. She studies hair cell regeneration in the cochlea, and is just embarking on that quixotic quest called 'thesis.' She lies awake at night pondering how science intersects with politics, culture, policy, money, medicine, and religion in an attempt to be more than just a niche scientist sitting in the oh-so-lovely ivory tower. Follow me and my parrot on the quest to get funded, get a PhD, and stay sane.
for%20blog%20cropped.JPG

Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the earth, are never alone or weary of life. ~Rachel Carson

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Highlights from Retrospectacle

Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration

Interview With Dr. Irene Pepperberg

My Travels

Chemistry of Red Bull

On Religion and Taking the 'Red Pill'

Fibonacci Poems

Neuroscience of Cocaine Addiction

Basic Concepts: Hearing

Basic Concepts: Prions

Parrots Have Object Permanance

Video Game Addiction

Nicotine Makes You Sober

Buzz on Honeybee Cognition

Help Out A Grad Student (Me!)

My Amazon.com Wish List

Serotonin Jewelry

Alex Foundation Store

Technorati

Be My Friend on

MySpace

Commenter Policy

I love constructive comments! However, I reserve the right to delete comments that abuse this forum. Voicing your opinions is great, just be respectful. :D

Other Information

blogging_winner_2nd.jpg Openlab 2007 intel.jpg Badge.jpg thinking-blogger.jpg bloggeroftheday1.jpg bloggers%20rights.gif
I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

liberty_waits_badge.bmp B-List Blogger
synapse.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg


My blog is worth $164,845.68.
How much is your blog worth?

Joost™

Retrospectacle is now Of Two Minds!

« Science Meets a Nice Ass: Genetic Jeans | Main | Genetic Jeans + Pepper = Awesome »

Why Can't You Tickle Yourself?

Category: Tastes Like Neuroscience
Posted on: January 31, 2007 12:19 PM, by Shelley Batts

Scientific American has a "Ask the Expert" series, and someone asked why it was impossible to tickle yourself.

The answer lies at the back of the brain in an area called the cerebellum, which is involved in monitoring movements. Our studies at University College London have shown that the cerebellum can predict sensations when your own movement causes them but not when someone else does. When you try to tickle yourself, the cerebellum predicts the sensation and this prediction is used to cancel the response of other brain areas to the tickle.

Two brain regions are involved in processing how tickling feels. The somatosensory cortex processes touch and the anterior cingulate cortex processes pleasant information. We found that both these regions are less active during self-tickling than they are during tickling performed by someone else, which helps to explains why it doesn't feel tickly and pleasant when you tickle yourself. Further studies using robots showed that the presence of a small delay between your own movement and the resulting tickle can make the sensation feel tickly. Indeed, the longer the delay, the more tickly it feels. So it might be possible to tickle yourself, if you are willing to invest in a couple of robots!

Hmm, so the key here seems to be the inability to predict *what* movement someone is going to do to try to tickle you. Only novel sensations tickle, and they aren't novel if you made them. I want to know what study used robots to tickle people. Cause thats just crazy.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/32037

Comments

1

While reading it, I found myself trying to do that and I didn't succeed.

Posted by: BenP | January 31, 2007 12:52 PM

2

Interesting. I only have to tickle my wife once. Then I can just wiggle my fingers and if she sees it it has the same effect as if I had really tickled her. Makes me think at least part of it is psychsomatic...

Posted by: afarensis | January 31, 2007 1:39 PM

3

Sarah-Jayne Blakemore (PhD in Coochi Coochi Coo) @ university college london

The paper in Nature Neuroscience, 1998

Awesome :)

Posted by: Cameron | January 31, 2007 7:11 PM

4

Hmm... I must have some rare neurological condition. I can tickle myself on the feet,without robotic assistance. Should I go see a doctor now?

Posted by: Kim Boone | January 31, 2007 8:49 PM

5

i can tickle the roof of my mouth and with a little more effort, the bottoms of my feet.

Posted by: knobody | February 1, 2007 1:12 AM

6

I must be really strange then 'cause I am VERY capable of tickling myself at will. Especially on the knees and ribs. It's never like someone else doing it though...

Posted by: Daniel | February 1, 2007 5:14 AM

7

w00t! My field!

I see someone already posted the Nature paper, but here are a couple more links to Blakemore's work in which robots are used to tickle people.

Journal of Neuroscience - Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor estimation

Neuroreport - Why can't you tickle yourself? (requires subscription)

Posted by: Despard | February 1, 2007 6:25 AM

8

I can tickle myself also. Why is it such a persistent myth that no-one can ?

Posted by: zzz | February 1, 2007 6:49 AM

9

Hmmm, maybe the majority of us can't tickle ourselves but a few people can. Does that mean you can't predict your own actions? Quite sneaky! :)

Posted by: Shelley Batts | February 1, 2007 9:23 AM

10

One biological component of Extraversion is cortical arousal -- it's not that strong of an effect, but it seems to be real. Introverts have higher arousal, and so can't tolerate lots of stimulation (thus preferring to be by themselves), while extraverts are under-aroused and so seek out stimulation by socializing.

I've wondered on my blog before whether introverts are more ticklish -- they react more when you give them electric shocks, squirt lemon juice in their mouths, and so on, so why not be more ticklish? Of those who actually can tickle themselves, I'm guessing being quite introverted plays a role. (I'm incredibly ticklish, can tickle myself somewhat on the ribs and waist, and am definitely a big ol' introvert.)

Posted by: Agnostic | February 1, 2007 11:45 AM

11

Whether you can tickle yourself or not, the point is that we are less sensitive to self-generated movements then we are to externally imposed sensations.

To those who can tickle themselves: is it as strong a feeling as when other people do it?

Posted by: Despard | February 1, 2007 12:22 PM

12

The introvert theory sounds reasonable. There are also conditions where the person is particularly sensitive to sensory inputs and overload. Forgotten the name of it now.

Posted by: zzz | February 3, 2007 8:22 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM