Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab PSA

Seed Media Group

Profile

Hi there. The purpose of this blog is to write about current and interesting science news that may affect people's lives. I hope you enjoy the posts. The blog was maintained from January 2007 to October 2008.

Science/Medical Writing
Jobs!


Brought to you by:

Hitt%20Medical%20Writing%20Logo.jpg

This Week's Featured Job:

Medical Writer, Cary, North Carolina

Medical education company seeks in-house medical writer to join content development team. Tasks include writing, research for new and ongoing programs, reference searches and retrievals, Med-Line searches, communication with faculty, and development of slides in PowerPoint.

Qualifications
Masters, PharmD, PhD or MD, with a medical or bioscience background
Please send resume, writing samples and salary requirements to

job2008@thecustomer.com

Subscribe to The HittListTM for more science/medical writing jobs!

make%20request%20image.jpg.jpg Is there a topic you would like me to write about? Send me your requests here.

thinkingbloggerpf8.jpg

BANNER%20NOTICE.jpg Submit your entries for the Science To Life Banner Contest! Email your entries to sci2life@aol.com or Click here.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Main | The science of memories »

New Down syndrome testing recommendations-a bioethics point of view

Category: Bioethics
Posted on: January 3, 2007 1:36 PM, by Karen Ventii

New guidelines by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published in the January issue of the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology now recommend that every pregnant woman, regardless of age, should be offered a choice of tests for Down syndrome.

Down syndrome is a condition that occurs in one out of every 733 live births, according to the National Down Syndrome Society, and affects more than 350,000 people in the U.S. The condition is characterized by the presence of an extra chromosome which causes mental retardation, a characteristic broad, flat face and small head and, often, serious heart defects.

The guidelines for testing are based on the development of a new, less invasive technique called the "nuchal translucency test."

The main reason for the recommendations appears to be to make mothers more knowledgeable so that they can prepare for the challenges of raising a child with special needs or so they can choose to terminate the pregnancy.

What I would like to know is: is this ethical? Is this just part of the dangerous slippery slope that is leading to a world of 'made-to-order' babies?

To get a more knowledgeable point of view I asked Karama Neal Ph.D, a senior program associate for the FACES program at Emory University who also holds an MA in bioethics, about her opinion on the new recommendations.

According to Dr. Neal, "the development of less invasive testing is a useful step. But pregnant women and their partners need to consider their potential response to possible results BEFORE choosing to take the test. Having more information may not always be the best option for every woman. Furthermore, it is important to note that the 80% accuracy rate of the nuchal translucency test means that 20% of tested fetuses with Down syndrome will not be identified."

Nevertheless, Dr. Neal adds that "pregnant women should feel free to ask for it if their physician does not offer it." This is particularly important, she says, because all sonographers may not be trained to provide it.

Technorati Tags: ,

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM