Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Profile

Hi there. The purpose of this blog is to write about current and interesting science news that may affect people's lives. I hope you enjoy the posts. The blog was maintained from January 2007 to October 2008.

Science/Medical Writing
Jobs!


Brought to you by:

Hitt%20Medical%20Writing%20Logo.jpg

This Week's Featured Job:

Medical Writer, Cary, North Carolina

Medical education company seeks in-house medical writer to join content development team. Tasks include writing, research for new and ongoing programs, reference searches and retrievals, Med-Line searches, communication with faculty, and development of slides in PowerPoint.

Qualifications
Masters, PharmD, PhD or MD, with a medical or bioscience background
Please send resume, writing samples and salary requirements to

job2008@thecustomer.com

Subscribe to The HittListTM for more science/medical writing jobs!

make%20request%20image.jpg.jpg Is there a topic you would like me to write about? Send me your requests here.

thinkingbloggerpf8.jpg

BANNER%20NOTICE.jpg Submit your entries for the Science To Life Banner Contest! Email your entries to sci2life@aol.com or Click here.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

« Banner design contest! | Main | Thinking Blogger Award »

New recommendations for estrogen therapy

Category: Health
Posted on: June 22, 2007 1:07 PM, by Karen Ventii

6-22-7%20menopause.gif
Contrary to earlier reports that estrogen replacement therapy increased the risk of heart attack and stroke, researchers are now saying that it may actually be beneficial for some women.

Here's a little back-story (taken from this LA Times article).

Long-term use of hormone replacement therapy was popularized in 1966 by Dr. Robert A. Wilson's book "Feminine Forever," which touted the treatment as a panacea for menopausal ills. Subsequent animal and small human studies suggested the hormones could help ward off heart attacks and increase bone density. By the end of the century, an estimated 40% of menopausal women were taking the drugs. It came as a shock in 2002 when researchers from the Women's Health Initiative reported that the drugs actually increased risks of heart attack and stroke.

According to the LA Times the initial negative findings in the Women's Health Initiative resulted because the investigators included a substantial number of older women in the study in the hopes of observing enough heart attacks to be able to draw conclusions. Researchers now know that when estrogen therapy is administered to women who are10 years or more post-menopause there is a higher risk of heart attack associated with the therapy.

The new study, [published in the June 2007 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine,] involved a subset of 1,064 women in the Women's Health Initiative study who were ages 50 to 59 and had undergone surgically induced menopause through a hysterectomy. Half were randomized to receive a Wyeth-produced estrogen called Premarin and half a placebo.

The women were on the drugs for an average of 7 1/2 years. About a year after the study was stopped, physicians used CT scans to measure the buildup of calcium deposits, or atherosclerotic plaque, in their blood vessels. Overall, they found, women taking estrogen had 42% less calcification of their arteries. Women who had taken at least 80% of their daily doses of the drug had 61% less calcification.

Essentially, estrogen therapy appears to have different effects depending on the stage of menopause at which it is administered. This is called the "timing hypothesis".

Researchers believe the benefits of estrogen replacement occur only if it is started before atherosclerosis begins to develop. Once the hardening of the arteries has set in, estrogen is known to produce damaging effects.

Here's my two cents:
There are usually always risks and benefits associated with any therapy (hormones, in particular, have very complex effects). The patient must decide if the benefits outweigh the risks.

It is always disturbing when medical recommendations (made by organizations we should be able to trust) are changed or reversed because in some cases they may be a matter of life and death for the patient.

As research advances and scientists learn more about how particular therapies and diseases affect the body it is not surprising that from time to time an old recommendation will be replaced by a new one, which may likewise one day be replaced by an even newer one.

Technorati Tags: ,

Image taken from here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/43692

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.