Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Retrospectacle: A Neuroscience Blog

The trials, tribulations, and joys of a Neuroscience gradute student writing her thesis in the postmodern, post-Y2K world.

Profile

me%20and%20pep.jpg Shelley Batts is a Neuroscience PhD candidate at the University of Michigan. She studies hair cell regeneration in the cochlea, and is just embarking on that quixotic quest called 'thesis.' She lies awake at night pondering how science intersects with politics, culture, policy, money, medicine, and religion in an attempt to be more than just a niche scientist sitting in the oh-so-lovely ivory tower. Follow me and my parrot on the quest to get funded, get a PhD, and stay sane.
for%20blog%20cropped.JPG

Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the earth, are never alone or weary of life. ~Rachel Carson

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Highlights from Retrospectacle

Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration

Interview With Dr. Irene Pepperberg

My Travels

Chemistry of Red Bull

On Religion and Taking the 'Red Pill'

Fibonacci Poems

Neuroscience of Cocaine Addiction

Basic Concepts: Hearing

Basic Concepts: Prions

Parrots Have Object Permanance

Video Game Addiction

Nicotine Makes You Sober

Buzz on Honeybee Cognition

Help Out A Grad Student (Me!)

My Amazon.com Wish List

Serotonin Jewelry

Alex Foundation Store

Technorati

Be My Friend on

MySpace

Commenter Policy

I love constructive comments! However, I reserve the right to delete comments that abuse this forum. Voicing your opinions is great, just be respectful. :D

Other Information

blogging_winner_2nd.jpg Openlab 2007 intel.jpg Badge.jpg thinking-blogger.jpg bloggeroftheday1.jpg bloggers%20rights.gif
I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

liberty_waits_badge.bmp B-List Blogger
synapse.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg


My blog is worth $164,845.68.
How much is your blog worth?

Joost™

Retrospectacle is now Of Two Minds!

« Oops, I Did It Again | Main | Friday Grey Matters: Parrots Have Individualized Calls For Offspring »

Modified Human Blood Protein Deactivates HIV Virus

Category: AIDSChemistry
Posted on: April 20, 2007 9:45 AM, by Shelley Batts

One reason that treatments for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are particularly difficult to develop is that HIV is quite good at adapting resistance to drugs. Many of the virus' surface proteins--natural targets for inhibitory drugs--have a high turnover rate and are easily changed. There are a few exceptions; a few well-conserved surface proteins that are integral to HIV's function. One of these is the protein gp41 (below), which is required for HIV to attach onto a host cell, and infect it.

hiv%20virus.bmp

However, a recent paper in Cell describes a naturally-occurring blood molecule called VIRIP (virus inhibitory peptide) which can bind to gp41, preventing the HIV virus from ever infecting cells. Furthermore, they've found a way to modify VIRIP to be 100x more potent.

(Continued below the fold...)

HIV is tiny (it 1/60 the size of a red blood cell) and has a unique composition. Within an cellular envelope (capsid) are 2 copies of single-stand RNA which code the viruses nine (yes, just nine) genes. Also within the capsid are proteins and enzymes needed for the survival and propagation of the virus. At the surface are many "Env complexes" which consist of gp41 molecules (green) and gp120 molecules (purple). These complexes are what gives the HIV virus the ability to attach to and infect human cells, dumping the capsid into the host cell and forcing it to make more HIV virus (see diagram below.)

hiv%20replicate.bmp

Keeping that in mind, Munch et al. discovered that an endogenous human blood molecule called VIRIP binds to gp41 which prevents the virus from being able to attach to a host's cells. This precludes infection and viral replication, and therefore looks to be a innovative and promising therapy. This also helps to explain why some people are naturally more resistant to HIV infection. VIRIP levels in people are variable, however VIRIP levels in humans and infective risk has not yet been investigated. This therapy is promising in another regard in that gp41 molecules are required for viral function. While HIV may be wily at adapting to drugs and hosts, this is a protein that must stay put, making it a prime therapeutic target.

However, the group noticed that while regular VIRIP worked pretty well, a slight modification in VIRIP's structure (changed three amino acids) rendered it 100 times more effective at binding to and inactivating gp41. Changing the structure in another way made VIRIP inactive, which indicated the binding site (ie, don't mess with that.) The modified VIRIP inhibited every variant of HIV-1 (most common human type) that they tested, but did not change the infectivity of HIV-2 or SIV or Ebola, etc.

Trivia: The authors initially isolated endogenous VIRIP from over 10,000 liters of blood! After that, they made artificial VIRIP.

Source: Munch et al. 2007. 129. Cell.
Nature News

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/38603

Comments

1

That's really cool. I hadn't heard of VIRIP before. I wonder if people with high levels of VIRIP are being selected for in sub-Saharan Africa, and that over time people will become more resistant to the disease?

Posted by: Jon | April 20, 2007 11:11 AM

2

There is an already-known population in Africa who are naturally resistant; I wonder if they express this protein?

Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | April 20, 2007 12:30 PM

3

It's so purty, surrounded by those lovely purple tulips. why do you hate beauty?

Posted by: Mustafa Mond, FCD | April 20, 2007 12:57 PM

4

Charlie, I think this same team (Munch's group) is checking out that issue as we speak.

Everyone expresses the protein in small levels, its thought to be that some people express in very large levels, and perhaps they a more resistant. However, remember that these populations would most likely have extra amounts of the normal protein, while its the modified protein that really seems to kick HIVs butt full force.

Posted by: Shelley | April 20, 2007 1:24 PM

5

Dear Shelley,
Cool post. Just a couple of questions:
1. For those of us unfamiliar with the size of red blood cells, can you give the virus size in SI units?
2. Do HIV2, ebola, etc. use a binding protein other than gp41?

Posted by: Lab Lemming | April 21, 2007 9:52 PM

6

Lab Lemming: The authors actually did test the effectiveness of the inhibitor to reduce the replication and infection rates of HIV2, ebola, and SIV and found it did not make an impact. So from that data I would assume that those viruses either use a different docking protein or another one in paralell which can substitute function.

The virus is about 120 nm in diameter.

Posted by: Shelley | April 24, 2007 2:07 AM

7

Very interesting. Studying how HIV infect cell is important for prevention. However, more people concern how to use drug to treat HIV. Some people are posting their articles in my HIV blog

Posted by: Simon | April 24, 2007 2:44 AM

8

(for Lab Lemming) A red blood cell is 6-8 um (microns) in size. HIV is ~120nm (nanometers).

Posted by: chrism | April 24, 2007 1:55 PM

9

Sorry Shelly! I hadn't noticed the last line of your reply when I posted.

Posted by: chrism | April 24, 2007 2:01 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.