Now on ScienceBlogs: The significance of 2/13

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

SciencePunk

Science beyond the bell curve

« Man without fingerprints stumps airport security | Main | Science and the European Elections: The Environment »

Nick Cohen in the Observer: "Why are they trying to gag a top British science writer?"

Category: Legal ChillSingh vs BCA
Posted on: May 31, 2009 6:25 AM, by SciencePunk

Nick Cohen has a great article in the Observer discussing the British Chiropractic Association's legal action against science writer and producer Simon Singh:

Reputable medical authorities could test the evidence and decide whether the treatments work or not. Instead of arguing before the court of informed opinion, however, the BCA went to the libel courts and secured a ruling from Mr Justice Eady that made Singh's desire to test chiropractors' claims next to impossible. Because Singh used the word "bogus", the judge said he had to prove that chiropractors knew they were worthless but "dishonestly presented them to a trusting and, in some respects perhaps, vulnerable public".

The learned judge did not seem to understand that the worst thing about the deluded is that they sincerely believe every word they say. On Eady's logic, a writer who condemns as "bogus" a neo-Nazi's claim that a conspiracy of Jews controls American foreign policy could be sued successfully if lawyers jumped up and said neo-Nazis sincerely believed their conspiracy theories to be true.

The consequences of letting the libel law loose on scientific debate are horrendous. Science proceeds by peer review. A researcher's colleagues must submit his or her ideas to scrutiny without fear of the consequences. If they think they could lose their homes and savings in the libel courts, however, they will back off.

Full article.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Medicine & Health

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/111248

Comments

1

I blame Bush.

Posted by: will | May 31, 2009 8:36 PM

2

I never got the slightest bit of benefit from going to a chiropractor! I too question the medical value and fear in some cases like a friend of mine, they do harm.

Posted by: Randall Klopping | June 1, 2009 10:52 PM

3

It appears that the critics of chiropractic are wallowing in a self deluded pool of ignorance heck the word luddite comes to mind.
Why not seek out the millions of people who are helped by chiropractors and the many others who have avoided crippling back surgey through the efforts of chiropractic doctors......come on waken up.

Posted by: M BOLES | June 7, 2009 1:55 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.