Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Retrospectacle: A Neuroscience Blog

The trials, tribulations, and joys of a Neuroscience gradute student writing her thesis in the postmodern, post-Y2K world.

Profile

me%20and%20pep.jpg Shelley Batts is a Neuroscience PhD candidate at the University of Michigan. She studies hair cell regeneration in the cochlea, and is just embarking on that quixotic quest called 'thesis.' She lies awake at night pondering how science intersects with politics, culture, policy, money, medicine, and religion in an attempt to be more than just a niche scientist sitting in the oh-so-lovely ivory tower. Follow me and my parrot on the quest to get funded, get a PhD, and stay sane.
for%20blog%20cropped.JPG

Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the earth, are never alone or weary of life. ~Rachel Carson

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Highlights from Retrospectacle

Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration

Interview With Dr. Irene Pepperberg

My Travels

Chemistry of Red Bull

On Religion and Taking the 'Red Pill'

Fibonacci Poems

Neuroscience of Cocaine Addiction

Basic Concepts: Hearing

Basic Concepts: Prions

Parrots Have Object Permanance

Video Game Addiction

Nicotine Makes You Sober

Buzz on Honeybee Cognition

Help Out A Grad Student (Me!)

My Amazon.com Wish List

Serotonin Jewelry

Alex Foundation Store

Technorati

Be My Friend on

MySpace

Commenter Policy

I love constructive comments! However, I reserve the right to delete comments that abuse this forum. Voicing your opinions is great, just be respectful. :D

Other Information

blogging_winner_2nd.jpg Openlab 2007 intel.jpg Badge.jpg thinking-blogger.jpg bloggeroftheday1.jpg bloggers%20rights.gif
I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

liberty_waits_badge.bmp B-List Blogger
synapse.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg


My blog is worth $164,845.68.
How much is your blog worth?

Joost™

Retrospectacle is now Of Two Minds!

« New Headphones Pipe the Ocean Into Your Ear | Main | The Neuroscience of Badgers »

What's Your Internet Importance? (Your QDos Number)

Category: Blogging
Posted on: January 16, 2008 2:51 PM, by Shelley Batts

There's a new way to gauge your importance on the 'Net, a little app in beta stage called QDOS. The forumula used to compile your QDOS number (which made me think of Erdos number) is a propriatary blend of Myspace, Facebook, activity, searches, popularity, blogging, online buying, chatting, and more.

"We're trying to find a way for the consumer to take ownership of their digital status," said Tom Ilobe, chief executive of Garlik (as in, "powerful stuff," one of its mottoes). "Businesses are doing it pretty well, but the consumer is in danger of being left out of the game. Their information is in so many other people's hands."

"What we're trying to do is get people engaged with their digital status. If we as a company can get millions of people engaged, they will tell us what services they want in identity protection," he said.

The QDos website requires that you register (just enter your email address) and will send you an invite to participate in the beta testing. Then you can go compare your QDos number against Britney Spears, Stephen Hawking, Miley Cyrus, and whoever else. A bit reminescent of Big Brother (if QDos knows, who else does?), but could be fun.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/61521

Comments

1

"What we're trying to do is get people engaged with their digital status. If we as a company can get millions of people engaged, they will tell us what services they want in identity protection," he said.

Sounds like it could end up being a pretty important service! The digital age is complex and letting people regulate their lives more could be real convenient!
Dave Briggs :~)

Posted by: Dave Briggs | January 16, 2008 5:00 PM

2

After I signed up and got the beta invite email, I had somewhere in the 2200 range. Then 3560, then down, up. I guess beta means they're still working out the kinks.

Posted by: Shelley Batts | January 16, 2008 11:15 PM

3

Which is better, a high or low number?

Posted by: Greg Laden | January 17, 2008 8:33 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.