Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Profile

The vanguard of science has always been populated with young visionaries, those individuals who are motivated by impossibility and undaunted by failure, who operate and lead in a world in which cross-pollination and the synthesis of ideas are the norm. Seed’s Revolutionary Minds series features profiles of theses young innovators that are changing our world, moving us forward by asking the unasked questions. They revolutionize how science exists and operates, ensuring a better, more fulfilling, scientific future for us all.


Greg J. Smith is a Toronto-based designer with an active interest in the intersection of space and media. He authors Serial Consign, a blog dedicated to digital culture and information design and is a regular contributor to Rhizome. Greg co-edits the art and technology journal Vague Terrain and is currently working on several writing and design projects focused on the representation of urban space.


Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

« Saleem Ali on Accessible Energy | Main | Margaret Turnbull on Localizing Energy »

Fernando Esponda on Family Dynamics

Category: Boundaries of science
Posted on: August 10, 2009 1:42 PM, by Erin Johnson

esponda150.jpgBelow, Fernando Esponda responds to the question:

The boundaries of science are continually expanding as scientists become increasingly integral to finding solutions for larger social issues, such as poverty, conflict, financial crises, etc. On what specific issue/problem do you feel we need to bring the scientific lens to bear?



I suggest turning to the fundamentals. It is often said that the basic unit of society is the family, that it is quickly being disintegrated, and that many social problems are connected to this fact. I think it is time to refocus the scientific lens on this topic. Here are some relevant questions: What is important about the family that is being damaged and how? Is there a substitute? How are the larger social issues, like the ones mentioned in the question's text, related to family disintegration? If we have a problem, what can be done, what policies should be adopted, what technologies and practices are helpful, which are hurtful?

It is not my intention to be touchy-feely. My initial reaction to my own answer is, "this guy wants us all to hug more," and for that, he (me) is not serious. But really, we need more hardcore mathematical, computational, psychological, etc. models of this constitutive molecule of society--of how it touches other issues and ideas of how it can be "engineered."

I would like to see a plausible model of societal dynamics that identifies key parameters and its consequences. For example, how the average distance between the residence of family members affects poverty, or the degree to which the frequency of family vacations affects the probability of a country going to war, and how with just more hugging everything would be alright...just kidding.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/116857

Comments

1

I look forward hearing more about this topic. I am most interested in your findings about this part - how the average distance between the residence of family members affects poverty. Thanks, Doreen

Posted by: Doreen | August 10, 2009 2:34 PM

2

Family represents people living together by ties of marriage, blood or adaptation, thus representing a single household

Posted by: daysofmb.com | September 4, 2009 10:02 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.